Brahman

Terrence Howard on Reality

367 posts in this topic

1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

If you have 2 apples and rise them by the power of 0 you get 1 apple. (That never happens in real life.)

You have to understand what it means to raise a number to the power of zero.

In this case, you are literally dividing apples by themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I doubt that any finite system can truly be consistent. Such systems are fudged into psusedo-consistency through mental gymnastics and unholistic ways of thinking.

I also had similar thoughts. Because no language can encapsulate the whole of reality. Because there are elements in reality which are beyond all definition and description. Where no language can touch. And so every system is going to fail somewhere. Probably. I'm just guessing here. 


I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Salvijus said:

I also had similar thoughts. Because no language can encapsulate the whole of reality. Because there are elements in reality which are beyond all definition and description. Where no language can touch. And so every system is going to fail somewhere. Probably. I'm just guessing here. 

Time to awaken to what language is. What is language? 


I AM a devil 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I doubt that any finite system can truly be consistent.

Dude you have to learn basic logic, of course you can create finite systems that are consistent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

11 minutes ago, Nemra said:

You have to understand what it means to raise a number to the power of zero.

In this case, you are literally dividing apples by themselves.

Well then it's another logical flaw. 

If you say I'm going to rise 100 apples by the non existent value 0. How did those apples all disappeared and became only one? 

Edited by Salvijus

I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Salvijus said:

Well then it's another logical flaw. 

If you say I'm going to rise 100 apples by the non existent value. How did those apples all. Disappeared and became only one? 

How did you learn multiplication?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Another way of saying. 

If you have 100 apples. And you make an impact on them which is of zero value. Where did all those apples disappear and became one only? 

Edited by Salvijus

I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Salvijus said:

Another way of saying. 

If you have 100 apples. And you make an impact on them which is of zero value. Where did all those apples disappear and became one only? 

I showed you what means to raise a number to the power of zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

If you have 100 apples. And you make an impact on them which is of zero value. Where did all those apples disappear and became one only?

IF you have 100 apples and divide it with 100 apples how much you get?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, zurew said:

IF you have 100 apples and divide it with 100 apples how much you get?

1

But that's not what I'm pointing at. 


I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I doubt that any finite system can truly be consistent.

Is mind/intellect/thinking not the most ultimate finite system? The basis of all finite systems, you could say. It only points to finite things.


Describe a thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

@Salvijus

If I showed you 2^3, you wouldn't understand it if you didn't know multiplication.

Raising a number to the power of 0 means to divide it by itself.

Edited by Nemra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

But that's not what I'm pointing at. 

You don't have any understanding what powering a number to 0 even means. I already give you a breakdown and nemra gave you a breakdown also. I don't know why you are ignoring both of our answers

Its extremely frustrating to engage with you , because you are willfully ignorant and you ignore answers and you trying to critique a subject that you don't even understand the basic concepts about.

Edited by zurew

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Nemra said:

I showed you what means to raise a number to the power of zero.

Then your definitions are not consistent. 

Just look carefully at the words you're using. 

"Rise by the power of zero" means to have an impact of zero value. 

How can you have an impact of zero value and end up with totally different result? 


I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

If I said to you guys. I'm going to have zero impact on these 200 apples. How much is there going to be left afterwards? 1? 

Edited by Salvijus

I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

@Salvijus

Why are you even writing x*x like x^2? Why not x[2] or something else?

Edited by Nemra

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

4 minutes ago, Nemra said:

@Salvijus

Why are you even writing x*x like x^2? Why not x[2] or something else?

You want my definition? 

My definition would be:

the number of times the base is being repeated in multiplication

So 2^5 means there are five 2's that are in multiplication with each other. (2*2*2*2*2)

Edited by Salvijus

I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

So 2^5 means there are five 2's that are in multiplication with each other. (2*2*2*2*2)

So, 2^0 means 2/2, which is 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Nemra said:

So, 2^0 means 2/2, which is 1.

2^2 = 4 ( two 2's in multiplication) 

2^1 = 2 

2^ 0 = _____ blank. There are no 2's that multiple among each other

But instead they write 1. And there is good reason for it actually. Because they have to. 


I simply am. You simply are. We are The Same One forever. Come and join The Glory. 

Those you do not forgive you fear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

If I said to you guys. I'm going to have zero impact on these 200 apples. How much is there going to be left afterwards? 1? 

That doesn't translate into a number raised to the power of some number.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now