Hardkill

Trump and Obama weren't able to make Housing any more affordable than it is now.

We really need major advertisements and a much more powerful method of promoting all of these progressive ideas to the public until they become overwhelming popular and heavily desired by the vast majority of Americans.

Though it could cause unwanted backlash if progress is pushed too much on the masses, right? I am absolutely all for M4A, but if right now every American's private health insurance were to be replaced by a single payer system like Medicare for All, then many health insurance businesses, Big Pharma, and many everyday Americans might get so freaked out and get so enraged about it to the point of causing some kind of serious uprising against it, yeah? So many conservatives in America would become so furious with having their private health insurance replaced by M4A, that they would feel like they had absolute worst form of socialism/communism ever imposed upon their own lives. Same thing might happen if say the US government right now passed a constitutional amendment that permanently abolished the 2nd amendment. But maybe what should be done is to have tons of ads out there that constantly promote a single-payer system or some kind of universal health care system in order to persuade the masses to support and vote for it. There should also be some kind of heavy regulation on the advertisement and promotion of guns that could make the idea of having the right to bear arms much less appealing to the public than it is. That's how smoking no longer became popular in America.

I hope we don't have another big war any time soon.

Well, I am sure it doesn't hurt to try out the creams just for fun. Penis enlargement exercises like Jelqing and stretching your own cock actually can actually cause permanent damage to your penis. Though I think penis pumps are okay to use. Here's a good explanation from a professional Urologist on whether certain PE methods actually work or not:

Yeah, Leo also said all of that stuff too in both his "Why Bernie Sanders Lost" vid and "How Societies evolve" vid.

That’s why I am considering owning a gun for my own protection. I fear there is going to be more chaotic political violence in the future for an indefinite period of time.

Yeah, but how exactly are going to see the light and decide to vote for liberals or progressives within the next decade or so?

I said that he has no soul as an expression. Is it true that his father abused him? Well, I am sure that his upbringing greatly influenced him to turn into the kind of monster that he is. Actually, he could've used his marketing skills to build his own successful kickboxing training company in many parts of the world. That would've been perfect for him.

I get that, but what about the fact that we still have too many people in America who are primarily stuck at stage Blue or are somewhere between stage Blue and Stage Orange? What about even some of the other people in America that are between stage Red and stage Blue? How will all those Americans who are in those stages of the spiral transition into Green in the future?

Leo did actually say that himself in his video on "Why Bernie Sanders Lost." But the problem with progressives isn't actually so much that they use these tactics of fear and shame. It in fact, the problem they really have is that most of them don't know how to relate well to people's cultures values or connect well with them on an emotional well. As James Carville has said before, "Wokeness is a problem" and progressives use “Faculty lounge” politics. Progressives might also be pushing the Democratic party too far to the left. That could be a real electoral problem for the party in the future. https://youtu.be/3d886hjFaYg?t=2155

Is that why ass is sometimes called cakes?

But even the courts have unfortunately a lot of times failed to bring real justice because the prosecutor and his client still couldn't gather enough evidence needed to prove the criminal guilty or because the jury might have had too many inherent biases that could've clouded their ability to make a truly fair and objective decision on the case. O.J. Simpson and George Zimmerman were not found guilty for their crimes even though they deserved to be. Furthermore, I don't know how much corruption there is Romania, but it's possible that in a country like that, the judges and the jury in the courts there might not be above being paid off to look the other way. Actually, the more I think about, the more pessimistic I am about Tate receiving the kind of justice that he deserves. I hope that I am wrong.

Oh yeah, I am not saying that you should go out of your way to break any girl's heart or abuse them in any sort of way. In fact, I've always been generally cautious about leading any girls on because I've always believed that doing that or tricking girls into thinking that you want a serious relationship with them, when you really not looking for anything serious is shitty. That's why I try my best to make it clear to a girl as best as I can that I am not ready to commit to her yet until a while later.

How long have you been dating this chick? Also, if you're not in a committed relationship with her, then you're not obligated to just date her. You don't owe her anything. If she doesn't like it then that's her problem, not yours. Don't let her take control of your life. As the man, you gotta be the leader and make it clear to her that it's your way or the way. If she's not down with your program, and won't really do anything for you out of love (with reasonable and healthy boundaries of course) then I am afraid that you're gonna have to kick her to the curb and move on to another chick. What I've learned from dating women and having had a girlfriend before is that a woman's compliance is key to having a good relationship with any woman. After all, when it comes to dating, romance, and sex compliance is feminine energy, while dominance is masculine energy. Only when she has been your girlfriend for at least a few years has she earned the right to ask you to do some things that you may not want to do in the future. Even then, you still want to be the alpha male with a few beta traits to keep the relationship going, like how dating expert Alan Roger Currie talked about it.

That may be true, but that's what has made him very successful at being a con man. At the end of the day, he still has no soul and the only real skills he genuinely has is his kickboxing skills. Also, like Leo said, Tate doesn't really know how to successfully run a truly legit business or market himself in any honest way. Fundamentally, he's just a low class brute and a meathead with probably a low level of education. Plus, he's an extreme right-wing fascist in his own right. He even said before that he moved to Romania because he liked "living in countries where corruption is accessible for everybody." He really does have a lot in common with Trump and Kanye. You know, he should've just stayed in his lane by sticking with kickboxing or doing MMA or being just a kick boxing coach. There's nothing inherently wrong with any of those careers, per se. What a shame.

As far as I am concerned, Andrew Tate is one of the biggest deepfakes on the planet. He has no real human personality deep in his core and almost everything about his whole life has been fake. Except for his kickboxing championship titles and Bugatti.

I don’t agree. social circle game hasn’t worked out for me. I’ve gotten way better results with day game. That’s also how I got my first and only true girlfriend ever.

That’s true. but I feel like rejections rates for men in America, Canada, and in other first world countries have been skyrocketing non stop since around the beginning of the new millenium. Women and men in developed countries are becoming too entitled and too closed off from each other for many different reasons in this day an age. I worry that this problem could continue to get worse and worse for more and more men around the world until something really bad happens in the future within the dating world.

Yeah, but women generally aren’t as visual as men. They are more attracted to a man’s charisma and masculine vibe. Besides looks, what else is she better at than you? Is she smarter than you? Does she have a better career than you or make more money than you? Perhaps more importantly are the following things: Does she cook and clean for you? Is she someone who has a deep level of compassion? Does she give you much respect? Is she submissive and cooperative with you? Does she support your goals in life? How good is she in bed? Do you picture her as possibly wife material?

It reminds me of Kylie Jenner’s butt cream product she sold years ago. She said that it stimulates the fat cells in your butt cheeks to make them grow. That really was a scam.

Yeah, I agree. That's why I don't believe in the idea that a guy who has no game should start out sleeping with or even making out with girls that he's not attracted to.

Yeah, you know it's getting to be so comical when people like Cenk keep saying stuff like "I am one of the most unbiased commentators out there!" or Unlike the mainstream media, here on TYT, we really tell it like it is!" or "I can't stand the mainstream media! They keep lying!!!" or "You know what guys? Real journalism is dead!" And yet I see now how people like Cenk are getting too emotional and sounding too extreme and dogmatic in their views. That's why I've cut down on watching TYT, the Majority Report, and others channels like those ones so much since about a few months ago that I now only watch about 5-10% of the content in each of those channels. You said before that Pod Save America have people on there that are left-wing, but sound wise, pragmatic, balanced, reasonable, not so whiny, not too populist, and not too anti-mainstream. It's probably one of the very few tier 2 YT channels that exist out there. That's why I actually really like watching their channel too. Noam Chomsky is also very likely one of the very few true tier 2 political analysts out there.

But what if the person who say they got raped by someone can’t prove it according to the standards of proof? How does one know for sure in that case, that the person alleged to have raped that person actually did it or not? The women who claimed they were raped by him unfortunately don’t have enough evidence to prove that to the police and the courts.

Is it possible that she may also feel like you’re out of her league?