-
Content count
878 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Alexop
-
It is like being a policeman. You have to deal with the garbage of society, but it is a job that has to be done. As a philosopher you have to deal with the collective ego of society, you have to point out the evil in people and they will fight back, exactly like criminals do. They will mock you, ignore you, hate you etc. you will have to calculate how much truth can people endure without backlashing on you. Are people ready to hear the truth about human looks and genetics? Are they ready to hear the truth about men and women? Of course academic philosophy is full of shit. It has to be, everything mainstream has to be full of shit. Otherwise it will shed too much light on the collective devilishness of society.
-
It is always like this in all self-improvement communities, no matter physical or online. It is not like in sports where most pro players have an idea of Of what they are doing. In self-improvement you can get out with spinning shit up because there are no real consequences for it. You don't need more than 18 years old and 10 hybernating neurons to come here and just attack people who really do stuff and dare to stick out and be vulnerable by saying uncomfortable stuff. Maybe I did a bit too much of that in this thread. Sorry OP 🤙🙏. We should be more understanding. We are now in a femininity bias culture, anything that smells like exceptionality and straight forward truths is penalised with mob justice. It is like: be vulnerable but not in toxic ways that we don't like.
-
Yes I feel you, maybe you expect too much from a relationship? We are in the drak ages, society is as it is... Don't expect a woman to make you happy.
-
I think she is reffering to the Stage Orange women socializing other women to be hookupy, independent, plastic surgery and makeup brainwashed etc. Those women don't even appear on my radar. I am basically allergic to Orange women, those values are atithetical to womanhood and find them unattarctive. They feel like men in women's bodies. AND maybe this is WHY men only sleep with them a few times and then leave, because only the body is feminine so they only want the body not the person. On the other hand, the Green women I date don't present these problems. there are highly conformist Green women too and it comes up in different ways. Some Green women can exaggerate with their woke shit but that can be managed by not talking about politics, I learned to not do it and since then it is much better. Say the magic words and change subject. yea sure, LGBT, racism, feminsim etc. Like saying Jesus Christ is great in front of a heavy ass Christian, they will love you. You don't tell a Christian that God is not in the sky. Most Green women are very nice and feminine, they are loyal, they want long term relationships, especially when they get over 30, most of them want kids, they are pretty mature and lovely. The problem is that they are overwhelmed by abundance of choice now with all this social media and dating apps madness, so they are picky. They are cold to new men they meet, they are hard to date organically due to lack of third places. The biggest problem in dating nowadays is not women as these frustrated sexless men say, it is mostly social media, dating apps and MEN. Yes, most men suck ass nowadays and you can't change my opinion. I'd rather take a coffee with a woman than a man all day even if no sex/dating is in my mind. But that is also because I live in Sweden, where the feminine bias destroyed men completely. In Romania I could still meet fun, mature men. But here? My God... Of course feminism is changing the structure of society in a feminine biased way, but that should not be an excuse to not grow into a mature developed man. Nowadays it is not enough to just bring some money in the house. Women have their own money now, especially in states with strong social security. You have to bring something more to the table than just some sperm and money. They will consider you as an option if you present emotional maturity, discipline, inspire safety and security, are fun and humble, loyal and interesting. But as I said, even if you do all these, it is hard to catch their attention because of the fucked up social media world we live in and because they met so many low quality men that they don't have the lust or time to get to know you better. Go to dancing classes, Green events, Green festivals, cold approach, and there is a chance they will give you a chance. But it is not only their fault, is the the whole system that is fucked up.
-
Of course good philosophy is about teaching people how to think for themselves. This is why I want to be a coach. I want to let them contemplate the answers. That is the safest bet with most people. I also reverse engineer Leo's and other philosophers ideas, I contemplate how they came to those conclusions and that is also huge. Some pople are just gifted and extremely ambitious. I never seen a guy like Leo, he is a machine. Most guys I met were just disappointingly stupid, maybe this is why I have this frustration about guys. The ones I made friends with I did because they were interested in self-improvement. But they disappointed me one by one chickening out and getting lost in human bullshit. And there is a big reason for why men are so shit because we are so different. And today's society fits women better, even if there still are remnants of the patriarchy here and there. Men develop in challenging environments, where they are constantly pushed and held accountable by their peers, not in this nany society that we live right now. I let you contemplate deeper how men and women tend to approach truth. I got bored to spin this subject around. This is what happens when we disconnect from our natural survival environment, we start spinning shit up. Not exactly. Those who haven't deconstructed patriarchy are machos. You can deconstruct your macho programming and still be a pussy as a man. What we notice right now is two big types of men: machos and "nice" guys. Both of them come from a deep conformism instead of conscious development. Machos are masculinity without refinement and feminine integration, nice guys are just boysh guys who remained in their teens for life because they were not properly forged into manhood. It is basically femininity bias applied across the board. You can't just equalize something that is biologically different. If you don't let them be heroes they won't be villagers, they will become degenerates. If you don't let them do more for you, they will do less. If you don't let them be men, they will be children.
-
The only escape is acceptance. Accept anything that's thrown at you.
-
word
-
@Lila9 Leo wrote it on his blog. Contemplate it. Of course there are women who kill it in philosophy. It is a generalization. Men are more passionate and nerdy about abstractization and "figuring out shit", more autistic, more lone wolfs. This of course if they are properly trained and forged into manhood, because, as I mentioned, we have an epidemic of men-pussies. Women are killing them in almost all domains right now. You see... This is why I feel so reluctant to pursue serious philosophy teaching. You will just get tons of backlash and shit shows because you threaten people's egos.
-
@oOo you good bro 😂? I did not ask for advice, it was just a statement. I fixed my Internal dissonance, I realized that these "new men" are just a bunch of o pussies that don't dare to dig deep and fix their lives and understand reality. I keep my philosophy for myself. And I am happy that I am a straight man. If I had to date these worthless man-children I would maybe have hanged myself already.
-
Is it more conformist than the MacBook/apple cult??
-
Yes, actualized rat.
-
Actualized fans now be like:
-
i don't know too much about her. It seems that she doesn't get the trans issue, but the critique of wokeness is quite on spot. What is your experience with some institution corrupted by toxic femininity?
-
@enchanted thx, will check 🙂
-
through gender you can implicitly tell others who you are. It is a form of non-verbal communication. Instead of putting a sticker with He/him on your forehead, you could show that you are a man and have a dick in other, smarter ways. They way gender studies delululs deal with gender is non-sense, but for surviving more effectively is a deep useful thing. For understanding yourself and designing a society that creates healthy people is a useful thing.
-
There is no such thing as "we work now on capitalism". There is always a combination between socialism and capitalism. Scandinavia has more socialism than USA. Is Scandinavia socialist? Hell no. It only has more powerful and efficient socialist elements. Amazon, Facebook, Tesla-> capitalism Public roads, FDA, IRS, anti-monopoly laws, labor unions and laws -> socialism. You cannot have a fully socialist country nowadays, it will just fail on the global market.
-
Good video. This guy gets it. He should change that stupid title, it sound like Andrew Tate shit. Yeah, the feminization of media in Sweden is pissing people off for sure. Is is now less about: what happened? and more about: what does this mean? who is hurt? and who is to blame? These guys will replace JP. JP went nuts, now more reasonable people will call out this issue. I think we will be good. Human behaviour changes rapidly nowadays. Feminists will adapt and nuance their approach. Those imature, delululu wokies will be called out by the more mature leftists and will be phased out.
-
ouch. It seems that the AI is starting to compete with youtubers.
-
He said epistemically humble. He might have an arrogant style but his work is humble. He doesn't claim stuff that he does not have deep understanding of. A scientist is arrogant because he (it is mostly a he) feels superior to spiritual and religious people just because he believes he is better. He didn't study spirituality or religion deeply, he doesn't even understand the mechanics of science well enough. They are epistemically laughable, they make the same epistemical errors as religious people make. The universe is dumb. Why? because science says so. = appeal to authority The traits of a being are like they are because they helped survival for thousands of years and we know it helped survival because it survives = circular reasoning Consiousness is computation. Category error. Treating statistical significance as equivalent to truth. Reality exists because 1 million people were interviewed and they say they perceive reality to be very real = methodological imperialism anomalies labeled noise instead of signals - confirmation bias we define intelligence as what IQ tests measure because we noticed that high IQ individuals do better in life. If you score low, your intelligence is low - reification I talked to scientific people and they play a humble role in the same way a kid puts a spiderman costume and plays spiderman. They are arrogant as fuck masked by roleplay. I'd rather have an arrogant guy with a humble epistemology than a fake humbe guy with arrogant epistemology.
-
100%. I totally understand that. I did not want to sound in that way. You have to intuite if a person is ready to hear something or not. How much truth is the person able to handle? Even if they say they are open to it, they might not. It is a dirty work because you deal with people's egos. You can fail not because your work is shit, you can fail because your work is too good, if you reveal it too much to the wrong people. Anyway, I appreciate your courage to share so much truth out there 🙏 I would feel uncomfortable to do that.
-
Exactly! You never know how much truth to reveal. This happened to me also! I shared the recent video about truth to a friend and was too much. I talked a lot about masculinity vs femininity with her and she was open-minded about it. But Leo's statements that a woman is generally more prone to corruption because she tends to follow her feelings and feelings can be deceiving was too much. She said he is a misogynist. I forgot Leo said that in that video 😆 wouldn't have sent it to her. Even those who claim that they are open to truth can close up rapidly.
-
Obviously it affects my survival, it does the same to you if you are really serious about this work. And it especially affects your survival if you have a strong masculine personality. Why do we say: Ignorance is bliss?
-
Of course, and this is what most serious philosophers do. Some come in front and deliver a sugar coated version of their understanding to the public. Not even Leo delivered his whole worldview to the public, even if he is the most straightforward philosopher I know. He held back his blackpill video, he deleted his solipsism video. He got massive backlash against some claims too. He saw it is counterproductive.
-
I did not say I am above survival. I throw an engaging discussion here. Discerning shit. philosophy is fucking my survival too. It is doing that to all of us here maybe. Why are we here? Because you cannot talk this shit to mainstream people. Tell them that the feminine cares less about the truth than the masculine. Tell them that they hallucinate their spouses. Tell them that there is no such thing as time. They will want to meet you again for sure 😂.
-
What do you mean by the mainstream being generally more right than wrong? Leo made you tens of hours of videos where he explained how almost the whole mainstream epistemology is full of shit. Materialism is full of shit. Neo-liberal economical system we have is devilry. We don't even know what a woman is anymore. Mainstream people are clueless rats. No judgement, discernment. Tell them they are a bunch of rats and they will hate you. Your 20 years of philosophy can get you hated instead of loved. Because your ideas cripple their survival. In the same way police cripple the survival of mafia gangs. If you relativize and say it is right in regards to keeping the situation from becoming even worse than yes, agree.
