Hardkill

How does that explain why there are only so few moderate Republican politicians but about 50% of moderate Democrat politicians?

Okay, so then if most Republican voters are actually moderately conservative, then why have most Republican politicians been so far to the right for decades? Why do moderate Republican politicians keep decreasing in number while about half of the Democratic politicians in America are still moderates?

If I creeped them out, then why did they like talking really dirty with me?

Given how there are only a few moderate Republicans left in America, do you believe that the vast majority of Republicans in the US have actually turned into extreme conservatives or not necessarily?

So, NATO is dancing with The Devil They Know. Although, from what I understand, the antisemitism from the Azov Regiment has apparently been very minimal and non-threatening to Jewish people in Ukraine in recent times.

Ahh... I wondered why he converted to Islam. But I think you're right. That's probably why he did it.

why is he doing polls when the masses are asses, especially when it comes to running a big business?

You know, if China ever established a democracy in their country, then I wonder if China would in that case one become the first country with Democratic Socialism. There economy seems to be working well and in some ways is better than ours. So, imagine if decades from now, the country granted the same kinds of social freedom and social equality that US government has given for every American .

Before the rise of Neoliberalism/Reaganism, capitalism in the US was much more regulated in the mid 1900s and it worked even better for all people of all classes throughout the entire country. So, why hasn't our country gone back to having that kind of economic system after 40+ years of Neoliberalism/Reaganism, which has ultimately caused not just two of the worse recessions since the Great Depression, but also the worse levels of economic equality arguably since the Gilded Age in the late 1800s? The profoundly disastrous effects of both the Great Depression and the Gilded Age both happened mainly due to unchecked capitalism as well. So, shouldn't most Americans including most of the elites in the US have already learned by now that unfettered capitalism is a serious liability to the economy?

That's what I still wonder about.

This article just came out on the Hill mentioned how some progressives from New Hampshire have already launched a statewide campaign urging Biden not to run again because of how unpopular and old he has become, they believe that Biden is likely to lose in 2024, especially if he runs against a fresh new GOP candidate such as DeSantis. They also of course don't how he still comes off as a status quo/establishment president. "Jeff Cohen, the co-founder of RootsAction, said the campaign is 'just getting started' and the advertisements would soon run in more states." https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/3773627-dont-run-joe-campaign-launches-first-tv-ad-in-new-hampshire-urging-biden-not-to-seek-reelection/ I am worried that progressives will not only ruin Biden's electability, but also cause the Democrats in the party to tear each other which would ruin the chances of the Democrats holding onto to the Presidency, Senate, and winning back the House in 2024.

Could Trump have prevented the economy from going into a terrible recession if he had respond to the COVID crisis much better?

Yeah, he does seem to have greater intelligence and integrity than most conservatives in the US. Biden has passed really great bills with Congress. Funny enough, even Cenk actually said recently that Biden now has successfully completed a percentage of his own agenda that is greater than the percentage of Obama’s agenda that actually got done during Obama’s presidency. Otherwise, the increasingly polarized and terrible political climate we’ve been in for decades has really stifled so much progress for our country.

Fair. That's why progressives and even many right-wing populists, like Saagar Enjeti, always like to cite back how FDR and LBJ were legendary presidents who helped to radically reform our country for the better. So did both Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson too as progressive presidents in the early 1900s.

Yes, society today is definitely way more fair, socially, and we of course have far superior medicine, knowledge, and technology than we did back then. But what do you think about Chomsky's take on social democracy that did occur in the US during his time back then?

But America did have a social democracy during the mid 1900s that worked out great with FDR's New Deal, strong labor unions, and LBJ's Great Society. I'd say that social democracy was especially at its peak during the late 60s. Noam Chomsky talked about how there was much more solidarity in the country during his youth. He said in one interview: "Q. I read that when you were a child, you began working at a kiosk with an uncle, selling newspapers. Or that you helped him, at least. I would like to know, how did that mark you, how did that influence you? A. There is a good deal of irony, tragic irony, in that question. I grew up in the Depression. I was a child in the early 1930s. My family were immigrants, mostly unemployed, with really bitter suffering from the Depression, but there was an atmosphere of hope, aspiration and expectation, because of the labor movement. The labor movement was reviving. It had been crushed by force during the 1920s, but it was reviving. There were militant labor actions, there were political parties, radical political parties. There was debate, discussion, cultural activities. There was a sense of: “We can all get out of this together.” In fact, if you look at what happened in the 1930s, the effect in Europe was fascism, Franco, Mussolini, Hitler, other minor figures. That was Europe. The reaction to the Depression in the United States was social democracy. The New Deal, Roosevelt’s New Deal, pressed by labor activism, popular pressure, led to the modern era of social democracy, picked up by Europe after the Second World War. Now that was 90 years ago. Look at today, there are other crises today, very serious ones. Europe is holding on to some form of social democracy. The United States is leading the way to proto-fascism, the reverse of what happened in my childhood. " https://chomsky.info/20220125/

Yeah, that's truly comical. But Trump is truly skilled at dividing and destroying everything around him. He can easily divide and destroy the Republican Party if he wanted to.

I see... So, we are just going to have wait and see what will happen with 100% certainty with both the economy and who the GOP nominee will be in a year or two from now. There actually is also the possibility that the Republican party could end up tearing itself apart so much that Trump ends up officially splitting up the GOP in two conflicting parties, which would destroy the right-wing's chances of taking back the white and maybe lose more than that. Especially if Trump does happen to lose the GOP nomination. That's exactly how Teddy Roosevelt totally ruined the Republican's party chances of winning the presidency in 1912.

Yeah, I personally believe that too. What happens though if the economy enters into a recession next year or the year after, which unfortunately is what most economists, business elites, and investors have lately been forecasting?

There is also the concern amongst many people in America that Biden is already in his 80s and looks like a doddering old man. My dad who is the same age as Biden doesn't think that he would be able to handle another 6 years of being POTUS given how extremely taxing of a job it is, especially for such an old person. Do you think this could negatively affect Biden's electability?

Communism/Socialism failed because the people in charge became too greedy for power and money. The idea of Socialism, particularly with Communism, is to have no hierarchy and no class structures in a society. Furthermore, everything would be equally owned and equally shared by everyone within an entire society permanently. While humans can be compassionate and the human race as a whole has continuously evolved throughout history into better and better beings, they or we are still too selfish by nature to want to share absolutely everything, make absolutely everything and everyone equal (from a relative standpoint), and respect and trust every single person in a society. Plus, pure Communism/Socialism has never produced a strong competitive economy. China tried it before and it didn't end up working out so well for their economy in the long-run. That's why by the late 1970s/early 1980s, the country began to gradually become increasingly capitalistic. This trend towards a more capitalist society continued all the way through the 80s and actually began to accelerate after the early the 90s all the way into the new millennium. China is still mainly a Socialist country run by the CCP, but the country has been forced to become much more capitalistic, than it was approximately 40+ years ago in order to become a strong economy that is now becoming about as competitive as the US economy in its own way. To my knowledge there has been no known practical way to make Communism/Socialism work in a way that is not conducted or governed by an authoritarian regime. Theoretically, Democratic Socialist governments probably have a better shot of working than the authoritarian style Communism/Socialism did. However, I don't think that there are any experts out there on this matter who know for certain that this style of government would produce enough of a strong, competitive economy. Also, I am not sure if there would be enough people out there who would support the idea of having to share a lot more of what they own with many other people they don't know or are not close to. Plus, there would probably be a lot of people out there who may not like the idea of having anyone who doesn't have much business acumen or experience be involved in running or managing a company. That's why I believe that every society needs to eventually have some kind of social democracy, which is a very regulated form of capitalism that has every kind of social safety net needed for each individual person in a country or island.

Yeah, I put that clip up on his forum recently. I am totally with Professor Lichtman. He’s a brilliant US Historian who has always been on point.

Yeah! It's truly fascinating! If nuclear fusion energy does become a widely available and viable source of renewable energy that is safely used all around the world, then it will no doubt revolutionize the whole world. We would really be living in the future.

I am inclined to believe that. Although there have been some polls out there lately showing that a majority of GOP voters now prefer DeSantis over Trump to be the GOP nominee in 2024. “Republicans and conservative independents increasingly want Trumpism without Trump,” said David Paleologos, the director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center. GOP pollster, Frank Luntz, recently held a focus group of voters who had voted for Trump at least once during the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. He said that they are getting tired of Trump and that "They still appreciate him, they still think he was a great president, that hasn't changed," Luntz said. "But they now look at him and they say, 'Why all this chaos?'" Do you buy that? Or do you think that the all of the Trump supporters and even the vast majority of regular Republican/conservative voters in the US don't really mean that and will probably come back home to Trump by 2024? Yeah, these progressives are really getting my nerves with their foolishness. They definitely have got to get over there Bernie or bust mentality.

Kyrsten Sinema has left the Democratic Party. She is a traitor and she was never a true Democrat. https://www.michaelmoore.com/p/eps-the-meaning-of-independent-sinema#details