Faceless

I think that is reasonable that you stay with what you know for now. And if you are not accepting what others say get are willing to suspend your own bias/prejudice there is no problem. And as far as questioning what Leo says, it’s better to stay undecided until we go into in depth. You do see the limitation of thought right?

So your referring to intellect. THOUGHT. Right? The conditioned brain. THOUGHT BEING memory knowledge/experience.

I haven’t watched the video... What do you think intelligence is@George Paul ??

Thought is an actual process. It’s an actuality taking place within the brain cells. It is a fact that thought works in a process. This is a great question.

Those guys actually get it. Maybe you should drop all you biases and listened without the “thinker” distorting for its own self sustainment. I saw your game from the beginning, that’s why we are here going back and forth. I am going to remain here. Bringing to the surface your BS. Get use to it.

@Nahm is aware that I have listened to Krishnamurti. And I have told Markus as well. And they are not followers lol We talk to each other. I learn as much from others if not more than I give. I have stated that before. You think you have exposed me. But actually you are giving the sharing more attention. Thank you. I have tried sharing watts, Krishnamurti, and bohm sharings before. No body took an interest so I stopped sharing them

It’s essential.

And I am responding to your posts. Just stating the facts.

I have never said i am enlightened once. That statement has no meaning. Lol This is what I mean you guys are full of it.

@Etagnwo I’m sorry buddy, you don’t know what you are taking about. And you are not enlightened. It’s totaly obvious.

Indeed.

Again, I have never read a book in my life. And have listened to very few Krishnamurti videos. On how thought works. That has nothing to do with non duality teachings. And takes an ending of psychological becomingto inquire into deeply. For me time ended way before I seen any Krishnamurti videos. Even people who spend years looking into what Krishnamurti shares never end time in themselves. This is something that cannot be taught. And again, I have shared with others that I resonate with jk.

What was lied about?

If it is something that shows the importance of not escaping. Or going into how somthing works like thought is not the teachings I am referring to. I mean all the romantic and sentimental glorified mumbojumbo. Anything that doesn’t promote understanding the self. Not teachings as in offering things to believe in and promote self deception. Not just merely an accumulation of information for one to hide behind. Bury the fear. More about understanding what is actual. And working with that. I already known you appreciate that @Saumaya

The ego clings to that which has strengthened and perpetuated its own movement. They have nourished the ego. Been deceived by thought.

I don’t care what it is. You don’t need to study a teaching to understand duality in yourself and be aware of duality in yourself.

That’s what I mean by calling out all the bs.

?? Yes. We should work on what is actually moving inside of us. Not escape what is “duality” to an idea of nonduality. Which is generally what nonduality teachings promote.

That’s that fear. Watch It, it will get you. ? You are the ones trying to play enlightened. I don’t even bring that word up.

No YOU just don’t get it. Take yesterdays question I asked. Have you even considered it to be the case? The question where you responded with “no” You say you have read his stuff. You must not grasp what’s said.

@Saumaya only I assume you understand the difference between the Krishnamurti sharings between the nonduality teachings.

Yep. Thought that was you.

You keep ingnoring the fact that I have shared my reference to Krishnamurti.

Expose me lol So childish. I have shared his vids before. Nobody watched them. At least I understand this stuff. And am not sharing “bullshit”

I think it was 2-3 months ago. Only I was not real familiar with that way of communication yet. I think you refered the other Krishnamurti. Was that you?