-
Content count
356 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Brandon Nankivell
-
I haven't crossed anyone that I feel what would be receptive enough so it hasn't crossed my mind
-
Brandon Nankivell replied to blessedlion1993's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Digital nomad ey? -
Brandon Nankivell replied to Terell Kirby's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
@being_frank_yang @thatbeyondduality @nargis.no.thing Nahm Anna Brown -
Brandon Nankivell replied to BipolarGrowth's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Agreed. -
Love. I've glimpsed enough to see that it's worth it, even though things are tough right now.
-
Brandon Nankivell replied to MarkusSweden's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I've read 27 Osho books in the last 12 months (Ikr, fan boi much?) - From what I recall, the main points about food: Osho is vegetarian Osho supports vegetarianism and says the future enlightened people will all not eat meat (He mentions some enlightened figures in the past who would eat fish etc) Osho doesn't eat all that much Osho isn't doesn't advocate fasting (only when necessary, to say, balance out a day where you over-eat) Because it isn't truly conducive to raising consciousness, it gives a fake high (I'm talking long fasts, 7 days plus etc) Osho says what you eat is not nearly as important as cultivating awareness when it comes to awakening I haven't come across him saying anything about a superfood, nor do I get the impression he ever would have Sidenote: Sadhguru has also blanketly said "Listen to your body" when it comes to eating food. -
+1
-
If you're looking for honesty, it's time to evict Owen and most of RSD from taking up your real estate .
-
Brandon Nankivell replied to Brandon Nankivell's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
-
Brandon Nankivell posted a topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
PT Mistlberger has decades of experience as doing the work and from what I can tell, is very spiritually mature. One of his big points of emphasis is monks / sages etc... traditionally spend solitary lives, but he strongly encourages being in the world and to continuously be 'in relationship' with others, as this can help bring out character blind-spots and challenge you to develop them etc. In my current stage of development (2 big first awakenings this year: 1,000 on-the-dial awakening + kensho-style laughing buddha "Ah! This is it! All this time..."), it makes sense to me to exit the crazy world of social relations (in a men's support group right now but see it as full of distractions). Mistlerberger seems to imply staying in the social world whilst also doing the work. In my experience, this doesn't seem to be working well. Distraction central! Ideas! Beliefs! Expectations! Temptations! Party Invites! Madness! I see the value in deepening the awakenings without distractions, especially social ones. Maybe this takes a few years. Then slowly re-integrating into the social world, assuming there is a purpose behind it (like pursuing a big awesome business or project that requires social interaction). Thoughts? -
Basic: Why Meditate: Working With Thoughts and Emotions by Matthieu Ricard Advanced: The Book of Not Knowing by Peter Ralston
-
Or rather to simply commit to the Truth at all costs, and the other stuff to come as a by-product. I recall Leo mentioning something like this isn't really a purpose but a potent supplement to your human experience - something like that. Or like what Ralston mentions - You awaken to certain degrees, then you do the transformation work, continue to live in the world etc. Is it worth revising my life purpose even though it drives me and gets me excited?
-
Brandon Nankivell posted a topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I was contemplating what time and space is today. TIME It got super weird. It seems to me time and space are no more than a sensation occurring in the now. With eyes closed, I would ask myself how I was able to estimate between how 'about 1 hour' and about '10 minutes' and about '6 seconds' had passed. I noticed with the 6 seconds passing, I could feel that about 6 seconds had passed based on the sound of the nearby bus engine, gradually fading as it drove away. I have memories of vehicles and their sounds with estimates I had made without really realizing it. I also noticed the subtle vibrations of the bus engine coming through the air/ground into my body which gave another marker to help estimate the 6 seconds passing. It started getting weirder when I questioned why time is represented by numbers which are represented by shapes and sounds. What makes 6 seconds different to 6 minutes? I asked myself. I ended back to realizing that time seem to be related to a sensation occurring, or a group of sensations that trigger each other based on which sensation occurs first. I could hear the sound of a bus, see a bus moving in my visual field, and feel the vibrations of the bus in my body - seemingly all at the same time. And it's like a lightning-fast, assumption is made about how much time has passed. The final thought is 'About X time has passed'. But then I started wondering how the hell the sound of the bus was able to drag out, for lack of better words. To hear the volume of the bus gradually go down... If time doesn't exist the way we usually know it, then I entertained the idea of some kind of hyper fast 'time-slice' of each degradation of volume, revealing itself as an experience of a sensation in the timeless now, but that sensation would be a slightly different sensation, with all these sensations happening in a lightning fast string, much like how video is made - a string of slightly different images projected at lightning fast speed to give the illusion of video. But that still seems to imply a past and a future. I'm struggling to see how things can appear to change without a past and future. If we were really in a timeless now, then we wouldn't notice a before or after. Like in the case of the sound of the sound of the bus seeming to decrease, it wouldn't be possible to perceive this without a past and future. If we listened to the sound of the bus in a timeless now, then we probably wouldn't hear the decrease in sound, because perception of a decrease in sound requires the past memory compared to the current experience to make the contrast - does that make sense? So in this normal dual world / normal state of consciousness, it's impossible to experience the timeless now. It has to be an illusion. ... But hang on a minute. It seems you can only have one thought at a time. And, it's like there's thoughts that trigger other thoughts to ultimately conclude that 'X time has passed'. And each thought happens now. So... Maybe there is just now. F***. Strange world. SPACE ***This one more of an after-the-fact intellectual reflection, the actual contemplation was more drawn out and based on 'feeling things out' for extended durations*** At the bus station, sitting on a chair, eyes closed. Determined that I knew what space was based on 2 main things: Being able to move my hand through the wind in front of me, and also feel the muscle pressure - and estimate based on that how much 'my hand' had moved So I guess space is a muscular and/or kinesthetic sensation Or a thought based on both Or a thought based on a collection of past memories of the sensations and what I've assigned as a certain amount of space, as represented by numerics, e.g. "About 25cm away from my body" If I were to determine space on what I see in the visual field, then I'm going off memories of how much space, representend numerically, there is based how much space distinct phenomena is taking up in the visual field, relative to other distinct phenomena (e.g. how big is the bus compared to the road compared to the tree compared to my body compared to the nearby building compared to etc... body seems to be the 'anchor' since it doesn't seem to change in size because my eyes are always in the same place in the skull) Am aware that my mind is making disinctions in the visual field and that it is actually all the same, although it doesn't appear that way unless in deeper states of consciousness / meditation So space is just based on distinctions of the mind? Which makes space what... a concept based on distinctions of the mind. The illusion of space is useful however, assuming the goal is to stay alive, do certain things etc. So is space just being created as I seemingly walk around to different places? Are these places being created as they enter my visual field? But hang on! What if I shut my eyes and walk along a beach, and then re-open them about 10 minutes later? I will still assume I have walked some distance which implies space, and I'd be estimating that based of a memory ocurring in the now Fuuuuck So, space, like time, is just a sensation in the now And I'm beginning to think every single memory / sensation that ocurrs in the now is unique to every other one that has seemingly been experienced. How could it possibly be the exact same? What is it exactly that makes each experienced sensation just a little unique, if I am correct that each sensation is unique (even if by a tiny-tiny-tiny bit) It's like there's some divine fucking intelligence going on that is pretty clever or something! I couldn't help remember the quote that says something like, "The path is created and destroyed as you walk it" There is no beginning, and no end - It somehow makes sense, yet not at all Where is a thought located? Above where I feel my head is? That's what it feels like Or inside my body somewhere This is weirrrrd - It doesn't seem to be in this physical space, so how can I say it appears relative to somewhere I just described, like above my head? It's like thoughts appear in another dimension -
Wow. Very interesting.
-
-
Brandon Nankivell posted a topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I've found compliments and non-constructive criticism affecting me less in the last 12 months. When somebody gives me a compliment, I politely acknowledge it but it doesn't have much value as it used to since some awakening experiences. Hearing compliments however still has a slight pull that I don't feel is beneficial to consciousness development. I'm part of a Men's self-improvement group and an activity is to give another man a compliment. I have a sense that the compliment sharing isn't benefiting other men in their conscious development, nor mine. Perhaps harmful, further pumping up the ego. However, even if I don't see much value in it myself, perhaps giving a genuine compiment may be what helps another man in a tough situation to keep moving forward during a time of depression/anxiety and ultimately serves as a leap-pad into motion where the consciousness work can then be focused on. In this situation, are compliments beneficial or detrimental to the group, assuming the goal is for everybody to become more conscious? -
Brandon Nankivell replied to Synnergy's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
https://giphy.com/explore/michael-jackson-popcorn -
Have had multiple awakenings. Experience lots of inner peace. I eat meat.
-
Brandon Nankivell replied to Vido's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
How to best map it? -
Brandon Nankivell posted a topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Since 2 recent awakenings in the last few months + a gradual unfolding of inner peace over the last 12 months, I've noticed dream activity increase. Especially since the most recent awakening. My mind has been pretty relaxed lately. Spending hours outside in nature sitting and doing nothing. Walking sometimes. It seems as if the ego is attempting to fight for its survival by ramping up dream activity. Coincidence? Or normal? -
My cringe video turned into a YouTube career in which I work a couple hours a week. Post it! Then keep optimizing.
-
Great way to grow in my experience. Did the digital nomad thing for 1.5 years on and off. Taught me that living in an apartment for $80 in Thailand for the rest of your life isn't as good as I thought it was It was awesome at the time though, because that's what I wanted. Made friends that I still have today, and valuable connections. Crazy experiences. Learned how to be independent. Going broke overseas was a big wake-up call. Learned much about stress and asking for help. Dating experience greatly increased. Learned the basics of spanish. Learned street smarts and the value of reading people. At some point though it does indeed decline in terms of overall ROI in your life. Mark Manson mentions this. After you've been to enough countries, it all becomes the same. You'll also realize you can't establish roots anywhere and may eventually yearn for that like most. But for 1-2 years I think it's a high growth activity.
-
Brandon Nankivell replied to evolving55555's topic in Life Purpose, Career, Entrepreneurship, Finance
+1 -
Where do you think you could start?
-
I concur with @Nahm 's comment on understanding the emotion instead of coping with it. Best wishes to you for meeting kinder people.