Hardkill

Instead of trying to play games with a girl to try to get into her pants, why can't I just screen for girls who are down to have sex with me by getting sexual right at the beginning of my approach? Here's the mindset: "Talk to the girl and touch the girl in a sexually explicitly manner as soon as you first meet her. Is she in or is she out? If she's out then move on to the next girl and try it with her. If not her either then keep it moving and try it on the next girl and see if she wants to sleep with me. I keep trying it on however many girls I am attracted to until one of them wants to fuck me." Sounds good?

I wonder if Obama would've called for a ceasefire or would've done a better job of keeping Bibi and the Israeli government in check. They say that Biden has been more pro-Israeli than Obama was when he was president. Also, during Obama's presidency, there was much greater peace in the middle east. Not even presidents Bush 2, Bill Clinton, H.W. Bush, Reagan, or Carter were as pro-Israeli as Biden has been. I hope Biden is making the right call on this. Although, he apparently has lately been getting more and more impatient and upset with Netanyahu.

That is according to the polls and according to the vast majority of countries around the world. Here's an article on it from the Data for Progress website: Voters Want the U.S. to Call for a Permanent Ceasefire in Gaza and to Prioritize Diplomacy https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2023/12/5/voters-want-the-us-to-call-for-a-permanent-ceasefire-in-gaza-and-to-prioritize-diplomacy "When asked how knowledgeable they are about the Israel-Palestine conflict, 25% of voters say they have either an 'extensive' or 'proficient' level of knowledge, while 35% say they have a 'moderate' knowledge level. Voters who get their news from social media are especially likely to consider themselves knowledgeable: 36% of voters who get news from Instagram, 33% of voters who get news from TikTok, and 30% of voters who get news from Facebook say they have extensive or proficient knowledge about the conflict. Sixty-one percent of likely voters, including a majority of Democrats (76%) and Independents (57%) and a plurality of Republicans (49%), support the U.S. calling for a permanent ceasefire and a de-escalation of violence in Gaza."

Even if it costs him his re-election? Even at the possible lost of our country's democracy being lost because Biden lost too much of the support he needed to beat Trump again in 2024? Or will those voters probably come home by the election day, regardless of what his decision is with handling Israel? Or will those disgruntled voters not really have a real significant effect on the electoral outcome?

Alright so clubs, bars, and house parties are no excuse for me to do bulldozing approaches.

I get that a ceasefire is realistically not gonna happen anytime soon, but Arab Americans and young voters in very key battleground states that Biden last time won, only by razor thin margins in 2020, are threatening to not vote for Biden and the Democrats again in the 2024 general election, if he and many other Dems in Washington don't call for a ceasefire. So, would it still be better politically for a lot more Democrats, including Biden himself, to call for a ceasefire?

Oh I see. That makes sense more sense to me now. So, even in any nightclub/bar/house party setting in any city or town with lots of fun music and alcohol around, it's still best to slowly escalate properly if I want to best results for sleeping with the hottest and coolest girls in the club, bar, or house party on the same night I met them, right?

Is that because most girls who are sober, even in a big nightclub, are still afraid of being slut-shamed or because it usually takes them longer than guys do to get horny or both? Also, how come you said before that all girls at bar/club are fair game because all of them are DTF?

But I thought that as a man and a leader it is my duty to orchestrate the agenda and the woman is supposed to follow it right? Either she complies with it or I charge her to the game and keep on moving to another who's with me. I also shouldn't be apologizing for whom I am and what I want as a man.

Alright, how about as a more reasonable compromise for my approach, I screen for DTF girls by asking if them what kind of porn or erotica they like. If they refuse to answer that then it's her lost, she's not comfortable with her sexuality, a prude, and time for me to move on to the next girl. Keep doing that process until I find one cool attractive girl who's not so uptight about sex. Fair enough?

Why should I apologize for being who I am as long I am not threatening anybody at all or hurting anyone on here or harassing anyone on here or posting any porn pics on here?

Maybe if she happens to be horny because she's ovulating or for whatever other reason and she thinks I look hot and liked how ballsy I came off, then maybe she'd be down to fuck.

Then what's the difference between a sexually liberated girl and conservative sexually repressed girl? Is the former easy or harder to pull than the latter? That was a long time ago and I don't think I ever mentioned Sex and the City before. lol

but why won't that work even on most sexually liberated DTF girls? I don't want to be a pornstar and I don't think I would even be successful at it if I tried it.

Or maybe most girls aren't as sexually liberated and open-minded as I though they would be like in Sex and the City or Fifty Shades of Grey.

Okay, fine then, how about I screen quickly for horny girls by just talking about sex explicitly right away on approach? If she doesn't want to talk about sex then she's out and it's her lost. I would keep doing until I find a cool sexually liberated girl I am attracted to who likes to talk about sex and then sleep with me. Also, I don't judge women who sleep around a lot.

But I don't know if she likes it until I try it. Just like how you don't how interested she is wanting to talk to me until I try talking to her first.

But wouldn't be okay as long as I respected her decision to say no? Besides, wouldn't I eventually find a girl who's horny enough to have sex with me right away? Besides if

A lot of left-wingers and Pro-Palestine people have been saying that even if we won't be able to convince Israel to agree to a permanent ceasefire, we should still inspire the whole world to condemn the Israeli government for all of the mass killings and destruction they have caused. Already, most of the world wants Israel to stop and the amount of people all around the world who are condemning Israel is still growing. Will this mean that Israel will pay a heavy price for this in some major way?

I don't know what happened when I tried to copy and paste this vid starting where Dan Pfeiffer talks about why Trumps has currently been doing shockingly better than expected in the polls against Biden, but he started talking about it at the 25:53 mark.

But what kind of shift could or would happen over time from this condemnation?

Biden has made it clear that the US will defend Taiwan from China if China tried to invade the country.

Those points need to sold to the public in a very emotionally compelling way: "Big corporations and the rich have been slowly taking over the entire country and if we don't stop them, then not only will they have bought off the entire government they will be able to buy every American citizen as their wage slaves through commercial slave trades." "The wealthy elites and corporate tyrants have already rigged all of our elections and have been gradually destroying our democracy. Also, Donald Trump, the MAGA Republicans, the right-wing megadonors, the corrupt Republicans in Congress, the authoritarian GOP governors, the Republican state legislators who have implement racist gerrymandering, the very corrupt conservatives federal-level justices (especially those on the US Supreme Court), the radical right-wing racists such as KKK, Neo-Nazis, human sex trafficking rings, Proud Boys, and QAnon have all rigged the elections in favor of the white christian people in this country." "The Billionaire crime lords and mega corporations like Amazon are the real culprits who have been truly responsible for having caused such historic levels of economic inequality and wealth inequity in our country that are now comparable to what they were on the eve of the Great Depression. They've been able to get away with lobbying the politicians in Washington to pass laws that allow these corrupt private enterprises and rich robber barons to steal even much more money from the middle class, working class, and the poor. Moreover teachers, military soldiers, policemen, firefighters, and other people in the public sector are all getting skinned alive by the rich and the corporations. Big pharma and private health insurance companies have running one of the biggest scams ever in the history of the world as a massive cartel that have let millions upon millions of innocent sick people needlessly suffer and die. Corporate greed has also been the main reason as to why our national debt is the highest it has ever been in US history and still keeps getting worse. We need to lock these corporate criminals and predatory rich elites in prison."

Again, this is why we desperately need a powerful liberal/progressive media ecosystem that can drown out the right-wing media ecosystem and can promote left-wing policies in a much more entertaining and provocative manner, widespread progressive grassroots activism that overwhelms the right-wing movement on the ground throughout the whole country, Democrats need to continue to be more aggressive with their attacks towards the Republicans and bad-faith conservatives without backing down, and another once in a generation charismatic liberal/progressive leader like TR, FDR, JFK, or Obama. Once we have all those factors in place, then liberalism/progressivism will rise again as the dominant political force for decades just like it was during the progressive era in the early 1900s progressive era and the political dominance of the liberal consensus during the mid-1900s.

If there are more men than women who are creeps, then are there more women than men who are prudes?