Terrence Howard on Reality

[Nemra]

1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

If you have 2 apples and rise them by the power of 0 you get 1 apple. (That never happens in real life.)

You have to understand what it means to raise a number to the power of zero.

In this case, you are literally dividing apples by themselves.

[Salvijus]

3 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I doubt that any finite system can truly be consistent. Such systems are fudged into psusedo-consistency through mental gymnastics and unholistic ways of thinking.

I also had similar thoughts. Because no language can encapsulate the whole of reality. Because there are elements in reality which are beyond all definition and description. Where no language can touch. And so every system is going to fail somewhere. Probably. I'm just guessing here. 

[Yimpa]

Just now, Salvijus said:

I also had similar thoughts. Because no language can encapsulate the whole of reality. Because there are elements in reality which are beyond all definition and description. Where no language can touch. And so every system is going to fail somewhere. Probably. I'm just guessing here. 

Time to awaken to what language is. What is language? 

[zurew]

9 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I doubt that any finite system can truly be consistent.

Dude you have to learn basic logic, of course you can create finite systems that are consistent. 

[Salvijus]

11 minutes ago, Nemra said:

You have to understand what it means to raise a number to the power of zero.

In this case, you are literally dividing apples by themselves.

Well then it's another logical flaw. 

If you say I'm going to rise 100 apples by the non existent value 0. How did those apples all disappeared and became only one? 

Edited June 17 by Salvijus

[Nemra]

Just now, Salvijus said:

Well then it's another logical flaw. 

If you say I'm going to rise 100 apples by the non existent value. How did those apples all. Disappeared and became only one? 

How did you learn multiplication?

[Salvijus]

Another way of saying. 

If you have 100 apples. And you make an impact on them which is of zero value. Where did all those apples disappear and became one only? 

Edited June 17 by Salvijus

[Nemra]

Just now, Salvijus said:

Another way of saying. 

If you have 100 apples. And you make an impact on them which is of zero value. Where did all those apples disappear and became one only? 

I showed you what means to raise a number to the power of zero.

[zurew]

3 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

If you have 100 apples. And you make an impact on them which is of zero value. Where did all those apples disappear and became one only?

IF you have 100 apples and divide it with 100 apples how much you get?

[Salvijus]

Just now, zurew said:

IF you have 100 apples and divide it with 100 apples how much you get?

1

But that's not what I'm pointing at. 

[Osaid]

19 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I doubt that any finite system can truly be consistent.

Is mind/intellect/thinking not the most ultimate finite system? The basis of all finite systems, you could say. It only points to finite things.

[Nemra]

@Salvijus

If I showed you 2^3, you wouldn't understand it if you didn't know multiplication.

Raising a number to the power of 0 means to divide it by itself.

Edited June 17 by Nemra

[zurew]

1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

But that's not what I'm pointing at. 

You don't have any understanding what powering a number to 0 even means. I already give you a breakdown and nemra gave you a breakdown also. I don't know why you are ignoring both of our answers

Its extremely frustrating to engage with you , because you are willfully ignorant and you ignore answers and you trying to critique a subject that you don't even understand the basic concepts about.

Edited June 17 by zurew

[Salvijus]

3 minutes ago, Nemra said:

I showed you what means to raise a number to the power of zero.

Then your definitions are not consistent. 

Just look carefully at the words you're using. 

"Rise by the power of zero" means to have an impact of zero value. 

How can you have an impact of zero value and end up with totally different result? 

[Salvijus]

If I said to you guys. I'm going to have zero impact on these 200 apples. How much is there going to be left afterwards? 1? 

Edited June 17 by Salvijus

[Nemra]

@Salvijus

Why are you even writing x*x like x^2? Why not x[2] or something else?

Edited June 17 by Nemra

[Salvijus]

4 minutes ago, Nemra said:

@Salvijus

Why are you even writing x*x like x^2? Why not x[2] or something else?

You want my definition? 

My definition would be:

the number of times the base is being repeated in multiplication

So 2^5 means there are five 2's that are in multiplication with each other. (2*2*2*2*2)

Edited June 17 by Salvijus

[Nemra]

1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

So 2^5 means there are five 2's that are in multiplication with each other. (2*2*2*2*2)

So, 2^0 means 2/2, which is 1.

[Salvijus]

Just now, Nemra said:

So, 2^0 means 2/2, which is 1.

2^2 = 4 ( two 2's in multiplication) 

2^1 = 2 

2^ 0 = _____ blank. There are no 2's that multiple among each other

But instead they write 1. And there is good reason for it actually. Because they have to. 

[Nemra]

10 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

If I said to you guys. I'm going to have zero impact on these 200 apples. How much is there going to be left afterwards? 1? 

That doesn't translate into a number raised to the power of some number.