Truth Addict

@remember The shift in consciousness between tier one and tier two is the shift between being soppy and naive and being realistic and integral. The further one develops, the more integrated they get.

I don't know. And I don't think it's possible to know. God doesn't have to be rational. If I say because it's infinite love, then the question arises: why is it infinite love? And so on we go back to strange loops and the mazes of the mind. Any answer to the question "why?" only begs more questions. The ultimate answer is that I don't know and that I don't need to know. The question "why?" implies that God has a purpose, and if God has a purpose, that implies that God is incomplete. If I were to give my best shot at answering the question, then I would say that it's because of me, everything is the way that it is for me to be who I am, and to live this story. In other words, if God has a missing piece, then that piece is me.

The insight that I keep getting is that it is what it is, and whatever I believe becomes reality.

The most important lesson is that there's nothing important.

Yeah. Don't act realised while you're still not. When I am deeply immersed, those questions don't make any sense at all.

No, it's not.

That's pretty damn accurate! The inevitable journey of ignorance!

Interesting. What I meant though was that love at stage Green does not go beyond 'the green'. The circle of concerns for someone at stage Green is limited to 'more life for all', it's basically a form of cancer so to speak. Stage Green people value life so much that they exclude death and don't integrate it. They just want more life. The difference between them and the lower stages is that they don't only care about their own lives, but they care about others' lives as well. As you might see, that's a big problem of utopian pipe dreams.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1Is16stxA0 (Not sure why the video wasn't allowed except in a link form). This guy has a lot to offer. He's going to be my teacher for this new chapter of my life. I like his vibe and energy and body language. Joseph, if you're reading this, I'm glad that you have finally started working on this project. I'm eager to see how and where it goes. Bless.

I would say balance is yet another important factor in growth. And I don't mean that you should apply balance. I mean it will apply you! ? Good stuff by the way. Thanks for sharing.

Yes! Combine the two answers together, and see what happens.

@Leo Gura What is the practical use of using the Love aspect in teaching non-duality? I see a lot of misunderstanding and confusion among people here on the forum. My biggest disappointment is that Love is being mostly confused with stage Green hippie love. That's crucial. I think there lies the problem for why it's so misunderstood. Stage Green love is probably the highest form they can identify with. Maybe you could benefit from Spiral Dynamics in your future videos. Precisely emphasising stage Yellow love, and stage Turqoise love. I think that would be a good approach that would help elevate a lot of people.

?

@Nahm Awesome! ?❤️

I like her a lot. But she can't see me. ???

Freedom is Power. And Power is Freedom. Good day to you too. It was nice talking to you. ?

The point is freedom. Freedom is what I'm trying to communicate. In other words, there's no point at all. Well, that's just your opinion. It's not the truth. Because how do you know? Try to answer without thoughts. What is 'grounding'? How do things get 'grounded' inside of each other? If you cannot see how fragile the linguistic construct that you're using, then reflect again. You said in one of your posts that understanding Truth has no end, or something like that. Even though I don't quite agree with that, but you might want to keep an open mind. More mental constructs. There are no fallacies to commit. Yes. I can clearly see that. I hope you can too in the same way that I do i.e. Infinite Intelligence. It seems to me like you're still using thought.

Then you'll keep making the same epistemological mistake forever. You're creating a duality between freedom and power, while they're one and the same. All freedom is also grounded in power. Without power there would be no freedom. You asked me earlier to try and describe Truth, and I refused. That's because I saw you repeatedly falling into the trap of trying to convey Truth with language, and it's a shame to me if I make the same mistake. Everything I say is metaphorical and a pointer. I don't think that any perspective is the absolute truth, I'm free from perspectives' captivity. I simply refuse to be under the spell of thoughts. It's your problem if you are/think otherwise. You need to learn how to distinguish pointers from the truth. The reason why it seems like solipsism to you is probably because you're still a captive to your thoughts. Thoughts are empty, only you can fill them with meaning. Solipsism is a distinct mental contrust that you're probably afraid of for some reason. And even though solipsism isn't the truth, you're doing yourself a disservice by rejecting it entirely. Every perspective has its pros and cons. You need to learn how to use them instead of them using you. You need to learn how to integrate the pros and leave out the cons. If you came here and said the same thing that I said, (i.e. There's no relative world. The relative is absolute), I would negate it with an opposite perspective that I'd come up with. My main aim is to release others from paradigms. Not to make them buy into one. I would always try to find the weakest link in one's reasoning and then show them how groundless they are. That's how you crack open your paradigm locks. So, no. It isn't that there's actually a relative world, nor an absolute world. Those are but mental constructs. Look beyond that. More mental constructs. I'm not bound by any of them anymore. Whatever you think becomes true. @Phoenixx I replied to you in replying to Tsuki. See above. @Nahm Nice! Out of popcorn? ? Because you don't have the power to lock it.

I'm having fun. Please don't. Good. Because you didn't say that earlier. You kept on denying power until now. See: Freedom is Power. Just like God is Love. They're all one and the same. Again, power is just one facet of God. I was going to use this example in my earlier posts. But I thought it wouldn't be appropriate. I thought it might trigger you. Not necessarily. The freedom you're referring to here is relative, unlike the one you referred to earlier. The underlying incentive is to find a common ground from which we can work together towards the same goals, whether that happens through brainwashing or through civilian conversations. Arguing is a form of using power to create more power. Whether it's conscious or not. There is no relative world. The relative is the absolute. There's something deeper that you're still missing, which is that you don't need a paradigm in order for you to be convinced of feeding yourself. All paradigms are just maps. But when you have the territory, all maps become optional. You don't really need thought in order to survive. Thought might often be required to get you to survival, but you (God/devil) are the one who is doing the survival. Whatever you say.

Just because you can't see it yet doesn't invalidate it. Saying that the world is what it is does not remove power as the core dynamic of the design. You can't have it both ways. Either say the world is what it is and stop talking about hierarchies. Or, if you want to talk about hierarchies, then you have to accept the validity of other related terms, such as power. The world is what it is, means that there's nothing more to understand. Yet, you keep trying to understand the world, but only how you like it to be. I'm not sure why you dislike the term power. It's as accurate of a description as it can get. Maybe try to stop seeing power as a bad thing and consider the possibility that it's a necessity. Power is just another facet of the absolute. Sugar-coat it however you want. There cannot be a shepherd without power. Consider the opposite possibility of preserving your active attitude towards life and emphasising your human spirit, which is bound to your ego (its fragility). I told you that I've transcended that duality. You're free to not believe me. Maybe you should focus more on your own ego instead of mine? I don't. And I'm not a brute. Maybe you're just afraid of facing that brutal truth. I don't agree. But okay, because as you may see, that's just a pointer.

You don't need to agree with me. No problem. I didn't claim otherwise. What makes you think so? That's a better example, but it still falls under the same category, a power based relationship. First of all, me or my aunt owning the dog?! Regardless of how silly that concept of ownership is, isn't it a power based dynamic? If dogs were more powerful/smarter than us humans, they would probably end up owning us. You can't say I own something without first having power over it. Feeling lonely is not a noble reason, the dog does not care about fulfilling my desire for connection. I am literally using him for that purpose because I am stronger than him. Second, the 'severe mistreatment' was an act of forcing power. It doesn't have to be intended. Power does not necessarily have to be applied with intent. In fact, in most cases, it's applied unconsciously. Again, if it wasn't for my power/his weakness, I might have end up being his human. Precisely because there's nothing to talk about. All pointers are just games for the ego. Why?

Here's a list for the things I know about you: You're male. You're married. You're Polish. You have multiple journals on this forum. You took LSD last month or so, and realised some things. Assuming that I know more than that requires me giving you a lot of attention. It's kind of narcissistic to think so, don't you think? You're obviously not the most important person in my life. Because if I want to be completely honest, I can't. It's not possible. I'm simply using the neti-neti with you. Not denying your stories, and not hiding behind smoke screens. No sir. ? That's a funny example. You already mentioned one way of how power is used in that hierarchy. But I will tell you exactly how power is the basis of that dynamic: First of all, like you said, a dog isn't conscious that it can kill me because it has been raised in captivity. But what is raising dogs in captivity but forcing power? That's the core of the dynamic, and it's completely based on power. Second, no. I don't teach the dog out of concern for his safety. That's just a story that people like to tell themselves and others, a nice cover they put on a 'zombies' magazine, to remain asleep. Thus, tricking the dog, themselves, and other people. But not me, haha ? I can easily see through their bullshit. The real motives behind having a dog and teaching him, etc... basically converge at preserving a 'status quo' among other people (stage Orange), or at living in the story of being a caring and a loving person (Blue or Green). Both of which, boil down to gaining more power in order to climb up the hierarchy. That's how the ego works, and that's how sneaky it is. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. There's also the ego at stage Yellow and beyond, but it's more tricky and slippery. Believe it or not. You don't need to worry about what paradigm you operate from, as long as you are aware of it. What I'm talking about goes beyond disidentification from negative emotions, way way beyond. It transcends the duality of passive vs. active effort.