Hardkill

Well, let's hope that this strong conservative backlash is only a temporary phase in the grand scheme of things. Let's also hope that centrism (including the center-right) in the EU still dominates overall for as long as possible until things cool down sometime in the future when the center-left to more left-wing comes back to power. Fortunately, virtually all of the EU countries are much more developed than they were in the 1900s and still firmly believe in democracy.

It also looks Trump has already been losing voters from his conviction:

There's plenty more of this on their channel

Clarence Thomas admits to having taken $4 MILLION IN GIFTS from rich donors!

There is no alternative besides Biden. In any case, Biden has arguably become the most progressive president since the 1960s. If he defeats Trump, then he might go down in History as a heroic president. That's it!

I actually think Trump needs to step aside and make room for a new GOP candidate that's a lot like Mitt Romney. He's the one that has real signs of dementia and psychosis, not Biden:

Yeah, I was surprised! Sheinbaum won by a triple landslide! I also like how she's Jewish. I never thought their country would elect some Jewish even though it's mostly a Catholic country.

Chief Justice Roberts declines meeting with Senate Democrats over Alito concerns:

Alito just stated that he will not recused himself from the January 6th case:

Oh, well then I guess that's okay for you to abstain because Maryland is supposed to be a safe state for Biden. Unless a crazy amount of people in Maryland decided to stay home and not vote. However, I very much hope that you vote for Alsobrooks for US Senate. Even though Larry Hogan may seem like a reasonable good Republican if he wins that seat then that could very well mean Mitch McConnell's return to being Senate Majority leader.

No, you're wrong! I mean, why would someone like Trump ever dare or even think about breaking the law and order of our country? Ever since Nixon first ran on the idea of Republicans being the party of Law and Order, they've all kept saying that they are Standard-bearer of those values, including Trump himself! So, I believe them when Republicans, especially Nixon and Trump, have said that they are the prime examples of Law and Order. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

No, he doesn't. That's a very misleading statement that Trump and his MAGA goons have been making. Even the US Supreme Court already implied that during their hearing of Trump's case for "Absolute immunity" as a sitting president or even former president. Otherwise, that would essentially mean that POTUS is a king who is above the law, which actually mean that Biden would a king that is above the law.

That's okay. At least you acknowledge the credit I get for mentioning it first. But that doesn't really matter.

It's about damn time!!!! He got convicted on ALL 34 counts as a felon! Alvin Bragg will go down in US History and maybe in World History as a legendary hero for being the very prosecutor in the history of our country to have successfully achieve the conviction of a former POTUS as a big time criminal!

Wait, did you want him to be acquitted?

Lol. Not according to the time stamped on mine. Look on the first list of threads made on the Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events Forum and the top of each of our threads to check the time that states when you started your thread and then check the time that states when I made this thread of mine.

Hey! I already started a threat on this before you did, OP.

Are you serious? Why are you making that a main concern over Biden’s major historic policy change and great character compared Trump who was the worst president ever? Besides, he has his VP Harris to take the edge off the age problem. which state do you live in?

Yeah, while America still isn't as corrupt as any underdeveloped or any developing countries are, it is arguably the most corrupt first world/developed country in the world besides perhaps Israel now.

He couldn't with SCOTUS because there have been no openings for Biden replace any conservative justices with liberal justices. None of the conservative justices plan on retiring or stepping down anytime soon. None of them seem to be dying anytime soon. Furthermore, Biden and most Democrats in Congress don't want to pack the court with extra judges because they believe it would be perceived as being too divisive and too political and set a precedent for the Republican party to do the same if they gain back control of the White House and both chambers of Congress. However, Biden and his party have appointed 200 federal judges, which is the highest amount for any president since like JFK. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/joe-biden-nears-200-judges-highlighting-stakes-courts-2024-election-rcna152485

Well, we'll have to see. A lot would have to go wrong in terms of governance by Biden and his party. Besides, there is already a growing number of people who are getting very scared about Trump not leaving office.

Oh, I do know how bad it will be. So, I am not sure why you said before that if Trump wins the election then: But yeah, that's why we have to re-elect Biden. Even though the polls are not looking great right now, but they are also all over the place and most of the pundits out there really have no idea who will win. Besides, a lot would have to go wrong for Biden to lose according to the fundamentals.

That's partially true. However, when there is way too much of a mandate for such policies or for a major liberal/progressive vision, then even the stage Orange lobbyists will be forced to compromise a lot. Otherwise, if they don't, then they jeopardize the public order and tranquility of our country. Even these slimy lobbyists know that they don't want to have another Gilded Age era rife with extremely violent widespread labor strikes and rioting around the country. In fact, look at what Biden and his party got done so far, even they made compromises with their corporate lobbyists and wealthy donors. They already achieved what seemed impossible in many ways, especially when you consider how much gridlock there has been in our government for so many.

We don't have a firm left-winger for president. A center-leftist will do. But we also need to elect a supermajority of Dems in both chambers of Congress. Also, the Supreme Court won't be controlled by the conservatives forever. As for the deep state, like I said before liberals and progressives will have to inevitably make some pragmatic compromises with the government elites and the business community in order to get a lot of the big changes we want done. The deep state also can't just block every major reform, especially when there is an overwhelming mandate for such reforms by the public. Otherwise, they risk destabilizing our society. They know that and that's why the deep state will have to make compromises with the people if the liberals/progressives have a supermajority of Dems in both chambers of Congress and we have another FDR-like president. This will much more likely happen if all of these factors coincide with another major crisis pertaining to the economy happens under the watch of the GOP and/or have a groundswell of support from some kind of movement that can't be ignored by the public.

Most leftists are not good at that, but a new youngish center-left politician who has such exceptional talent like the Roosevelt presidents can pull it off in a way that can frame progressivism or liberalism as the mainstream dominant ideology in America like in the first two decades of 1900s or in the mid-1900s. That can very well happen again if the left-wing and the center-left in this country can get it together by building an overwhelming groundswell of support and awareness for all of these liberal/progressive ideas with grassroots organizers and activists mobilizing communities and pushing for bold policy changes all over the country. In fact, it already seems to be happening and has continued to grow to such a level that America hasn't seen since like the early to mid 70s. It's probably just going to take decades of very hard and commitment for all of this to succeed in our country. Even you said before that the chances of having a once in a generation broadly charismatic person like Obama, but is a real fighter seems more likely to happen within the next 20 years. Besides, I am aware of the fact that liberals and progressives will have to inevitably make some pragmatic compromises with the government elites and the business community in order to get a lot of the big changes we want done. That's always been the case according to history. So, I do concede that we probably still won't achieve all of the forward thinking changes we want within our lifetimes. However, transforming our society to one that is much more progressive than it is now within our lifetimes should be doable.