Carl-Richard

Just a correction: I did watch the video of Professor Dave in its entirety. You might've misread what I wrote. I recently made a thread about a model that is useful for understanding construct awareness. I used this exact topic as a way to demonstrate the different levels of the model, so I highly recommend reading it (that and the video underneath about Lagrangian mechanics) What is accepted by society is to eat carcinogenic foods, drink toxic chemicals (alcohol), and watch the same news channel every day. It's obvious that this work is not going to resonate with that. This goes back to how to approach sensemaking: do you intend to think your own thoughts or not? Of course you're always going to rely on other people's thoughts, but intention is key. The intention is that you want to understand; you. When something resonates, there is a feeling of understanding rather than confusion. It happens when you have an internal framework that is able to accommodate what is being presented. That framework can be based on things like logic (rationality), or it can be based on thing like experience (personal empiricism). You've accurately pinpointed the problem, which is that the teachings have a lot more to do with experience rather than logic (although they might overlap from time to time), so the correct solution is to grab that experience. That might not be possible from someone like Professor Dave who is stuck on rationality, but there the solution is development.

It's not a complete representation of the phenomena. It's a visualization for the means of deconstructing falsehood and point to truth. Truth can never be represented. It can only be presented.

Every distinction can be deconstucted.

The thing is that not all communication involves sound or intentional signals. Like the communication theorist Paul Watzlawick once said: "you cannot not communicate." Communication and sharing of thoughts happens in a shared environment, and it can be broad and subtle. The environment also isn't limited to a specific locality in space and time. It stretches across past and present (past events, interactions, interpretations, thoughts; general behavior patterns). This is why telepathy tends to occur more easily among relatives and close friends, because they're more behaviorally locked in to eachother. If you have strong empathic abilities (the ability to "see the other"), the amount of information you can gather from perceiving behavioral patterns increases. That is how a guru can simply look you in the eyes and know your past, present and future. Spirituality increases telepathy because it dissolves the boundaries between self and other.

You might want to watch this: 00:22:35 Chris Langan, the CTMU, and Distributed Solipsism

If we're going to have yet another covid debate thread, please keep it civil. No personal attacks.

The mistake materialists make is that they think telepathic abilities have to be equal to moving your fingers or taking a leak. It's more like seeing a squirrel or meeting an old friend. Besides, reading thoughts doesn't require an ethereal transfer of information from one head to the next. All you need is empathic awareness of the other and a similar internal framework ("what would I think in her situation?") Many thoughts arise more or less dependently on the environment. In communication between two or more people, the environment is shared. It's not so wild that thoughts can be shared as well. In fact, that is what communication is about: acknowledging your shared experience.

Every rockstar in history.

Systems theory (relationships, feedback loops, externalized costs), cross-paradigmatic operations (evolutionary theory x economics x policy) and focus on sustainability across different domains.

58:14 - 1:07:42

Growth. If it happened in aliens, it can happen in humans.

At least I'm not alone in feeling this way

27. Criticizes itself constantly

Speaking of the vatican, you should change your name to St. Peter Jordanson

Yes it is.

Ah, so it's a normie trait. Got it!

Fancy Death Metal?

We don't discuss the particulars around obtaining drugs on this forum (drug sourcing). You can talk about practices around safe use, but no detailed information about how to acquire illegal substances (buying practices, sites, extraction methods or growing kits). Please read the forum guidelines : https://www.actualized.org/forum/guidelines/

When you say experience, I understand that as Absolute Truth. Relative truth is thought.

Case in point

Integrating all aspects of yourself.

The truth is not in the communication. Communication is a means to an end; utilitarian. Truth is existential. Truth cannot be spoken. Speech is noise, Truth is silence. If there was any intention behind the communication, it was to put an end to it

Opeth is unmatched in its versatility and creativity:

If you do something that is not beneficial for survival, your body will tell you by sending some signals. If you keep eating cake after you've had enough cake, your body will tell you by making it taste bad. If you touch a hot stove, it will feel bad. If you don't eat food when you're hungry, it will feel bad. To maximize pleasure, you must do the right things at the right time. Your body as a self-perpetuating life system needs to maintain a steady internal state (homeostasis) in order to survive. Survival means to keep a fixed boundary between yourself and the environment, and complex creatures like humans have evolved elaborate behaviors to aid in this process (avoiding predators, routine feeding behaviors, seeking shelter etc.) along with more basic physiological processes (maintaining a constant body temperature, acidity, water content etc.). The nervous system is one of many systems that work to control such behavior and maintain homeostasis by using signalling molecules like dopamine. Dopamine is involved in things like movement, motivation and seeking rewarding stimuli, but pleasure only happens once you do the work that dopamine tells you to do, and when the work is over, systems like the serotonin and opioid system take over (movement stops, you rest, sleep etc.). You seek what is pleasurable because it aids in your survival, and things that give you pleasure generally do aid in your survival. If you go against your own survival and homeostasis, your signalling systems will tell you this, and hedonic adaptation is one such process, i.e. feeling less pleasure from eating more cake after you're full, or drinking more water after quenching your thirst, or having sex for the 12th time in a day. There is a myriad of different adaptation mechanisms in your body that all work together to make your life possible The need for success and achievement is a higher-order expression of deeply rooted survival drives, and they follow the same adaptation mechanisms and use the same signalling systems as the lower ones. For example, the movement through a social hierarchy is tracked by serotonin levels. Your motivation to finish a project is driven by dopamine etc. Your signalling systems also generally respond to changes in stimuli. If you sit on your butt for a while, the feeling of pressure that you experience while initially sitting down slowly disappears. When a stimulus becomes persistent and static, you adapt to it by decreasing the receptiveness (unless there is a positive feedback loop that increases it, like with certain pain pathways). This tendency to respond to change is what drives people to constantly seek new stimuli and explore new environments. It's why millionaires keep earning more money even though they have all the money in the world. It's why the biggest bodybuilders think they look small in the mirror. Experiencing change is also a source of strength and health as it challenges your system in new ways, engages a fuller range of capacities and resources, and perks your senses. Experiencing stagnation makes you numb, depressed and nihilistic. In many ways it's the voluntary confrontation with change that creates desire, drive, meaning and not least pleasure.