Search the Community

The Jews will never give up on conquering their God promised holy land. The thing is ground troops need to move in with air support otherwise it is just a suicide mission. Terrorists would pop in and out of buildings and tunnels and shoot with bullets and RPGs; you see even with air support, over 170 soldiers have died fighting in Gaza. So in conclusion the buildings and tunnels must be destroyed before moving in; lets not forget about the rockets and rocket launch sites, in case you guys missed it, here are two video:

The gist Ive gotten from leos videos about realizing youre god is that besides psychedelics there are no adequate means. However I am hestitant to use them (Ive used lsd, shrooms and DMT in the past, but to reach enlightenment Id need to keep using them for a while I think) because of having a family history of schizophrenia and my usage of antidepressants. Im interested in hearing if any people here have realized god through means other than psychedelics. So far Ive tried do nothing style meditation, mindfulness meditation, self enquiry and kriya yoga shortly, but I dont see myself reaching those levels of enlightenment with those techniques. The other thing I can think of to reach it is suicide but I will not be attempting that any time soon. Thanks for any help.

But by that logic, what lead to the second Intifada with suicide bombings twice a week in the early 2000's was Oslo agreement (1993), Oslo 2nd agreement (1995), Hebron agreement (1997), Y agreement (1998), Camp David negotiation (2000)... By using I mean it was pre-trapped (before the war) and the logic behind that is that in the same way hamas has invested every second since 2005 to build a 400 km length tunnels city, it also has invested in trapping entire neighborhoods all across the Gaza strip way before the war started. What I think is that just like the undergroung tunnels-city, also this was already made before the war. I agree with you in this logic but the question is, if this is really the case in Gaza because according to the ever arming-race of hamas the situation there is, I think, very different. Why do you think that?

You’re right. They value it significantly more. Hence I forgot the exact number but women say yes to men at an insanely lower rate than men say yes to women on dating apps. And the main factors that make men stand out on dating apps is face and height. It is fucking IMPOSSIBLE to get a less than 200 lb girlfriend if you’re some 5’8 socially inexperienced guy in a 60k population city. And I definitely don’t blame myself for not being able to move out. I didn’t ask for this shit. It hurts me to bring weight into it because fat chicks are some of the coolest, funniest people I’ve ever met. But they aren’t very fuckable if we’re being honest. But they’re way more fun to hang out with than hot girls in my experience. Seriously, there are no chances for us. No opportunities, no connections. Nothing. What do you do in this state? Go knocking door to door in your neighborhood asking to see available women in the family? Go cold approach at malls, college campuses you don’t attend and bars/clubs where one wrong move gets you harassed by authority figures who don’t give the tiniest speck of empathy for your suicidal desperation? Go wedding crashing? Party crashing? 80 percent of this struggle would be solved if we weren’t so unfortunate to be born in a small city because god is some sick and twisted motherfucker that strokes his fat goober and gets off to the sight of us being ruthlessly tormented by seeing happy couples rubbed in our faces like taunting a starving child with delicious food, and being heavily punished for our mistakes when we goof up socially trying to climb out of our hell hole. But no. God fucking hates our miserable, suffering asses and is constantly working overtime to keep us stuck. A big city would take most of that away because social mistakes don’t carry nearly as heavy of a penalty. That’s because you can go out every night and rarely see the same people twice. Word gets around about you faster and you stick out like a sore thumb because people have less to focus on in smaller cities. NO ROOM FOR ERROR This too can be debunked by looking at the numbers. There are twice as many male virgins in the 18-29 age range than female virgins. Also compare the suicide rate between genders and that should tell you something This right here speaks volumes about the female threat detection mechanism. Women are afraid those socially inexperienced, 5/10 guys are the dangerous ones when really those kinds of guys would treat them like queens, but they aren’t attracted to them because “weirdo vibes”. Meanwhile they consistently get involved with the actual dangerous men and suffer dire consequences because of it.

@Karmadhi I can take your what I think a sickingly twisted logic and say what you ARE in denial about and filter out: 1. The fact that Israel built a 1 Billion dollar smart fence out of the fantasy the thecnology will prevent wars. 2, Israel let Thousands of Gazans to work in its areas for years out of the hope it will make them moderate. 3. Israel did more than 10 careful operations with good surgicality lead to anything but worsen the situation in the long term. 4. Israelis soldiers are many of them boys in theirs 18-22 years that are also humen being with broad heart and worried mothers and familiy that are putting their lives in a serious risk in one of the most dangerous areas in the world. Thousands of them are doing that right now for more than 3 months straight. 5. The fact that almost no other military warned civilians so many time in many ways before their attacks. 6. The fact that a hostage suffering is X100 times harder than any other soldier or citizen from both sides. Imagine have a gun on your head for 100 days when you never know when the bullet will be shot on you and if it will. 130 of them. Now imagine this is one of your friends or family members. 7. The fact that Gaza kids are indoctrinate into killing and suicide from birth and already been damaged psychologically to a mental condition not less severe than any other mental disorders and need an urgent recovery if such a recovery is even possible, Million of them. Where was the world when that happened during all those years before the war?

The material constituents, or whatever cascade/milieu of consciousness that composes of reality, seems distantly secondary to the "stupidity" I mentioned above. If hypothetically, I scientifically proved the universe was made of superstrings or whatever, and that above-stupidity continued to exist, that would simply mean I don't know what's going on in a meaningful way. (I consider things concerned with the definition of "meaning" to be unavailable to communication.) That would weakly suppose consciousness, or rather, whatever subjective properties precede that notion of "stupidity", has a role in constructing reality, if not for the fact that in the absence of consciousness that stupidity is merely replaced with a kind of existential suicide; the same stupid sans subjectivity. I'm sure there's more recreational things to say, perhaps as it relates specifically to the scientific enterprise, but what I said prior is enough to capture my beliefs and the ignorance it's composed of. If there's more to explore outside those beliefs than my ignorance, than that ignorance ought be considered first.

You're fine. I have free days when I do nothing. I have days where I have breakthroughs. Work influences me. Society influences me. My bad habits influence me. I can act only on a free day and I have to go to a different location to play my instrument. I haven't lost my ability etc., it has gone a bit better acctually. There are times I envy everyone who is living a more traditional life, but I yet I fail to see a reason why and acctually I don't want to live like them. I just need to calm down and continue. Still have to figure a lot of stuff to have a sustainable lifestyle and a good foundation for the future. And then work on my life purpose. You are fine, if you don't want to do anything today, sit and visualize what you wanted prior, write on paper. Remind yourself of your core values. Just sit and relax. You can't fault yourself that you feel bad, so many things are influencing you. You feeling guilty about it leads to suicide. I sometimes envy people who have time to play their instruments more too, but I have what I have. So no reason to feel bad and just relax. Also, me and people I envy and I am envied by all have this fear of losing the ability to do the things we love. Remember that. Sustainable lifestyle is also very important. Don't kill by yourself overstressing and overworking too.

@Karmadhi Only one side is taught to kill and suicide. I have never learn anything bad about the Arabs themselves besides that we have wars and we signed peace agreements and wanted to do peace also with Syria and to co exist with the 20% of the Israelis which are Arabs. I remember that I was in 6th grade.

@Merkabah Star I understand the situation in Gaza hurts you and you are right it that! But blame hamas on that because he has at the very least 90% of the responsibility and likely even 95%+. Thats the truth according to my impression. You can think something else and I really don't want to just argue with you. But I wonder, where was the world before the war, when one Million of poor kids where brainwashed every single day by their education system into the importance of killing others along with the importance of suicide in the name of their religion?

I lost my ex boyfriend to a meth overdose (laced with fentanyl).. Last time we spoke was just few days before his death he said he does not want to speak to me again anymore and I did not say anything; I decided to reach out few days after and I realized he's dead. we had a really good friendship after our breakup (almost 3 years ago) but it really affected him and made him depressed that we were no longer together; the last few months were really hard for him after his brother's suicide and death of his cat who was his best friend. I know it is not my fault; I know I did not cause him to overdose but I am still overcame and defeated by guilt and what ifs.. what if I had reached out to him sooner what if i had been a better gf at the time what if i had been a better friend. this is the very first death I deal with in my 25 years of life. any tips? words of comfort? anything will help.

@Princess Arabia The problem is, his brother committed suicide and shortly after his cat died.. and our breakup (which happened way before that) was all so hard on him my heart aches so much for what he had to go through and drove him to the addiction. I try to distance myself from the situation of blaming myself but I cannot.. I could've reached out to him that day and we could've talked it out but I didn't know.. I was his only friend

How You Lie - All Your Dirty, Sneaky Lies & Manipulations Exposed! https://youtu.be/XulpS3cAkOM Foundational Concepts for Self-Actualization: Leo states that understanding one's own tendency to lie, manipulate, and engage in self-deception is crucial for personal growth and self-actualization. Warning of Disturbing Revelations: He warns that the forthcoming revelations about self-deception may be shocking but are ultimately beneficial for long-term development. Self-deception as Life's Central Theme: Leo positions self-deception as a central theme in life, significantly affecting all areas where success and results are pursued, and is a major obstacle to personal growth. Introduction of the "Self-Agenda" Concept: The self-agenda, a concept Leo learned from Peter Ralston, drives our actions and is focused on preserving our self-image rather than our physical survival or wellbeing. Truth vs. Self-Survival: The primary operating principle in life is not truth, but self-survival, with most people prioritizing the preservation of their self-image or self-concept. Seeking Comfort and Certainty: Leo argues that people primarily seek comfort and certainty rather than truth, even when they claim to act out of love or altruism. Protecting the Ego: All actions, even seemingly self-destructive ones, are directed towards protecting and maintaining one’s self-image or ego. Low Awareness as a Defense Mechanism: Low awareness protects the ego by shielding individuals from facing the painful reality of their self-deceptions and lies. High Awareness Requires Responsibility: Gaining higher awareness involves confronting the lies one has lived by and is a challenging process that may stir cognitive dissonance by challenging one's identity. Self-Deception Through Lack of Awareness: The mind is wired for self-deception; lying to oneself effectively serves the self-agenda, as the very concept of the 'self' is a lie. The Ego as a Fabrication: Leo explains that one's entire identity and the understanding of reality are fabrications created by the mind, sustained through low consciousness. Evolution's Role in Self-Deception: The human propensity for self-deception is tied to survival and evolutionary mechanisms that prompt organisms to value their well-being above others. Lying to Uphold a False Sense of Specialness: The idea that our lives and those close to us are more important than others is identified as a fundamental lie driven by ego and survival needs. Survival vs. Truth: Leo suggests that survival/reproduction interests and the pursuit of truth are often at odds, leading to a dilemma where one might have to choose between self-preservation and honesty. Self-Image as Truth Defender: He points out that some people perceive themselves as champions of truth, but living true to this self-image is extremely challenging unless they abandon their self-image entirely. Early Onset of Lying: Leo explains that lying starts at a very young age, becoming so habitual that it is like a fish not realizing it's in water; people become unaware of their constant lying. Consequences of Lying: He lists numerous negative physical and mental health outcomes—from stress and anger to heart attacks and suicide—claiming these are often consequences of living a life filled with lies. Subtlety of Lying: Leo asserts most lying is not overt but subtle and unconscious, which makes it particularly insidious and a manifestation of low consciousness. Examples of Subtle Lies: He catalogues various forms of deceptive behaviors, from fake smiles and politeness to withholding important information and pretending to be more spiritual or compassionate than one really is. Hypocrisy in Self-Professed Virtues: Leo criticizes those who claim to be spiritual, loving, or altruistic as often being the most deceptive and selfish, using their 'virtues' as a smokescreen for ulterior motives. Manipulation in Relationships: He describes the extensive use of manipulation and subtle lies within intimate relationships to avoid conflict or to influence partners' behaviors. Lies Stemming from Self-Agenda: Leo reiterates that many lies derive from protecting one's self-image and agenda, which ultimately backfire and reduce the quality of life. Cultural dishonesty about sex: Leo criticizes society's false modesty about sexual behavior, stating that many people lie to themselves about their sexual activities and desires to maintain a "good" image. Deception in marketing and sales: He points out that professionals in marketing and sales often lie and manipulate consumers through deceptive advertising tactics and urgency to make sales. Withholding information in leadership: Leo emphasizes that leaders, bosses, and CEOs frequently withhold crucial information from their teams for self-serving reasons, not respecting the principle of truth. Reluctance to admit mistakes: People often refuse to acknowledge their errors and concoct excuses to maintain their self-image instead of admitting they were wrong. Hiding weaknesses and insecurities: Leo highlights the common practice of hiding personal flaws and insecurities to appear confident and put together, which is often exaggerated during dating. Failure to express emotions: Many individuals suppress their emotions, such as anger or sadness, and lie about their well-being by claiming they are "fine" instead of sharing their true feelings. Watering down opinions: He discusses how people often soften their opinion in social settings as a way of avoiding conflict and protecting their self-image. Manipulative use of humor and sarcasm: According to Leo, humor and sarcasm can be used to manipulate, belittle, and divert attention from true intentions or real issues. Secret scheming for self-preservation: Leo mentions that in situations like anticipated layoffs, individuals will secretly plan to avoid personal loss, often at the expense of others. Seeking validation through deceptive niceness: He criticizes people who behave nicely just to receive validation, approval, and love from others, viewing it as a form of manipulation. Pretense of not being hurt: People often pretend they aren't physically or emotionally hurt to appear strong, which is a self-image preservation tactic. Indirect ways of expressing desires: Leo points out how individuals express desires and emotions in covert ways to maintain a humble self-image, like showing off new possessions subtly. Unawareness of personal hypocrisy: He argues that most people are not conscious of their hypocrisy, giving the example of holding in one's stomach to appear thinner as a self-deception lie. Solution to lying and self-deception: Leo suggests becoming mindful of one's lies, manipulations, and self-deceit and advocates for truth-telling, especially when it has personal costs. He explains the three levels of truth-telling: being honest with oneself, communicating facts honestly, and expressing one's emotions truthfully. Self-Agenda vs. Truth: Leo highlights that people primarily care about their self-agenda and self-image over the truth, and stresses that only through extensive work on oneself can this prioritization change. Levels of Communicating Truth: Leo describes three levels of truth communication: level one is noticing one's self-agenda, level two involves accurately reporting facts regardless of consequences, and level three is about expressing emotions related to the facts. Service to Truth: Gura argues that genuinely serving truth through communication and behavior is emotionally difficult, which discourages most people from doing it, but it is essential for personal integrity and life quality improvement. Integrity Issues: Lying and manipulating, Leo contends, harm personal integrity and, by extension, the individual's mental and emotional well-being, leading to depression, stress, and physical health problems. Embracing the Consequences of Truth: He warns that truthful communication can have serious consequences, but fears are often overblown, and that in reality, honesty can lead to a more appreciated and refreshing life experience for yourself and others. Practical Mindfulness Exercise: Leo suggests wearing a colorful rubber band as a reminder to stay conscious of manipulations, lies, and self-agenda in daily life, to prevent slipping back into unconscious deception. Supporting Actualized.org: Leo encourages the audience to support the platform by engaging with the content, signing up for the newsletter, and delving into the deep, transformative material provided. Silencio

I really really want a very very strong argument on why suicide is not a solution to the problem of life. I have been looking for a good counter argument myself but so far I am not convinced by anyone. So let's see who can provide a genius perspective on this and convince me.

I know, my childrenhood has been an absolut nightmare on some points. I finished so neurotic at one point that I went so far as to make two hours of bodybuilding per day, while eating little and even by doing water fast and even a dry fast. I even ended up taking hormones to increase my sporting performance and it largely has to trigger my very scent insomnia from which I begin to get rid of. Now I find it a little even but there have been a long way and there are still some, I could have committed suicide in the process. Lots of super honest introspection and experience have changed the situation. Psychedelics have also helped to change thought patterns, may be simply by sending strong epigenetic neurological signals, IDK. You should think about it.

If somebody held a gun to my head and asked me what I wanted to be my answer is as follows. He would probably stop me after professional chess player. I wanted to be a professional chess player. The problem was that there was no college major for it and it is hard to make enough money as a chess player unless you are world class which I wanted to be. I would study everything intensely, but the need to build another line of work takes the fun out of it. I Wasn't raised to be a champion like most child prodigies. I felt lost in life because it looked like following my passion wasn't an option. I needed to develop some other line of work. my second choice was to change the school curriculum to reach emotional mastery in schools to prevent suicide. This is also very hard to do. I don't know how I should go about pursuing this project. The best I know is to write a book on the subject. I'm on chapter 3 so far. I am very interested in psychology, but I see myself more as an advocate rather than as a therapist. Psychology was my initial major but I didn't like the career paths. Sociology is also interesting, but I'm not sure about the career paths. My next choice would be philosophy and politics. I don't like it, but it has a lot of noble goals to strive for. If the impact on humanity is important enough then I would push through the difficult parts. I see beauty in having well thought out positions and using them to improve people's lives. It requires selflessness and objectivity which Most people lack, hence the polarization of America. The common problem is that I am not confident about the career paths. It leads to frustration as I feel lost in life.

Enlightenment FAQ - Part 1 - All Your Questions Answered https://youtu.be/H0GbcGMar_E Introduction to the Enlightenment FAQ: Leo is creating an Enlightenment FAQ series to address common questions about spiritual enlightenment for those who have followed his previous content. The series aims to clarify misconceptions and fears and provide a deeper understanding of the journey toward enlightenment. Difference between Understanding and Experiencing Enlightenment: Enlightenment extends beyond understanding the concept of "no self" intellectually; it must be experienced personally. The difference between talking about enlightenment and living an enlightened life is vast and necessitates a profound shift in perception and everyday experience. Visibility of 'No Self' and Psychological Obstacles: Despite being a simple truth, the realization of "no self" is obscured by our psychology, culture, and inherent resistance from our ego. Achieving enlightenment entails unlearning deep-seated beliefs, requiring significant effort and a radical shift in perspective. The Matrix Misconception: Enlightenment is not akin to living in a simulated reality like "The Matrix." Unlike the film, enlightenment posits that while the physical world exists, the individual self is a fiction. This realization is paradoxically more complex and challenging than escaping a simulation. Reality vs. Illusion: Enlightenment does not claim that reality is an illusion; rather, everyday physical objects exist. What is illusory is the perception of a separate self observing these objects. Enlightenment challenges the reality of personal identity, not the existence of the external world. Enlightenment versus Religion and Philosophy: Unlike religion and philosophy, which construct models and theories about reality, enlightenment is about directly experiencing reality without the interference of mental chatter. Enlightenment is the practice of being reality itself, rather than thinking or hypothesizing about it. Mental Chatter and the Nature of Enlightenment: Theoretical constructs, which are common in religion, philosophy, and science, prevent direct experience of enlightenment. Enlightenment occurs beyond the scope of mind-driven rationalizing and theorizing, in the realm of stillness and non-thinking. Risk of misinterpreting enlightenment: Leo emphasizes the difficulty in discussing enlightenment without it being misunderstood as another belief system, philosophy, or religion. He is meticulous with his language to avoid this since enlightenment is about direct experience rather than theoretical frameworks. Enlightenment vs. nihilism: Leo differentiates enlightenment from nihilism, emphasizing that while both acknowledge the lack of inherent meaning, nihilism, as a philosophy, often leads to despair, whereas enlightenment embraces this lack of meaning as a positive truth without attaching any dark significance to it. Language and stories in conveying enlightenment: He acknowledges the conundrum of using stories and language to convey enlightenment. Though they are flawed mediums, they're necessary tools for pointing towards the truth. The goal is for individuals to read between the lines and pursue the deeper truths hinted at by these stories. Misinterpreting Leo's teachings as another "story": Leo addresses the potential confusion that his teachings are just another narrative by clarifying that his role is not to impose his story as truth but to guide others to experience what he points to, encouraging viewers to look beyond his words to the underlying reality. Achieving strength and power through enlightenment: Leo provides a paradoxical answer to whether enlightenment brings strength and power. It does, by freeing one from mental and emotional limitations, but not in the ego's sense of gaining control or dominance. True strength comes from acknowledging the lack of an intrinsic 'self' and finding inner peace. The illusion of free will in enlightenment: Addressing free will, Leo asserts that the sense of a controlling 'self' is illusory. By examining the origins of one's thoughts in a meditative state, one can realize that the self is merely a construct, and thoughts arise independently of any willful self. Purpose of life and enlightenment: Leo states that life inherently has no point or purpose, which can relieve stress and emotional distress. The yearning for purpose is an ego-driven desire, and recognizing life's purposelessness is an aspect of enlightenment. Life's inherent pointlessness: Reality simply exists, and life is a continuous flow without needing a specific point or purpose. Our search for meaning or purpose is driven by the ego's need for significance, leading to distress when we feel insignificant. Enlightenment reveals that the meaninglessness of life is itself without meaning, which liberates rather than depresses. Misconception of nihilism: The idea of life being meaningless can prompt existential questions like suicide, but this stems from an egoic misunderstanding of enlightenment. Recognizing that there is no "self" to kill or be killed invalidates such reactions, reframing meaninglessness as a freeing truth rather than a negative one. Value of business and family despite pointlessness: On a practical level, both business endeavors and family life are ultimately seen as pointless in the grand cosmic scheme, which is liberating because it allows one to pursue these activities for the inherent joy and experiences they bring, rather than a need for legacy. Enlightenment's effect on emotion: Enlightenment doesn't make a person devoid of emotions. Rather, it enriches emotional life by allowing one to fully experience and appreciate emotions in the present moment without being controlled by them. Monastic lifestyle not required for enlightenment: Enlightenment is about inner realization, not about assuming a particular lifestyle like that of a monk, unless one personally finds it meaningful. Aligning lifestyle choices with inner understanding is emphasized. Ego's contradiction to survival: The ego, being an illusion, is not necessary for survival and can in fact threaten survival through harmful behaviors. Letting go of the ego can lead to improved quality of life and better chances for thriving. Ego's lack of positive qualities: Enlightenment teaches that the ego is completely illusory and does not inherently have positive or negative aspects. Good things in life are not the result of the ego; they can exist without it. Misconceptions about losing the good in life: Enlightenment does not mean losing the valuable aspects of your life like family, relationships, or achievements. These are not directly created by the 'self' or ego, but are aspects of life that exist independently of our perceived control or creation. Enlightenment and motivation: Becoming enlightened does not equate to a loss of motivation or turning into a dispassionate individual. Rather, enlightenment helps eliminate neurotic obligations, enabling a person to pursue authentic desires and more genuinely aligned activities. False motivations and enlightenment: Enlightenment helps to dissolve false motivations driven by societal expectations. If business or success does not resonate with your true self, enlightenment enables you to let go and seek what genuinely fulfills you, possibly even increasing motivation if those pursuits are authentically desired. Inherent nature of motivation: Motivations stem from the body and the unconscious mind rather than from a 'self'. Enlightenment may change motivation, but does not eliminate it, as the feeling of being motivated does not originate from the ego, which enlightenment reveals to be an illusion. Enlightenment and self-actualization: Enlightenment does not negate self-actualization or self-help; it represents the advanced stages of personal development. Lower levels of self-improvement are necessary steps on the journey towards enlightenment. The role of self-help in relation to enlightenment: Depending on one's stage of personal development, self-help may still be relevant. For those dealing with basic life problems, self-help advice is useful. However, as one progresses, the focus might shift towards practices that advance spiritual growth and release of ego. Leo's personal development journey: Leo acknowledges his own continued journey towards enlightenment and the value of self-help in his life, illustrating that while one may understand they are in the 'matrix', practical aspects of self-help remain beneficial until higher levels of enlightenment practice are reached. Engagement with Leo's work: Leo welcomes interaction with his content through comments, likes, and shares, and suggests signing up for his newsletter for further insights on personal development and enlightenment topics. He emphasizes the balance of exploring both basic and advanced stages of personal growth. Riddikulus

You guys clearly understand the concept of being pushed to the limit of exploding after years and decades of trauma but then can't seem to apply this same concept to the Palestinians or for what Hamas did on October 7th which yes - was horrible. Were women truly oppressed under patriarchy - was the feminist movement including the suffragettes in England who vandalised buildings and committed arson justified in fighting for women's right to vote? The level of resistance will be in line with the level of oppression. When describing situations it doesn't have to be the most absolute use of a word to apply as people can be partially metaphorical to make the point. Like when people refer to Gaza as a open air prison - it isn't true in its most literal sense but partially true in the sense that freedom of movement and restrictions exist for Gaza. If we're talking international law then definitions require more precision to be used and applied (genocide, ethnic cleansing for example). Otherwise, certain words are used as analogous to make a point. A revolt or resistance doesn't have to exclusively be only to the most extreme absolute versions of oppression and it doesn't deny the fact that some form of oppression is occurring that needs resisting to. Ethnic cleansing/displacement is still happening and has been for decades - they aren't supposed to resist that? When people are denied a state their denied a certain type of more 'civilised' and accepted means of protection/deterrence - when a group of people don't have a military, navy, air force, intelligence agencies or the backing of a global superpower they need to resort to guerrilla warfare and other unsavoury uncivilised tactics like suicide or terrorist attacks - which they are then gaslighted as savages for and I get it, it is savage - but it doesn't detract from their cause being a just one of equal human rights, self determination and dignity even though they go about it in undignified unjust ways of which they have been left with little choice.

They invaded Russia because there was no other choice. Russia had already plans to invade Germany and it was just a matter of time. Russia already prepared for many years to invade Germany, thats what you will not learn in school because of propaganda. And you should not forget that Germany almost defeated russia so it was not a suicide mission.

There is no hell or heaven after you die. When you die, you die, that's it. If you want to be less depressed - you need to ask who is depressed? Is it you that is depressed or is it your body? It is your body that is depressed. You are not your body. Then who are you? You are not. You do not actually exist. When the body realizes it, then it lets go of it's belief in a seperate self and alongwith it goes your depression (and you). Instead of doing something stupid like committing suicide, if you have a great deathwish... then use all that energy to engage as much as possible in SELF INQUIRY.

@Danioover9000 Lol, all in good faith. True, important we know what each of us means by our definitions or else we're just talking past each other. Doesn't it exist at the expense of never offering the other side a fair sovereign state that when they fight for the dignity of they're subjugated, oppressed and gaslighted for as savage. The military occupied area of West Bank which could possibly be their future state gets continually eaten away at through settlements - that's not a peaceful atmosphere for negotiations. From the river to the sea has different interpretations but in practice they have negotiated and come close to accepting recognised borders (not from the river to the sea) but these deals fell through on other details such as right of return, rights to resources (water), demilitarisation and the issue of still having Israeli security points within their 'sovereign' state. So Israel would always have the means to protect themselves but the Palestinians don't? Likuds charter also mentions from the river to the sea and that no other sovereignty will be recognised within it. On the contrary and in practical reality Israel has implemented that via military occupation and settlement expansion in the West Bank and now clearing out Gaza - that's actually from the river to the sea in practice and not just in ink. Palestinians have one of the highest literacy rates in the Arab world. West Bank is littered with check points and trouble for kids on the way to school not to mention delays and clashes which obviously restrict access - including permits restricting development of enough schools. I guess they are also preoccupied with securing their survival before higher aspirations of higher education like in Gaza where schools are routinely destroyed or damaged through periodic operations which btw the current destruction of schools only shifts these kids into what will probably come to be make shift camps where Hamas can more easily recruit motivated vengeful kids who've had loved ones die. Couldn't the October 7th atrocity likewise be provoked by past atrocities done to Palestinians. Just by the numbers alone they have suffered far more deaths than Israeli's and much more discrimination - this can never justify a genocide however and each life matters besides the numbers. The elderly politicians themselves aren't fighting yet it's 'old men who plan for wars that young men die for'. It is admirable of Israeli society to create a sense of national pride and unity (as long as that doesn't manifest in particularly ugly ethno-nationalistic ways) and the meaning that comes with that. 'Man dies for fiction more so than facts' - we are dreaming creatures that die more readily for symbols we attribute meaning to (a religion, a flag, a idea) The centre of gravity has moved much more right blurring the middle and aligning the society especially when it comes to this war and after October 7th. The polls showing Netanyahu popularity plummeting is good at least, though other troubling polls show over 75% believe in Gazan's leaving Gaza being a good idea or majority of Jews (80%) not caring for how much suffering Palestinians incur in the next phases of fighting: True they aren't oppressed to the level of a Warsaw ghetto or slaves and its silly of people to equate Israeli's to the Nazi's also. Again with how words are used it doesn't have to be the most absolute use of a word to apply as people can describe situations in metaphorical ways like when David Cameron called Gaza an open air prison in the past which isn't true in its most literal sense but partially true in the sense of freedom of movement and restrictions. If we're talking international law then definitions require more precision to be used and applied (genocide, ethnic cleansing for example). Otherwise, certain words are used as analogous to make a point. A revolt or resistance doesn't have to exclusively be only to the most extreme absolute versions of oppression and it doesn't deny the fact that some form of oppression is occurring that needs resisting and protesting to. Ethnic cleansing/displacement is still happening whether they live in a nice house or not - maybe it's worse if a family had a big house with a nice garden in West Bank which they get dispossessed of because their loss is greater - nonetheless a home is a home whether big or small. As for Gaza - they exercised their freewill and democracy which was overseen by 3rd parties and deemed a fair election but they made the mistake of using their freewill to choose the wrong party not as sympathetic to Israel/the West. When people are denied a state their denied a certain type of more civilised and accepted means of protection/deterrence - when a group doesn't have a military, navy, air force, tank units, intelligence agencies or the backing of a global superpower they need to resort to guerrilla warfare and other unsavoury uncivilised tactics for offence and defence like suicide or terrorist attacks - which they are then gaslighted as savages for and I get it, it is savage - but it doesn't detract from their cause being a just one of equal human rights, self determination and dignity even though they go about it in undignified unjust ways of which they have been left with little choice.

If we are all going to god ,why the suffering then why should i bear the shit of other people. Why work hard Why socialize , why do anything

I see it in another way, A country that been tortured by a terror organization that traumatized thousands of children in shelters since 2000, murdered hundrets of Israelis in suicide bombing when their fellows refused any peace suggestion you can think of, causing Israel to do countless operations when hiding, using and disguising to civilians making the world put the pressure on the wrong side drawing Israel as an opressor when it doesn't deserve this, and in the end kills, rape, butches and kidnapp 1600 Israelis. Thats why Israel has been exploded. The moralizers can get down their mountain and visit here for couple of days or stay quiet. Enough is enough. Israel response might have flaws tactically but absolutely and utterly understandable to me.

@zazen Why they moved to the right? Because of the suicide bombing. Before that, half of the Israelis were highly into the negotiations and peace.

This Aella Girl Newsletters are very good food for thinking about different perspectives the last one was this one below. As a Child who was spanked by my parents and even Grandparents I made me think that this Valuable info came to late: I would break more windows if I could go back in time A Disobedience Guide for Children how to make your parents stop hurting you AELLA - DEC 31 This post is not by me. It was made across some comments in a private facebook group, and I’ve collected it here. The authors requested to remain anonymous. I’ve very lightly edited it for readability/post format. Author #1 I've thought about rebellion against my parents' violence far too much. (I have intrusive thoughts about it.) When I was 15, I finally hit my mother back, and then she never hit me again. That's a comforting memory, but I wish I'd done it much earlier. What I didn't realize back then is that sometimes violence can be deterred not because you can outright win a conflict, but because it could be more costly than the victory is worth. I wish I'd fought harder and smarter, earlier. Adults are physically stronger, but they have so much more to lose. Even a 4-year-old can break a window. It would have been miserable in the short term, my parents would have yelled and threatened and punished, but I think it'd have only taken two or three windows before they never hit a child again. I know this only works when your parents are paper tigers. My parents' violence was relatively limited, they had some internal divisions over it, and they didn't have an ideology or community that supported it. I hate that I believed the mirage for so long. If I'd solved it sooner, it might have set the family on a much better track. One of my brothers killed himself, another died in a drug-overdose-or-was-it-suicide. I doubt my parents see it this way, but I mostly blame them. I wasn't strong as a child. It was only as an adult I realized how good it is to be strong, and decided to train in strength and combat. I appreciate my unearned testosterone. Upgrade to paid Author #2 It'd have only taken two or three windows before they never hit a child again I'm thinking about this with my own dad, who also used violence (and wasn't very committed to it / regretted it later), and man, this still feels pretty dangerous to me from a kid perspective. Like, maybe they stop hitting you but now you are a child with "behavior problems" and they don't trust you anymore and they are "worried about you" so they make sure you're always supervised and you have no privacy and maybe you can escalate again but they can escalate as far as institutionalizing you. I wanted my dad to leave me alone more to do my own thing, and he had complete (legally sanctioned) control over my freedom, so the best way to get more privacy and freedom was to capitulate to him and be thought of as a "good child", I think? (I also think you would hate this framing but I'm actually not sure how to reconcile that with my model of what would have happened if I'd intentionally broken windows as a child) (I do wish I'd told him not to hit me every time he did, and stayed obviously hurt/mad at him for longer each time, I think that would have helped him feel more like it wasn't an acceptable thing to do, given that he was already somewhat conflicted about it) Author #1 (The following is about my situation, maybe some others, but I doubt it applies to all situations) I was also the "good child", feigning placidity and affection until my sharp left turn. With finesse, I think the "good child" reputation can be complementary to a violent anti-violence strategy. After I hit my mother back, she was, if anything, a little nicer to me for a few days. Which is odd—you'd think she might at least try being cold. (btw it certainly wasn't fear; she definitely knew that I'd only hit her in self-defense, that I never initiated violence with anyone, and that I was principled in general.) I think it was a few things, several of them related to me being a "good child": -She wanted me to like her. Me hitting her back indicated that perhaps I *didn't* like her. -She wanted me to want her to like me. Me hitting her back indicated that I cared less for her opinion than she thought. -She wanted me to still be the "good child", who was never in trouble, whose academic and musical accomplishments reflected well on her, who made her look good to her friends. If she behaved consistently with that, perhaps it would still be true. -She wanted it not to have happened, not to be real, for everything to go back to normal. One thing I didn't understand when I was young, when parents seemed so powerful, was that parents are overwhelmed like everyone else and would much rather not have more problems. Is your formerly "good child" now a "problem child"? You don't have time for that. Please let it not be true. (I'm sure there are potential pitfalls. People might ignore some problems when they can, but they'll find time/energy for dominance challenges from those they consider beneath them. Gotta avoid that framing.) Some things that are on your side (for some, hopefully most, parents): -Their pride: they want to show you off to their friends. They want to say "my child is top in their class, won the music competition, and look at this cute Father's Day card they made". -Their shame: they don't want to say "my child dislikes me, breaks windows, tells everyone I assault them, is a problem child". -They want happy family times, Christmases and birthdays, teaching you to ride a bike or drive a car, building a snowman, playing Monopoly. They're trying (sometimes incompetently) to steer the family situation toward that. -Punishment is costly: Supervision costs time or money, involving therapists and social workers costs money and pride, it all costs more of your child's goodwill. So you're 4, or 8, or 12, and you break a window and tell them you'll do it again if they assault you again. They're shocked, this can't happen, the world is awry. They ban you from TV or computer or whatever. Maybe they test it again a month later, and you break another window. Maybe they call the police to try to scare you (my parents tried this a couple of times against my brother when things got especially violent). Of course the police will do nothing of consequence. If they even turn up, they'll sternly tell you that it's illegal to break windows, maybe bluff or bluster about jail, and leave. They hit you again, you break another window, and they send their problem child to a psychologist for an oppositional defiant disorder diagnosis. In this case, you tell the psychologist this: "I know that the law doesn't take child assault seriously, but I will do whatever it takes to be safe in my home. I am not a problem child. Here's my most recent report card, see how my teachers all love me, here's the phone number for the school, call and ask if I'm ever in trouble. This isn't about a personality disorder, this is about child assault. But I'm open to other solutions. If I require safety and my parents require violence, then we aren't compatible. Can you refer me to the foster care system? You don't think it's warranted? Then I'll make my own inquiries." (Foster care can be a bluff if you want. Your parent/s would be ashamed if anyone even heard you were seeking foster care, and they'd fear that their long-term relationship with you is in doubt.) So you're theoretically a problem child. They still don't want their windows broken. Next time they want to hit you, they hesitate. And eventually it's six or twelve months later, they haven't hit you and you haven't broken any windows, you got an A in math or something, maybe you're back to good child, can it be true? They never need to find out it's not, if they never hit you again. Other strategies might work. Go to their workplace, tap a glass until you have everyone's attention, and tell them all that your parent assaulted you last night, and could everyone please tell them not to attack children. A lot of people would want to avoid the shame of that occurring again. Run away for a couple of days. I've heard of parents saying that their child being missing is the most scared they've ever been. Depending on the parent, that might be a cost they don't want to pay again. Call the police, even if the assault didn't cause a visible injury. The police might not take an assault that leaves no marks seriously, might tell you not to call again about normal parental assault (call again anyway), but it'll be very embarrassing and memorable for the assaulter. And maybe it did cause a visible injury. (The police will probably not press charges the first time if you change your mind and stop cooperating. Or if your parent does get charged, well, it's dangerous to assault people.) The police report may help protect you from any institutionalized problem child stuff your parents try later. An unarmed 4-year-old can't fight back usefully, but even a 10-year-old can bite and can try to eye-gouge, if they can withstand the pain of the fight. The adult will surely win, but if the child always fights back with extreme viciousness, it may deter the next attack. (You don't have to actually gouge out their eye, you just have to make it look like you're trying to. And if your parent does get injured, well, it's dangerous to assault people.) I suspect you can still keep the "good child" reputation even if you do this. "My child is gentle and good in general, except they go fucking crazy when physically attacked, strong primal instinct I guess" is a plausible thing to think imo. he had complete (legally sanctioned) control over my freedom While I agree that a parent can cause a lot of trouble for you and it's much easier to be regarded as the good child, I think you still overestimate their power, especially compared to yours. If they devoted their life to ruining yours, they'd probably succeed. If you devoted your life to ruining theirs, you'd probably succeed. You both have horrific options, and you're both afraid of the other's escalation. (Or maybe they're not afraid, but you can make them afraid.) You worry about how they'd feel if you did something unimaginable, some trauma they'd never forget, like you embarrassed them so badly at work that they switched jobs, or you called the police and there was some protracted CPS investigation, or they have a scar from a fight. Fine! The stakes are no lower for you. It's decades later and we're still talking about what they did, maybe still having the nightmares. And in some sense, your victory is inevitable. Who's the more needy in your relationship now? Of course parents differ, but I think in many cases you can do unthinkable things and your parents still end up wanting you to like them and wanting to think well of you. I skimmed the book by the mother of one of the Columbine shooters (not recommended, at least not at face value) and she's desperately clinging to the idea of her "sweet, beloved child" led astray by the other shooter, recalling the time he cared for her when she was sick, and the way he made the family laugh at dinner. I don't think the legal sanction aspect is very powerful. Police hate domestic violence calls, social workers are overworked and underpaid, and the justice system has very few options for punishing children. They won't imprison you for breaking your parent's window, and they can't sue you. As in so many things, rules aren't really rules, they're just risks and costs, if even that. And it's all unbearably embarrassing, calling the police or whoever after assaulting you. They don't want to do it. They'd rather threaten to do it, bluffing that you'll not call them on it and demonstrate that authorities will do nothing that matters. (Unless you did actually do something the police might care about. Maybe you go as far as juvenile court. Super embarrassing for the parent to have a child go to juvenile court though! They'd probably rather threaten it than do it. Especially if they're in the witness stand explaining that yes, technically they did hit you first but what you did was worse.) (Aella’s note: I think adults could pretty successfully explain that no, it was a ‘spanking’ or whatever, and your kid is being dramatic, in a way that would not be embarrassing for them. I’ve known adults who were very careful to ensure that their physical punishments caused the maximum possible pain without any visible injuries, so they wouldn’t risk legal trouble. I generally don’t endorse lying, but giving yourself a physical injury to blame on your parents at as evidence might be a viable strategy here, might embarrass your parents more, and is something that’s hard for them to physically prevent you doing to yourself.) So much authority over children is smoke and mirrors. Schools make threats about your "permanent record". Parents count to 3 without saying what happens at 3. Of course there's a few things they can actually do, like withhold money or computer access or internet or transport, and that'll hurt (maybe immensely) in the short term. (Though, they're afraid to use all of their real options, because then they'd have no more leverage at all.) But eventually it'll be months since they last hit you, and they want to be a happy family again. From another angle: what is the limit of what is possible for a child? Joan of Arc led an army at 17. Fred Burnham became a scout in the Apache Wars at age 14. John King became a pirate at age 10. In this fantasy of going back in time with the knowledge and skills I have now, one can probably find a way to apply cunning and charisma to stop parental assault.

The following is a copy and pasted YT comment from a Rupert Spira video. He was speaking about Universal Love. "Love is the Experience of the Unity of Being" is the title of the video. This comment caught my attention and I would like to hear your thoughts on this. I could feel the pain in the words while reading this and it actually made me very emotional. There have been numerous forum users who have spoken about Consciousness in this fashion and I think it is a very important subject to address because so many of us feel this way. I don't think it is addressed enough so we can truly understand this part of Reality and why it exists - apparent or not. It's a pretty dark comment but this is an example of how a lot of people feel that's why I'm sharing it with the intention of understanding why this is so. 2 days ago (edited) It is not like that. It's easy to be fooled by words that please the conditioned ears. Here's Rupert talking about love and oneness, while baby fawns are being torn apart, eaten alive by predators, screaming in pain from the top of their lungs to absolutely no avail, while the mother gazelles helplessly watch in distress from a distance. A woman forced to watch her daughter being brutally raped and killed by the invading soldiers, followed by the execution of her husband and her two sons. The woman lost her mind, threw herself over a bridge and committed suicide. What would Rupert tell the baby fawns and the mother gazelles, if they ask why? Because, that was exactly the question, the woman asked before ending her life. WHY? Will Rupert tell them, oh, don't suffer, because your true nature is all happiness, but, somehow, you decided to forget your happiness nature in exchange for this experience? Really? If this is what you believe, then, not are you only insulting their sufferings, but, you're actually killing them twice. It's better you say nothing than to deceive yourself twice. Oh, How long are we going to deceive ourselves ? Rather, how much longer will consciousness deceive Itself? If he truly believes that it is consciouness and consciouness Alone that is doing the whole show, then, it calls for the question "WHY" ? Which will inevitably invite self introspection. Consciousness needs to introspect itself as to why it has all these itches and impulses to manifest, rather than, continuing to indulge itself, in all kinds of self deceiving, self aggrandizing, schizophrenic, narcissistic self praises and worships like a dictator. This is a WRONG understanding of Existence. These insane self deceiving understandings are coming from old religious and spiritual ideologies and beliefs, founded upon self ignorance and self dishonesty. Existence is not all good, all loving, all peace or all happiness. Existence is not like that. It has never been like that and cannot be like that. It's a very self ignorant and self dishonest belief ,only , to perpetuate further self deception. Just like the great honest philosopher put it. " Every history of life is the history of suffering ". The question is always, Why? Religious or spiritual ideologies have always offered distorted ,ignorant, childish and dishonest answers due to ignorance and dishonesty. Saying God and the Devil, or, consciouness and mind, finite mind or ego, can only lead oneself into further self deception. Just as you do not get something from nothing, You do not get sufferings from all happiness, or, all love. What is never within, does not and cannot manifest as without. Consciouness can only manifest what is within. No violence within, no violence without. No suffering within, no suffering without. All the endless pains and sufferings are the itches and impulses within consciouness, that, found its way to manifest. No matter what, You simply do not get apple juice from oranges. No matter how you twist, turn and distort. Consciousness has to ask itself by introspecting as to why it has all these itches and impulses to manifest ,which are experienced as endless pains, tortures and sufferings in what we call " Life ". There's no another way for consciouness to liberate itself from its Own desires, itches and impulses other than self introspection. It is consciouness that gets liberated from its Own itches and impulses, no one else! It has to face its own darkness in its Own Psyche, rather than go on to further deceive Itself playing childish, self praise and self worship games. While it indulges in all kinds of self deceiving ganes, countless life forms are being eaten alive and go on suffering, at this very moment, and, every moment,crying out and screaming in pain from the top of their lungs to absolutely no avail. Do we not hear their screams? Or, is consciouness too busy deceiving Itself , boasting and bragging how happy , peaceful and loving it is? Eternity means absolutely nothing in self deception, other than, condemning itself to an eternal damnation as the history of life shows. One can NEVER be too careful when it comes to the Absolute True Nature of oneself or Existence as Is in Itself.