Carl-Richard

@PsychedelicEagle Leo looks like some stock bald guy lmao. And it looks like he is wearing a grey yamaka.

There can't be syntax/structure without semantics/content, so there can't be logic without feeling Perhaps a good mix. I don't divide people neatly into feelers and thinkers (I'm a statistician, ya know), but there are moments or cases where you have the thought "that's a feeler thing to say" or "that's a thinker thing to say". I was prompted to write this topic by watching how Sam Hyde describes why he started believing in God and stopped being an atheist (it struck me as very "feeler" like, and wouldn't you know it, people on Personality Database seem to agree, those in comments who provided arguments at least). You can also observe this on the forum. Notice how some people are prone to leaving statements "hanging" and then either proceeding to a new statement or simply refusing to elaborate at all. I will add though that raising your "awareness" (or consciousness) is in a sense a semantic (and thus interestingly feminine) quality. It makes your experience more consistent, more holistic, more interconnected, more united, more One, a single whole, a single quality. Meanwhile, raising say your analytic ability (be it through increased working memory capacity or declarative pattern recognition ≈ IQ) is more syntactic (and also more masculine), concerned about structure, about dividing things up into parts and indeed analyzing them. So someone who is spiritually inclined in the mystical sense of being connected to awareness or presence would definitely be more connected to feeling, but I would say not necessarily in a way that closes them off from thinking. The idea behind MBTI types is that you have certain "go-to" strategies (because you just go with what you're best at, or what works most of the time, or what you're the most used to, more often than the alternative), and therefore you would naturally be slanted either towards feeling or thinking. But you can definitely train either side quite substantially as well depending on your focus, and you can also be supremely gifted such that you're slanted to one side but your other side is also way above average. That could be the case for Buddha.

@Natasha Tori Maru Yeah that's yeah. Yeah. 😵‍💫

What have I spawned My NatashaGPT prompt is too powerful.

Authentic high heels to nutsack, no AI can recreate.

Long time no see. I was thinking about you. Spoken as the most heterosexual man to have ever heterosexualed.

I'm gay. No.

Calling AI text perfection is like calling a vax figure of Brad Pitt perfection.

It writing out text that makes me puke is all I need to know it's not real.

Try the technique in the video. I recently thought about it as a potential treatment method for akathisia and other movement disorders. It has a way of balancing (quite literally through bilateral symmetry) and gently channeling one's energy into smooth movements which could be helpful for exorcising anxious stuck-up energy.

? Try it.

I mean does he suffer now with his current behavior (e.g. while maintaining his Blueprint protocol)? Does he feel it's a problem that is negatively impacting his life in some way? Even if he hasn't commented on this specifically, what would you guess? To me, there is a distinction between say a Howie Mandel ("I don't feel in control of my thoughts") and Bryan Johnson "we will conquer mortality". I guess unless he is so much in denial and blind to his own mental life that anything he says about his mental state is inaccurate, it would probably be hard to label it a "mental disorder", but perhaps again "personality disorder" is possible.

It's ok, go marry a mannequin. Yes, there is a tension between the benefits and utility of AI and it invading and corrupting every human domain. That's the problem.

In what way though? Does he suffer a lot due to it? Or is it merely a "personality disorder" in that he doesn't suffer from it personally but it just seems extreme to (or bothers) other people? And it doesn't seem to be limited to food: it's his entire routine. Some people are just highly orderly/industrious and they feel quite fine.

High on A-I. That's what's going on.

Human substrate zapped, cursed, soul-banished, lifeless powder extracted, sprinkled in the shake we call internet.

Taking a multivitamin makes your biomarkers look good, but they make me feel overly wired and funky. Feeling overly wired and funky for 80 years vs not, what effect does that have on lifespan? Bryan Johnson's idea of "trust the biomarkers, not bodily signals" is what clashes the most with my view and might be his Achilles' heel. It might even kill him acutely: Recently, he said he had been doing sauna "all wrong" because according to the way he measures core body temperature (from the insides of his stomach), he was supposedly not getting a release of heat shock proteins. So now he does over 30 minutes of sauna in 93.33 C° at one time. He says it's excruciating. Yet he enthusiastically recommends this. Imagine what other extreme things he could end up recommending if only the numbers tell him to, despite using questionable methods of measurement and questionable conclusions. For me, I leave the sauna when I feel like I'm ready. Not only do I feel benefits despite sitting there for shorter, I could very well be getting the heat shock protein benefits Bryan claims he was missing, because increasing the temperature of the insides of your stomach, a spacious internal organ insulated by skin, muscles, intestinal walls, containing food contents, surely happens later than more peripheral body parts.

At least it's real. There is nothing worse than living in a fake world where there is literally no soul. Even materialist capitalist spiritually dead people have a soul compared to a piece of text printed out by a large language model.

Attracting women (or rather making them experience attraction) is one thing. Satisfying them is another. If you care about merely attracting women and dumping them after your 5-second performance, do your looksmaxxing and psychopathmaxxing and whatever. But if you care about developing lasting, meaningful and deep relationships with women, be someone they want to be around. The desire for safety and being cared for is what underlies "eww what a creep" and dumping the attractive guy who is an asshole or is unable to provide, and perhaps paying a male escort who is sensitive and caring. When they're in the situation of willing to pay for a set and planned deal, they're already looking for safety, for care. So that need perhaps becomes more readily apparent in that situation. That doesn't mean they won't experience attraction from perhaps somewhat of an asshole, or just a good looking guy despite of their behavior. But you have to take into account the former if you're looking for something prolonged.

Imagine a zoomer meeting a medieval Buddhist and they start talking about auras.

Dick so flaming it developed bioluminescence, functioning as a flashlight. Hence enlightenment. We have to be open to alternative historical interpretations. I'm the Graham Hancock of buddhist history.

Thunderbolt of Flaming Chlamydia.

It's not going anywhere when you're not engaging. People also drink alcohol every day.

People are doing hard drugs every weekend and going to work. Viewing a thing as either completely good or completely bad for all people at all times in any dosage or any context, that is religious thinking.

Resilience only takes you so far when your own resilience is used against itself. Big muscles when smashing a hammer against your own skull. Inner conflict is the ultimate pathology because it turns your resources into resources for self-destruction. In fact, being very resilient and active in response to inner conflict (by actively ruminating and trying to find a solution) is over time a losing strategy if the problem doesn't seem to have a solution (you're essentially just wasting energy and beating yourself up for no seeming reason), so you move over to helplessness and a more passive state where you don't entertain solutions, and this is directly tied to the experience of low mood and low energy (it comes from a lack of movement, lack of discovery, lack of action, a more passive form of suffering). What people with depression usually do is they oscillate between states of rumination and helplessness and opt for pseudo-solutions and various coping mechanisms and dissociate themselves from the causes of the internal conflict (which limits their cognitive scope, their emotional attunment) and end up in this overall lousy and low-functioning state (and if they get really helpless to the point of hopelessness, they might take their own lives). You don't take your own life if you merely have poor cardiovascular health. That's at best a contributing factor among many others. Calling poor health "depression" is understandable due to the symptom overlap but overall a bit misleading. Therapy and identifying the source of conflict might ideally be the first course of action, then getting to the point of solving it might involve trying to increase resilience again.