Recursoinominado

Big pharma doesn't have to have pure divine intentions to be competent. Yes, they are greedy but they are competent greedy. All serious professionals who don't have anything to do with Big Pharma agree on the effectiveness of vaccines. Many places in the world manufactured their own vaccines, through their own research labs and universities, as was the case here in Brazil. Vaccines were produced in record time because 1. Science evolved. 2. Many cases available to study 3. Huge economic interest in stopping the Pandemic. All three were basically unprecedented.

What is the problem here? Can't companies profit from their products? How familiar are you with the production of a vaccine for COVID? Pretty bold of you to say if it was rushed or not. The pharma industry profits from all of that and none significantly helps with COVID.

Vaccines do not offer much profit even with the government "giving" billions of dollars. If profit was the goal, vaccines are not the best way, they are really cheap per unit and almost "solve" the problem.

Surprisingly good and original take. Kind of asshole of him for charging for the full episode

Vaccines aren't very profitable, that's why they must be subsidized by the government. Do you know what is much more profitable? The cocktail that people like Joe Rogan took instead of the vaccine. That cocktail costs at least 20x more than the vaccine, the average person can't even afford it. Also, hospitalizations are way more profitable.

EVERY workplace has rules, and every profession has rules and ethics. For someone who spends his life saying that people should take responsibility, he is for sure someone who hates taking responsibility for the unhinge shit he has been saying from the start. He got famous by making a drama by refusing to comply with simple decency and call trans people how they want to be called. He accused the "bad authoritarian government" of limiting his "free speech", screaming like a bitch about how he was going to be arrested for that and years later, NOTHING happened. He makes his career by overblowing situations that only become a problem because of his own lunatic reactions to it.

Good cities attract people, people bring issues. It is the city's duty to solve those issues. Just kicking people out from the streets, isn't solving issues, this is just a classic moronic right-wing way of dealing with complex issues.

He explicitly stated that he found a way to monetize social justice warriors. He is being paid millions of dollars + fame to defend his idiotic positions. At this point, he will say and do anything to keep receiving validation from his fans.

Well, if i were homeless, i would love to be in Los Angeles, fuck it, why not? Nice weather, beautiful city, gorgeous people, going to the beach.

Half-grifter, half-melted brain from a dangerous induced coma.

Well, then their "democrat" suck as left policies go. Some would say that the US only has a right-wing party and a slight less right-wing party. Clearly not enough. Have they provided enough cheap housing? Jobs?Mental Health assistance? Drug rehab? That's how you solve such problems. Usually, the "obvious" is just flat-out wrong.

Do you think those problems were created by the left? This kind of shallow political analysis is laughable, to be honest. Think late-stage capitalism. If anything, those cities need more leftist policies of social assistance.

Good.

You aren't the "observer" of thoughts, you are the consciousness of thoughts.

They aren't going overboard, conservatives are overreacting. How often do you see someone talking about "50 genders and identifying as animals"? You using this example is a result of how conservatives work, they play dirty, pick up "extreme" and rare cases and repeat forever as something common to scare dumb boomers. Boomers lack epistemic awareness, they confuse what they see on facebook as reality, so they think the "real world" has gone mad.

Such a tragedy...

This is obvious, everyone is aware of how "good" and addicting they are. Any good debate has to go beyond this type of argument. If we should learn something about this whole "war on drugs" it is that no one can stop people from using drugs. No jail threat is enough to stop people from using it. Even in maximum security jails, you can still find drugs to use. The question now is: Should we let people use garbage drugs laced with the worst kind of shit like fentanyl or should we provide them with safer drugs that are pure? With LSD we have the NBOME category of substances that people sell like LSD but it isn't. NBOME is dangerous, can cause overdose, fry your system, and trigger psychotic episodes. With MDMA we have all sorts of meth derivates, probably 90%+ of all "MDMA" sold and consumed are, in fact mostly METH. Heroin and cocaine are famously impure also.

Portugal doesn’t sell cocaine at the pharmacy They should.

19th century China? The poorest country in the world 150 years ago? Can you even compare it with anything we have today? We already have plenty of successful examples today. At this point is just fundamentalism or pure ignorance.

Don't believe everything you see, historical revisionism is a thing. Everyone has an agenda.

We aren't in 1970 anymore, this shit never worked.

Sell with prescriptions, like lots of medication is. Invest in education, rehab centers, inform people the dangers and how to do harm reduction. Also, i bet if you actually get the pure stuff, without all the garbage drug dealers put to increase profits, the actual drug is much less dangerous.

Smoke what?

Why?