Alexop

ouch. It seems that the AI is starting to compete with youtubers.

He said epistemically humble. He might have an arrogant style but his work is humble. He doesn't claim stuff that he does not have deep understanding of. A scientist is arrogant because he (it is mostly a he) feels superior to spiritual and religious people just because he believes he is better. He didn't study spirituality or religion deeply, he doesn't even understand the mechanics of science well enough. They are epistemically laughable, they make the same epistemical errors as religious people make. The universe is dumb. Why? because science says so. = appeal to authority The traits of a being are like they are because they helped survival for thousands of years and we know it helped survival because it survives = circular reasoning Consiousness is computation. Category error. Treating statistical significance as equivalent to truth. Reality exists because 1 million people were interviewed and they say they perceive reality to be very real = methodological imperialism anomalies labeled noise instead of signals - confirmation bias we define intelligence as what IQ tests measure because we noticed that high IQ individuals do better in life. If you score low, your intelligence is low - reification I talked to scientific people and they play a humble role in the same way a kid puts a spiderman costume and plays spiderman. They are arrogant as fuck masked by roleplay. I'd rather have an arrogant guy with a humble epistemology than a fake humbe guy with arrogant epistemology.

100%. I totally understand that. I did not want to sound in that way. You have to intuite if a person is ready to hear something or not. How much truth is the person able to handle? Even if they say they are open to it, they might not. It is a dirty work because you deal with people's egos. You can fail not because your work is shit, you can fail because your work is too good, if you reveal it too much to the wrong people. Anyway, I appreciate your courage to share so much truth out there 🙏 I would feel uncomfortable to do that.

Exactly! You never know how much truth to reveal. This happened to me also! I shared the recent video about truth to a friend and was too much. I talked a lot about masculinity vs femininity with her and she was open-minded about it. But Leo's statements that a woman is generally more prone to corruption because she tends to follow her feelings and feelings can be deceiving was too much. She said he is a misogynist. I forgot Leo said that in that video 😆 wouldn't have sent it to her. Even those who claim that they are open to truth can close up rapidly.

Obviously it affects my survival, it does the same to you if you are really serious about this work. And it especially affects your survival if you have a strong masculine personality. Why do we say: Ignorance is bliss?

Of course, and this is what most serious philosophers do. Some come in front and deliver a sugar coated version of their understanding to the public. Not even Leo delivered his whole worldview to the public, even if he is the most straightforward philosopher I know. He held back his blackpill video, he deleted his solipsism video. He got massive backlash against some claims too. He saw it is counterproductive.

I did not say I am above survival. I throw an engaging discussion here. Discerning shit. philosophy is fucking my survival too. It is doing that to all of us here maybe. Why are we here? Because you cannot talk this shit to mainstream people. Tell them that the feminine cares less about the truth than the masculine. Tell them that they hallucinate their spouses. Tell them that there is no such thing as time. They will want to meet you again for sure 😂.

What do you mean by the mainstream being generally more right than wrong? Leo made you tens of hours of videos where he explained how almost the whole mainstream epistemology is full of shit. Materialism is full of shit. Neo-liberal economical system we have is devilry. We don't even know what a woman is anymore. Mainstream people are clueless rats. No judgement, discernment. Tell them they are a bunch of rats and they will hate you. Your 20 years of philosophy can get you hated instead of loved. Because your ideas cripple their survival. In the same way police cripple the survival of mafia gangs. If you relativize and say it is right in regards to keeping the situation from becoming even worse than yes, agree.

Of course, my shit smells from far away too. But in the last 15 years I made sure to eat the food that makes it smell the least.

You have to relativize your point. The mainstream is more right than the mainstream from 100 years ago. It is more right than the anti-mainstream conspiracy theorists. But compare the mainstream academics with some serious philosophers like Ken Wilber and it is like comparing Trump with AOC.

The trick is to enjoy the suffering. Like playing GTA. You don't feel the punch that your character takes because you don't identify with it.

I notice that very few people really manage to turn serious philosophy into a life changing engine for their lives. And even if they manage to do it, it takes maybe 15-20 years of suffering to do it properly. Those who say that they started with self-help 2 years ago and now they are in heaven are kidding themselves. They just did some surface adjustments that improved their survival. In order to realize deep Tier 2 actualization requires maybe 15 years of suffering. I wanted to become a Leo figure since childhood, but realizing these facts in the recent years, I don't really know if I want to push so much truth onto people anymore. Maybe just coaching them on basic survival, and if they are really ready for serious change, they'll do that themselves, there are enough serious books and mentors for that.

James Cameron is so smart but so myopic at the same time lol. How can such a smart dude get stuck in the "doing"? Amazing.

What isn't? Blackpill ideology.

https://actualized.org/insights/actualized-quotes-379 This is deep. These people who measure intelligence with IQ. Is IQ really a good test for intelligence? According to it you can be a selfish asshole and score skyhigh on it. How the fuck are you so intelligent if you can only do top level math and abstractions but then you come home and beat your wife, drink alcohol and hate political opponents?

Yes, they get triggered alot. They usually grow up in a very pampering environment where nobody says no to them. And such spiritual shit I don't really talk at all. I get bored by spiritual people. I do spirituality, I don't talk about it. I suggest you do the same. People who talk about spirituality all the time are full of shit. When you finally think you mastered the ego, ithe ego pulls the last card, spirituality. Personal development is so hard to be done right and I myself suffered for 15 years in oder to finally dare to say I am at Tier 2. I don't really push it on anyone anymore. It is very rare to meet a person who will have the will, motivation, vision, genetics, wisdom to go through all this hell. Leo's videos are a free gold mine and virtually nobody cares. Low view count, low retention, and I suspect very low embodyment.

Well said! Generally they are more conscious than the mainstream society, Green > Orange. And there truly are good people who are open to healthy masculinity among them. Generally the older more mature ones who saw the problems that arrise with denying masculinity.

Those hippie people who live in their communities can be even shittier than the city people. If you are not feminine and emotional/vibey enough, they get triggered. My strong masculine personality does not fit into that environment. There is no polarity, men and women behave the same. Social engineering against masculinity. They deny their masculine nature, especially guys because they have a more masculine nature.They talk a lot of new-age shit which is boring and unstimulating. But they are good artists, women are beautiful because feminine people flourish there and are not traumatized by the Stage Orange social media beauty standards and conformism. It breeds lovely women and weak men. Men develop through challenge, accountability, consequences etc. not in that hippie dippie nonsense

I just accepted that people will never satisfy me. I try to work with what I have and not ask for more. It is not other people's business to fix my happiness. And I understand better now why some people are so conformist and closed minded. Because realising this Leo stuff will force them to be fake with others and other people are their primary way to get happiness.

I was a lot more vibe driven and "just do it" guy. That until I realised how important theory is, then I started to do stuff in a strategic Theory based manner.

What qualifies as an ND? Men in general are more autistic, are most men ND?

True. Especially in a pussified/woke social group, you need to be careful of being too authentic as an ND.

I agree with what you wrote but that doesn't infirm what I said. There are people who want to get good at stuff without too much theory. Even enjoying time with friends needs theory nowadays. We got so fucked up that we need to learn how to socialize, what to say, what not to say. If you want to get good at a complex topic you need a solid theoretical base. A complex mental map that will guide you and make you understand the importance of what you do. That motivates you to invest time into it.

Word. These people who say theory is a waste of time have no idea what they are talking about. That idea itself comes from a lack of understanding mind mechanics and ideology.

"life not lived accordingly to their ND genes" led to their chronic health problems? Lol. That Dr. K talks a lot of bullshit. He fits in the orthodox self-help norms because it helps his survival. He does not understand masculinity and femininity, men and women and he leads people astray. Tried to listen to a podcast with him and got annoyed. Science parroting automaton. Of course almost everyone who cares about Leos work and seriously watched the videos and took notes are more autistic. People who watch this are systematizing, mapping oriented, cerebral, disagreeable people. Social consensus matters less than discovering truth to us. If that was not the case why should we watch hundreds of hours of content and contemplate and talk about this stuff for ages? Non-autistic people conform to the social norms.