Carl-Richard

You should provide timestamps and concrete examples of what he says that is Yellow.

I never explicitly said there is no agenda.

@Rolo ?

Are you new here? haha

ENFJ https://www.personality-database.com/profile/57706/sadhguru-jaggi-vasudev-international-leaders-mbti-personality-type

"I was so fucked up bro"

I can't take competition seriously anymore. It's just play. I still smash the table when I lose in Fall Guys though.

Everytime you have to mention the brain, you're in la-la land.

You aren't. This is most likely getting locked for being low quality.

This perfectly illustrates my point. When race is mentioned in western society, it most often is in the context of people of colour. White people are "just people". This is whiteness in a nutshell. Wow, look at that! Only one black person... ("black").

Just because your search includes a word doesn't mean that word will be represented in an image in any particular way. You'll often get links to news articles, youtube videos, and social medias that mention that word, and the pictures are often heavily context dependent. In the case with "happy white woman", the race of a white person is often only mentioned in the context of another race also being mentioned (in this case, black), and therefore you should expect more images that include other races in that particular search. For example, many of those pictures are about a white woman being happily married with a black man. Try looking up just "white woman" and see how extremely loaded the contexts are. The different results are a reflection of how the search engines work differently. It's not necessarily a reflection of the intent of the engine creators.

Dim Tool

LMAO

Show me a question that wasn't asked by a human.

You got an example?

Did the people you listed say explicitly "I'm 100% certain that this true!" or is that just a general wibe you're getting? How do you go about distinguishing that wibe from just being invested, involved, or simply taking it seriously? Does every action require 100% certainty?

You meditate and then you go about your day. That is about as conscious you'll get. If something entertains you, that's high consciousness entertainment. Don't turn consciousness work into a crippling obsession.

You're confusing seriousness with certainty.

I'm more onboard with that. Though, one should be vary of letting this kind of insight paralyze you to the point where you don't know what to do. You can never ever perform a fully informed action.

@Mikael89 You're confusing limited experiences for Experience itself; the relative and the absolute.

That is like asking "why do people dance?". Because they want to. It's because God wants to. The idea that every question must have an answer is an anthropocentric notion. Adopt a cosmocentric perspective. Why do people dance to music? You need a beat, a rhythm, a structure, a progression. If it's infinite in all dimensions, it must be happening right now. Absolute Infinity contains EVERYTHING! Confusion, delusion, illusion is all true. Where else could it be if not inside infinity?

Knowing is experience. You said you didn't trust your experience, and I asked "how do you know that?", and you replied with "I don't know". I replied "Good", because you showed consistency in your answers. Whether or not you claim to trust in your own experience, "trust" is still a duality. Whichever part of that duality you choose to go with, you still have to know that. Experience still stands.

How do you know?

Good.