Carl-Richard

I heard Leo said that he studied under Ken Wilber himself, so I doubt he would disagree.

Literally yesteryears news.

"Oneness" as The Absolute, "you" as the relative. Don't conflate the two.

Death rates.

How many new mutants do we need before you realize the reality of the situation? There is nothing stopping a new mutant from being >10x more deadly - only chance.

Natural selection is always a fact as long as people are reproducing. It's simply that human culture and technological innovation has allowed for more artificial selection.

Which countries do you have in mind?

But the man behind Healthygamer.gg is arguably Tier 2.

The pandemic response is a basic survival response to a pathogen. It can happen in any type of society, from pre-agricultural, Purple tribal socities to hyper-technological, Tier 2 global societies. It's even observed in animals: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3189355/ These don't seem to be explained by the developmental domain. You'll have a better chance with the temperament or personality domain. For example, if you're prone to paranoia and distrust of authority, you're more likely to be skeptical of these types of government interventions.

Oh I misread that, I'm sorry. Yeah, appeal to nature is just a lazy argument in general. If you're trying to build a successful society, looking to nature is probably the last thing you should do. Animals kill and rape eachother. Very applaudeable stuff.

Votes on the Personality Database website: INFJ (596) ENTP (356) INTP (166) https://www.personality-database.com/profile/11071/jordan-peterson-psychology-neuroscience-mbti-personality-type It's about Ni and Ne like I was talking about . JBP's whole archetype shtick is typical Ni.

I only get more aware of it when I'm writing something for example. It's like "welp, here comes Mr. Dunning-Kruger again with his tryhard word salad" ?

Maybe the worst part is that homosexuality has actually been observed in nature in other species than humans. Besides, when did theologans suddenly pull themselves down to the level of animals? (or maybe that's just a Christian thing) ?

They simply have to evolve past viewing everything through the lens of pushing a political narrative and adopt freedom of thought. If people are free to be whoever they want to be, this shouldn't be a problem at all. If someone believes that people ought to believe in their restrictive worldview and somebody says "we accept a wider range", of course they will project by saying "you're forcing this on me!".

I did not mean depression in a clinical sense. That was just a funny way to put it. It's about the realization of one's relative incompetence and how it changes how you perceive yourself and the world. It's not like I'm pulling my hair out because of this. It was simply an interesting observation. It's possible to be highly meta-aware of your own mind while also noticing finer distinctions about the limitations of that mind.

That is the best part ?

That is the best part ?

i.e. escaping the part of the curve that people most often refer to when mentioning Dunning-Kruger (the low competence, high confidence area). The later part of the curve is more often refered to as just expertise.

It is, but the experience of it is real, and my experience of it has changed over time. Just curious if other people have had the same experience (of essentially escaping the Dunning Kruger effect and feeling the ramifications of it first-hand).

The video and the music are both masterfully done.

Break through the illusion of separateness. There is only seeing.

"I am done with pants and will not spend the rest of my life with pants on. I don't care what any progressives think about it. It's not going to happen. I think it's a form of psychological abuse to expect that out of an entire planet, to expect kids in pants at school all day long, forever? For the next 100 years? No. Just no. I will not comply. My kids will not comply. I'll take natural selection and take my chances."

The relative is dual. The Absolute is non-dual. Duality is comprised of two parts that make up a whole (e.g. hot-cold, up-down, big-small). From the relative perspective, duality is two. From The Absolute perspective, duality is one. From the relative perspective, you can choose between many different purposes. From The Absolute perspective, there is only one purpose, which also means there is no purpose.

You're not pulling me out of this boat. Only I can do that.

Your purpose should be to differentiate between the relative and The Absolute