Faceless

I understand my friend. Ask yourself, If you wouldn’t have ever read any book and accumulated any cultural and traditional knowledge where would you be? Can one know emptiness, nothingness? I’m not calling anyone out. I’m simply suggesting exploring yourself without anothers point of view. Not to depend on any second hand content. This is reasonable is it not? It’s only in self understanding and reflection that one is unbound by the movement of time. No authority being personal or collective leads to actual emptiness. Do you see what I mean by emptying conditioned consciousness? To end all conditioned movement and content of the self. Which means the cessation of the psychological accumulation of self and its conditioned responses. To be religiously attentive to the movement of thought. And in that not carry over past experience “knowledge” and psychological memory of the i and it’s conditioned responses to the dynamic movement of the now.

Second hand knowledge my friend. Emptiness is not about accumulation. When you speak of awareness you are referring to things you have read that have been passed down through the stream of thought. The “You” is then bound by experience. This is has nothing to do with nothingness/emptiness. It’s to die to the old, to the self/thought/experience, actually. Not to accumulate a bunch of conceptualizations that thought/self/experience has put together and grasps/clings to. Emtpy, don’t add and perpetuate the conditioned consciousness. Unless you want to of course?

Indeed, It is only in this mechanism of thought that we have developed a capacity to depend on psychological time to bring about contentment in daily life.

As long as this movement of self “idea” seeks psychological security in the idea of happiness there will be unhappiness. An idea seeking psychological security in an idea??‍♂️ In this one is only creating inner turmoil and disorder. Stick with the fact of what is, and in that the game opposites will not create the ups and downs that so many get caught up in there life. To stay with what is and not resist what is, will make for a much more stable ride in life. Don’t seek anything psychologically. As that is where all psychological problems are born.

To create and chase the idea of happiness is to create and resist the inevitable consequence of it’s opposite, unhappiness. Perpetual conflict and suffering. This is the nature of duality, THOUGHT. Watch out for that duality, it will get ya?

Until this becomes actual Then emptiness/nothingness is not. Until consciousness is empty of its conditioned movement/the center, then any talk of nothingness/emptiness is coming from the field of things/thought.

??

@MarkusSweden ??

If this is not understood self deception is inevitable. The ball is in your court. Figure it out for yourself. Or don’t?

I tagged you in that thread to so you explore for yourself what I am getting at. For some reason there is a total resistance to explore what I suggested be inquired into.

Has nothing to do with english my friend. You just don’t grasp what’s being said. And to top it off you don’t investigate what is being said. Sorry for your confusion.

Investigate without the bias of experience

Says experience/experiencer/thought. The Dualistic movement of time. End time, end duality, then one is whole, ONE. The sign of one who is holy

@Mikael89 @Anna1@Etagnwo WHAT IS AN EXPERIENCE? HOW DOES IT COME ABOUT? IF THERE IS AN EXPERIENCE DOESN'T THIS IMPLY THE EXPERIENCER?? AND IF THERE IS AN EXPIERENCER, DOES NOT THIS IMPLY IDENTIFICATION?? EXPLORE THIS IF INTERESTED

Positive action is a movement of time. This is not an opinion but a fact. Only a movement of the dualistic entity moves positively within the field of time.

Only thought/ego moves positively. See for yourself. Its quite interesting.

Why do you move positively??? Have your questioned that??? sneaky, sneaky, sneaky indeed?

Identification with either “the Little i” or “the big I” is still identification “of thought/mind” If there is this movement of identification, Time/thought is in movement. Thought is very sneaky my friend. It will get ya. ? End the movement of mind, don’t create another movement of mind “time” then call it no-mind “timeless” I’ve been down this road befroe. It leads back to where it started⭕️

???

To end the veil of experience “thought/self” is to end the movement of duality. To live this is embodiment.

Experience which is the experiencer implies duality. Experience is the very thing that prevents this oneness. If you are interested in this explore it. It’s fundamental to understand the nature of experience/experiencer. Maybe that will perhaps clear up some confusion. It doesn’t take a intellectual mind to see this. Just takes an understanding of thought/ the thinker. Check it out

@Etagnwo If one has to ask the one does not know??‍♂️ Which is exactly my point when entering this thread yesterday.

This has to do with what @DoubleYouposted yesterday..... “Love has no opposites. Love is the absence of these polarities. And the ego can not know it. I agree with what you are saying but what you call the whole picture is Love. It's that all-inclusiveness. Unconditional love is the most hardcore thing there is. It's the embodiment of Truth. A lot different from that hippie movement love.” All dualistic action must end. Otherwise Oneness, “LOVE” is not.

It’s easy to see when a dualistic mind is expressing itself. Fear and reaction tell the story. I’m sure the actions of such antagonistic behavior has not gone undetected by others here. This dualistic action was the point of my entire discussion. If one feels attatched to ones own experience “knowledge, memory” and has not a capacity to suspend there own accumulated beliefs for the benefit of the conversation then that implies they are still clinging to the self image they have constructed. My point was simply that one who feels as one doesn’t live a dualistic life. For one who embodies oneness all action is whole, not fragmented,mechanical, as was displayed here yesterday. Everything I said was meant to show that there is no oneness if this duality is being expressed as action in ones daily life. You presented me with a concept that we are one.My intention was only to share that oneness implies embodiment of that oneness. To say we are one, yet continue to cling to ego/self implies severe contradiction indeed. Again, if one expresses this dualistic action in there daily life then they know nothing of onesnss. If we are one, shouldn’t all action be expressed as so???

@Charlotte ?