Carl-Richard

It's able to differentiate between INTP and INTJ, so if anybody wants to settle the Leo INTx debate, get to work

It doesn't seem to use a very mathematical approach. Maybe if I give it a lot of text. I was already logged in to the site before it reached capacity. I tried to log in on my phone a minute ago, but I couldn't.

What I really wanted was this: "As a part of an MBTI analysis, can you give me a rough estimate for the amounts of phrases using 1. Ti: 2. Te: 3. Fi: 4. Fe: in this text?:" But it gave me a dissatisfying answer (I used some other text example this time):

"Stop punching yourself" ?

"It's only- *punch* the- *punch* NOW! *KO*"

It has a real tribal rite of passage feeling to it. Maybe they experienced something transformative underneath all the ideology ?

Is it ethical to use wikipedia?

It's the pre-workout

If you're thinking about suicide, the last thing you should be thinking about is what happens after and instead what is happening before. Sincerely, get some help. It's possible to get better. Many of us on the forum are proof of that.

I take the things Tate said about himself seriously

?

I've experienced my finite experience fade away and seen that it was not essential to myself, hence solipsism cannot be true, because my finite mind is not what is essential. Me looking at another person and saying "they cannot be experiencing anything like this, because I am currently only experiencing this" is to conclude that my finite mind is the basis of reality, not boundless consciousness. Boundless consciousness arises prior to any looking at another person.

@AtheisticNonduality Great, get some adults in there

The embodiment of ?

Try it!

I'm just balancing out all the threads of the people who cry their balls out because they nutted in their sleep on day 40 of nofap

Yes, it's absolutely crucial. Talking about the absolute is not the problem. It's to have a conversation about relative distinctions and then suddenly flip into to the absolute without acknowledging it which is the problem (or jumping back and forth between them like a jester).

Yet here you are calling them by different names.

To not be able to hold a coherent conversation is not a sign of spiritual development. Keep your absolutes and relatives in order and everybody will be happy.

Yet here we are talking about it.

They're the same thing from the absolute perspective, but they're not the same thing from the relative perspective, which is the perspective we're talking about — you know, the place where we make distinctions.

It's possible to break identification with the human and live from the identification with Mind most of the time. That is what spiritual practice is pointing towards.

Why is not the universe the same as a single human being? The same reason why a swimming pool in not the same as an amoeba.

Absolutely not. The entire universe is not the same thing as a single human being.

True. The only being that is conscious is not a person, so to say that other people have no consciousness is meaningless, because no person has consciousness in the first place. The person, the human character, does not have consciousness. It's an apparent limitation of consciousness, which we refer to as perception (sights, sounds, smells, tastes, sensations, etc.). Consciousness is an infinite being, not a finite person.