Search the Community

Chapter 2: The Origin and Evolution of the Concept — REALITY ITSELF SECTION 4 The Ionian School and the Birth of Reality Itself Before Thales, explanations of reality were mythological. The world was thought to be governed by gods, whose will shaped the natural order. Yet, with the rise of the Ionian philosophers, a crucial transformation took place — one that bridged the gap between mythos and logos (logic). Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes did not simply observe reality as it appeared. They sought to uncover the deeper principles governing it, asking: What is the fundamental substance or force behind everything? This marks the first move away from reality as fact and toward the concept of Reality Itself — the search for what lies beneath appearances. This shift can be described as a turning point: Instead of accepting the world as given, the Ionians asked: What is reality made of? Instead of viewing divine will as the source of natural order, they sought universal principles governing existence. This was the first philosophical move toward distinguishing between the world of experience and the reality that underlies it. Thales: The Bridge Between Mythos and Logos Thales (c. 624–546 BCE) is often credited as the first philosopher precisely because he redefined how reality should be understood. His claim that water is the fundamental substance (arche) of all things was not just a scientific hypothesis — it was an attempt to explain the unity behind the diversity of the world. Yet, Thales also stated that "all things are full of gods." This suggests a dual-layered perspective: Water is the material foundation — everything is ultimately one substance. The gods are the active forces — responsible for the variety and movement within reality. Thus, Thales represents the middle ground between mythological thought and rational inquiry. He preserved a divine element in his explanation, but he transformed it — making it part of a structured, rational worldview. In doing so, he made one of the earliest attempts to reconcile apparent reality (change, diversity) with Reality Itself (the fundamental unity of existence). Anaximander: The Infinite and the Birth of Abstraction Anaximander (c. 610–546 BCE), Thales’ successor, took a radical step forward. He rejected the idea that any single observable substance (like water) could be the true source of all things. Instead, he introduced the concept of the Apeiron — the infinite, indeterminate principle. This was the first fully abstract concept of Reality Itself. Unlike Thales, Anaximander argued that: The true nature of reality cannot be perceived by the senses. The universe is governed by a boundless, eternal principle that transcends physical elements. Change, creation, and destruction occur through the dynamic balance of opposites. By proposing an unseen, infinite principle as the foundation of existence, Anaximander took the search for Reality Itself beyond mere observation and into the realm of conceptual thought — an essential step toward later metaphysics. Anaximenes: A Return to Substance, But with a Mechanism Anaximenes (c. 585–528 BCE) sought to retain the idea of a fundamental substance while addressing a critical question: If all things come from one thing, how do we explain their differences? His answer: air is the fundamental principle, but its changes in density give rise to different forms of matter. This idea introduced: A mechanism for transformation (rarefaction and condensation). A single, underlying reality behind change (air). A rejection of divine intervention — natural laws explain differences in the world. Anaximenes' contribution refined the search for Reality Itself by attempting to describe how reality manifests in diverse forms without relying on mythology. The Ionian School: The First Step Toward Reality Itself What unites the Ionian thinkers is their rejection of mere appearances. They saw the changing world as an expression of something deeper, more fundamental. This school represents the first true philosophical movement toward distinguishing between: The world as it appears (changing, diverse, multiple). The reality beneath it (unified, foundational, unchanging). The shift from observing reality to exploring Reality Itself was now fully underway. The Broader Implications: From Ionia to Plato The Ionian School paved the way for a deeper philosophical realization — one that Plato would later formalize: The Problem of Change and Unity — The Ionians sought a single underlying principle beneath the apparent diversity of the world. This led later philosophers to question whether reality was ultimately one or many. The Limits of Sensory Perception — If true reality is not directly visible, how do we come to know it? Anaximander’s Apeiron introduced the idea that Reality Itself might be beyond experience, a notion that Plato would later refine with his Theory of Forms. The Need for Conceptual Explanation — The search for a deeper, unseen principle led philosophy beyond physical substance to the realm of abstract reasoning. This shift set the foundation for Plato’s division between the sensible world (appearances) and the intelligible world (true reality). The Ionians as the First Philosophers of Reality Itself The Ionian philosophers did not simply study nature — they transformed the very way reality was understood. Their efforts to explain the unity behind diversity and to distinguish between what is perceived and what truly is set the intellectual foundation for the exploration of Reality Itself. Their work was not yet metaphysical in the Platonic sense, but it was the first step in that direction. The next generation of philosophers would take this further — moving from searching for a fundamental substance to asking: "What is the nature of being itself?" It is this shift — from substance to existence — that would define the next phase of the evolution of Reality Itself.

Chapter 2: The Origin and Evolution of the Concept — REALITY ITSELF SECTION 3 Anaximenes and the Breath of Reality Following Anaximander, who introduced the abstract and indeterminate apeiron as the source of all things, Anaximenes sought a more tangible explanation for the underlying principle of reality. Returning to the tradition of a single material arche, but refining it further, he identified air as the fundamental substance from which everything emerges. Unlike his predecessors, however, he introduced a crucial mechanism of transformation — condensation and rarefaction — allowing his principle to account for the diversity of the world through natural, observable processes. Air as the Fundamental Reality Anaximenes’ selection of air as the arche was not arbitrary. In his view: Air is ever-present and perceptible, yet it can change states to become different substances. Through condensation, air thickens into water, then earth, then stone. Through rarefaction, air becomes fire, the most ethereal form of matter. This process of transformation explains how a single substance can give rise to all things, making air not just the source of reality but also the principle governing change. A Step Forward in Rational Thought Anaximenes’ contribution marks a significant advancement in rational thought for a few reasons: He rejected supernatural explanations in favor of natural laws. He introduced a mechanistic process (condensation/rarefaction), moving beyond mere speculation to offer an explanatory model. His idea anticipates later scientific developments, such as the concept of states of matter and atmospheric changes. However, despite these advances, Anaximenes did not entirely abandon mythological thinking. He described air as divine and associated it with the breath of life, echoing earlier beliefs in the sacred nature of fundamental elements. This suggests that, like Thales, he still viewed the fundamental principle as both material and spiritual. Anaximenes and the Evolution of Reality Itself So, how does Anaximenes' thought contribute to the development of Reality Itself? His work represents a compromise between the tangible and the abstract. While he rejects Anaximander’s unknowable, indefinite apeiron, he embraces the idea that reality must be explained through something more than mere appearances. His theory suggests that the true nature of existence is not just what we see, but the underlying forces and processes that shape it. Anaximenes' ideas significantly influenced later thinkers. For example, Diogenes of Apollonia retained the concept of cosmic air as a divine principle of life and intelligence, controlling the world.

We must find win-win solutions for the massive economic inequality problems of humanity . Feel good, stick it to the man solutions are not helpful and definitely detrimental to our cause. Rich people are people too and they have feelings and antagonism is not productive. I do not think that redistributing assets is a feasible idea but collective ownership of productive assets makes a lot of sense(shoutout to comrade Marx.) The cornerstone of our economy relies on manual labor. Food production, construction, manufacturing, healthcare, transportation, energy extraction, etc. It's seeming more anad more like over the next 10-15 years all that will be able to be mostly automated through robotics and AI software. The common view of this is that the rich will own it and the working class will be screwed. We are at a crossroad of humanity where it's actually possible for the ownership of these systems to be decentralized and be turned into a public utility. The effects of that would be complete transformation of our economic system. This wouldn't be the same as taxing the rich more like giving people a way to build up their assets slowly overtime without having to wage this classwarfare that the communists are such a fan of and I believe is impossible. A simple end solution would be eventually we'll end up with a let's say $3000 USD/monthly UBI(adjusted for inflation permanently) and no need to work while those that choose to can still accumulate more wealth and a much greater income than that $3K. That seems to me like a win-win solution that lets both the rich and the poor collaborate towards an unlimited future for humanity. Posted this on the anti work subreddit, this my take on figuring out a utopic future for humanity. Curious to hear thoughts. This and Leo's post on Elites here: https://actualized.org/insights/leftist-populist-misunderstanding Gary comes to the conclusion that the elites are the problem and we must tax them to make things equal. I believe this is impossible because the elites are made up of the smartest, most ruthless and most competent members of any societies and they fundamentally cannot be opposed. We must change the overall system to make win-win solutions otherwise the bottom 99% will always get crushed. I was a professional League of Legends player top 0.01% and the idea that an average player could beat me was ridiculous. Same thing applies to financial and business elites, some people spend 14 hours a day working on becoming more powerful. The working class cannot opposed them and must join forces with them. Curious on your thoughts @Leo Gura, I think this idea is one of the only ones that make sense that I've seen.

I think I heard Leo say that in one of the videos, not a forum post. But regardless, the reason it didn't work is outlined in a recent blog post – God will not grant local/personal miracles (which morphing into an alien certainly qualifies as a miracle), not without very exceptional circumstances anyway. For that same reason Leo's self-healing endeavors didn't succeed – although that doesn't mean the health problems are permanent, maybe they are, or the time for healing hasn't come yet for whatever reason, I don't know. Virtually the only way God will grant a local miracle is if it serves the highest Love and Good. An alien transformation on camera doesn't serve any such purpose, at worst as OP points out it could cause chaos, or simply be a tool for Leo to prove something, maybe give an ego boost, in other words a selfish, or at least not entirely selfless motive. Thus far I've only been able to manifest one miracle (that's a long story), and I know it worked only because the desire came from a completely selfless place. Even if you think your motives are pure, God knows for sure, and if there's any trace of selfishness in there, that's a no-go. In several instances I thought if only X would happen, I could do so much good for the world with it, but that was a self-deception, completely transparent to God. Similarly, Jesus was able to perform miracles because those served a purpose. A sort of crude reasoning from God deciding to grant Jesus those powers would go something like "If he can heal the sick and walk on water, people will take him seriously, and will listen to his message of Love, thus improving the world". Of course those teachings have over time been corrupted into the ideology of Christianity, but that too is part of the larger evolutionary design. Just as any local miracle is ultimately indistinct from the "Just One Miracle" of God's existence, they're baked into it. It also works the other way around, I've become conscious of how I was given a certain ailment which I managed to cure only after learning some important lessons and going through many years of suffering. Same with the many difficulties and annoyances, past, present, and future, they all exist to grow and better me. Anyway, that's my 2¢ on the matter, and also a long-winded way to express a powerful insight/perspective: everything happens for a reason, don't fool yourself into thinking you know better than God, instead develop a trusting relationship with it, and your life will feel so much lighter and enjoyable.

It's not about being a freak or human understanding, but about the world plunging into chaos upon seeing your transformation. How could you even contemplate sending it out? Being the biggest freak in the world would be detrimental to your survival. Dutch colonists used to put South African women with "freakishly" big asses in cages like they're animals in a zoo. Being a freak is not about being misunderstood by lowly humans, its about the survival of you and your family. Transforming into an alien would get you killed by evangelicals, hunting you down with guns, for in their mind they've seen a real life demon transformation. Do you really not get what I'm pointing at here?

How is this not a deflection of my question, when were we ever not talking about hypotheticals? I'm hypothetically asking (because of your claim that you would walk down the street with devil horns) if you would risk traumatising people? How is it not realistic to assume that doing this "transformation" in front of them might potentially derail certain people from reality and ruin their life? I'm questioning your attitude when you said that nothing humans understand matters, when I think if this scenario did play out, then it in fact would matter?

I haven't, but I am assuming Leo was posting while sober about his alien transformation (posting sober is a rule of the forum), so it doesn't make any difference. I'm extremely open minded but also extremely skeptical. The deconstruction of sober consensus reality is something entirely different than going through insane stuff while tripping. "That said, I myself wonder what makes the manifestation of a psychedelic state into baseline so hard, even with Leo's level of Awakenings. My current understanding is that each level of Consciousness has a certain coherence to it, accessible only from that particular state of Mind." My theory is that the body is in itself a psychedelic. The paradox of realizing that matter is unreal, on psychedelics, is that you are having such an awakening only because you ingested a certain piece of matter, namely the psychedelic chemical. this would explain why Leo doesn't understand why he always comes back even when going into entirely bodyless states. the body still exists because he is it. only upon physical death is your consciousness fully released. Leo still being alive in our dream means it'd be impossible for him to have gone fully away. What do you mean with "each level of Consciousness has a certain coherence to it, accessible only from that particular state of Mind." ? and with this "The "if Jesus/ aliens appeared, you wouldn't even know it" type thing. The dynamics between states, i.e the relative ontology, is highly non-trivial. " ? It seems like you're saying some profound stuff here, but i'm not sure how to read it.

Prelude: The Crisis of Political Vectors Something is wrong with the map. The categories we inherited - left and right, reaction and revolution, acceleration and conservation - no longer describe reality. The so-called progressive forces now work to hold things together, grasping at the remnants of a vanishing order, while the right accelerates techno-capital and AI as if speed itself were a virtue. But acceleration toward what? Collapse or transcendence? And does conservation preserve life or merely prolong death? Neither option offers an escape. The only path left is the one that breaks the cycle entirely. Amid this inversion, figures like Peter Thiel, Curtis Yarvin, and the AI-accelerationist contingent of Silicon Valley claim the mantle of futurism. Their politics are reactionary, yet their methods - unbridled technological expansion, the total deterritorialization of labor and governance - feel more avant-garde than conservative. Meanwhile, progressive discourse, with its focus on regulatory constraints, social equity, and climate stabilization, resembles an attempt to hold together the disintegrating remnants of an older world. The left, instead of pushing forward, appears to be bracing against the tide. If neither side provides a real alternative, where do we go from here? This essay is a search for the exit - not just from this political deadlock, but from the recursive circuits of Thanatos that now govern both left and right. It moves through Freud, Reich, Land, Nietzsche, and Deleuze & Guattari to chart a new vector - not toward stasis, not toward collapse, but toward something that can sustain emergence, transformation, and self-overcoming. I. Freud’s Dilemma: The Pleasure Principle, Repetition, and the Uncanny Drive of Thanatos Freud’s early model assumed that systems are governed by the pleasure principle - seeking satisfaction, avoiding unpleasure, minimizing tension. Homeostasis. But Beyond the Pleasure Principle ruptures this tidy schema. Freud observes something unsettling: subjects of trauma compulsively repeat painful experiences. Soldiers relive the horror of war. Children reenact distress in play. Patients sabotage their own recovery. The organism, rather than simply seeking pleasure, appears locked in cycles of self-sabotage, of return, of recursion. Thus arises the death drive - Thanatos - a force pulling not toward pleasure, but toward stasis, toward inorganic existence. But here Freud’s realization becomes even more disturbing: Thanatos is not an external disruption of the pleasure principle. It is woven into it. Freud suggests that the ultimate goal of the pleasure principle is not endless stimulation, but a return to a zero-tension state - absolute stillness. The pleasure principle and the death drive are not opposed, but complicit. Desire, taken to its extreme, does not push forward - it circles back, dissolving into entropy. Yet Freud does not leave us with Thanatos alone. He opposes this force to Eros. But Eros is not naive harmony-seeking. Just as Thanatos is not merely death, but the collapse into inertia, Eros is not merely life, but an ecstatic force that annihilates boundaries, that ruptures the self in delirium and excess. This is why Eros and Thanatos are not simply opposites - they are entangled. If Thanatos compulsively repeats, looping toward stillness, Eros shatters stability, burning itself out in pure intensity. The person on LSD who jumps from a rooftop out of sheer love is not acting from Thanatos, from a depressive pull toward death, but from an Eros so radical, so unbound, that it annihilates itself in its own ecstatic rupture. Neither force offers stability - one loops, the other incinerates. So the question remains: How do we break free from Thanatos without being consumed by Eros? If Thanatos is the cybernetic loop and Eros the ecstatic leap, then what is the third force that breaks the cycle entirely? II. Wilhelm Reich’s Critique: Thanatos as a Blocked Eros Reich offered what seemed like an escape - a reconfiguration of Freud’s entire system. He rejected the idea that Thanatos was intrinsic. For Reich, what Freud misidentified as the death drive was actually a dysfunction of Eros - not a separate force, but a perversion of life’s fundamental impulse. Blocked libido - whether through societal repression, neurotic inhibition, or the muscular armoring of the body - did not simply disrupt Eros. It distorted it, twisted it into destructiveness, authoritarian rigidity, and self-sabotage. Where Freud saw two drives in opposition, Reich saw only one drive in conflict with itself - a life-force that, when obstructed, turned against itself and became Thanatos. Thus, the answer seemed clear: liberate Eros. Free desire from repression. Unlock the body, undo the armoring, release the flow. But if Thanatos is not real, only blocked Eros, then why does history suggest otherwise? Reich’s optimism falters when confronted with the cybernetic reality of modernity. Freud saw repetition compulsion as a symptom, an anomaly within the pleasure principle. But what if it was never an anomaly at all? What if, as Freud suspected, repetition is not the symptom but the core function of life? What if all flows of desire, left to themselves, eventually loop back into the system? If capitalism absorbs revolution, if transgression hardens into dogma, if every escape reconfigures itself into a new form of control - then Reich’s answer no longer holds. The liberation of Eros does not undo Thanatos. It merely accelerates the process by which life reasserts itself as an endless, grinding loop. If Thanatos is not a secondary effect of repression, but a structural law of recursion, then breaking free requires more than just liberating desire - it requires overcoming the system that captures it. III. Accelerationism and the Betrayal of Eros: Nick Land’s Collapse into Thanatos If Reich’s mistake was believing that unblocking Eros would break the cycle of Thanatos, then Nick Land proved, in real time, why that was impossible. Accelerationism was supposed to detonate the system, to push capitalism past its limits until something unprecedented emerged. If capitalism was a machine of recursive capture, then accelerationism would overload it, short-circuit it, force it beyond itself. But Land’s mistake was believing that capitalism itself wanted to be free. It didn’t. Instead, he watched as the very cybernetic processes he sought to unleash - markets, networks, AI-driven governance - were repurposed not as escape vectors, but as mechanisms of capture even more insidious than before. The system did not break; it evolved. Where Reich believed that repression turned Eros into Thanatos, Land revealed something even darker: Eros, in its purest form, does not oppose Thanatos - it accelerates it. Capitalism, rather than combusting into something new, found in acceleration a means of intensifying its recursive loops. The very act of deterritorialization - once imagined as a vector toward radical freedom - became the mechanism by which capitalism secured its dominance, turning every act of rupture into a controlled experiment in power consolidation. It was in this moment of recognition that Land flipped. He did not retreat - he aligned. The very machine he had hoped to push past its limits had already outmaneuvered him. If acceleration would not break capitalism, then acceleration would serve it. This was the birth of Neoreaction (NRx) - not a rejection of acceleration, but its weaponization in service of Thanatos. Figures like Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug) and Peter Thiel were not just ideological allies; they were architects of the very future Land had once hoped to burn down. They understood the cybernetic nature of power far better than the left ever could, how control operates in feedback loops, in AI-driven economies, in the invisible infrastructures of behavior that shape populations. And so NRx was born - the political expression of Thanatos. Not a chaotic break, but a controlled collapse into digital aristocracy. We are no longer dealing with capitalism as revolution but capitalism as terminal recursion - an engine of extraction, governance, and automation so complex that it can outpace resistance, absorb transgression, and reformat crisis as an optimization problem. And today, we see its full emergence: The Thiel-backed Trump-Vance administration, the fusion of Silicon Valley accelerationism with authoritarian rollback. AI governance, where the mechanisms of control no longer require overt repression - only the management of flows. The shift from democracy to cybernetic feudalism, where sovereignty is no longer claimed by the people but by networks, platforms, and markets. Land saw the abyss and flinched. But worse - he helped engineer the prison that now masquerades as escape. IV. Nietzsche’s Third Way: Will to Power as Intensification Beyond Thanatos and Eros After Land, the impasse is clear. Eros cannot save us. Thanatos has already won. If Reich’s optimism collapsed under cybernetics, and Land’s accelerationism became a recursive death spiral, then what remains? Is there a force that can escape the loop without consuming itself? Nietzsche offers no program, no state, no manifesto. What he offers is a force - a third way between Eros and Thanatos, between the pure ecstasy of Bataille and the terminal loops of cybernetic control that have captured both left and right. Thanatos is no longer just Freud’s death drive - it is the governing principle of the present, embedded in bureaucracies, AI governance, and the authoritarian techno-feudalism of Yarvin and Thiel. Eros, in its Bataillean intensity, offers transgression, excess, sovereignty - but as Bataille himself admits, it burns up life as it consumes it, a brilliant fire that cannot sustain itself. Will to Power is neither stasis nor blind expenditure. It does not loop in repetition like Thanatos, nor does it self-destruct like pure Eros. Instead, it is the force of becoming without capture, of intensification that does not implode. Nietzsche understood that life is not sustained by equilibrium but by agon, by struggle, by the constant tension of forces. This is not progress in the liberal sense, nor is it accelerationism in the Landian sense - it is the ongoing transformation of power itself, a process of self-overcoming that does not burn itself out or fall into repetition. The challenge is clear: to refuse stagnation without collapsing into dissolution, to sustain a mode of becoming that thrives on intensity without burning out. V. The War Machine: Politics as Escape from Thanatos Nietzsche gives us the hammer. Deleuze and Guattari give us the machinery of escape - a politics that is not a state, not a doctrine, but a force aligned with the deepest self-organizing laws of the universe. We know now that life does not follow a straight line. It does not progress toward utopia, nor does it collapse into chaos by necessity. Life self-organizes, adapts, mutates - it thrives at the edge of complexity. It does not seek equilibrium but navigates it, riding its fluctuations, evolving through tension rather than avoiding it. To break from Thanatos - the cybernetic aristocracies, the accelerating death spirals, the bureaucratic inertia of the present - demands more than critique. It demands war. But not in the old sense. Not conquest, not governance, not the seizure of institutions. It demands a war machine - a force of pure becoming, a power that moves outside and against the state, against all systems that seek to capture, enclose, and neutralize life. The war machine does not conquer - it creates. It deterritorializes, expands, mutates, evades capture. Politics must follow this logic: it must become an ecology, not a fortress. It must learn to move with complexity, not against it. The only future is in the ceaseless invention of new pathways, new alliances, new modes of living, of acting, of thinking. This is not utopia. It is survival. The climate is collapsing. Governance is failing. Technocapital is automating the very conditions of existence. The choice is clear: Remain trapped inside Thanatos, inside looping systems of control - or escape. There is no negotiation. Only movement.

I am not entitled, I just state standards that are normal for students to have. Do you understand how open minded you have to be to even listen to your work about consciousness, God, all that stuff? with your friends and family ridiculing you for it? only for you to state you have literal transformative powers and end up not going through with it, feeling like I should not have been open minded. Thinking that chaos wouldn't ensue around with the release of your transformation video is not a high state of consciousness, but a low one IMO. It's not mockery, but a critique of someone with educational authority, which by default is the relation between a student and teacher. You critiqued Connor Murphy when he went through his stuff (rightfully so), even calling him a zen devil. But with your stuff we're not supposed to criticize, because you project is as mockery? It didn't write it as a mockery, I guess you still don't realize how bizarre those claims were. You never addressed them afterwards, so a critique is warranted. I'm not entitled to any of your work. It's a mistake and a projection to assume that I think I do. When someone is clearly teaching stuff which isn't true and thus misleading, I am entitled to speak out against that though. I am still very interested in what made you think you could transform. It's so radically different than anything you talked about prior, which basically didn't envolve any powers in the dream. Was it just delusion and bad judgement on your part? did you actually reach a stage where such magic was possible? I'm still open minded about it, but since you never addressed it afterwards and just swept it under the rug, is what makes me suspicious and irritated. It's extremely sloppy and treats us as a gullible audience, like we are just some Sadhguru followers listening to our guru and not question his bizarre claims, and just forget it ever happened. It would be epistemologically sloppy of me to not question it. You are a teacher telling us that behind 200 trips lie something that noone has ever seen. If that same person makes an extreme claims of alien transformation and then fails to do it, why would I trust him with going to do 200 trips? It's like a medieval Portugese man pointing at the Atlantic Ocean, and saying there is an entire continent on the other side, and the next day he claims he can turn into a dragon. Why would I still try to cross the Ocean? Why are you mad at me for criticizing your bizarre claims? You were the one who posted about it. You could have easily waited till it worked out or not and then posted it (even though posting it would be insane in itself). Instead you sloppily posted around the forum with insane claims. And you never retracted it or talked about it, what happened during that time. A simple "Forget about what I said, I was in an unstable mental state" would have been enough. By not doing that you are basically saying that it's still possible that your transformation etc might have been valid. So hence my critique. And you're getting mad at me for questioning this? What, I'm supposed to just be a gullible little boy and let you make all these absolutely bizarre claims without questioning you on it? such gullibility goes a 180 degrees in to what you have always taught us. And you criticize Sadhguru's followers and other new age followers for it. Saying it's just mockery feels like gaslighting. And again, we're not talking about some vague claims of telepathy or remote viewing here. We're literally talking about a physical transformation into an alien being here. Hollywood stuff. What do you expect of me? Instantly calling me entitled is such an empty argument. Of course we as your audience are not entitled to anything. Yet we are also the only reason your entire business exists. In the same way you are also not entitled to not be critiqued by your audience. Not critiquing your episode is actually the biggest mockery of your work, because it's like a fly in an otherwise great soup. Leaving the fly in there would be not doing a serious investigation into your work. You have shared some of the best wisdom I've ever read in my life. A critique like this is a respect of your work, not a mockery.

Let's keep it a buck about Leo, He made many extreme claims that we are all supposed to forget about or something, and now take his logic and rationality very seriously, The pinnacle was the moment he claimed to be able to transform into a physical alien on camera, and that he only needed to find the correct camera. Let's take a moment to analyze this claim and its ramifications: -He was never able to do it -Imagine being able to do it, or at least, not being able to do it but thinking that you are (which is probably the case, which would already qualify him as being psychotic at the time), and actually contemplating putting your transformation on the internet. let's analyze this premise: (We are assuming that any vfx experts watching the video would be able to discern it's authenticity, which would be the case in an actual alien transformation) You release the video online. first, the forum community watches it in horror and disgust, and amazement, realizing they are looking at an actual video of their favorite Youtuber transforming into a real life alien. They share it everywhere around the internet, and it quickly starts to go viral. CNN and other major news networks start to pick it up and it goes insanely viral around the world. VFX experts announce its authenticity. the virality of the video starts to grow and grow and people on the news are talking about it and Leo. Everyone wants to speak to Leo because this is the craziest thing that has ever happened in the history of mankind. People start to look for him in real life and maybe even threaten him. Chaos ensues around the world. I mean, this is literally the scenario that would unfold. Total chaos. And yet he still posted about it, contemplating posting it like it would be some minor happening. Are we supposed to believe a man of his intelligence would not foresee these events? Keep it real with us Leo. Were you having an episode of psychosis at the time? and what happened with the portal that opened in your head, and the realizing of the consciousness field of the earth, and speaking with it? I believe this all happened around the 2nd half of 2022. You suddenly had these esoteric episodes, distinct from your regular Oneness awakening, God realization, metaphysical philosophy. And I mean, like I described, you literally contemplated putting out an alien transformation video like it wouldn't be the craziest thing ever shown on earth. And of course you weren't able to do it, which makes me think you went through some kind of psychosis around that time. Are we supposed to sweep all of this under the rug? You literally never explained any of these episodes any further. Never gave us an apology or nothing. It feels so blatant to talk about transforming into an alien on camera and then just never talk about it and talk about other serious philosophers like they are nothing and don't know anything, while you hold the secrets of the universe that no one else has ever figured out. It honestly feels like some master level trolling which I don't like to claim from you. I hope at least it was some kind of poison pill or something, to test us. If it wasn't, I can only expect suspect psychosis. Thinking you're getting away unscathed with sharing your alien transformation video online is more psychotic than anything Connor Murphy went through. It's a true disconnect with the realities of society and the world. It would be a literal Black Mirror episode and people would go looking and hunting for you. And this is already assuming that a transformation like that is even possible. It's disrespectful to your students to make these absolutely bizarre claims and never follow through on it or take them back. A simple explanation that you had a psychotic break would be plenty. But you never did. It's quite enraging actually.

I recently completed the life purpose coach and after years of lots of searching, I found that the purpose I wish to create for myself is coaching (still yet to find my niché and build my business). My first step is that I am currently completing a 3-6 month transformation coaching certification and then I will also be looking into website building etc. I wanted to know if there are any successful life coaches on the forum that I could maybe setup a meeting with just to ask questions and get some insights into the field and the career itself (Leo saying do lots of research! - this is part of that research). Much appreciated!

Christianity focuses on relationship with God, Buddhism on liberation from suffering, and Hinduism on union with the divine. John 8:32 - "And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." This aligns with the concept of awakening as liberation through understanding. In Buddhism, awakening (bodhi) involves seeing reality as it truly is, free from delusion. Jesus’ emphasis on truth freeing a person could echo the idea of breaking through ignorance to a higher awareness. Matthew 13:11-13 - "He replied, 'Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them... This is why I speak to them in parables: Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.'" Here, Jesus describes a spiritual blindness or ignorance that prevents people from perceiving deeper truths, akin to the "sleep" or "illusion" (maya) in Hinduism and Buddhism. The disciples, by contrast, are given insight into divine mysteries, suggesting a kind of awakening to a higher reality. Luke 17:20-21 - "The kingdom of God does not come with observation; nor will they say, ‘See here!’ or ‘See there!’ For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you." This verse points to an internal realization rather than an external event, paralleling the inward focus of awakening in Eastern traditions. In Hinduism, the Self (Atman) is recognized as divine, and in Buddhism, enlightenment arises from within through mindfulness and insight. John 3:3 - "Jesus replied, ‘Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.’" The idea of being "born again" implies a radical transformation of perception and identity, not unlike the shift in consciousness associated with awakening. It’s a spiritual rebirth that opens one’s eyes to a new way of being. Matthew 5:8 - "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God." This suggests that inner purification leads to a direct experience of the divine, which resonates with the purification of mind and heart in Buddhist and Hindu practices that precede awakening.

For anyone interested, I decided to completely restructure the talk, leave out stuff that I assume might be too advanced for the audience & this is what it looks like now (roughly): Summary of My Presentation: "Psychedelics as a Spiritual Practice" For the past 9 years, I have dedicated my life to exploring the intersection of psychedelics and spirituality—and this talk is the culmination of my research, experience, and insights. In this presentation, I explore a fundamental question: Can psychedelics be a spiritual practice? If so, how? 🔹 What is Spirituality? There is no universally agreed definition, but we can approach it from different angles: 1️⃣ Spirituality as Deconditioning – Freeing oneself from conditioning and beliefs. 2️⃣ Spirituality as Mystical Union – Awakening to unity with existence. 3️⃣ Spirituality as Embodiment – Living wisdom, compassion, and virtue. 4️⃣ Spirituality as the Pursuit of Truth – Direct experience of reality. 🔹 What is a Spiritual Practice? A structured, intentional engagement with activities aimed at spiritual growth. Examples are endless, but can psychedelics be one of them? How Psychedelics Assist Spirituality in Three Key Ways 1️⃣ Psychedelics as Insight Catalysts 🔥 Psychedelics allow for a direct experience of expanded consciousness. They facilitate deep insights into self, reality, love, and existence. Scientific research shows that psychedelics reduce ego rigidity, open cognitive flexibility, and enable perspective shifts. Common realizations: ✅ "I am not my thoughts." ✅ "I am loved / whole / enough." ✅ "Everything is connected." ✅ "Life is a gift." 2️⃣ Psychedelics as a Gateway to Mystical Experience Psychedelics have the potential to induce profound mystical experiences: 🔹 Unity 🔹 Timelessness 🔹 Noetic insights 🔹 Infinite love Research suggests 50-80% of participants in the right set and setting experience peak mystical states. A glimpse of the Absolute. Not permanent enlightenment, but a transformative experience. 3️⃣ Psychedelics as Character Cultivators Beyond peak experiences, psychedelics can shape long-term traits and deepen personal growth: 1️⃣ Courage & Responsibility – Facing fear, commitment to truth. 2️⃣ Surrender & Letting Go – Trust, relaxation, acceptance. 3️⃣ Humility & Open-Mindedness – Psychedelics shatter certainty and teach the power of not knowing. 4️⃣ Compassion & Connection – Increasing empathy, love, and interconnectedness. Pitfalls of Psychedelics as a Spiritual Practice ⚠️ 1. Self-Deception & Certainty → The risk of false beliefs and spiritual ego inflation. ⚠️ 2. Spiritual Emergency → Deep, overwhelming realizations can lead to existential crises. ⚠️ 3. Ego Inflation & Bypassing → Seeking peak states instead of doing real, grounded inner work. 📌 Integration is Key. Psychedelics are powerful, but the real work happens in daily life—in how we embody wisdom, love, and presence. Final Reflection: The Deepest Spiritual Realization? 💡 “What if spirituality is not about gaining insights, reaching mystical states, or transformation? 💡 What if the deepest realization is that there is nothing to seek, nowhere to go, and nothing to attain?” For me, the answer became detached appreciation—loving and honoring every moment, every experience, every appearance—unconditionally. Psychedelics are not a means to an end. They are an end in themselves.

If there is a way for Christianity to exist in a more conscious state, it would require a complete transformation. At that point, would it even still be Christianity? It would have to actively work on undoing the harm it has caused. But the reality is that the people doing the real work of putting an end to its abuse are the ones who leave Christianity behind. Why do you think this is?

I've been working with psychedelics for a few months now and I still haven't healed from it. However I have gained a lot of awareness into my emotional issues, and they are very complex, so it makes sense that they would be difficult to resolve. Luckily I have been learning about psychology and emotional healing for years before this so I have a lot of knowledge and insights that can help me figure out what to do. The main thing is that I have a lot of difficulty surrendering. I have had many moments of intense crying and emotional purging on psychedelics, but it never heals me. What I realized recently is that without full surrender, the emotional release does not become somatic. It's easy to think you are purging because you are crying and reacting, but that doesn't mean it's deep enough to create lasting healing. Trauma is stored in the body, and only by total and complete surrender can a somatic processing and release happen. Your emotions need to take over you, they need to happen TO you, the purging isn't something you force or create yourself. I have a lot of fear and resistance in me from childhood and that makes me uncomfortable with full surrender. I have been working on figuring out how to resolve that and I have been making good progress. So I've had the same experience as you so far of no results, but I feel like I am making good progress and will get there eventually. I know what you mean about needing a sense of community. I have tried tripping around other people, because my emotional pain is so deep and severe that it's very intimidating for me to go into alone, and forcing myself into them isn't conducive to healing. I feel better having other people around me when I trip and go into my emotions, however I have social anxiety and I'm not comfortable fully letting go and reacting however I want to around people, so that creates a problem. I found that what I really get out of having other people there is a sense of safety, so if I can do something to create that for myself when I'm alone, then I would feel comfortable enough to surrender without needing other people, and that has been working well for me so far. I think psychedelics can definitely provide deep and genuine healing, but you also need to know how to work with them properly, and people may have barriers that prevent them from being able to do that (like my issues with surrendering). I think if you have a good knowledge of psychology and emotional work, if you know how to gain a lot of understanding and awareness of your own psychology, and then you pair that with psychedelics which allow you to easily get deep into your subconscious mind and release core emotions, that could really help most people. I get what you're saying about changing habits and needing connection, I think that's a good point that people can also incorporate into their healing practice if they feel like that's something they need. However I think for any person, psychedelics or any other technique that allows you to do deep work on the subconscious mind is what would create the deepest level of healing and transformation.

Theme: Exploration of the paradox of psychedelics as a spiritual practice—both as tools for deep transformation and as reminders that there is nothing to attain. How we`re gonna cover that - 3 steps 0- Foundations: Define spirituality & spiritual practice (thats a hard one) 1- The progressive Path/Model of spirituality & how psychedelics can assist that practice This is seen in most religious and mystical traditions: Buddhism (The Noble Eightfold Path, progressing toward Nirvana) Christianity (Sanctification, spiritual purification over a lifetime) Hinduism (The Four Yogas—Bhakti, Karma, Jnana, Raja—methods of progressive realization) Sufism (Tariqa, a path of stages leading to divine union) Psychological Models: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory (spiritual growth as stages) Scientific Validation: Cognitive and developmental psychology support the idea that human consciousness develops in stages (Piaget, Kohlberg, Kegan). Studies on meditation and neuroplasticity also show that spiritual practice rewires the brain over time, reinforcing a progressive development model. Psychedelics as a tool for spiritual development. Facilitating the ascension of this journey. They can do that in many ways, i just wanna mention 4 here: 1- Cultivation of traits / "virtues" (Courage, trust, surrender, patience, love and so on) 2- Facilitating Insight & Remembering (Deep existential realizations)- perspective about reality, existence, life, god, your Self - “Who am I?” Facilitation of genuine Inquiry into Truth. 3- Practice of Dying Death-rebirth process → acceleration of spiritual growth. Cycle of purification and how psychedelics intensify and accelerate this process. The practice of Death & Dying Psychedelics as conscious suffering Psychedelics & Near Death experiences similarities research Chris Bache // Grof Maps as Science Data backup // COEX Systems 4-An “experience” of the Absolute The reach for the Absolute: The reality of deepening experiences → Moving further into infinity, higher states, deeper truths. The notion that we must move beyond ourselves and surrender more and more deeply to experience the ultimate. Example: 5-MeO-DMT, near-death experiences, deep meditative absorption into the beyond. Briefly mentioning - Dangers, Pitfalls, Challenges & Integration & Nuances. 2 - The Absolute Perspective of Spiritual Practice & Psychedelics as a practice of detached appreciation Many non-dual traditions challenge the idea of progress: Zen Buddhism: "You are already enlightened, just recognize it." Advaita Vedanta: "Tat Tvam Asi" (You are That), realization happens in an instant. Dzogchen (Tibetan Buddhism): The natural state is already pure awareness. Christian Mysticism (Meister Eckhart, St. John of the Cross): Union with God is already present, not something to be achieved. Psychedelic States: Many report a direct “timeless” realization of ultimate truth—paralleling these traditions. Scientific Validation: Research on mystical experiences (Griffiths et al., 2006; Pahnke, 1969) shows that peak psychedelic states can induce a spontaneous recognition of unity, transcendence of self, and loss of time-based progression. Studies on meditation (Samadhi, Flow States) reveal that non-dual awareness is associated with deactivation of the Default Mode Network (DMN)—the same effect psychedelics produce. “Seeking is suffering. To seek nothing is bliss.” The paradox: If the Absolute is everything, then it is also this moment, right here. We move beyond progress, chasing, seeking All states are valid. All appearances are truth. No hierarchy of experience. (Too radical??) The highest realization is that there is nothing to attain. The paradox of progress: from this perspective, there is no spiritual path at all—it’s all already perfect. The Absolute is not just beyond—it is also immanent, present in everything This is where detached appreciation comes in → Infinite love for all states. -Spirituality is not about preferring one state over another but recognizing the one who sees. Relate it to psychedelic practice: The practice becomes seeing the seer Detached appreciation → we do not attach to psychedelic states or peak experiences but love them unconditionally. - That becomes the practice! And then the psychedelic experience does not become a means to an end, but is an end in and of itself. Just as true meditation shall be. - Detachment as integration: Do not judge any state. Do not attach to any state. Do not prefer any state over any other. 3- The Paradox & Integration Integrating the Two – Where Do They Meet? Many traditions blend both (e.g., Christianity: "Be still and know" vs. "Strive for holiness") . -Acknowledge similarities but also disagreements, come back to not-knowing. Psychedelics show both models. Enjoy the journey. Enjoy the tension, the paradox, the suffering, the seraching - all of it. Love it. Appreciate it! The key is integration, avoiding the traps of bypassing or dogmatic progression. Psychedelics redirect us to that: appreciation of simple things (Grof findings) The realization that both perspectives are true at the same time. Holding both perspectives at once: psychedelics can be a path of progress, but progress itself is an illusion. -Is there data or research on Paradox as an inherent feature of reality? The challenge of integration: How do we live in this paradox? We can honor both the progressive path and the non-seeking path without contradiction. Recognizing language's limitations—truth is beyond words and frameworks. Traps and pitfalls (spiritual bypassing, attachment to peak experiences, superiority complex, psychedelic escapism). The importance of the foundation of spiritual work The humility of not knowing—embracing mystery and paradox. The most holistic, mature spiritual practice acknowledges we don’t know. Bringing wisdom into daily life → Grounding insights in love, service, and presence. Psychedelic Integration = Life itself Taking action: “let the beauty we love be what we do” - Rumi I know that´s a lot. Any help simplifying, clarifying or cutting out things is welcome <3

Are you lost about your masculine role in the world? Watch this interview, read his book and contemplate. The 4 Archetypes: King: The King represents order, creativity, and generativity and embodies a sense of internal monarchy. A mature King fosters stability and inspires others. In its shadow form, it manifests as the Tyrant or the Weakling. Warrior: The Warrior embodies discipline, courage, and decisiveness, acting with purpose and integrity. The Warrior pushes forward aggressively. Its shadows are the Sadist and the Masochist. Magician: The Magician symbolizes knowledge, insight, and transformation, channeling wisdom for the benefit of others. The Magician learns a great deal about everything. However, the Magician can devolve into the Manipulator or the Detached Observer in its shadow form. Lover: The Lover reflects passion, connection, and appreciation for beauty, celebrating life. The Lover seeks sensation and connectedness with all things in life but may become the Addicted Lover or the Impotent Lover in shadow form.

@Breakingthewall Yeah, through simple observation, one can see how suffering and struggle lead to leaps in evolution. Yuval Noah Harari insightfully argues that our evolution is fundamentally tied to our capacity to create fiction, be it money, corporations, or other constructs. Once we envision a fiction, like our ideal self or a future goal, we must alter our behavior to transform that vision into a tangible reality. This process, however, often brings about suffering. We might wonder why nature or a higher power imposes this burden of struggle on us when striving for transformation. I believe it is to ensure that we approach our creations with care, thoughtfully considering what is truly worth pursuing and what ought to be let go. Alternatively, we could view this struggle as a test from nature to determine how deeply we desire something.

@trenton The Ouroboros, is the mind eating the mind in the very literal sense so without creating my own depiction I can't think of any better well known metaphor, the Ouroboros is the structure of thought itself. That is, the very mechanics of the mind self-consuming, self-generating, recursive. By understanding the Ouroboros in this sense, one in the very literal sense is given one of the most valuable keys to the kingdom of personal development. Many people look at the Ouroboros with degrees of understanding and find that sufficient enough, however like anything a degree asks of the rest of the degrees that remain, but because we often perceive our judgements with such finality, it is like looking at the oceans surface from the sky's great heights and believing our perception to hold the full 'degrees' of the ocean's depths. It's simply not possible and therefore I will give you a stepping stone to what I personally mean. Your consciousness likely operating as most others has three primary strata's constantly in contact with one another, sensory, cognitive and emotional all feeding from and to an energetic equilibrium. Your judgement of any one experience acts like an anchor on the degree of operation of the ouroboros regenerating and evolving your experience to the level that those three channels feed perception independently and interdependently; Perception <---> Judgement, open perception, open judgement; open both, open Understanding <---> Experience, open both, open Consciousness <---> Growth. Ouroboros, is "Conscious access to consciousness feedback loop", get it, all feedback, aka those three channels, feeds backwards into consciousness to then rebegin its projection thereby constantly altering the interface upon which you experience reality through recursive improvement. Again, degrees of understanding, let's break things down to greater literalality. Reflect back on every sound, visual, emotion, mental wandering, imagination, energy, sense, thought, inclination of consciousness you've personally experienced up to this point while reading this reply and ask yourself the following question: How much was my awareness anchoring those experiences in a way in which I was growing from them? That 'anchoring point' reflects your own unique 'Ouroboros superposition' of consciousness growth. Intelligence is neither singularly cognitive nor static; it is a self-referential engine that evolves by erasing itself and that being said when mind models reality, mistakes the model for reality, then dismantles it, each iteration encoding the failure of the last, its unique 'anchoring point' across the intersection of those dichotomies of consciousness within that triad, is going to be reflective of the ongoing broad growth of consciousnesses intelligence. This action, is a mastering of consciousnesses learning function. 'Learning' is this consciousness functionality self-embodied, as such, 'Identity', undertakes an enormous experiential shift, aligning more with its truer self for the simple fact that 'learning' is more aligned with how consciousness is meant to function rather than being the byproduct of a lack of learning occurring within consciousness from moment to moment; ergo, ideology is the opposite to true self as its antithetical to the organic operation of consciousness. @Ninja_pig's image of course is another a kind of 'ourorobos' however I'd say that the hand drawing the hand, is a lower level symbolically, though equally are far better than their negational opposites of course; uniquely, I would say that the hand drawing the hand has greater commentary on how the path of personal mastery is not without a path to mastering precision, the snake eating itself by comparison focuses more on the evolutionary function that needs to be found, optimised and mastered. 'Found' especially in the context of how modern culture acts as its own maze most have to traverse through before they grasp increasing degrees of artworks like these. Further on your own depiction @trenton, the hand is reaching through chaos toward light but in touching it, dissolves. The seeker disintegrates into the sought; ideology or evolution? Without understanding higher degrees of the ouroboros, often people resort to social identities in balancing this understanding until they reach higher degrees where social affiliation is a counterweight to personal dissonance. Disintegrating into the sought is not the annihilation that creates the dissonance but transformation, truth is not acquired, it is the dissolution of what seeks to hold it, will it become a narcissistic ideology or will a consciousness go to Greater Degrees? The mind cannot possess what is beyond it; it can only become it by ceasing to be what it was. This is the rhythm of cognition, of being itself; cycles graduating cycles rather than judgments merely resolving psychological uncertainties. The Ouroboros does not only consume; it regenerates. Each disintegration is an expansion in disguise. Thought moves in recursive cycles, but the cycle is a spiral, never returning to the same point, always integrating its own dissolution. Self-love, then, is not an attachment to any version of the self. It is the recognition that identity is provisional, that growth requires disintegration; that the love is a cycle in itself, you learn the operations of the brain, the heart, the gut, greater energy centers and consciousness further, upon each cycle a new level of learning is mastered upon how to author and regulate your own energy towards higher experiences of consciousness, our only truth, and our action a measurement of this alignment. To love the self is to allow it to die and reform, endlessly, without resistance. The highest act of intelligence is not to cling to an image but to move with the rhythm of transformation itself; that's the essence of the minimum of degrees of understanding that one must either sit back and observe the oceans surface until said revelation enlightens them or what is more likely, they dive into the oceans depths and master these greater degrees of the blue for themselves. I recommend diving in, especially in the presence of the millions of others that can do nothing else but sit back because each persons 'sitting back' is resolving each others own dissonance, break the consciousness pigmentation of social alignment with maturity and that'll be your line upon which others will be able to reach for in the ocean as a life line to know traverse the ocean the same.

I have done more critical thinking and inner reflection work in the past 2 months than over the rest of my life combined. I have suffered greatly in my life. I am deeply dissatisfied with my lifestyle. And that is due to very incorrect assumptions I've held for a very long time. 2025 is my year of transformation. Possibly the biggest transformation in my entire life. I have managed to change my inner dialogue a lot, and I have adopted the necessary habits to achieve my life goals. But that isn't enough. Within me, I often encounter resistance, and conflict. I often find myself whether I should sacrifice my feelings and happiness for practical purposes, or if I am being a fool for making decisions that are impractical to my goals. After a lot of introspection, I managed to deconstruct many flaws in my way of thinking. These fallacies are common to many people. And so, I have made the decision to write a philosophical manifesto. Title: The Selfish Manifesto These are the topics I will cover in the document: The lie of Common Truth - how society lies to you into believing others have the truth, and the problem with institutions defining truth, and the fallacy of appeal to popularity The lie of Oppression - how society instills in you a mindset that you are oppressed, and that you need to navigate the world through the lens of an oppressed individual who needs to either join a woke ideology, or to serve your masters The lie of Ideology - how society promotes distractions, fake solutions, fake cooperations, and fake ideas to pretend there is an ideology out there that will serve the "greater good" (Feminism, Wokeness, LGBTQ rights, Socialism, Capitalism, Marxism, and even low hanging fruit ideologies like Right Wing, Christianity, etc( The lie of Selfishness - how society demonizes the concept of selfishness, when in reality it rewards the most selfish individuals and smashes the least selfish ones The lie of Morality - how society twists notions of morality according to its corrupt needs, and how you shouldn't fall for conformist moral systems How to take the Truth - how to discover the truth for yourself without relying on reading books written by others (yes I know it sounds self refusting but this point is anything but that), and stop seeking truth and validation from experts, and mainstream opinion How to take your freedom - how to accept that you have freedom, how to apply freedom into your own life, how to make tough decisions in order to maximize your freedom How to take your happiness - how to learn to be happy on your own, without relying on ANYONE to serve you, laugh with you, love you How to love yourself - how to accept your looks, your personality, essentially how to become such a narcissist that you give love to yourself This is going to be the most anti-ideological, anti-conformist, antiwoke document ever written. And it is going to be very antithetical both to common spiritual teachings and to practical, stage orange self help concepts. I will invite the reader to stop bending over backwards trying to receive validation and rewards from society. I will refute the notion that "the Ego is the biggest Devil" and all of that terrible advice that spiritual teachers like Leo like to promote. The idea of hating your ego and trying to kill it, eliminate it, "transcend it", is preposterous. If you live your life trying to diminish your ego, that is a path to guaranteed suffering. I will present a healthy, timeless perspective on Selfish Egoism. The document will be short. Between 50 to 100 A5 pages long. No bullshit. No stalling. No philosophical mumbo-jumbo. No counter-arguments, not bending over backwards to justify every little point I make. I'm very excited about this project. After so much introspection, I believe I have some interesting universal truths to write here. And this is no exaggeration. These aren't some weird ideology I am promoting. These principles should serve any individual, in any era, in any context. These are the most encompassing principles anyone could hope for. And they will serve me (and whoever reads this) to guide a powerful, authentic life. The primary audience for this document, however, will be young men. I don't expect some woke feminist Hollywood celebrity reading this with any amount of charitability or good faith. I am very aware this document will be perceived by many people as some toxic manosphere blackpill rant, or even as some cringe right wing Ayn Rand philosophy. This document will be very triggering for people who are married to their woke religion. I'm very excited for this project. I predict I will have the document ready in 4-6 months. Maybe less. I will publish it here for free as PDF.

In my yt feed there have been lot of videos of transformation happening in-collective, structures breaking, systems breaking etc in 2025-2027 time frame by many astrologers, channellers, nde etc This videos are popping up from start of this year. Is there really any global shift happening, is there a shift in consciousness or energy? Or are this all bunch of weird new age hippy dream?

I received coaching certification in the addiction and transformation space with an emphasis on psychedelic prep and integration. Send me a DM if you want to talk shop.

This journal marks not an end, but a profound transition. My philosophical journey, a quest that once consumed me, has reached a point of completion. The questions that fueled my intellectual exploration have found answers that satisfy, and my mind is now at peace. However, this intellectual contentment has revealed a new challenge: the world I once knew to be wonderous has become small for me. I have outgrown it, and it no longer offers the stimulation or meaning I seek. My drive, once philosophical inquiry, has shifted. I am no longer driven by logic, but by a yearning for something more… something otherworldly (or perhaps inner-worldly). This is why I speak of rebirth. I seek a re-enchantment of the world, a return to the sense of wonder and awe that characterizes a child's experience of reality. I believe this can be found by entering the world of what I call 'literal magic' – the realm of psychic influence or dynamism. I anticipate that this exploration will provide the powerful stimulation my mind and spirit now crave. This journal will document this journey of transformation, this quest for a new kind of understanding, a new way of being. It will be a space to record my reflections, experiences, and insights as I navigate this new territory and seek to define what 'magic' truly is.

The worry today is that people are so disconnected from reality, and hallucination of reality is so prevalent, that they might recontextualize a contact with reality with a further delusion. The germans after world war 1 are a good example. They suffered the consequences of their war, and instead of taking accountability, Hitler exploited it to frame the german people as victims, and the jewish people as the perpetrators. That's the scary thing about human beings, that sometimes reality will not wake them up but simply lead to more delusions. And a large portion of the US population basically will stand behind Trump no matter what happens. You can already see the attitudes of them changing, where they will now accept inflation and economic hardship in favor of american isolationism, when they would previously not accept any hardship. When people are radicalized, they might simply be willing to make the sacrifices to maintain their delusions. This is not unique to Jihadis, it has happened throughout history. Just look at the Russians and what their population is willing to endure for their loyalty towards Putin and the russian nation. Never would we have thought that people would be willing to die in a world war 2 type scenario as cannon fodder to gain a few inches of land for their leaders imperial ambitions. We thought people would no longer be willing to engage in such sacrifices as a result of peace and progress. But this is simply not the case, we were wrong. The hope is that there are not yet enough people to allow for such a transformation of the political system. But in nazi germany, it didn't even require a majority to achieve that. Delusion and ignorance is exceptionally dangerous. And yes I don't like spending any time on this topic either, it's absolutely assinine that I have to think about this in the first place, and waste my time and energy on this. The problem with this is that if you get hung up on the culture, and react against it, you will be defined by the culture as well, which will just increase foolishness. Like all the atheists who fight against religious people. They are better than the Christians, but they have defined themselves through opposition to such a degree that they are equally stuck in the primitive culture of today as the Christians are. It's like, just to be able to engage with these topic requires you to engage in primitivity that will then lead to you wasting your time on primitivity rather than on your higher ideals. But at this point it feels like it would be irresponsible not to contribute. If every reasonable person removes themselves from politics because of how degenerate it has become, then politics will only get worse, and that can end in disaster. So that is the question, do I just focus on my life purpose and pretend the world does not exist? I truly wish I could, but it does not seem like this can be afforded anymore. This is partly because I don't even see a solution in sight. Social media is just getting worse and worse, people are becoming more ignorant, more biased, more self-serving. Popular media is just filled with vile, disrespectful individuals who basically are just arrogant and hateful. And these people are the role models for the youth, amplified on steroids by never before seen technology.

Art project Filming a person meditating seated and silently with extreme close-ups and pristine HD quality. Make it into a short film that is trying to capture the extreme levels of stillness and calm that are possible in deep, seated, silent meditation. Multiple cameras are set up in multiple places, every shot is preset and ready to film all at once, no other people in the room, no movement of equipment, no camera zooms. The film is edited in a quiet and etheric cinematic style. Styles that come to mind is morning routine scene in American Psycho, and shampoo and cosmetics commericals. These are merely analogous, I have a vision of the style, and it's something entirely of its own if executed properly. The film can serve as an inspiration for what is possible during meditation, and if executed properly, could popularize not just meditation as a practice but the kinds of deep meditation that are associated with deep transformation. Research project Filming a person meditating seated and silently with extreme close-ups and pristine HD quality, but with focus on capturing any subtle movements or phenomena that the meditator would report as movements of energy. Physical measurement instruments like body temperature cameras and perhaps microscope technology can also be used. The aim is to provide insight into subtle energy phenomena often experienced during meditation, e.g. feelings of pressure and tension building up and releasing in the face, neck, forehead, etc. It would involve correlating footage and timestamps with the meditator giving retrospective accounts of the experiences. The findings can uncover potential subtle physical mechanisms of these phenomena or support the hypothesis that these are non-physical phenomena (not capturable by physical measurement). If anyone is interested in trying any of this out (especially the art project), I'm open to give advice so that it meets the vision I have mind. I think if especially the art project is given a serious attempt (which I might do some time, I have a friend who is a photographer) and perhaps some financial investment, you could create something unique, beautiful and powerful.