Faceless

Perhaps the endless conflict of chasing “its” own tail. The misery of nourishing the self feeding loop⭕️

Break free from?? so many dualities?

There is no master You create the image of “enlightenment”, and you perpetually seek to attain that self projection. Liberation comes with holistic understanding of the i. Depending on any form of authority prevents the necessary freedom to understand yourself. Maybe instead of trying to “become”, understand this desire to become. Watch it free of any “masters” two cents, distorting the fact. You don’t want to play that endless game for ever do you??

Can there be an awarness of this seeking, without any movement to carry that seeking through, or stop it? Can there be space without that action-reaction(response)? Few questions to ask ourselves Are you aware of all the subtle forms of seeking that take place from moment to moment? You would be suprised how much seeking psychological security goes unnoticed. Be careful with your attention. When you are reading other peoples posts that talk about there “enlightenment” experiences, or the experience of the absolute, use that time reading, to observe your reactions to that reading. You may see this compulsion to create an image and seek security in that self projected image. This tends to happen when we read about “great experiences” of others. ? Thought always wants to measure and compare itself with projected images is it has invented through imagination. its ok. Just watch it. Anyway take it easy, friend. Life is much to beautiful to spend it chasing an image you created out of fear, or resistance to the actual.

Fear seeks security in seeking various types of experiences. Seeking these experiences is the very binding movement of psychological dependence that becomes the burden of of time, and prevents timeless being. Are you sure experience is what you are looking for? And who is this experiencer? Is it not one and the same movement of experience. Observe with care...what causes this disharmony with your “absolute”? Is it not the accompanied implications of the “experiencer”, which is the carry over of (experience, knowledge, memory), or (static content) onto each new, fresh, and (dynamic) movement of the now? Can this “absolute” be experienced, or is it the absense of experience at all. Its easy to take a substance and temporarily remove that space between the experiencer and the experiencing. But when there is a cessation of carry over of the veil of experience, (psychological memory as the i), in that every moment in daily life makes for not a mere “temporary experience”, but a never ending, and ongoing movement of unconditioned freedom. To meet each moment afresh. The most creative movement that can take place. A dynamic stillness. Timelessness or what I call headlessness. Again, are you sure what you want is mere experience??

@Victor Mgazi can you observe all this within yourself? Not accepting it as a concept, theory, abstraction. Not understanding it intellectually, verbally, but seeing this entire movement in action within oneself.

We (attachment) are attached to the the mechanical compulsion to seek psychological security in abstraction. This all implies this false sense of duality between the thinker and the thought is influencing all action, which implies contradiction, conflict. Ultimately the movement of fear.

?? Do you see that as correct? When you look inward.

Or as @robdl puts it, seeking security in that which thought(experience, knowledge, memory), has put together as the i. The i, the seeking, and the (accumulated experience, knowledge, memory) being one and the same movement fear seeking security in time-thought.

Can we identify when we have invented abstraction to evade the actuality? Thats is the question.

I’m taking about the actual ending of fear, attachment, dualistic movement as the i, which is all one and the same movement of the ego seeking security in thought.

If there is fear within yourself determining action then the fact of what is remaims conditioned. It’s all a movement-invention of thought unless all incomplete action ends. That means “you” don’t seek, “you” are not bound by fear actually This can very easily become an invention of thought, therefore the result of (causation-time) im talking about actualizing this in daily life. Until there is freedom actually, there is no freedom. Oh I get what your Laying down. But again the actuality and the abstraction, (invention of thought), are very, very, different indeed.

The self-thought is very tricky. Always looking to act within the field of time. Self perpetuating mechanism.

Remember thought-fear will evade the fact (fear). It will seek shelter in the idea-abstraction or (thought) like... If so, still a movement of fear-attachment

Is there? Has fear, this dualistic movement of the i ended? Has all such movement of seeking psychological security in time ended? In daily life that is... what remains the fact in ones daily life?

This will make sense if we see the connection between incomeplete action, time, reaction-action, causation, and notice as the chooser-duality.

FREEDOM IS NOT BOUND BY TIME-CAUSATION THOUGHT WORKS TO SOLVE PRACTICAL-FUNCTIONAL PROBLEMS WITH TIME, BUT PSYCHOLOGICALLY, TIME-CAUSATION IS HAS NO PLACE. ACTION INFLUENCED IN ACCORDANCE TO CAUSATION-TIME, ARE THE ROOT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPRISONMENT. FREEDOM IS NOT CULTIVATED IN TIME, BUT IS NOW, OR IT IS NOT.

Only to a mechanism inclined to move within the field of causation. We must be aware of motive (unaccomplishable)

Any action be it positive-negative, implies will-volition, is incomplete, and will further nourish this fear, and manifest itself in, and as, reaction (a motive)...this will perpetuate and sustain incomplete action, as fear continues to influence action mechanically. This is all a movement of the chooser who seeks security in time. To seek security in thought, not seeing that thought itself creates the i, and the insecurity. Self feeding loop⭕️

We can also observe the subtlety of fear in being detached “from” outcome, or something. As this implies reaction. Freedom from, when gone into very deeply, is not actual FREEDOM. As freedom is the absence of conditioned response , or (reaction), which then influences another action, and this becomes an endless pattern of incomplete action.This still remains a perpetual movement of fear-thought-ego reacting, and acting on behalf of that reaction. It then becomes a viscous cycle of cause-effect-cause-effect. Thought-ego will nourish its own movement as time by this never ending compulsion to act incompletely, or mechanically as a response(reaction-action).

@Victor Mgazi i wouldn’t even go there with the opposite to attachment. To me that implies that the duality as I still chooses between, or decides. all a movement of i, time.

Even the “remedy” is fueled by the movement of fear. The remedy in this case being to end fear. But any movement of fear cannot end fear.

Indeed. Fear grasps onto or pushes away

Well he said opposite yet not conceptually. If there is no psychological fear, there is no attachment. The conceptual opposite being dualistic, and an opposite of attachment, like non-attachment, is also a movement of duality. Non-attachment becomes an idea born to the resistance of attachment. But either way, more subtly, to create an opposite in its opposite remais an action born of fear-duality. The duality in the movement that takes place, and the duality that influenced that whole movement, which is the action taken as this isolated entity that sees itself different from that which it wants or does not want.

The absence of fear