Hardkill

Why aren't Trump and his supporters more toxic Orange than toxic red? Even though they are all despicable, most of the Trump supporters throughout the entire country aren't violent like cold-blooded murders, bloodthirsty brutes like Atilla the Hun and his warriors, or power hungry megalomaniacs. Most of them don't even have it in them to become a gangster or commit any crime let alone any kind of felony. Hell, Trump didn't even have the balls to try his hardest to use the military and the police when he was president to overturn the election and take over the entire country by sheer force. He also never had any interest in trying to conquer other lands or territories in any other part of the world. Furthermore, he never lived or grew up in the streets or was ever part of a criminal gang. I don't even recall him having gotten into any sort of physical altercation with anyone. He's really more a white collar criminal and is a sexual predator more on the level of Bill Clinton, which is toxic Orange.

Would you say that the decision Biden has made, at the beginning of his presidency, to withdraw the troops from Afghanistan was a stage Yellow decision?

Well yeah, I kind of understand that, but what exactly did most Afghans not like about the more Democratic kind of government that we built them? Did, for example, most Afghani women in their country actually not like being given equal rights and freedom?

I am glad that the US has finally withdrawn from Afghanistan, but what I still wonder is why most Afghanis in their own country did not like the kind of democratic government that we created for them for the past 20 years?

Over the past month, I've applied to about 20-30 different kinds of jobs and I only got two job offers. I got one job as a temporary painter at a University for $33.72/hr. which I've already been doing for 3 weekdays now and I got another job offer at a hotel with a rating of about 4.5 stars as a seasonal daily recreation attendant for $14.5/hr. Is that a not bad success rate for jobs offer or is that a poor success rate?

Okay. I guess that means that there's never a shortcut to explicit sex with any women, unless she's either a prostitute, pornstar, very drunk, or just by luck happens to very horny when you first met her.

This guy absolutely needs to be removed from office ASAP.

Not to be a troll, but could actually talking about sex or porn with her with the right sub-communication and energy behind it work when cold approaching her?

But how? Sadly, corporations are still overwhelmingly powerful. How can we stop them from destroying and polluting every piece of the world they get their hands on? I don't think that there's much one can do to improve the conditions of the environment unless there are enough liberal or democratic votes within the government that will be able to pass the kind of legislation we need to truly effectively carry out and enforce the solutions our world needs to solve these climate change issues. Even if the Democrats or Liberals did have all of the votes they needed, wouldn't corporate lobbyists still be able to easily persuade enough Dems to not vote for any bill that would truly improve our climate in the long-run?

The number of cases in the US have now become worst than it was last summer. I fear that the Fall will be even worse because the cold weather will exacerbates the COVID transmission further. Afterwards, we might have another dark winter that's even worse than the dark winter we just went through.

Just because I said in my past post a number of times that I have opened conversations with women talking about porn does not mean that I actually did that all of the time. In fact, I only did that a number of times on apps like Wakie and Facebook. However, whenever I've met new women IRL, I've never once opened that way. I also mentioned before in some of my other past posts that I had a girlfriend before who I met through cold approach on the street. We were together for almost 3 years. I've cold and warm approach hundreds of girls throughout my whole life in all kinds of venues and I even hooked up with some girls from online dating who just wanted sex. I've also mentioned before in other post of mine on this forum many of the most legit pickup and dating gurus/coaches out there consistently for years on how to succeed with women. I know I still have a lot more room for growth in many areas of my seduction and social skills, but to say I have zero knowledge about female psychology and how attract women is major overstatement. I know that women get sexually turned on slower than men do and yes a guy need to emotionally stimulate women in order to get her horny and comfortable enough to have sex with you. The three main keys of seduction required for a man to pull a woman into bed with her are Social Frame, Emotional Stimulation, and Sexual Arousal. Social Frame, is about making her feel okay to have sex with you. This is done by coming off as a guy who not only presents a high enough perceived social status and social skills around women and even people in general, but also involves you coming off as a guy who does not judge or slut-shame women. Projecting yourself as a man with reasonable high standards also helps with having good Social Frame. https://www.girlschase.com/content/confused-about-pickup-and-seduction-article-will-change If the guy is able to successfully activate those 3 keys within about 5 min. or more of meeting a chick you approach, then she quickly will sleep with you. It will seem like the guy instantaneously aroused the girl just within the very first minute of meeting her, but what really happened was that the guy had such smooth enough game that he was able to rapidly escalate the vibe enough to the point where she became horny enough from his influence within just a few minutes or so of meeting him. The other possibility could be that she was already horny enough to begin with even before he met her for whatever reason, in which case would mean that the guy pretty much just lucked up on getting sex with her. So yes, a guy has to influence enough of a transition from first meeting her to sex, by socially, emotionally, and sexually inspiring her to want to date you or have sex with you, but you don't need to spend days building rapport and comfort with her on the phone or through texting. Furthermore, like Starstruck said, there are a lot of girls out there, especially these days who can't help, but enjoy sleeping with fuckboys just for a good time. Not all women take sex as seriously as you think.

Building rapport with a girl for several days over the phone before asking her out for a date or a hookup is a major waste of a guy’s time, particularly if his game is not advanced. In fact, the more he texts or says something before the date, the more of a chance he has of saying something that might turn her off too much. Also, let’s not forget how many girls who are attention whores out there who just love to text or talk with a guy over phone without having any interest at all of ever wanting to meetup with him. I’ve made the mistake myself a number of times before where I’ve let girls like that just waste my time for days on the phone with multiple texts or phone calls to them, but meanwhile none of those girls had any real intention of ever meeting up with me. Like Leo said on the forum before, right you get her number, the phone calling and texting should only start out being used to set up a date or hookup.

The big infrastructure package which includes significant tax increases on the rich and corporations and substantial "human infrastructure." In order for this bill to be passed it will require every Democratic senator and almost every Democratic house member in Congress to all agree to vote for it through budget reconciliation. McConnell and every other Republican Congressmen have made it very clear that none of them are going to vote for this bill at all. Now, TYT says that there's only a small chance that it's going to happen, because of the razor-thin majorities Democrats have in both the House and Senate, too many corporate Democrats in both the House and the Senate who have already been lobbied by their corporate donors not to vote for the bill, and there's not enough of a clear strategy on how this is actually going to work.

I am 33 years old and I still haven't found my LP. I've tried looking into many different kinds of careers and life purpose from being a scientist, a doctor, occupational therapist, physical therapist, actor/voice actor, model, teacher, martial arts instructor, fitness instructor, artist, etc. but I never could get anything substantial going with any of those careers. Why is it that there are so many people out there who already found theirs in their late teens or 20s, but then there are so many others like myself who still haven't even as they are getting close to their 40s? How did all of these celebrities out there including all of these famous actors, athletes, musicians, politicians, businesspeople, entrepreneurs doctors, attorneys, etc. who have been practicing their careers for most of their lives were able to figure it out at such a young age? It sadly another reason for someone like to feel envious of the rich and famous. ?

Well, I’ve talked to a number of experienced successful pickup gurus myself, including Gunwitch himself who not only knew all of the actually had many of his own techniques stolen by all of the RSD guys. Which guys told you that 3% success lay rate is the highest that anyone can get?

Yeah, but one has to be realistic or practical about what is possible to achieve. What if no matter how much you delude yourself into thinking that you’re so great with women, but still are struggling miserably with women because you don’t what you’re doing at all? I know guys out there who think they are God’s gift to every women, but in reality hardly can get anything going even after approaching countless women with extreme confidence.

COVID cases are surging again throughout the entire US! The community transmission level has now risen from moderate back to substantial. Also, the medical experts are considering the possibility of having to delay school reopenings in the Fall. Also, California counties have already reinstated the mask mandate. This is truly disheartening and worrisome.

I know that people like Leo and other pragmatic left wingers have already talked about how unrealistic and impractical progressives generally are when it comes to actually getting some kind of significant form of progress done for the greater good of the country. However, progressives have frequently talked about the idea of of having the top Democratic leaders in Washington do unilateral arm twisting on every Democrat Congressmen and even some centrist Republicans that would aggressively pressure enough members of both chambers of Congress to vote for essential Democratic legislation for the greater good of the country. They believe that is one of the effective ways to actually making fundamental changes truly happen for our society. Progressives keep mentioning how Corporate or Establishment Dems including Biden, Schumer, and Pelosi constantly negotiate and compromise too much with the other side including Republicans because most Democrats since the past 4 decades have been too weak, don't know how to fight for what they want, and are too easily persuaded by their lobbyists. They also say that FDR and Lyndon B. Johnson were known for making fundamental changes for the greater good of our country because they each skillfully applied enough pressure on both the Republican and Democratic caucuses within both chambers of Congress that would force enough members of Congress to vote for FDR's legislative proposals and LBJ's legislative proposals. That's why progressives all around the country are pressuring Biden to do the very same thing FDR and LBJ did to get real things done and have been constantly saying that if Bernie was our President instead of Biden, then Bernie would've since the very beginning of his administration been so much more aggressive towards Congress than Biden has been that not only would we have already had some real meaningful changes for our country by now, but also Bernie would've continue applying constant strong hardball tactics on Congress in order to further get even more fundamental progressive changes made for the greater good of our country: What do you guys think?

I've been told that the highest anyone has ever gotten for a success lay rate was consistently with 1 out of every 5 girls he approached, all of which have been same day or same night lays. This has been done by the legendary Gunwitch, Allen Reyes who is truly an elite level PUA or master seducer. A 40-50% success rate would only happen with an elite seducer and even then probably on extremely rare occasions.

So, what was FDR's and LBJ secret to making Congress capitulate?

A high quality is also someone who gives her man the utmost respect. That means that she is mostly cooperative or submissive to her man as if he treats him like a king or a god. No high quality man wants a woman who has a terrible attitude, is too difficult to deal with, too argumentative, not drama-free, and is not supportive enough of his goals or life purpose. However, the man must also play his part by showing her that he can be a strong leader and protective warrior for her, is socially savvy, and has sexual charisma. I know this sounds misogynistic and primitive, but it is a truth and it's for the greater good of a sexual/romantic relationship. Also, women don't just want men who can be gentle and are loyal. They also on a subconscious level are highly turned on by men who are very dominant and charismatic.

I see. Well, then it really begs the question of how FDR or LBJ were able to successfully pressure enough members of Congress to vote for their agendas.

You think that Biden and the Democrats in Congress will be able to effectively raise the taxes on the rich and corporations? Or will the lobbyists be able to persuade them not to raise them?

So, then wouldn't that mean that progressives are right about Biden too weak in character? Also, do you think that if Bernie were president and if he had done a lot of those FDR or LBJ tactics on enough members of Congress, that Bernie would've actually been much more successful with getting a lot of new liberal or progressive laws passed?