Alexop

Member
  • Content count

    1,090
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Alexop

  1. I stopped theorising about attraction. Waste of time. Go out, laugh, joke, Inspire, lead, be powerful in a healthy way, and that's it. Find friends who mastered this and emulate them. Those who fail at it care too much. And women smell that weakness, that loneliness, that desperation. Attraction theory is more like learning how to be a normal man, who goes out and can socialize. Lol
  2. Sorry for not contributing here. I dont have the patience you guys have, theorising the shit out of the subject. Dudes, attraction is easy. There are guys who did not read one sentence about attraction and still attract all the girls. Attraction is easy, it is relationships which are complicated. Attraction is about power dynamics, charisma, social skills, showing up where you should show up. Boom. Relationships require serious work, that si why almost nobody have deep meaningful relationships. Most people who say they have figured this out too, think again my dude, think again. Firstly, you need a partner that can meet you at your depth. No matter how good you are, you need a partner to match your level.
  3. @Bjorn K Holmstrom of course nothing is black and White
  4. The politics "market" in Sweden is quite saturated. You could squeeze some niche party that comes with a special cause or a new perspective. But most reasonable new politicians choose an existing big party where they might make reforms. for example, I joined the biggest party and help it evolve with cutting edge Tier 2 ideas, instead of creating my own party. I recently been to a lecture by a new party called MoD. The party leader held it. It was laughable. They had pie in the sky ideals about how they will help people feel more free and shit. I asked them.. let's say you come into the parliament, what are the parties you can collaborate with? He said: it is not really important for us, we think all parties are dissatisfying. All these new pie in the sky parties called something like: citizens for democracy or some shit like that are just inexperienced people who do not understand power, who do not understand how politics work, who are SD illiterate; and how to make changes in a country. When the rubber meets the road, when they come into power and realize their ideals cannot be achieved, people will laugh at them and they will disappear. If only they will come so far. Liberals make the sane mistakes, Leo had a blog post about it. Capitalism exists because it works. Marxism doesn't exist because it doesn't work. Greta Thunberg said she voted for the least bad party because there is no good party in riksdag. Naive little girl, everything in the world s is GOOD. "Bad" is your own interpretation of the world through you own miopic perspektive. The above paragraph for example should NOT be told by any politician. People will not understand what i just said and that only would damage my PR. The above paragraph is very true but it won't work. Turquoise ideas don't work because people are not ready for them yet.
  5. I don't think there is a Swedish politician around here. But this is a good idea, to be careful what I say in the public contexts.
  6. Magdalena Andersson said S will have a strict migration policy. And also a strict workforce immigration. I just had a discussion with a neo-liberal who was dissatisfied with making workforce immigration stricter. They want their cheap slaves for their companies.
  7. https://www.instagram.com/alexopris0?stkn=bTc1NDV5ZnM5amU3
  8. Parties that did not make the threshold are there for a reason. People don't resonate with them. Either they are too extreme or they have a poor PR. Like those antivaxxers or those excess Green woketards (feministisk intiativ). Even the Sweden Democrats who we can all agree they are a bunch of assholes, they got so big because they were the first ones who dared to say something that was kind of true. That immigration has to be carefully managed, instead of ideological pursuit of "opening our hearts" and "my country does not build walls" and become world's good Samaritan. Look what i got from that Moderate guy haha, he got kind of triggered. Sun cream.
  9. I think in-person mentoring is very weak in society today, but there are tons of mentors online. When people struggle, they go online and seek help, or even to the AI. Individualism has created a society of people who do not want to accept that they need help, they just suck it up and go forward.
  10. Thanks 🙏 yea politics is cool because you can combine soo many disciplines together. Sociology, psychology, economics, finance, law, power-dynamics, Spiral-Dynamics (which is HUGE and almost no politician knows about it). It is and art too. How much truth and progress will the people accept? Where is the country's center of gravity? Which party posess excess of one or more SD memetics? It is not as simple as you go in and tell people about Stage Turquoise "reality is a hallucination" shit. Nobody will take you seriously or you will even be get kicked out.
  11. Bingo! We have to think with our brains, not with our dicks. And best sex you can have is in a relationship with a woman you care for. A few relationships can scratch you itch for sexual diversity I think. You don't need to sleep with the whole city for that. Body count is like personal wealth. 5-10 body count sounds ok. 500.000 - 2 million in personal wealth is ok. But wtf dude? 100+ body count? Billions in personal wealth? Are you sure you are not running away from yourself??
  12. You can sell sex but not buy sex. That poor guy omg, broke my heart. https://youtu.be/nDk1oR6Ly8Q?is=ASuFGC1d1J_4pGDb
  13. I think monogamy is good. Women fall in love deeply to one man. Immature men want to fuck the whole city. But I personally want ONE woman and I want her to commit to me, and need me. This polyamory shit doesn't really work nowadays. Only in niche cases of some hippie hipsters. I most cases polyamory is what a man wants, ignoring women's feelings.
  14. @Emerald I don't sense women are not selective enough. I see a lot of them not selecting at all, just staying single. If they are attractive, they have tones of guys competing for their attention. And the women get choice anxiety, they don't know what to choose. Like when you open netflix and you have so many options that you just freeze and choose nothing instead.
  15. Of course it has to be well regulated. I believe it it should be legal, too many lonely and sexualy frustrated guys.
  16. They admit that this model is affecting some people, but they say it is a net positive because they save trafficked women. I don`t think so, women will be trafficked even if you make it illegal. You cannot stop prostitution, especially now when it is so hard to have sex.
  17. Not necessarily. It is mostly the people she had in her life that calcifies her.
  18. Depends which men they met. But I feel you. Most men are shit, so there is a good risk they met some assholes down the road, that eroded their femininity. They cannot be truly feminine without exposing themselves to trauma. That would be the core of femininity, to completely let go and fall in love and trust him.
  19. Yes. Women without a direction are boring. What can they offer besides of some sex and company? If she also has a developed masculine side, it is more exciting. You are in for a journey together.
  20. @LordFall Yes, and I see this change in style and content in almost any influencer. If in 2010s they used to wear specific clothes and talk about what was cool then. 15 years later, they are completly rebranded. Just look att that fucker, Zuckerberg. he is a perfect example of a sellout. Just look at his first Joe Rogan appereance and the last. They adapt to what people ask, to what is the hipsterish trend RN. The timeless teachings of Leo will be in the backround for a long time to come.
  21. They don't want to be associated with the enemy, they also are too biased and closed minded, and it makes for bad business. To succeed as an influencer you have to feed the pigs with the junk they want to hear.
  22. @LordFall exactly! I dated a girl who acted all bossy and stuff with guys. Because she mostly dated loser nice guys. When she was with me, she was a compltely different person, she told me that her nervous system was in full alert while with those soy boys, but with me she felt safe and lead, so she acted feminine. Our behavior is very contextual. Of course there are nature aspects, like the temperament and introversion/extroversion. But context influence our behavior alot.
  23. @Joshe Let´s keep the thread about masculinity/femininity and talk SD somewhere else. It is pretty clear to me that you have a lot of work to do until you understand the model.
  24. really good analogies! On the one hand, people are able to experience and develop only one energy, typically the masculine, due to environment. On the other, even if they have both sides develped and they are atuthentically feminine lets say, when in a masculine environment, they let only the masculinity out. I also believe that most people can be flexible and be contextually masculine or feminine, depending on what is required from them. I refuse to believe that for example, a highly brainy academic woman who talks about advanced economical models etc. cannot let go and relax and trust the lead of her man when at home. She does not have to become some fluffy whoofy daddy´s girl. For me it is enough to just let go, relax and let me contain her. And sometimes, why not, let her lead me. I also need a break.