Carl-Richard

@Someone here Brother, if anybody as inquisitive as you ever has a mystical experience, they'll become an actual sage. Don't hold yourself back Aim to try some psychedelics, or go on a meditation retreat or something.

?‍?

This is not my usual kind of post, but I was (literally) blown away by this. So, I own an air purifier that I have in my bedroom: It's from Cotech, it's very cheap, and it takes in air from the backside and blows it straight upwards. Anyways, I have a routine of finishing off while standing (because it feels better), and one time I noticed that having the air purifier on high speed a few feet away from me creates a slight breeze on my back which acts kind of stimulating. So I've been doing that for a while, but last time, right before climaxing, I decided to place it directly behind me where it blew straight across my back, and it threw me into the most breathy climax I've ever had. It was as if the wind was blowing straight through me. I sounded like a freaking train leaving the station How do I explain this? At least for me, the area around my lower back becomes more sensitive the longer I go without releasing my sexual energy. It's to the extent that the times I've shaved my back (lol), I can have trouble falling asleep because of the short hairs slightly rubbing against the blanket as I breathe. There are of course obvious associations between sexual energy and the spine (kundalini energy), so it seems like stimulating the lower back during climax can cause a synergistic build-up of energy. I also think the upward-moving direction of the wind is important as well. If you have an air purifier like this one, or if you just want to try it out with a normal fan, tell me what you think

Would be good to know. Considering the base suicide rate in the world is about 1/10 000, probably 1-10 every video (assuming unique viewers).

So making one-liners about death being an illusion is suddenly not the reason why Leo is 10x worse than Tate?

I'm literally just following your statements to their logical conclusion. Making one-liners about death being an illusion => you're 10x worse than Tate.

Yeah, and he is 10x worse than Andrew Tate for making that video...

Yep. We know that humans are capable of human cognition, but a program that moves letters around is not anything close to a human. To claim that there exists anything akin to human cognition which correlates with such a letter-moving process is a wild claim.

You don't know that. I for one discovered Rupert's videos before Leo's forum.

Any suicides would be due to a misunderstanding of Leo's intended message, while any sex trafficking operations would be due to a proper understanding of Tate's intended message

Here is one such one-liner: Yeah, compassion = bad

This is just not reasonable. I don't know how to make you see this. Would you say the same thing for Rupert Spira, Eckhart Tolle, Mooji, etc.?

Bro, there are levels to this shit

It's this simple: is a human the same as a computer program?

Well, that erases all the points you just made about Leo being 10x as toxic as Tate. Regardless, I don't think you sincerely believe that repeating a New-Age trope of "you're immortal" is 10x worse than sharing a step-by-step guide on how to sex traffic innocent women.

You could make the case that some spiritual teachings should ideally be locked behind doors and only shared in an intimate teacher-student relationship, as was the case traditionally. However, if we look at the current reality, "death is an illusion, etc." is a common trope which has existed all throughout history in various religions, and today, there are thousands of YouTube videos from especially the Advaita community where this is mouthed ad nauseum. It's virtually certain that a Leo follower who is interested in spirituality already knows about this information. But sure, I think spirituality in general needs an ethical revamping. However, this is not even in the same ballpark as abusing and traumatizing tons of women in a sex trafficking operation aimed to only benefit yourself and sharing a step-by-step guide on how to do those exact things to millions on the internet.

I disagree, and you can't. But go ahead.

Why should those things be comparable? lol

I can actually somewhat agree to that in some specific cases, but "unambigiously linked" is ironically a very ambigious thing to say, and I wouldn't say that makes him 10x more toxic than Andrew Tate lol.

Bruh. Correlation ≠ causation

When it feels like you're communicating with a child. Age of consent laws kick in ;D

I'm a metabolizing organism which is a part of a 4 billion year old lineage of similar metabolizing organisms.

You can find admirable traits in very bad people. Nothing new there.

I got my idea for using ChatGPT to type my MBTI as I was about to wake up one morning