supremeyingyang

He does not talk about upgrading, but if women want to upgrade they upgrade to those men which are not 'most men'. You also can be low value and still be better compared to the former partner of the woman in question. I don't see a contradiction in @zurews argumentation.

I don't argued against the video with the phrase you referred to at all, I talked about what I picture as a more precise description of what is going on. So it's no wonder that it is from you perspective consistent as you could argue it enhances and refines the thesis of the video (which I said is too general to be of any value ) I mean that women leave their man if they are too ignorant and resistant to change. The 'women treat men as men treat jobs' thesis is non-sense in it's purest form to me as I stated in my second post here.

No, I want to state the opposite: Women walk away from long-term relationships, because they can't stand the paralysis of men anymore. They generally try it for a long to time to get their partner understand this and change for their better (mens) - it's not fun to women. Regarding the video, if you mean the video from the OP - I get what he is saying that it is not personal, but I also wrote here that I find that statement is non-sense. To me it's not a useful generalization and if you act on this it'll hurt you more than help you. Or what do you mean by saying I do not understand the video, @Devin?

Yeah and there are according to the articles causes why straight and gay women become 'walkaway wife's': lack of commitment incompatibility and growing apart communication problems extramarital affairs financial incompatibility (money disagreements) substance abuse domestic abuse, and conflicts over family responsibilities. incompatibility and growing apart and financial incompatibility are 'just' signs of philosophical differences. The rest is exactly what I observe and women warn their man excessively (ok, maybe not in a domestic abuse situation) and tell explicitly what they want. It's time for man as a demographic to mature like women did with feminism, not to just become Anti feminists, Allies who do as they are told instead of thinking for themselves or remain just Indifferent NPCs.

@Gesundheit2 "Men who reported engaging in coercive strategies were more likely to endorse Ludus (game-playing love) love style, and less likely to endorse Agape (unconditional love) love style than noncoercive men. Men who reported love styles of Storge (a friendship-first attitude toward love) and Pragma (a selective, practical approach toward love) were more likely to report being victims of sexually coercive behaviors. Those men who reported being sexually victimized were also more likely to report using coercive strategies. The results can further our understanding of male victimization and usage of sexually coercive strategies." By BRENDA L. RUSSELL & DEBRA L. OSWALD https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0886260502017003003 But this won't tell us anything about Wamen. I don't find anything, but maybe this novel will tell use something that science and Youtube Gurus can't? “I’m the Bitch that Makes You a Man”: Conditional Love as Female Vengeance in Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl By Patrick Osborne http://genderforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/3_Osborne_GG_Final.pdf "her [the main protagonist] deviance is a reaction to a patriarchal social structure that reinforces gendered illusions of self-actualization and allows male entitlement to remain unchallenged." => Isn't that we talk about? Men being challenged and that they fail miserable?

As I wrote I don't think they mean the same as the dictionary meaning of 'unconditional love' when they use the phrase. It's just probability if you use a narrow definition, like women in the west with a middle class background with a college education and a political leftist preference will be more likely to act like this in a situation like that.. But nobody listens to that. Obviously is that kind of generalization subcomplex. I don't care as I don't think this characteristics of being 'not binary' or 'not straight' and 'not gay' are the single biggest determinant of how either of the demographics you named love. Maybe I'm wrong with my assumption, I don't know - are are there articles on this? On this subcomplex level like in the video indeed.

We had this discussed so many times!! Don't write about the plan in public, the patriarchy will be informed now, you fool! женщины не так уж плохи Too simplistic. What do you think? lol to that statement, but you don't miss much by not watching it. Jep, I see women leave not for more money but for more PURPOSE. Just look at most men 10+ Years in a relationship. Women complain and if they then leave the men are baffled. Hilarious. Depends on the partner. I prefer classic role models, but it could be the case that the women is the 'man'. Or neither. Or both. It depend on what people want. All the traits of a self actualizing individual would help. sounds good, I used that method as well - of course not with Tate which is too much foe me. Sooner or later one learns the lesson and integrates it. Just skip the illegal stuff^^ That's my Homeboy! I'd add: Lift weights. I guess they mean with 'unconditional love' that most men would stick with their first GF forever, if given the chance. Then they be left alone and develop the laundry list of traits of their next partner, hey paradoxical but why not. Sadly most stay at this point indefinetly. I don't know why. Do you have a theory?

I don't literally say anyone blames women, it's proverbial. Like: Can't you understand why they do it? I'd say if men would have the opportunities of a comparable women they would do the same.. And they do. We need some kind of mature pendant to feminism which focuses on self development. I see a lot of man doing almost criminal little effort into anything.. just games and wage slaving Not the women I know, be it my GF, the women in my family or the women in my wider social circle.

well the moderator has a point, but also it's interesting that women leave if there is no interdepedence.. about the 80%.. idk, but from what I observe: true. edit: you can't really blame the women for that.. a lot of men are treating relationships like a job and do only the bare minimum.. that is what I see

well that sounds very true as his situation turned 180 degrees and he seems not be able do adapt^^ Ok I suspected, but didn't knew that, so thank you. This is the part I couldn't decypher at all. He would be worth a PHD Thesis in 'How to not do Self Help' as a prime example with heavy focus on social dynamics and psychology. What do you think made him like this AFTER his MMA (or what it was) career? I mean, he was doing fine, why this bragging and evil doing that brought his downfall? Leo's Video couldn't clarify that point enough for me.

Okok, i watched it. As a man who left women because the relationship went nowhere I'm offended. As a observer who sees all the business women in their late 20s and early 30s who value their job above relationships I'm... yeah, I don't find it true for my demographic.

@Ulax It's a tool like tarot or the I-Ging. I don't prefer it, yes. A disdain for Astrology is not the root of my comment, it's that this comment... "If I did an astrology reading on Andrew Tate, without other pieces of information like his stage of development, cognitive and oral development, personality typing, ego development, state of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development in different domains of life, without checking his natal chart, I'd assume a few things, that he is born under the sign that has the fire element, maybe under Ares/Ram as the Ram is a cardinal sign" ... brings us to this obvious conclusion: "meaning a very strong starter, but may not have the same endurance power" ...and I don't know how the first part bring us to the conclusion. That is just hilarious to me

@NoSelfSelf Your profile picture looks like an eye. @StarStruck Wamen treat MEN the way men treat JOBS, I don't get why everybody talks about Steve. I mean the Ipod was cool and the Iphone is just brillant marketing, but what have Wamen to do with it? Didn't watch the video, I got the gist grom the title

I genuinly don't know if you are serious with this and at this point I'm too afraid to ask...

Karma. "The defendant wants to hide the truth because he's generally guilty. The defense attorney's job is to make sure the jury does not arrive at that truth." Alan Dershowitz ...and also: rofl!

Thanks for appreciating my communication style:) 35%... now that's a signifant difference! But you deserve 10% for Inflation alone, not matter what happens. Seems to be ok if you do it for 'only' one or two years, so I'd be leaning into doing it. Also the pay rise would be better than I thought.. and after 7 years it's time. Like in the hagakure: A man has to rise too slow in the eyes of his peers to be effective as a leader (paraphrase) By the way I'm also horribly distracted nowadays. What is you worst distraction? To me podcasts, chats and youtube. Worst is.. all on high quality topics, but still.. won't give me the cake. I guess you understand:)

You are not serious with you day job, don't do it. If you want to be more efficient stop doing some of the activities that waste time. Or is it THAT much money? It's gonna be 20% at most I estimate

First Paragraph: true Second Paragraph: That is a life mission in itself, to change the education system. A lot of people in the System agree and it still does not happen. Means that the problem is more challenging as it looks. Teach 1 person is easy, teach a whole population is hard and even if it relatively sucks, it's a big accomplishment. Basicly some people get factory education, some can affort premium education. I'd rather take a different angle, I think the education system is too robust and resistant to be changed from within quickly (in a few decades, lol - yeah, that is quick!!). Instead? We gotta make a guerilla war on education via a set of parallel education systems, like the informal university of youtube, the academy of udemy or every blog and book you can find online. It won't scale to all, but it'll be enough. In 2 or 3 decades we yield the fruits and then the systems changes.. over some decades. You might see it as a senior.

You may think you are lost and doubt yourself, in fact you are way ahead of the pack. Keep going.

@Realms of Wonder Thanks, I send it to you till the end of week:)

For the moment - yes

A video on learning, I can see if I can find a good use and then ask you before I make it public. ok?

Hahaha, I like that:)

It doesn't matter who I am. Edit: What matters is if my point is valid or not. I interpret you are not fond of my reply, which is no problem to me by all means. What do you think? A serious discussion creates barriers of does not happen.

Won't happen, people will come down to enjoy the antics. Plus the higher forum will have afracture of the posts as highquality posting taks effort. I see. and 9 /10 of .... Exactly. Totally. I propose to cut the 10% worst, the worst of the worst. Some here had a wild life for MONTHS or YEARS - that can't be good.