Hardkill

hydrogenated substances have trans fats and trans fats are absolutely no good for your health. Even trace amounts of trans fats stay in your blood stream and liver for many weeks or many months, especially if you don't have a healthy diet overall. Trans fats lower your testosterone levels and can cause other hormones in your body to not function well. Plus, they cause build up of plaque in your arteries to a significantly greater degree than bad cholesterol levels and excess triglyceride levels do.

Yeah, but it doesn't seem like the progressive's shifting the conversation further toward progressive values has been accomplishing anything. Am I wrong?

So, you guys think that progressives may not ever be able to win no matter how hard they fight with all of their political activism and protesting and campaign?

I just came back from a bar tonight and actually cold approach a girl there who happened to be a sex worker. She had a bull nose piercing like the kind that pierces your nose septum. I didn't know that she was a sex worker who has done some amateur work until I got to know her during the conversation. She also said that she is polyamorous and bisexual and I talked about that with her. I also asked her questions like does the size and shape of a guy's penis matter, what she thought about anal, the genres of porns she's into, her thoughts on girls getting breast and butt surgeries, why she got into sex work or porn, how it works from a financial perspective, etc. She asked me if I am truly a fan of porn or if I am one of those guys who just watches porn here and there. I told her that I've watched a lot of it since I was about 12-13 years old, and that I've become kind of a porn addict for a very long time. So, she then asked me if I have a pornhub premium subscription, to which I said that I don't and that I've never ever paid for any kind of premium porn subscriptions. She then said that that means I am actually not addicted to porn because otherwise I've would've bought some kind of premium porn subscription and that I actually gotta buy one. I asked her why and she explained to me why that is how and where you can get the best quality of porn. She also told me that she does custom porn vids too and we talked about that. Haha. After she told me her amateur porn screen name, I looked on my phone for some of the preview clips of her vids and told her how much that clip I found of her sucking off this guy in the vid already turned on me. She said thanks. I found a pic of her ass in very sexy shorts on online on my phone and told her that she has a nice phat ass. She was like "yeah some thing like that." I asked her if it was okay if I showed her a pic on my phone of my nude body from the side. She said "Sure. Thanks for asking." After she saw it, she ask why I was posing like a girl. I said that it's because I like to show off my ass. She was like "Oh I see." So asked with a smirk if she liked my body, and she said that it's okay but that she's more into the dad bod kind of look. Then I looked at her ass in person and asked if she liked doggystyle. She said "that's a dumb question." I then chuckled and said "So of course you do." She said "yup." I said "Me too. You know, this may be inappropriate but I would love to do you both standing doggystyle and you on all fours doggystyle as I grab you sexy brown bubblebutt cheeks. I'd also whisper sweet nothings into your ear." She then went "wtf!" So I said "Oh, sorry if that creeped you out." Her response was "right" in a sarcastic manner. I then said "that was probably too much information that I shared." she said "yeah." I apologized and steered the conversation towards more normal everyday kinds of topics. We talked about more regular stuff for several minutes longer. By the end of the conversation we exchanged numbers. I know that in general that shouldn't talk explicit about sex with a girl you just met until you have had sex with her. Leo also said in his how to get laid series said that the reason why you don't ever talk explicitly about sex with a girl or just go up to a girl and right away tell her bluntly that you want to fuck her because sex is generally too taboo. But this chick was a real sex worker and highly sexually liberated. Yet, I did end up making her feel very uncomfortable when I told her how I'd fuck her. So, is that because even girls like this one still feel that it is too taboo to be sexually explicit with a guy she just met and hasn't had sex yet?

Ever since 2020, we have had waves of violent crimes that have caused the annual rate of murders to be higher than at any point since 1996. Nobody in America seems to be able to stop the constant rise of extreme right-wing fascism of the Republican Party. Everyday, I keep worrying about what will happen if or when the Republicans take back control of the House, Senate, and the White House by 2024. The economic inequality in our country has reached its highest level in 52 years and it's only going to get increasingly as corporations and the rich are able to keep getting more economically powerful. Noam Chomsky has kept saying that the Republican Party has arguably become the 'most dangerous organization on earth,' but not enough people in America are getting it. He also has been trying to tell everyone in America for years that the future of organized human life is at grave risk and yet the Republican Party keeps making it worse and not enough Democrats are taking it seriously enough. How scared should Americans be about their safety and survival?

I didn't imply to her that I would rape her though.

yeah, he must be kidding himself. Also, I am not sure how useful neighborhood watches are, especially considering how much violent crime has been getting worse for 2 years now.

Okay, I get that. But if she already a super sex positive chick who has already had tons of freaky and risky sex, then what does she fear will happen to her if she gets really sexual or has sex with a guy who comes off weird and socially uncalibrated and doesn't pay her for it?

I get both of these states have high if not very high rural populations per capita. Yet, these states actually rank high in overall education level and are more secular than most states are. I mentioned in a previous thread about how Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine have some of the highest rural populations per capita, but they are still some of the most liberal states in the country (with some moderate republican leaders in the New England region). As for Utah, I understand that the state is greatly dominated by the mormon culture. However, that state actually has one of the highest urban populations per capita and is considered to have an undoubtedly high overall level education. Virginia has become a mostly safe blue state and Georgia has become a purple state trending toward blue, even though they are highly religious states that are part of the Bible Belt. So, why haven't Montana, Alaska, and Utah been able to transition to being more liberal?

We all know that the southern states in America have had more white people with old racist views per capita than the coastal states, northern states, and some midwestern states do. They say that the more racially diverse a place is the less racially conservative or racist its population will be. However, there are about eight southern states that are more racially diverse than a majority of all of the states in the country including Texas, Florida, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Alabama. In fact, Texas has become arguably the 4th most racially/ethnically/culturally diverse states in the country while Florida has been estimated to be one of the 7th most racially/ethnically/culturally diverse states in America. https://wallethub.com/edu/most-least-diverse-states-in-america/38262 So, why do all of these southern states still have more racist or more racially conservative people than other liberal states that don't even have as many black and brown people per capita as they do?

But how does paying her for sex or dirty talk make her feel safe? It still doesn't add up to me. I already know about Mode One, but I think she might've been the one who got too scared.

I see... So, then why are progressives bothering to try to bring back labor unions more into power?

So, you believe that the only key to real progress is if the vast majority of the common folk in America unite together against the corruption that needs to be vanquished? And you say that the only way that could happen is if the core of the entire regime becomes totally rotten?

So, thats it? The working and middle class people have no choice but to just give up because they are all powerless victims?

Yeah, I can see how the free trade policies would negatively affect labor unions. But what kind of propaganda did the business leaders and lobbyists put out that convinced a lot more Americans to not have or not join labor unions?

I don't get why labor unions haven't been as prevalent as they used to be several decades ago. They always worked out well for most Americans.

Some of what you guys are saying is valid. However, I think now really know why southern states that have a fair to high amount of racial diversity are still racist or racially conservative. The southern states that have a moderate to somewhat high amount of racial/ethnic diversity like Alabama, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi and Tennessee still have a relatively low to barely medium level of overall diversity including a low level of cultural and socioeconomic diversity. These states also have a high to very high rural population (by percentage) compared to the rest of the country. These states are further considered to be the 5 most religious states in the country. Alabama is arguably recognized as the most religious/most tradition-oriented state in the country. Tennessee has a somewhat high population density overall but Alabama, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Mississippi all have low to barely average level of overall population density. Lastly, all of five of these states are considered to be some of the least educated states in the country. Mississippi has the 2nd lowest overall education level per capita, Louisiana has the 3rd lowest overall education level per capita, Arkansas has the 4th lowest overall education level per capita, and Tennessee has the 10th lowest overall education level per capita. As for Oklahoma, it does a medium to high amount of overall diversity including a somewhat high amount of racial/ethnic and cultural diversity. However, it has one of the lowest levels of socioeconomic diversity in the country. The state also is approx. the 6th least educated state in the country and is approx. the 8th most religious state in America. Additionally, it still has a higher percentage of rural residents than most other states in America have and still has a low population density overall. The southern states that still have much racism but actually have had a high to very high racial/ethnic diversity such as Texas, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia each still have relatively high to very high religious populations. Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia also have each had pretty low to very low education levels per capita. Though in recent years, each of these states have had a significant uptick in the number of educated folk. Florida actually has a somewhat high overall level of education per capita and is less religious than the other four states are, which is why it may be less racist than Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. However, each of these five states have actually become increasingly much less racist over time largely because of how much each of these states' diversity, urban and suburban populations, overall population densities have all been booming over the past two decades. Regarding Virginia, that state has actually no longer had much racism. This is very likely due to state having become one of the most educated states in the country, having now higher urban and suburban populations than rural populations, having had a high population density in recent years, and having a high amount of overall diversity. Maryland has in fact been always kind of an exception in the South. It actually was never as racist as any of the other southern states were, totally supported civil rights and voting rights for all colored people in the mid-1900s, and has been loyal to liberals and the Democratic Party since 1992, particularly at the national level.

I think I now, figured out why Republicans have been dominant in Montana, Alaska, and Utah. Montana has one of the highest rural populations (by percentage) in America, one of the least densely populated states, and is one the least diverse states in America. Alaska has a high rural population (by percentage), is THE LEAST densely populated state, and has a slightly below average education level per capita. Utah is one of the most religious states in the country (including the fact that it has an abnormal amount of fundamentalists), low population density overall, and is one of the least diverse states in America. I also now get why Democrats have been dominant in Virginia, Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. Virginia has now gained such a high education level per capita, that it is now considered to be the 7th most educated state in the country. Also, Virginia has in recent years had a high amount of overall diversity and a high population density overall. Plus, over the past few decades, its rural population has been continually shrinking while its urban and suburban populations have been growing. Its rural population by percentage is now slightly below medium in comparison to all other states in America. Vermont has become approx. the 5th most educated state in the country and is tied with Maine for being the 2nd most secular state in America. A lot of this can be attributed to the influx of many liberals from other east coast states like Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut our the past few decades. New Hampshire has become one of the top 10 most educated states in the country. Moreover, it's been tied with Massachusetts as being the most secular state in America. Like Vermont, the state also has had an influx of many liberals from other east coast states like Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut over the past few decades. Maine has been tied with Vermont for being 2nd most secular state in America. Furthermore, Republicans in the New England region have always been more moderate than most other Republicans throughout the country. The state also has a relatively high education level per capita.

So, when will the US be ready for a major change?

But why do I need to be socially calibrated and sexually escalate with a girl who is already a very sexually liberated sex worker? I wonder why saying something sexually explicit like the way I said it is disrespectful to a girl who is totally sex positive and doesn't seem to view sex as something that is a big deal or as being a personal matter.

Yeah, I've been hearing the rumors about his health issues for weeks now, and I of course want to believe this, but I am still kinda skeptical about it because it hasn't been 100% confirmed yet and we can't always trust what the Russians say. For all we know, they could be making this up as part of some ploy or trick. It's also possible that all of these claims about Putin's health could be a mistake.

I believe that immigrants, especially those who are black or brown, generally vote more for Democrats and liberals than more for Republicans and conservatives. However, ever since 2016, it seems that there have been somewhat of a larger percentage of white and colored immigrants in America who have been voting more for Republicans. I am aware that one reason some immigrants will vote for Republicans or conservatives is because of how less educated and less cognitively developed those people are. Another reason is that some immigrants come from societies that have more primitive cultures. My dad is worried that having more immigrants from 2nd or 3rd world countries like Mexico, Cuba, other Latin countries, Middle East, China, India, Africa, Eastern Europe, etc. might actually be making it more favorable for Republicans because most immigrants from these countries are already conservative and less educated people. Does having more immigrants in America mean that the country will have more diverse voters who will tend to vote liberal and Democratic or does it actually mean that the country will have more low-educated voters who will tend to vote more conservative or Republican?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXz4YkFX4ro

I think your ideas would help. I also think that the Democratic needs to reach to A LOT more rural voters throughout the whole than they have been in recent years. This is what James Carville said last year in an article on Vox: "Here’s the deal: No matter how you look at the map, the only way Democrats can hold power is to build on their coalition, and that will have to include more rural white voters from across the country. Democrats are never going to win a majority of these voters. That’s the reality. But the difference between getting beat 80 to 20 and 72 to 28 is all the difference in the world. So they just have to lose by less — that’s all." Btw, I've recently studied up a lot on the voters demographics of each state and I see that the five key things that indeed do make a voting population more liberal and Democratic are: 1. Having a higher education per capita. 2. Larger share of people who are either less conservative in their religious beliefs or are not religious at all. 3. Decreasing rural populations while increasing urban and suburban populations. 4. Having more densely population cities, suburbs, and towns. 5. Increasing the diversity of the population. This is how a state such as Virginia turned from becoming a mainly conservative state to now mainly a liberal state. The state started off in 1619, as arguably having the worst level of slavery. After America became a sovereign nation 1776, Virginia very much continued on as a slave state through the rest of the 1700s and during the early to mid-1800s. At the beginning of the Civil War, Virginia joined the Confederacy and actually its state capital Richmond ended up becoming the capitol of the whole Confederate States of America. In fact, General Robert E. Lee, who became the top commander of the entire Confederate States Army in the war was born, raised, and died in Virginia. Even after both the end of the war and the end slavery in all of America, most Virginians were still very racist and by around 1877 implemented the Jim Crow laws in their state. The racist southern Democrats in Virginia were always the dominant political party in their state at both the state and national level from the late 1800s all the way to the mid 1900s. Even during the civil rights movement era, no Congressmen from Virginia for either the Senate or the House voted for ANY of the Civil Rights or Voting Rights bills that ended segregation and gave full citizenship and voting rights for all colored people in all of the South. During the late 60s, Democrats lost the South, including Virginia, to the Republican Party. From the 70s to the 90s it was mostly a red state. Then in the 2000s decade it transitioned to becoming a purple state. Finally, by the 2010s, Virginia turned into a mostly Blue state. The state is currently mostly Blue and it looks like it's only going to more Blue as time goes. The reasons why the state made such a change over the many years include having a much higher education per capita than before (Virginia is now arguably the seventh-most educated U.S. state), rural populations shrinking at a major rate while urban and suburban populations have been growing at a very significant rate, more and more densely populated areas in the state, greater amount of overall diversity throughout the entire state, and even though Virginians on average are more religious than most other Americans they have become less conservative in their religious beliefs overtime. This is also pretty much what's been happening with Georgia. It's a Deep South state that of course is a former member of the Confederacy and had slavery for over a century. Also, like every other Southern state, it too established and enforced Jim Crow laws from the late 1800s to 1965. No Congressmen from Georgia for either the Senate or the House voted for ANY of the Civil Rights or Voting Rights bills during the civil right era, except for a very few amount of House of Representatives from the state. Became primarily a red state from the late 60s to the 2010s. Yet, ever since Biden/Harris won Georgia for the 2020 presidential election, and the the centre-left Democrats, Ossoff and Warnock won both of those US senate seats in that runoff, the state has now become a purple state that is likely to turn increasingly Blue overtime. This happened because the state, especially in Atlanta, has become increasingly diverse, the average population density of the state has become high and will continue to increase overtime, and the entire state has higher urban and suburban populations and less rural populations than it used to. North Carolina, which is another former Confederate state with a long history of slavery and racism, eventually became a swing state by around 2008. Obama actually won that state for his first presidential election. Biden and Harris were very close to winning it in 2020. This is again is due the major increase in diversity, major increase in average population density of the state, and having a bit of a higher education level per capita than before. Texas itself has become increasingly less red since around 2004 for similar reasons. It's looking like that state will probably turn purple and then Blue within about a decade or so. This is because the state's overall population and average population density have been growing like crazy over the past decades. It now has high urban and suburban populations which both still continue to boom while the state's total rural population keeps declining. Furthermore, it has now become the 2nd most diverse state in the country. If the state had a higher education level per capita and/or was less religious then the state would very likely transition to Blue even sooner than a decade. I also think that Democrats in states such as Arizona, Texas, and Florida, need to do a better job with uniting Democrats at the state level and getting more colored people in their states to vote for Democrats.

Maybe he's going through a dry spell?