Carl-Richard

Still after that though, I heard him give a pretty milquetoast take on consciousness on one of his podcasts.

While that is true, I could never see him having a discussion about Tier 2 metaphysics.

Start reading about the first feminists in history and work yourself towards today's feminism and see if you can find where they supposedly went wrong. Simone de Beauvoir is a good place to start.

I'm not enlightened, because I fear it, but I can tell you that there is nothing to worry about regarding "functioning". If anything, you'll function better.

Duh. There is no you ?

This guy streams his study sessions every day. Makes me genuinely more motivated to read every time it pops up.

@Leo Gura

My philosophy professor randomly put this in a powerpoint when talking about hypothetical vs. categorical imperatives He is such a funny guy.

When "trigger hallucinations" is used in this way, it just screams 1960s stuck-up news broadcasters and drug scare stories. The ignorance ?

There are no persons. There is no you. There is only God.

Meditation alone is curative.

If you're already solid Green, study epistemology and metaphysics. People like Kuhn and Feyerabend can be considered Yellow.

People are meeting hyperintelligent interdimensional beings in DMT trips yet people don't believe aliens exist. ?

No. Soviet Union was Blue. Communism is not.

Yes, I'm a Zappa fanboy, but this one is special. This is the concert that inspired the lyrics of "Smoke On The Water" by Deep Purple: It has surprisingly good audio quality. You can hear "Fire!" at 1:21:05 and Zappa telling everybody to calmly exit the building.

That is one lens. Let's look at some different lenses: Cognitive: enlightenment is caused by the cessation of self-referential thoughts. Intrapsychic: enlightenment is caused by the cessation of egoic drives. Social: enlightenment is caused by the cessation of need for external validation. Existential-Humanistic: enlightenment is caused by the transcendence of the self. Behavioral: enlightenment is caused by a specific change in stimulus-response patterns. Buddhist: enlightenment is caused by the cessation of karma and thus the end of dukkha and samsara. Sometimes the idea of causality can be misleading. It's useful to first concede that these are merely descriptions (including the neurophysiological one that you mentioned, namely neurons and neurotransmitters), and that causality must then be recontextualized within this new framework.

@SolarWarden 0:55

Are you fucking serious bro? KEN WILBER

As a former doormat, no.

I'm from Norway. Max 5 visitors allowed in the same house, max 20 people allowed in outside gatherings, mandatory masks on public transport and inside stores. Recently reopened gyms with capacity restrictions. ...then on the news, 1000 young people gathered in the same place to party 2 days ago ? People are generally positive, but then you have the odd weirdos burning masks outside the government building (my roommate was there and ended up front page on the news the idiot?).

This is called the relative/absolute conflation. From a relative perspective, things matter. Having a life purpose and helping people matters relative to whatever human standard you want to set for yourself. But from an absolute perspective, nothing matters. However, that doesn't really change much, because from an absolute perspective, humans don't even exist. So as long as you're still human (relatively speaking), you should still strive to live as humanely as possible (whatever that means for you).

My conception of karma is not contigent on morality in the first place, so yeah, if you spend more time in flow, you more efficiently deal with karma, because that is all that karma is: information about the universe.

JP might go harder in this direction in the future. His talk with Russel Brand and other recent appearances seems to show this.

Here's a perspective: I used to seek enlightenment, but when I actually stood up next to it, I realized I was getting more than I wanted. Then I stopped seeking it, and man, that is when it really started. In a relative sense, the person that sits down and meditates can be said to be seeking, and that behavior is necessary for him to get to where he wants, but in an absolute sense, there is no person seeking and there is no place to go. Then what do you tell people? Well, you could say that enlightenment is when there is a spontaneous flip from the first perspective to the second perspective. It would therefore be wrong to say either "stop seeking – there is nothing to seek" or "keep going – there is something to seek", because it depends on where you're currently at. Some people need to pull and some people need to release. That is why teachers give different pointers that mean the opposite to different people and why people who aren't resonating at the same level get confused when they hear these conflicting messages.