Carl-Richard

He might be. That is essentially the entire tension between contemporary non-duality, analytical idealism, the mystical but still scientifically subscribing (naturalists), and Christians, Muslims, who are more open to the super-natural (and the brilliant cross-over: Christian perennialist panentheists, e.g. Rupert Sheldrake, who studies wacky shit like whether the Sun is conscious). Threading the needle is to remain agnostic: if you're a scientific andy, not that much evidence of a God that more or less literally speaks the world into existence through his divinely ordained plan (at least that I know, maybe somebody could make the case better than I can). But it's not exactly a divine impossibility either. I can't believe I'm linking this video of all videos on this topic, but Nick Fuentes (colloquially labelled neo-nazi) presented a similar tension here (not the meta-cognitive vs non-meta-cognitive God tension but the "tendency towards mystical phenomena associated with the Third Eye" tension, sort of tangential but anyway): 1:02-1:23 (when D starts talking, the clip is over).

I think @Cred is right about this forum after all considering this abominable display of context clue awareness 😆 "I confronted Vitality [...]" "Why I confronted Vitality [...]" Besides, you kinda have to think — if between the two options, when one of them is suggested to be light, you pick the one that is not light to contest the claim, not the other person — whether or not you know the difference. In other words, I thought it would be obvious I did not mean Vitaly was light, that's why I did not care to mention it. But sure, Vitality is the first guy that pops up on the screen when you play the first video, so that makes your heuristic prone brain clued to that rather than the perhaps slightly more demanding task of reading the title of the (two) video(s) beforehand (and moving your attention to the other person and comparing their energy). In other words, shame on you for being either a) TikTok brained zoomeroids, or b) merely human.

This guy is in some kind of state. Extremely light energy, piercing eyes.

Getting 2-3 eggs in the morning (I get 5, big boi) together with adequate vitamin D and co-factors should set the stage for the rest of the day. Fats and proteins seem to ground you generally (and pairing vitamin D with fats could make a big difference for absorption).

There is an ego trip and then there is doing what you think is right despite the potential consequences, which is the inverse of an ego trip. Vitaly was arrested the day after. Whether or not the guy who confronted him was also on drugs, whether he lied when he said "I don't do drugs brother", whether he has a "psycho stare", whether his sense of calm in such a situation is due to some psychopathic wiring, he is obviously in some sort of "state", be it mystical or merely psychopathic or pharmacological. I don't pick up "Ramana Maharshi" energy or anything, but it's beyond normal energy, and it's palpable, hence "insane aura". That you use "aura" only to mean mystical genetic phenoms hooked up on that spiritual crack, that's on you. And whether he is indeed hooked up on adderall or coke, that's highly tentative given his calm demeanor, unlike Vitaly who is clearly erratic and jumbled in his speech. Consider your own emotional state while watching the video (or in general, maybe even the last couple of days), or your sense of skepticism, or your expectations coming into the video, how it's affecting your reading of his state.

Perhaps. Vitaly was definitely on stimulants in the video, but you see quite a different aura there.

"It's your character" is straight out of a movie. I'm sorry if you're so addicted to spiritual crack that you can't appreciate other forms of aesthetics.

It reminds me a bit of one time I talked to this girl from psych class and I said something like "yeah I know, that's pretty OCD". And she was like "NO, you cannot use that word that way, OCD means you suffer with OCD symptoms to such a degree that it cripples your daily life and you have problems going outside your house or getting everyday tasks done". And I'm like "yeah, I meant the 'normie conception' of OCD; people use the word that way, whatchu gonna do about it?" And she was like "yeah, but I still don't like when the word is used in that way ". That was around the time when I started realizing and accepting that language, words, are used in so many different ways so you might as well participate in it.

Consider that being sensitive means you can pick out nuances better, while if you can only pick out the very strong from the very weak, you're not as sensitive

The Time New Roman is triggering me in ways I could not anticipate.

Eat eggs for breakfast.

You can recognize that someone has an aura even if it's not a literal jivanmukti beaming pure shakti out of their anus. You can adjust your expectations according to the situation.

You won't knock me out.

Funniest was the Bang Bus.

Unless you are in a constant state of bliss, ego death, rapture, terror, no control, no past, no future, you are in identification with your illusory ego, so you might as well start treating it nice.

He recently got deported to Russia (he was released) then he returned to America.

The negative language is one thing, another thing is the typologizing and absolutizing (diagnosing); you are "this thing" and it has these specific criteria. A different approach is "how much of these traits do you have?", or "what specific goals do you have?" and the person fills in the blanks. The former is a subtle distinction (and the "neurodiversity spectrum" idea could seem to support this, but in reality, people typologize themselves despite this). I have very deliberately challenged typologizing "introversion" when it comes to myself, because I know the traps my mind creates when I go in that territory. I generally avoid describing myself as a thing. There is a saying "I don't care about who you are, only what you do". Or you can say "do what you want, do what you are good at, and do it in an environment that supports these things". If that is not happening, that can explain why you have so much trouble in life. And if you can't figure out why those things aren't happening and you've really tried your best, then consider that you have some dysfunction that needs special care. But even in that case, challenging the dysfunctionalizing and typologizing framework is helpful. You don't have to call yourself "autistic" to go to a psychologist to get help with your concerns (and yes, it can be an uphill battle to deal with diagnoses from the people trying to help you, but that is a microcosm of life and people always "diagnosing" you for various things and you having to say "no you're full of shit").

Dude moves like he could knock you out by breathing in your general direction.

Not Vitaly, the guy confronting him 💀 Vitaly is just on coke. He doesn't have divine metaphysical energy driving his actions.

Generally, I might add that questioning how things are framed, like I'm doing here, is a brilliant source of autonomy. It puts the power of reality (as far as it is framed, which is often) in your hands. This is a lot of what Leo preaches and is concerned about with notions like conformity, becoming epistemically independent, intellectually sovereign. Whenever you encounter a frame that you might consider problematic, ask yourself "how does this frame make me feel?". "Do I agree with this frame?" "Is there a better way to frame the same things?". Because frames tend to connect to other frames, they tend to smuggle in things that might not be necessary or relevant for the problem you're trying to address. I've tried to provide a frame that I think is more relevant for many people and which explains why so many people have had such a negative reaction to @Cred and his let's call it neurodiversity educational crusade. And this is not me saying my frame is necessarily better for you. I'm saying you should question the frame and ask "if" it is better for you. I am not doing like @Cred and insisting that you should adopt my frame. Those who know Spiral Dynamics know that this does not work. You have to meet people where they are at, and address their actual needs, not enlighten them with a view that might not fit them. @Leo Gura A video on frames and how being aware of how you frame things is beneficial (and how to be aware of it), might be good.

@Ramasta9 I might have some of their DNA considering my father's side has some Finnish genes (and subtle Lappid phenotypic traits) and Finland is not that far from Siberia (the Lappid phenotype "overlaps" with the Sibirid phenotypes) 😎

I've recently tried many supplements, which is popular these days (Bryan Johnson, Dr. Rhonda Patrick, Andrew Huberman, etc.). Before, I had an aversion to B-vitamin supplements because they made me feel too wired, but I decided to still try them in the form of a multivitamin. I also added copious amounts of zinc, boron and vitamin D (and K2, magnesium, calcium, fish oil). Then after finishing my degree, I noticed I was a bit restless even though I had little reason to be. So I decided to drop the multivitamin to see if indeed it was the B-vitamins. The restlessness dropped noticeably and quite immediately. Then when I try meditating I still find there is some lingering restlessness there. Maybe it's the zinc supplement (which I over time decided to double the dose of, because it gave me more energy). Also, when I started the boron supplement, I went straight to two pills (6 mg) without starting with one and then deciding whether I should taper up (or drop it). I suspect it could be making me feel a certain way (I have for example had strong reactions to too much Vitamin E, probably due to its anti-oxidant/anti-inflammatory activity, and boron has anti-inflammatory activity). If I still feel too wired or weird, I will maybe start tapering down vitamin D (which is a bit of a tough nut because I've done it before; but then I also took smaller doses; and I did not respond positively).

Because if you're growing up fed crack, you will need someone to take away that crack before you can shift your attention to other things. Doing work with social value was easier in the past when there was not much else to do or that steered your attention (but yes, stamp collection was a thing, but it's not literal dopaminergic hard drugs). And when you don't know crack, you probably won't have much else that gives you a sense of value than work with social value (because if you end up doing too much stamp collection, you will realize it's not sustainable in most cases, and it's easier to stop and the perceived value drops). If you let the child self-adminster crack and figure out what functional behaviors to do themselves, you will rely on the progressive breakdown of their functioning until they realize their life is too shit to continue this way, and they will either die or have an internal transformation (rock-bottom theory). That's not a wise or sustainable way to parent. It's more wise and sustainable to guide towards more natural forms of stimulation (indeed that of a cat). That's arguably where most of the self-hatred comes from in the "degenerate gamer": the progressive breakdown of motivational systems, increasing anhedonia, decreasing sensitivity to life, leading to more isolation, more compulsive and stronger types of stimulation (stronger drugs, stronger videogames, stronger porn) and a sense of hopelessness where they feel like they can't get out. And that's where the feeling of disconnection (from the "NT world") comes from, of not having the motivation (forget the competence) to seek out places of connection. And this doesn't just apply to videogames: it's the eternal dynamic of growing up. It's to go beyond the immediate short-term gratification, impulsive, self-focused hedonism, and orient yourself more long-term, delayed gratification, control your impulses, focus on more things than yourself, eudaimonia. And that's where parents lead by example and provide challenges in that direction, to push away from the immaturity and towards maturity. I thought you might say that. I have another theory for why I got "fixated" on that game (we're talking about RuneScape btw), and it has to do with me being promised paid membership for my birthday when I was 11, and then when we were about to purchase it, my dad noticed the age restriction was 12 years old (yes, strict), and he said no. So I was betrayed, making it a kind of forbidden pleasure, so I became fixated on that pleasure once I obtained it for myself (later with pre-paid mobile cards). This was also reinforced by the fact that because of the feeling of betrayal I got when asking for something I really wanted from my parents (RuneScape was a really really, really, big deal for me at that point), I stopped asking for stuff from my parents in general to avoid that potential betrayal in the future. So I stopped asking for other videogames (and clothes unless I had to, computer-related things, really anything "big"), and it calcified my "fixation" on that one game. As for the game itself being repetitive, it depends on how you play it. Skilling can be more repetitive (and is notoriously labelled autistic; "clicking on a rock" a million times), but player-vs-player is more varied and action-based (more like FPS games than anything). I have like 9 different PvP accounts on Oldschool RuneScape, let's put it that way. I have probably also a comparable number of hours playing guitar, and I played sports from like 7 to 14 and was very social at that time. I don't know what technically counts as an autistic fixation, but I didn't channel all of my time into the game. Also, as for repetition, a friend I consider autistic has said he likes to play piano 6 hours at a time (and one time he said he worked 12 hours at work, engineering consultant, with no breaks). When I play guitar, I go around an hour and a half, max 3 hours at a time. Let me also add that "fixation" on a game like RS is not uncommon. All the bigger streamers in the category have been fixated on it despite being sociable and "typical" in other ways, playing it consistently for decades. There is a saying "you never stop playing RS, you just take a break".

Living in a place that is dark half the year might not be optimal, even if my ancestors survived doing it. Survival is not longevity. That's true in the summer in Norway, but the sun is too low in the sky in winter, all the UV rays get absorbed by the atmosphere because of the low angle of entry. 100 years ago in winter, my ancestors ate dried/salted or smoked fish, smoked meat, potatoes, grains, dairy, root vegetables (carrots, cabbage, onions, etc.), canned vegetables/fruit. There was no year-round fresh fruit market. If some genius were to be a fruitarian, they would forego the vitamin D from the fish and purely live on saved up vitamin D from summer sunshine. Maybe it's survivable if you're in the sun a lot during summer, but I'm not sure if it's optimal.