Carl-Richard

Bro, there are levels to this shit

It's this simple: is a human the same as a computer program?

Well, that erases all the points you just made about Leo being 10x as toxic as Tate. Regardless, I don't think you sincerely believe that repeating a New-Age trope of "you're immortal" is 10x worse than sharing a step-by-step guide on how to sex traffic innocent women.

You could make the case that some spiritual teachings should ideally be locked behind doors and only shared in an intimate teacher-student relationship, as was the case traditionally. However, if we look at the current reality, "death is an illusion, etc." is a common trope which has existed all throughout history in various religions, and today, there are thousands of YouTube videos from especially the Advaita community where this is mouthed ad nauseum. It's virtually certain that a Leo follower who is interested in spirituality already knows about this information. But sure, I think spirituality in general needs an ethical revamping. However, this is not even in the same ballpark as abusing and traumatizing tons of women in a sex trafficking operation aimed to only benefit yourself and sharing a step-by-step guide on how to do those exact things to millions on the internet.

I disagree, and you can't. But go ahead.

Why should those things be comparable? lol

I can actually somewhat agree to that in some specific cases, but "unambigiously linked" is ironically a very ambigious thing to say, and I wouldn't say that makes him 10x more toxic than Andrew Tate lol.

Bruh. Correlation ≠ causation

When it feels like you're communicating with a child. Age of consent laws kick in ;D

I'm a metabolizing organism which is a part of a 4 billion year old lineage of similar metabolizing organisms.

You can find admirable traits in very bad people. Nothing new there.

I got my idea for using ChatGPT to type my MBTI as I was about to wake up one morning

It's a program that shuffles letters around. We don't have AIs walking around picking up objects and stepping on dogs yet.

The devil is very charismatic, intelligent, funny and tempting.

?

It will require a lot of work.

I wonder if Andrew Tate was a spiritual teacher, how many people would come to his defense.

Trauma.

Let's test this thing out. I'm choosing the more meaty ones (longer text); 16 posts in total: Toxic Masculinity In A Nutshell (INTP) January 13, 2023 https://www.actualized.org/insights/toxic-masculinity-in-a-nutshell Royalty & Monarchy Is Toxic (ISTJ) January 13, 2023 https://www.actualized.org/insights/royalty-monarchy-is-toxic PBD vs Neil deGrasse Tyson (INTJ) January 9, 2023 https://www.actualized.org/insights/pbd-vs-neil-degrasse-tyson Conservative Socrates (ISTJ) December 20, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/conservative-socrates The AI Revolution Has Arrived (INTJ, ISTJ, ENTJ) December 18, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/the-ai-revolution-has-arrived Beware Of Celebrity Whores (INTJ) December 17, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/beware-of-celebrity-whores Understanding Shitcoins (ISTJ) December 14, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/understanding-shitcoins Conservative On Software Updates (ISTJ, INTJ) December 14, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/conservative-on-software-updates Killing Sparrows (ISTJ, ISTP) December 13, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/killing-sparrows Splice (ISTJ, INTJ) December 8, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/splice Attack On Truth? (INTJ) November 7, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/attack-on-truth Introducing Pure Philosophy (INTP) November 2, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/introducing-pure-philosophy Biden Worships The Devil (INTJ) October 31, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/biden-worships-the-devil Soloviev's All-Unity (INTP) October 30, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/solovievs-all-unity Poetry In Putin's Russia (INTJ, ISTJ) October 30, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/poetry-in-putins-russia When The Left Goes Too Far - Bonus (INTJ) October 24, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/when-the-left-goes-too-far-bonus Type count: INTJ = 9 ISTJ = 8 INTP = 3 ENTJ = 1 ISTP = 1 Function weighting (dom = 4, aux = 3, tert = 2, inf = 1): INTJ = 9(4Ni + 3Te + 2Fi +1Se) = 36Ni + 27Te + 18Fi + 9Se ISTJ = 8(4Si + 3Te + 2Fi + 1Ne) = 32Si + 24Te + 16Fi + 8Ne INTP = 3(4Ti + 3Ne + 2Si + 1Fe) = 12Ti + 9Ne + 6Si + 3Fe ENTJ = 1(4Te + 3Ni + 2Se + 1Fi) = 4Te + 3Ni + 2Se + 1Fi ISTP = 1(4Ti + 3Se + 2Ni + 1Fe) = 4Ti + 3Se + 2Ni + 1Fe Te = 27 + 24 + 4 = 55 = 25% Ni = 36 + 3 + 2 = 41 = 18.6% Si = 32 + 6 = 38 = 17.3% Fi = 18 + 16 + 1 = 35 = 15.9% Ne = 9 + 8 = 17 = 7.7% Ti = 12 + 4 = 16 = 7.3% Se = 9 + 3 + 2 = 14 = 6.4% Fe = 3 + 1 = 4 = 1.8% Te > Ni > Si > Fi > Ne > Ti > Se > Fe If we sort the functions by function type: Judging: Te > Fi > Ti > Fe Perceiving: Ni > Si > Ne > Se The weighting thing could probably be tweaked.

Some people I personally just go by functions. I'm apparently inbetween two types, which doesn't make much sense according to the theory.

Well, it did say INTP or INFP, so it's at least open to some options.

It's able to differentiate between INTP and INTJ, so if anybody wants to settle the Leo INTx debate, get to work

It doesn't seem to use a very mathematical approach. Maybe if I give it a lot of text. I was already logged in to the site before it reached capacity. I tried to log in on my phone a minute ago, but I couldn't.

What I really wanted was this: "As a part of an MBTI analysis, can you give me a rough estimate for the amounts of phrases using 1. Ti: 2. Te: 3. Fi: 4. Fe: in this text?:" But it gave me a dissatisfying answer (I used some other text example this time):