Recursoinominado

If you are not at least a 7 in looks, online dating is the worst for you. Approaching in person is a good choice, but it is a skill, it takes time and effort; if you are not good-looking, it will be harder. None of those favors rich guys. If I were you, I would bet on building a social circle of cool people who like to party. If you have money, you have more than enough to offer as value to both men and women in a good social circle! Go out, make friends, pay for shit, prepare your house to receive people, organize parties at your home, invite people over to do cool stuff, etc. Looks can be overlooked if you have a good network and social proof, and it's not a creep.

Direct approach is way easier for beginners/intermediates, maybe even advanced. It worked well for me when i used to do approaches, especially during the day. Women are more cautious during daygame. People who approach them during the day want something from them. Being indirect is almost creepy if you don't do it seamlessly, as extroverts do. It triggers the "possible scammer/criminal" alert in people. I used to approach women in shopping malls, saying something like: "Hey! (wave to her) I know it is kind of odd (show that you are socially aware) But i just saw you and found you interesting (open statement, better than just call her pretty) I had to come and talk to you" Direct, but it shows social awareness, and she can decide whether to continue the interaction or not. If she does continue, she is participating; it's a good sign already. I would say that to almost every woman I approached, and it works nearly every time. Sometimes, i would do this in nightgame too (except the "this is odd" part) and it works the same.

Bro, 90% of sex is mental and emotional, not physical. Ideally, the woman has to be soaking, almost orgasming when you penetrate her. Tease, tease, tease, be playful but dominant, make her forget everything else, make her 100% in your frame. When you do it right, she will cum in minutes after you start penetration. Do it slow, rhythmically, put her in a trance. I ended up developing my own "style" of sex, tantric but dominant. Forget all you saw in porn; that shit is low-quality sex, like fast food is to food or Marvel movies are to movies.

Not gonna lie, size does matter to a point. Women brag about having sex with guys who have big dicks all the time, and they tell all their friends about their partner's size. Big dicks have a visual impact; it's exciting, it's masculine/alpha/dominant, and it hits their vaginas differently. BUT, most guys think good sex is what is shown in porn, and even most women like that. They are wrong. Most people, including women, don't know what mind-blowing sex is. This is an opportunity for guys with average/small dicks to explore other aspects of sex that guys who are above average don't. You can be dominant without a big dick; you can make her have incredible orgasms without a big dick. You just have to work more to do it. Watch many videos, read books about it, master massage, tantra, learn to dance, to kiss, to make women squirt.

Christianism attracts a lot of narcissists, sociopaths, and psychopaths. Religion is the ultimate "i am better than you without needing to evolve as a person" card for assholes.

An 18-year-old girl's body can be insanely attractive. When I was 26, I practiced game a lot and ended up closing an 18-year-old who was insanely hot (8,5/10 overall and a 9,5/10 body). She looked and acted older. I was expecting her to be 22, but after I closed (we had sex), she said she was 18; I was surprised because her behavior (the way she moved and interacted) was that of a grown woman. She is still insanely hot to me today (33) and to any grown man, nothing you can do about it, call it what you want.

@Hojo A 13-15-year-old girl is a child to a 40+ man. It's not like an 18-year-old guy having sex with a 15-year-old girl (which is already weird and possibly illegal). I am 33, and I don't feel good about desiring an 18-year-old girl. They can even have a full-grown female body, but she is still a child/teen in her behavior.

Most people don't get how powerful networking can be. Offering sex with minors isn't even in the top 10. Unless you are really a pedophile and already have everything you want (money, power, status), which seems the case to many people involved with Epstein, but certainly not all.

I stopped when i realized my consciousness was way more elevated than my material life. I was thinking constantly about enlightenment and God but was broke and lacking basic self-development skills like time management, discipline and daily routine.

Guys, all joking aside, the course is going to be ready when it is ready. No need to be asking for updates, just do your thing until then.

And I am here for it

Jesus Christ, to watch any video from Owen, you have to plow through 30% of him bitching about the pandemic and calling people sheep by having the common sense to listen to experts and not spread a fucking disease to everyone you know. His contrarian bias is a sticking point he will take to his grave. Better luck on the next incarnation, I guess.

You can accuse Owen of all sorts of shitty things, but no one can deny the guy is a machine when it comes to taking action. He has been grinding on the front lines for like 2 decades. It's very impressive how he managed to brainwash himself into doing that to this day.

Same here. Do not mix with ADHD drugs. I have smoked weed while on Vyvanse, and the vibe was really weird. Vyvanse makes me serious and angry, i would not mix it with more serious psychedelics.

Nahh, they are perfect as they are! Just using authority (Alan Watts) to farm views on YT and make money. Probably some 15 yo wanting to buy a lambo who couldn't care less about Alan Watts or any teacher.

I feel the same. I hate it when people steal the voices of dead people to narrate an AI-generated text to farm views.

Napoleon Hill and Clement Stone just copied others before them, gave zero credit, and said they originated those ideas. Research the "New Thought" movement; it started in the 1800s, and it was the birth of the self-help movement. Hard to say the first one but i would guess it was Emerson, he wrote Self-Reliance in 1841. William Walker Atkinson was one of the first ones; he even wrote many books based on Yoga techniques (like from Raja Yoga), and he even talked about Enlightenment.

I can teach you to make money by working on your life purpose and serving people with your gifts, or scamming people and stealing their money, vastly different levels of consciousness.

Saint = Love = Heart Sage = Wisdom = Mind

I followed him closely for many years. He used to be Red/Orange. Nowadays, he is mostly orange, which is an improvement. He is performative green; he pretends to be green; he pretends to be what orange thinks is healthy green. It is like corporate orange disguising itself as green to make more money. Anyone who is truly at green/yellow would be disgusted with RSD, his peers, pickup, his industry, and would leave to do his own thing, even if it means earning less money. He is maxing out money/status/fame, so he is Orange.

WTF did i just see? This is horrible!

Yogis did it before it was cool.

Nah, he has to go through green first.

But what do you do exactly during trips nowadays?

I thought you practiced self-inquiry/contemplation and meditation during your trips. Why then does it work so well for you and not for any hippie who smokes DMT? Could it be your genetics too?