Faceless

Well Take what you and I have talked about before... Are You free of the accumulated memory’s of the psychological entity (the you)??? If so, wouldn’t you look at the world through fresh eyes ???

I haven’t heard that before.

To be simple. Thought (memory) projects what has been already known. That is what an experience is. Do you see that ?

Any action influenced by the knowledge, experience, memory, implies an action that is not new at all. All that must end for there to be that which is new. Its quite beautiful indeed.

If we accumulate experience and those experiences now form the the me, I, self, doesn’t that imply that those very experiences are the reason that creativity is not? Experience, which is a projection of thought (the past) is always old, never new. Isnt it only when the experiencer(experience) ends that there is that which is fresh, original?

Can creativity be cultivated? Can love be cultivated? Can nothingness be cultivated? Can emptiness be cultivated? Can that which is timeless be cultivated?

Creativity is when all movement of the self/time, with its volitional, dualistic, and fragmentatary movement of progress ceases. When all conditioned movement of thought ends. A mind with No-thing in it. Creativity implies originality, new, and wholeness. Not influenced by the stream of thought. Freedom is creative. They are one and the same movement. When this is so, every action one takes is an action of CREATIVITY. In fact creativity like joy, beauty, and freedom/love, is its own action in of itself. THE ACTION OF TRUTH.

Let’s take some time an meditate on this. Perhaps we can continue this later ??

yes Thought in of itself is coherent as long as it doesn't remain incoherent of its own movement. It’s the illusory entity that takes its imagined self as real, and the defending to maintain that entity’s permanence that causes the disorder. The next question would be is thought ultimately mechanical. Or is it intelligible. Can thought be straitened out?

Great question friend. Well done Well thought attributes to itself as being independent of thought. It doesn’t see that is is mechanical. The thinker is created by the movement of thought, and then says that it isn’t. You are really getting this. It’s nice to see one who sees the significance. Thought is a movement of fear, to anticipate for its own continuity, sustainment. Thought just looses track of its own movement. It creates illusion and acts as if were real. That is why it’s fundamental to understanding and maintaining awareness of its movement.

It's about neither accepting or denying that which is unknowable. Start nearer to (the known) and one may see the significance of this.

Hope is a indication of psychological dependence, a a movement of fear/time. A form of deception in itself. Rather interesting indeed. Investigate into the nature of Time and the thinker.

Start nearer with understanding the conditioned conditioned consciousness/stream of thought. Its rather important

Sure Thought (response of knowledge, experience, through memory) with its impermanent nature, moves perpetually to bring about security “permanence” in its own impermanent and insecure structure. The cause and the effect are one single unitary movement in contradiction.

One who is empty doesn’t defend. I am not a nondualist. I am nothing. Nothing does not identify. I am not defending Nonduality, Christianity, as only an entity who identifies participates in such dualistic action. Truth can not be seeked. To seek truth is to push truth away.

Why are we always moving and striving to fill? Always adding more to accommodate a sense of lack there of. Seeking and attaining experiences in which one has invented by means of thought. Escaping what is to one falsity to another falsity. Why is nobody willing to remain emtpy?

Ah my dear friend, I really wish you the best. I am rooting for you.

An abstraction attempting to squeeze from abstraction truth seems quite contradictory.

How does one go about finding truth in abstraction?

Religion is not the root of the problem, thought/self is. Especially when the mind works and clings to its abstract tendencies.

One must go much deeper into there own inner workings my friend. And maybe experience will cease to influence such confused/contradictory action.

Indeed

Where there is even a subtle hint of fear one will seek psychological security in an idea (religion) In this one is subtly escaping the fact (fear) to the idea it’s opposite (no fear) To escape, seek strength, and any other form of positive movement is still a movement of fear/thought. Seems to be that one seeks security in that which thought has put together, (tradition, cultural knowledge), but that stream of thought is the very mechanism that caused the fear and insecurity in the first place. Due to the dualistic nature of thought, one becomes insecure and then seeks to find order in that very problematic mechanism that created disorder in the first place. No matter what this implies dualistic/positive action, and therefore fragmented/self centered....Action determined by ones own fears, desire, and seeking of pleasure. As long as one is conforming to an idea to escape the fact this always implies fear/duality. Therefore all action in that direction will remain divisive, self centered, and implies the absence of LOVE/UNITY. Fear is very subtle. Do we see all the ways fear disguises itself as Love??? Unless we stop seeking the idea of love through the defensive nature of THOUGHT, and end what prevents love from flowering actually in ourselves (duality), fear will continue to manifest such hypocrisy in action. If we continue to seek psychological security in the very phenomenon that causes psychological insecurity we will continue to live contradictory lives. Blind to our own movement/action.

Also it’s not directed toward you in particular, but to us. ?

Sure I see that, Pleasure. If there is a movement of pleasure, what is accompanied with that pleasure?