.jpg.3c04741955d62a5239fc02efa035ca7b.jpg)
Hardkill
Member-
Content count
5,126 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Hardkill
-
-
25 minutes ago, BlackPhil said:What exactly of what I've been saying has been misinformation? Please be specific.
If I see that you, collectively, have been led astray and are uniting (like one huge cult) based upon, what my research and intuition has shown me, is false information, manipulation through fear and mindcontrol, then I'm gonna question this like any sane person would. If you personally still refuse to entertain different ideas then that's up to you.
Yeah that's the words they try to use in order to discredit these very prominent scientists. The only thing they infact have gotten from speaking out about this has been character assassination, risking their careers aswell as being ridiculed. Not really the things you would strive after if your goal is selfish, political/business agendas, do you think?
Yeah that's the words that these very "prominent scientists" try to use in order to discredit the real legit prominent scientists.
21 minutes ago, BlackPhil said:You only have to look at history aswell as read some psychology. The majority/masses rarely have the wisest opinions and have over and over again been drawn into these kinds of collective-madness's.
No, this is a faulty logic. Yes, the majority/masses rarely have the wisest opinions. Most people in this world are not above average overall intelligence. The elite intellectuals of the world who are of sound mind and have the greatest level of compassion are the ones who are able to form the wisest opinions in the world. All of the top medical scientists and doctors in the world who have agreed that these COVID vaccines are absolutely vital are some of the elites of the world who are well above the majority/masses of the world.
-
12 minutes ago, BlackPhil said:If you get irritated by someone questioning your point of view it's an unhealthy thing, and says more about you than what it does about me.
And no, not every scientist or medical expert are pro these mRNA-shots. There has been alot of whistle blowers so far. Some of them have been among the most qualified people in the world to talk about this stuff.
Robert Malone (one of the inventors of mRNA-technology) is one example. Peter McCullough (one of the most prominent cardiologists in the world) is another. We also have Luc Montagnier (virologist and the nobel-prize winner for discovering HIV).
These are just a few examples of a huge amount of experts who has been criticizing this "vaccine". All of them has immediately been censored from all controlled media and had their wikipedia sites changed in order to discredit their person. This censorship says alot about whats happening and also explains why not even more people has dared to speak out.
Perhaps that could be a flaw of mine. However, what most people on this forum don't like about what you're doing is that you're contributing to the spread of misinformation and creating more unnecessary division. We all have a collective responsibility to unite together against this deadly virus by following what the vast majority of the top scientists and medical doctors who are the best specialists for this matter have all agreed on.
Those guys you mentioned including Robert Malone and Peter McCullough represent only a small strange amount of corrupt scientists and doctors who are lying because they are the ones who have some kind of selfish political and business agendas of their own.
-
6 minutes ago, BlackPhil said:Explain how I'm a troll.
Is this the normal standard here nowdays? Was a while ago I read here.
You're irritating everyone here and you're also deliberately undermining the trust in information from the top medical doctor and medical scientists int the world. You really think you know more than all of those brilliant scientific experts who have all reached a legit unified consensus amongst each other for the greater good of the entire world?
-
1 minute ago, Carl-Richard said:...yeah, when you start questioning people's fear of death, it does kinda remove the seriousness of your comment. If you don't really mean it, then don't say it.
BlackPhil is a troll.
-
26 minutes ago, BlackPhil said:Jesus christ. Thought "spiritual people" used to be abit more clever and skeptical to the mainstream than this. Unless you are old or very sick you can rely on your own immune system and natural, healthy food and remedies to combat this virus. No need to fill big-pharmas pockets and inject an unnatural, untested mRNA-"vaccine" into your body (not once but over and over), which obviously doesn't stop the spread and only might prevent severe illness for a short period.
Omicron is less lethal and more virulent than previous mutations, so best thing is to let it run through the population naturally until it becomes endemic and we achieved herd-immunity.
Trying to vaccinate away an ongoing pandemic with "booster" upon booster is just pure madness.
Since when did you people become so irrationally afraid of death?
People like you really get on my nerves. Just you wait until either someone close to you dies or when you almost die or are going to inevitable dye from being infected by this virus. Then, you'll sing a different a tune about the vaccines. Mark my words!
-
6 hours ago, Girzo said:All these countries are lacking in development a few hundreds years. Countries like France or the Netherlands already had some industrial economies, while the Eastern europe was only producing wheat and other food.
Yeah, but Russia now is one of the most powerful countries in the world and has about the 11th largest economy in the world. So, why does that country still have such a very authoritarian regime?
-
2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:The new Pfizer pill is like 85%+ effective against death. So that will be a game-changer.
We just need to buy time until better treatment options are available and more vaccines are sent to the third world. That should be another year.
A few boosters are reasonable, spaced 6 months apart.
I thought that the pill is 89%+ effective against both hospitalization and death.
Besides that, after listening to that clip on your original post, this is getting really scary.
I really hope that we don't either have another lockdown or that every single human throughout the whole world will get infected by the virus, regardless of how many people have been fully vaccinated and have gotten a booster
.
-
58 minutes ago, vladorion said:Omicron is pretty mild.
Look at South Africa.
Biggest wave yet, barely any deaths. And it's not because of vaccines because only 25% are fully vaccinated.
Yeah, but it's going to spread even much faster than ever before, which means a lot more people throughout the whole world will be hospitalized and die at a much faster rate than ever before.
After listening to Dr. Ding just now, I am kinda freaking out now.
-
So, then would you guys say that a man at stage Blue may be able to get laid easier than those at stage Orange or above, but that actually a man at stage Orange or above can get laid more than a man at stage Blue?
-
Leo said in a previous thread entitled "Pickup feels fake and low conscious," that:
On 11/15/2021 at 7:07 AM, Leo Gura said:You can say whatever you want but most women are attracted to low consciousness behavior. Which is why the most low consciousness guys get laid the most and the most conscious guys get laid the least.
He also said in another previous entitled "Pickup id good-crap" that:
On 7/26/2020 at 3:25 AM, Leo Gura said:In stage Blue society getting laid is a lot easier because you just go to church and marry some girl your church friends introduce you to.
So does that really mean that a stage Blue guy is able to get easier than another guy either stage orange or stage green or maybe stage Yellow or maybe stage Turquoise?
I thought guys who is at stage Orange or above would get laid easier than someone at Stage Blue because of how sexually repressed you are when you are at stage Blue, whereas guys who are at stage Orange or above are more sexually liberated and open-minded.
-
5 hours ago, Leo Gura said:And that is fueled by religious folk.
Eastern Europe is not as developed.
why do Eastern European countries generally have more religious dogma than the Western European countries?
-
7 hours ago, Leo Gura said:Firstly, there is rockiness in Europe too.
Secondly, Europe has already had a lot of internal struggle in the last 100 years. They've earned some peace the hard way.
Thirdly, American culture is particularly hooked on Orange and even Christian Blue. America is more religious than Western Europe and this dogma is directly responsible for a lot of American problems. Fundamentalist Christianity + rampant capitalism is not a recipe for health.
Trump/Bush could not have won without the fundamentalist Christian crowd. Abortion is basically a fundamentalist Christian dogma issue which doesn't exist in Europe.
What still doesn't make sense to me is that even though conservatives/Republicans have a lot more Blue than liberals/Democrats do in the US and Blue is about Law and Order, there have been a lot more liberals/Democrats than conservatives/Republicans who have been willing to comply to rules such as economic regulation policies and vaccine mandates from the government.
-
35 minutes ago, Tim R said:Stage Blue ≠ (necessarily) Authoritarianism
Don't forget that people aren't only blue. Or any other stage. It's always a mixture of stages, e.g. of blue and red or blue and orange. That's where the demand for freedom comes in.
People and societies are too complicated too cram them into simplistic categories like "stage blue".
Wait, I am confused. Even if stage Blue isn't necessarily equal to Authoritarianism, Leo said this:
On 9/2/2019 at 5:44 PM, Leo Gura said:Stage Red & Blue spirituality is dogmatic and authoritarian.
On 8/21/2019 at 3:15 PM, Leo Gura said:Stage Blue has authoritarian tendencies. Because they like to follow a strong leader. So once a strong leader emerges by conquering everyone else, Blue falls in line and conforms.
Blue loves, loves, loves conformity. It gives Blue a sense of security & comfort.
Blue loves unambiguous black & white leadership style. Like in the military. Everyone knows his rank and knows exactly what is expected of him.
Blue makes excellent soldiers because they are so loyal. Of course the problem is, Blue also makes excellent Nazis.
So, why don't conservatives who have a lot more Blue than liberals, and Blue is still about complying with the laws and orders of society without question, then why aren't conservatives not as compliant or as cooperative with the government's vaccines mandates as liberals are? Why are liberals more compliant with the vaccine mandates?
-
22 hours ago, Tim R said:Depends entirely on the regulation. Regulation only happens within a context of certain values and those dictate the spiral stage.
Government regulation is a mechanism for enforcing certain values, not a value in itself. Although depending on the stage, there can be demand for more or less regulation.
22 hours ago, SonataAllegro said:Regulation is not the same as control. Blue wants control. Orange wants freedom. Green wants regulation.
If Blue wants control of everyone within its society in such an authoritarian manner then why are there more Blue citizens than Green citizens in the US who are against certain things like vaccine mandates from the government?
-
People like Joe Rogan and Barack Obama have some Blue traits, some Orange traits, some Green traits and some Yellow traits in them because of how relatively open-minded they are to many different kinds of perspectives and to all different kinds of political parties. Then wouldn't center-left Democratic politicians and voters also be stage Yellow people? After all, they are liberals who have a lot of good blue values, good blue values, and good green values unlike the progressives who don't have very little to no Blue values in them. Plus, the centre-left Dems are more reasonable with Republicans than progressives are with them, and definitely more moderate and pragmatic than progressives are about getting any liberal policies enacted for our society.
-
12 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:They will certainly try to steal elections and stuff like that.
Their constant crying about election theft is just classic projection. They are the ones who struggle to win democratically.
So, even if the right-wing freaks try again and again and again to steal future elections, you don't believe that the fall of US democracy is inevitable or even possible at all like how this guy talks about in this video?
-
1 minute ago, Leo Gura said:I foresee problems ahead, but not a civil war.
Will nutjob MAGAs and brainwashed conspiracy theories cause problems? Yes.
What kind of problems do you think are more likely to happen?
-
8 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:In other words nationalism/fascism. This is not new. We've been here before, but society has evolved a lot in the last 100 years.
That's true. However, do you think that this time we may be more likely headed towards a civil war given the fact that the US has become more polarized than ever before, especially due to both Trump and the right-wing media?
The Jan 6th capitol riot incident was the first time that something like that ever happened to our country.
-
I started losing my hair at around my early 20s. I now have a bald spot at the crown of my head. I know how you feel OP, at least to some degree. I feel insecure about my bald spot everyday.
I think mine was caused by too much dihydrotestosterone, because at the same time I was losing hair from the top my head, I was gaining more body hair on my chest, shoulder and back of my neck.
If you still have a good amount of hair left then maybe try some kind of hair concealer for a while. I haven't used it myself, but I actually want to try it on myself soon.
-
I get that Law and Order is an example of stage Blue, but what about government regulation? I know that conservatives are examples of stage Blue because they strongly believe in tradition, religion, conformity, moral codes of conduct, social norms, manners, hierarchy, law and order, discipline, pride in one's civilization, military, police, obedience, etc. Yet even though conservatives and Republicans in the US have always proudly portrayed themselves to be the champions of law and order (despite actually being more violent and dangerous than most liberals and Democrats), they are ironically against big government regulation, particularly when it comes to business and the economy. Yet, Stage Green people, including liberals, progressives, and most Democrats seem to be more in favor of more government regulation on everything within their society even though they have been the champions of the liberal movement.
So, is government regulation an example of stage Blue or stage Green or both?
-
Alright, I'll probably get that book some day.
Also, I am thinking that maybe healthy red values are still needed in a first world society.
-
Okay, I think it get it now. So, what makes Stage Blue different from stages Orange and Green, but always necessary even within 1st world countries is that Blue involves the official law and order of a society and the monopoly of force by the military, police, and justice system of that society's government. Green and Orange may have some degree of each of those elements, but not at the sufficient levels needed for a whole society, let alone a large nation in modern times, to function, survive, and deliver justice in a pragmatic cohesive way. Stage Blue also teaches individuals to respect the necessary rules and norms established by their civilization and carry out their responsibilities, civic duties, and obligations that a citizen has to his country.
So actually, Blue, Orange, and Green all need each other in order for a first world society to function, survive, deliver justice, prosper, allow creativity, allow freedom (within reason), allow equal rights, and make as much scientific and societal progress as possible. The same would apply for each individual person who lives within any of those societies.
So, then how necessary are red or purple values for first world societies or for any individuals living in any of those places?
-
2 minutes ago, AdroseAkise said:YES, of course.
BLUE is expressed through; Discipline, work ethic, integrity, proper dress, proper and polite language, sobriety and self control
RED is expressed through; Loyalty, passion, decisiveness, no-nonsense, the ability to stand up for oneself.
PURPLE is expressed through; connection to nature, and deep intimate bonds with family and community
This is deeply false.
Let me trying asking my question(s) in another way:
Aren't the BLUE values which do include discipline, work ethic, integrity, proper dress, proper and polite language, sobriety and self control, etc. also in Stage ORANGE?
Aren't the RED values which do include loyalty, passion, decisiveness, no-nonsense, the ability to stand up for oneself, etc. also in stage ORANGE?
Aren't the PURPLE values which do include connection to nature, and deep intimate bonds with family and community also in both stage BLUE and stage GREEN?
-
8 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:There are no healthy Tier 1 value systems. There are specific examples where where Tier 2 grabs inspiration, but as self-contained value systems, they're incomplete. Tier 1 is not self-aware: it excludes, judges, fears, otherizes etc. It does not understand its own values, how they relate to other values, or how to differentiate between healthy or toxic expressions of these values.
Okay? How does that answer the question I have which is what would happen if a person from a 1st world society who has stage both the essential aspects of Orange and Green which Leo talks about doesn't have any values from either Purple, Red, or Blue? What would happen to a 1st world society that only has Orange and Green, but has very little to no Red, Blue, or Purple?
Also, isn't there overlap with hard work ethic and discipline of Stage Blue and that from Stage Orange?
in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Posted
Dude! Most of the elite intellectuals of the world are not rich and almost all of them don't have that much of an interest in political or economic power like tons of business people and politicians do. You think that someone like Fauci is super rich or has much interest in having as much political or economic power as possible? If you believe that then I genuinely feel sorry for you.
Do you think that other intellectuals such as Albert Einstein or Noam Chomsky care or cared about their own profit and power? No! They genuinely care about improving our world.