Carl-Richard

Moderator
  • Content count

    13,373
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Carl-Richard

  1. I wonder if Andrew Tate was a spiritual teacher, how many people would come to his defense.
  2. Let's test this thing out. I'm choosing the more meaty ones (longer text); 16 posts in total: Toxic Masculinity In A Nutshell (INTP) January 13, 2023 https://www.actualized.org/insights/toxic-masculinity-in-a-nutshell Royalty & Monarchy Is Toxic (ISTJ) January 13, 2023 https://www.actualized.org/insights/royalty-monarchy-is-toxic PBD vs Neil deGrasse Tyson (INTJ) January 9, 2023 https://www.actualized.org/insights/pbd-vs-neil-degrasse-tyson Conservative Socrates (ISTJ) December 20, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/conservative-socrates The AI Revolution Has Arrived (INTJ, ISTJ, ENTJ) December 18, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/the-ai-revolution-has-arrived Beware Of Celebrity Whores (INTJ) December 17, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/beware-of-celebrity-whores Understanding Shitcoins (ISTJ) December 14, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/understanding-shitcoins Conservative On Software Updates (ISTJ, INTJ) December 14, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/conservative-on-software-updates Killing Sparrows (ISTJ, ISTP) December 13, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/killing-sparrows Splice (ISTJ, INTJ) December 8, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/splice Attack On Truth? (INTJ) November 7, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/attack-on-truth Introducing Pure Philosophy (INTP) November 2, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/introducing-pure-philosophy Biden Worships The Devil (INTJ) October 31, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/biden-worships-the-devil Soloviev's All-Unity (INTP) October 30, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/solovievs-all-unity Poetry In Putin's Russia (INTJ, ISTJ) October 30, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/poetry-in-putins-russia When The Left Goes Too Far - Bonus (INTJ) October 24, 2022 https://www.actualized.org/insights/when-the-left-goes-too-far-bonus Type count: INTJ = 9 ISTJ = 8 INTP = 3 ENTJ = 1 ISTP = 1 Function weighting (dom = 4, aux = 3, tert = 2, inf = 1): INTJ = 9(4Ni + 3Te + 2Fi +1Se) = 36Ni + 27Te + 18Fi + 9Se ISTJ = 8(4Si + 3Te + 2Fi + 1Ne) = 32Si + 24Te + 16Fi + 8Ne INTP = 3(4Ti + 3Ne + 2Si + 1Fe) = 12Ti + 9Ne + 6Si + 3Fe ENTJ = 1(4Te + 3Ni + 2Se + 1Fi) = 4Te + 3Ni + 2Se + 1Fi ISTP = 1(4Ti + 3Se + 2Ni + 1Fe) = 4Ti + 3Se + 2Ni + 1Fe Te = 27 + 24 + 4 = 55 = 25% Ni = 36 + 3 + 2 = 41 = 18.6% Si = 32 + 6 = 38 = 17.3% Fi = 18 + 16 + 1 = 35 = 15.9% Ne = 9 + 8 = 17 = 7.7% Ti = 12 + 4 = 16 = 7.3% Se = 9 + 3 + 2 = 14 = 6.4% Fe = 3 + 1 = 4 = 1.8% Te > Ni > Si > Fi > Ne > Ti > Se > Fe If we sort the functions by function type: Judging: Te > Fi > Ti > Fe Perceiving: Ni > Si > Ne > Se The weighting thing could probably be tweaked.
  3. Some people I personally just go by functions. I'm apparently inbetween two types, which doesn't make much sense according to the theory.
  4. Well, it did say INTP or INFP, so it's at least open to some options.
  5. It's able to differentiate between INTP and INTJ, so if anybody wants to settle the Leo INTx debate, get to work
  6. It doesn't seem to use a very mathematical approach. Maybe if I give it a lot of text. I was already logged in to the site before it reached capacity. I tried to log in on my phone a minute ago, but I couldn't.
  7. What I really wanted was this: "As a part of an MBTI analysis, can you give me a rough estimate for the amounts of phrases using 1. Ti: 2. Te: 3. Fi: 4. Fe: in this text?:" But it gave me a dissatisfying answer (I used some other text example this time):
  8. "Stop punching yourself" ?
  9. "It's only- *punch* the- *punch* NOW! *KO*"
  10. It has a real tribal rite of passage feeling to it. Maybe they experienced something transformative underneath all the ideology ?
  11. If you're thinking about suicide, the last thing you should be thinking about is what happens after and instead what is happening before. Sincerely, get some help. It's possible to get better. Many of us on the forum are proof of that.
  12. I take the things Tate said about himself seriously
  13. I've experienced my finite experience fade away and seen that it was not essential to myself, hence solipsism cannot be true, because my finite mind is not what is essential. Me looking at another person and saying "they cannot be experiencing anything like this, because I am currently only experiencing this" is to conclude that my finite mind is the basis of reality, not boundless consciousness. Boundless consciousness arises prior to any looking at another person.
  14. @AtheisticNonduality Great, get some adults in there
  15. I'm just balancing out all the threads of the people who cry their balls out because they nutted in their sleep on day 40 of nofap
  16. Yes, it's absolutely crucial. Talking about the absolute is not the problem. It's to have a conversation about relative distinctions and then suddenly flip into to the absolute without acknowledging it which is the problem (or jumping back and forth between them like a jester).
  17. Yet here you are calling them by different names.
  18. To not be able to hold a coherent conversation is not a sign of spiritual development. Keep your absolutes and relatives in order and everybody will be happy.
  19. Yet here we are talking about it.