Faceless

Yes, when there is unconditioned awareness (choiceless awareness) there is no i (fear-time) and all its implications.

If ? is (the i) which implies (fear-time) and so on, then the absense of ? implies @tsuki‘s ?? there is only actual observation when time-fear and so on are not in movement. The observer-time must cease for there to be unconditioned observation that is whole. as long as the observer is in the picture it will fragment, divide, distort, corrupt the observation. What do you guys think?

Originally I was using this ?to imply action influenced by division-duality. Being incomplete-finite-partial. But we can use ?? being two to represent duality-diction as well. As in being split-broken.

I think we are not. nobody read this?

originally I was implying the absense of ? at all was to see the whole. But i I adapted to communicate. Now we can say they ?? this implies and symbolizes duality-division followed by action, which is incomplete-finite.

That is not how I am using it. To me, ??is the i and ? is the holistic perception that the observer is the observed. This could be creating confusion in our communication

As long as one looks from this?? (fragmentation-time) the perception continues to be cut to pieces. Thought-self cuts all things to peices.

?action of holistic insight-perception. Or perception without the limitation of fragmentation. ??Fragmentation being selective, bias, partial, limited seeing influenced by the veil of (experience, knowledge, memory) as the i .

To me from the view of ? there is no choice . You know?

?? this impkes mechanical fragmentation ?this undivided attention (wholeness) Thought (the fragment) can never see (the whole) truth what do you guys think?

“You” being ?? cannot observe this ? what do you guys think?

The essence of the insight cannot be communicated, but only pointed two with the mechanism of thought-duality. Agian we agree that )experience, knowledge, memory) is one and the same movement of time-the I? ??

That’s it lol. It is unexplainable this is what I mean as well. Perhaps Thought-self-time is bound by ??. To see the whole is to see it all as one unitary movement of time.

Knowledge is also one and the same movement of mind. Do you agree on that?

In observation-seeing, as long as this? influences and determines action, holistic insight (action) is not. Do you see it?

@tsuki What are the implications of this? to you? One reason I ask is you are making multiple ??? when one ☝️ suffices as what ever number you use.

The “high vantage point” was just a way expressing that there is no limited partial insight-seeing. No movement of thought and then action. But the holistic insight is action in and of itself.

This mysteriousness i speak of is not premeditated as a result of volition-time. Creativity will act on everyday experiences, but this is not what I’m referring to. Im referring to creativity at its essence. This is cessation of experience.

Yes. If you had a holistic insight into fear, that insight will continue to light the way in perception. Reaction-response, a movement of causation-time. Due to the cessation of fear,(reaction-resistance) there is no influence of compulsive attachment and projection of (experience, knowledge, memory) as the i. So there is freedom to look-see with fresh eyes that don’t analyze and so on. To see without the veil which ultimately implies fear-time.

This is why I share this sacred with others in my writing sometimes. To be able to observe for an hour or two without the veil of (experience, knowledge, memory) is a indescribable movement of creativity. To see everything as it actually is without any form of registration, recollection, and therefore no identification is quite mysterious indeed. And this just continues to deepen.

For me the actual ending of fear implied love. Wasn’t like there was a next step really, but I just saw that thought, fear, time, and so on were all distinctions if you will, or functions of order-disorder within a “higher order” (TRUTH) WHAT IS.

Seems rather common if fear is not ended.

This is the way I see it from the standpoint of insight itself, which implies actual cessation of psychological(experience, knowledge, memory) as the i. Non-Fear I ? I Fear Duality between (Fear) and (non-fear)=fear=? ?=thought=(knowledge-memory-experience)TIME ?=self=(choice-the chooser) that chooses between the opposites. Duality-TIME. You the reader-observer will represent:(the whole action as (insight-truth). As you look at this moment of duality between the opposites up above, (You) are representing (the action of insight) that sees the whole of that movement of time-duality, which is one and the same movement of Truth-Love. ————————————————— From within the loop,(?),there is bondage of choice-time-(conditioned mind-self)........We do not see the whole of it, but instead are pursuing one side or the other of these opposites. And from that vantage point seems like the only available option. Because we are not at a far enough distance from that loop,(?), we are unable to see the whole of that loop. There must be freedom from that loop and all it implies for there to be this holistic insight of the loop. As long as fear determines action we remain in that reactive pattern of creating the opposite out of the its opposing opposite and choosing between those. Choice implies confusion, contradiction, and conflict, which breeds further fear......Example; we are unable to see that the world is round from down here on the ground. But far out in orbit it’s apparent that the world is spherical.⭕️. Same thing here. Being bound by the limited perspective (time-thought-self(chooser that chooses between), (dualistic perspective), (Time-fear), we cannot see the whole. So not seeing the truth of that fact holistically we continue to move within that same pattern of ? (fear-time). But from the outside looking in, or high above, FREEDOM NOT BOUND BY “LIMITED VANTAGE POINT”, we see the whole of choice-duality as being one unitary movement of time. And in that understanding-SEEING(perception-insight), there is whole action that ends that the perpetuation of that pattern? Again when we observe, the mind being dualistic, creates the opposite out of its own opposite, and non-fear is then born of fear and vice versa. So with the fact of fear, duality-thought, creates an abstraction of non-fear and calls it love. But it is not love.....Love-insight-truth has no opposite. In this action of WHOLE INSIGHT-TRUTH-LOVE are one and the same movement of that which is timeless. Non-causal Because to create an opposite out of its opposite implies time-causation. If there is causation-time, freedom is not, and if freedom is not, insight, love, truth are not. Once out of this limited mechanical and fragmented perception, which demands the ending of fear-time, there can be whole observation from above that will find out that time and all its implications are all a function, or form, or process, if I can use those words, of TRUTH-NOTHINGNESS. TRUTH, (The whole) CONTAINS TIMELESSNESS-TIME. DUALITY OR DISTINCTION IS PART OF THOUGHT-SELF-MIND Sorry if it’s confusing and nonsensical. Lol just woke up from long night crying toddler?

@tsuki @Big Guru Balls @Nahm Ooooh fun?? nice drawings tsuki. I’m not sure I meet you on them though. Give me a few minutes to try and explain how I see it.

? I don’t have that pic anymore