Alexop

@oOo you good bro 😂? I did not ask for advice, it was just a statement. I fixed my Internal dissonance, I realized that these "new men" are just a bunch of o pussies that don't dare to dig deep and fix their lives and understand reality. I keep my philosophy for myself. And I am happy that I am a straight man. If I had to date these worthless man-children I would maybe have hanged myself already.

Is it more conformist than the MacBook/apple cult??

Yes, actualized rat.

Actualized fans now be like:

@enchanted thx, will check 🙂

through gender you can implicitly tell others who you are. It is a form of non-verbal communication. Instead of putting a sticker with He/him on your forehead, you could show that you are a man and have a dick in other, smarter ways. They way gender studies delululs deal with gender is non-sense, but for surviving more effectively is a deep useful thing. For understanding yourself and designing a society that creates healthy people is a useful thing.

There is no such thing as "we work now on capitalism". There is always a combination between socialism and capitalism. Scandinavia has more socialism than USA. Is Scandinavia socialist? Hell no. It only has more powerful and efficient socialist elements. Amazon, Facebook, Tesla-> capitalism Public roads, FDA, IRS, anti-monopoly laws, labor unions and laws -> socialism. You cannot have a fully socialist country nowadays, it will just fail on the global market.

Good video. This guy gets it. He should change that stupid title, it sound like Andrew Tate shit. Yeah, the feminization of media in Sweden is pissing people off for sure. Is is now less about: what happened? and more about: what does this mean? who is hurt? and who is to blame? These guys will replace JP. JP went nuts, now more reasonable people will call out this issue. I think we will be good. Human behaviour changes rapidly nowadays. Feminists will adapt and nuance their approach. Those imature, delululu wokies will be called out by the more mature leftists and will be phased out.

ouch. It seems that the AI is starting to compete with youtubers.

He said epistemically humble. He might have an arrogant style but his work is humble. He doesn't claim stuff that he does not have deep understanding of. A scientist is arrogant because he (it is mostly a he) feels superior to spiritual and religious people just because he believes he is better. He didn't study spirituality or religion deeply, he doesn't even understand the mechanics of science well enough. They are epistemically laughable, they make the same epistemical errors as religious people make. The universe is dumb. Why? because science says so. = appeal to authority The traits of a being are like they are because they helped survival for thousands of years and we know it helped survival because it survives = circular reasoning Consiousness is computation. Category error. Treating statistical significance as equivalent to truth. Reality exists because 1 million people were interviewed and they say they perceive reality to be very real = methodological imperialism anomalies labeled noise instead of signals - confirmation bias we define intelligence as what IQ tests measure because we noticed that high IQ individuals do better in life. If you score low, your intelligence is low - reification I talked to scientific people and they play a humble role in the same way a kid puts a spiderman costume and plays spiderman. They are arrogant as fuck masked by roleplay. I'd rather have an arrogant guy with a humble epistemology than a fake humbe guy with arrogant epistemology.

i don't know too much about her. It seems that she doesn't get the trans issue, but the critique of wokeness is quite on spot. What is your experience with some institution corrupted by toxic femininity?

100%. I totally understand that. I did not want to sound in that way. You have to intuite if a person is ready to hear something or not. How much truth is the person able to handle? Even if they say they are open to it, they might not. It is a dirty work because you deal with people's egos. You can fail not because your work is shit, you can fail because your work is too good, if you reveal it too much to the wrong people. Anyway, I appreciate your courage to share so much truth out there 🙏 I would feel uncomfortable to do that.

Exactly! You never know how much truth to reveal. This happened to me also! I shared the recent video about truth to a friend and was too much. I talked a lot about masculinity vs femininity with her and she was open-minded about it. But Leo's statements that a woman is generally more prone to corruption because she tends to follow her feelings and feelings can be deceiving was too much. She said he is a misogynist. I forgot Leo said that in that video 😆 wouldn't have sent it to her. Even those who claim that they are open to truth can close up rapidly.

Obviously it affects my survival, it does the same to you if you are really serious about this work. And it especially affects your survival if you have a strong masculine personality. Why do we say: Ignorance is bliss?

Of course, and this is what most serious philosophers do. Some come in front and deliver a sugar coated version of their understanding to the public. Not even Leo delivered his whole worldview to the public, even if he is the most straightforward philosopher I know. He held back his blackpill video, he deleted his solipsism video. He got massive backlash against some claims too. He saw it is counterproductive.