Carl-Richard

Being Green is easy when you're an ordinary citizen who is operating within the confines of a Green country. Being Green is a bit harder when you're a president dealing with the mess that is geopolitics. Is sexual education harmful?

Listen to how they speak.

Integrating the whole Intuition.

This is what your body's energy production looks like at a microscopic level. Without it, there would be no war. But why would God change anything about these molecules? Everything is working perfectly from top to bottom. If you change just one thing about it, it's no longer complete. Reality is complete as it is. It necessarily has to be that way.

Yes if you're in a psychotic state.

Is that an official report or is it a bystander making assumptions? A violent breakdown on shrooms can easily be mistaken as coke rage.

He is literally on mushrooms. It's the first thing that is said in the video ?

Enlightenment itself is in many ways the opposite of abstract. It's just the thoughts "about" enlightenment that don't follow linear logic, i.e. it has to be intuited. Regardless, sensors and intuitives is not a straightforward dichotomy. You use both functions all the time.

That's exactly why you should be hesitant about blowing away your ego at a young age. You're living in a culture that hasn't integrated psychedelic use at a young age. It's not just about neurons. It's about behavior.

That would be a fun movie.

ISTP simply means Ti > Se > Ni > Fe. Ti - internal logical order. Se - specific and concrete perception of external world. Ni - broad & plethoric perception of internal world. Fe - external emotional data & harmony. (https://youtu.be/PQtBUvGK5C0) All MBTI personalities contain both intuitive and sensing functions. They're not all that different. They just emphasize different aspects. We're all humans with brains after all. On that note, ISTP is considered one of the most "intuitive sensors". Don't fall into the trap of assigning some teleological significance to your personality type. INTPs can be mechanics and engineers as well. It's just that some types are more likely to produce certain behaviors than others. It's a cognitive structural model, not a descriptive behaviorist model. Also, consider cross-referencing different models like Big 5 (granted, there are correlations, but no two models are equivalent). For example, you could have an ISTP who scores very high on openmindedness that would be even more likely to be express so-called intuitive behaviors. Not all ISTPs are the same.

Yes. No voice is too scary for me

Martin Ball is an ISTP.

You have to factor in the context of Leo speaking to mostly laymen who have an idealized idea of scientists as arbiters of absolute truth. Most of his critique is about undoing that view. You could probably find a decent number of construct aware scientists and philosophers (after all, those are the people who Leo are citing, people like Kuhn, Feyerabend, Capra), but it's not something that is a given. You're generally not incentivized to perform deep metatheoretical investigations as a scientist. The laymen pop-science view is just an exaggerated version of this fact.

Sometimes beautiful things happen. A month ago I found a pot of gold outside my school :

I heard they make great coffee.

Prove that you have something valueable to say.

Intuitives are probably more likely to pursue enlightenment, but that doesn't mean sensors don't pursue enlightenment.

Sure, if you define it that way .

Not all behavior is determined by belief. You have instincts, conditioning, habits.

Does a dog believe it has to bite you when you slap it?

What does this mean in practice? Give an example of a reaction and a non-reaction.

He is so powerful yet so refined. I just watched an entire Strapping Young Lad concert, a bit on the hevydevy side