Faceless

@John Iverson If the center is the now is not

Doesn’t a method imply thought, time, ego?

@Omni There is absolutely no division between us??

@Omni Good luck ??

@Omni Knowone can answer such questions for another. This has to be approached by ones own inquiry. Pointing one in a direction is all we can do. And this isn’t work. Self inquiry is to live. Anyone that accepts another’s authority will ultimately get know where. This has been the case since early man. Plus some people might appreciate the journey going it alone.

Who is this entity I call “me” ???

@Shiva you already answered previously.. just narrowing it down lol

@Ilya ??Investigate If you inquire you will see. Inquire into... “Center” “ego” “thought”

@ShivaAnd what is responsible for this false sense of identification?

Can the “center” prevent relapse? Doesn’t relaps imply there was a temporary, limited, false sense of improvement? Doesn’t any attempt by the “center” or “the me” to improve become a contraction?

@Cepzeu??

To see that the you backsliding hasnt seen the limits of the limit of thought. Therefore don’t know when one has gone beyond or not. If one was to backslide this would imply one was still slave to thought “Psychological time”

No practice... Every method is part of the movement and content of thought ??

@Joseph Maynor All of thought ??

@Angelo John Gage It’s actualy quite simple and doesn’t have to take long. Did you explore into freewill and the thinker, chooser, observer, decider yet?

@Ether ?? That’s a reactionary coping method implying that the center is taken in by each thought and is trying avoid its evolution into a feeling But how do we avoid this whole process? How does one know what thoughts to believe and not? Breathering is a great thing as it takes attention off the thought. But is attention off of thought what it takes to understand thought? I was asking @Samuel Garcia how he personally would become more conconcius.. I was asking what was his plan to do so?

@Samuel Garcia How do you personaly become more conscious?

Do you mean immorality rationalized as morality? Is it yours? Or inherited and shared by society? We are conditioned with those values. They are woven into our thought patterns. Learn the nature, structure, and substance of thought. Then ask yourself am “I” seperate from that process of thought, or a fragment of it? We need to get at the root of of the problem. And it’s safe to say that disorder in thought is responsible for the contradictory, hypocritical, habitual mannerisms of what we as a society agree to be moral.

Sharing the significance of inquiry into the nature and structure of thought, and it’s relationship to reality.

What is friendship? When is friendship actually a relationship between two people? When is there not a relationship? Once this this question is seen and understood then we must ask ourselves if we are being honestly genuine to that insight. Only then your motive will become self evident. In this case your motive is an indication of what action or non action to take into consideration to go about communicating the content of the message. If this sounds like somthing worth expending some energy into inquire into relationship and images. Google Relationship without image is love ??

@Shin Einstein to started to become aware of the limits of thought.

@shin least you didn’t get a cup that’s says Prayer for peace lol

@ShinThe perception of nature without the observation of the “you” as it’s influence is the seeing and understanding of nature and yourself. Seems reasonable no?

Nice cat ??

Who needs information on spiral dynamics? Just inquire into yourself ??