Faceless

To see the whole of that is one unitary movement of time, makes for optimal (passive-choiceless awareness), indeed.

The WHAT IS is not covered by what has been, which inevitably projects what should be.

Indeed.. Perceived without the perceiver (the old) no dead-static content of “the i” (thought) meeting the dynamic-alive movement of now (what is)

Psychological, spiritual, (collective-thought) and personal authority being; (experience, knowledge, memory) the past, “the i”

For me it was seeing holistically, the futility in this pursuit of seeking security psychological time. Then there was freedom without reaction-action. I saw that there must be a relationship with the observed, instead of perpetualualy evading it(escape). As to escape nourishes the division.

For me it was seeing holisitcy the futility in this pursuit of seeking security psychological time. But I would say to understand thought-self holistically would lead to psychological time cessation or vice versa. I understand your approach, i see through daily experience that most don’t like the passive approach that @robdl go about it. I understand your position @Shanmugam.

Total ending of psychological accumulation as “the me” Creative as in no past accumulation being carried over onto the now. (Newness) or (fresh eyes) to observe

Hmm sorry im not very good at interpreting language yet, but when I speak of this creative movement, I mean actual cessation of thought-experiencer. (Experience, knowledge, memory). In this cessation makes for a newness. Like stepping foot on a new world with a totally void mind. As in experiencing totally empty of the experiencer and it’s implications (accumulation of time)

I think you are already aware of this, right @Shanmugam? You are attempting to implement a way. Am I correct?

My approach is different indeed. My approcah is to understand the whole of time, which implies concentration, control, volition, fear, desire, and so on. Then we can see holistically the futility in all movement of time, that prevents passive attention-awareness. You see what I mean ?

@Shanmugam To me cultivation of concentration is not necessary, but I see how some would have to see that themselves. I understand your intention ??

@Shanmugam interesting....Buddha teaching is of interest to me.... It is a natural response to concentrate attention(thought-thinker) application of (experience, knowledge, memory) So it is a kind of gradual process to passivity(total attention). Trial and error type of process? For me, after the perpetuation of psychological time ended, attention was instantaneous. No more reaction-action of positive-negative movement of fear-time.

@tsuki @Nahm also known as learning-awareness through relationship.

That is what passive awareness implies; continual observation of the movement of thought-psychological becoming, which implies all movement of time in action. (Fear) For me this awareness is unpremeditated and not exclusive. Implying no reaction-action(positive-negative) movement influenced by fear. Otherwise fear would evade itself. Self perpetuation, self feed⭕️

?

As in Observation of fear (awareness) ?

Accumulation and application of thought-thinker?

We can say that any applied technique implies a doing (thought-thinker) right?

I would say it leaves the field of opposites all together. I don’t conclude on that. As that is a movement of accumulation-thought. Actualized passive awareness-cessation or opposition(reaction-action) or cessation of positive-negative movement of the self to me implies awareness. The actual dynamic movement as in experiencing without the veil of (experience, knowledge, memory) in movement

Does this do-nothing imply no reaction-action of thought? Or positive-negative movement of the thinker?

Thanks for response what do you mean active? as in dynamic?

You mean passive awareness meditation?

Fear evading itself. Psychological preservation.

Thought tends to exclude by its very nature. This is called concentrated attention-focus.

?? To focus on one part, (senses) is a movement of thought itself. As long as this exclusion is in movement so will be registration, recollection,(identification), thought-thinking, which is one and the same movement of the known-thought-thinker with its accumulation which it then creates questions and seeks answers. It is only with this accumulation-thought, that we invent questions and pursue answers to them. Self feeding loop. We invent and pursue what we invent. “We” also be an invention of that accumulation.