Hardkill

Yeah I agree with what @Zeroguy @Preety_India @Average Investor @intotheblack have said. It really sounds like you've been in a really unhappy relationship for too long. Also, not only does he sounds abusive by always putting the blame on you, but also it sounds like he's not willing to put in any serious effort on his own end in figuring out what he can do better to help improve your sex life and relationship with you. I know how emotionally difficult it will be to let go of him, but I really think this relationship is already essentially over.

In one of Leo's response post in the thread entitled "Can you Get Girls That Are More Physically Attractive Than You?" he said: Yet in this thread entitled, "another newbie question - 'social proof' thread", Leo said: In another one of his response posts on same "Yet another newbie question - 'social proof'" thread he also said: Additionally, in my thread "Is it possible to never find ANY girls who perceive you to be their type?" he said: and also said in my same thread: So, I am confused. Is there no point in trying to get with any 8s, 9s, or 10s if you don't have much of a social network or much of a social status? Or would simply mass approaching tons of 8s, 9s, and 10s with good enough game while having a very small to nonexistent established social circle or actual social status be a totally viable alternative for sleeping with and possibly get into an LTR with 8s, 9s, or 10s?

Uh, why not? I'd rather pull an 8, 9, or 10 than some homely girl or even a plain jane. Also, being able to do that would not only prove to me that I have charisma and confidence with women, but also it would mean that I would truly be able to get any kind of woman I want. Sorry, this is how my brain works. I am not trying to argue with any of you just to sound contrarian or troll people. I am usually very skeptical about what people say, especially these days considering how much seemingly inconsistent and contradictory information and advice there is out there on the web for all kinds of matters. That's why I always want to make that I get the facts straight until I feel comfortable enough to apply them. Also, I don't want to end up making costly and unnecessary mistakes with women by inadvertently using the wrong methods or wasting my time by trying our certain things that I may not be ready for. For example, I worry that if I don't already have a solid social circle or high enough social status, then I could very well end up wasting a ridiculous amount of much time going through a massive amount of unnecessary failure, embarrassment, depression, and lost of self-esteem/confidence approaching tons of 8s, 9s, and 10s because they may perceive me as a guy who has nothing to offer them. Also, I should've mentioned this my parents have told me that if I don't have much money or status, then I would have nothing to offer to any of the best quality women out there. You mentioned something similar to this, in someone's thread entitled "Online Dating driving me NUTS" thread specifically with regarding wasting time on doing the wrong things. You said:

Actually, I’ve been wanting to ask someone about this, but is it weird that on some occasions that I masturbate to my sister?

Alright, well yeah you can't ever really get away with coming off looking like an ungroomed slob, wearing unfashionable clothes/accessories, and have bad hygiene when approaching and dating women. So, then assuming that I look dapper and stylish, have good hygiene, carry myself well, what have you, would I still be able to get those 8s, 9s, and 10s even with just mediocre game?

Wait does that mean that even if I have no status, no money, look very unattractive, and have shitty game, I will still get laid and/or a relationship with some 8s, 9s, and 10s if I talk to 1000+ girls in the right places?

Yeah, I wish there was more information on how to get girls from those non-cold approach environments. lol Alright, well that's true with girls who are average or below average in level of attractiveness. Though aren't hot women much pickier than most women because they know that they are the ones that are the highest in demand?

Inflation is happening now: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/13/upshot/inflation-is-here-what-now.html

Wait, but on my thread called "How much do women get turned on by a man's looks?" Leo said: My response to that was: Leo then said back to me: So, my question is that if the saying "If you think you are attractive, you are; if you think you don't, you don't" is true, then why did someone like Leo basically suggest to me that just because I think that I am attractive doesn't mean that I really am?

You have a good point. Even though dating is competitive to an extent, almost everyone around has been able to be in some kind of relationship with another. You know, you seem to know a lot about dating, romance, and sex. Are you a dating expert?

Why is someone like Caitlyn Jenner a Republican conservative when she is a rich and famous transgender? I remember you saying in your “how society evolves” vid on YouTube that’s conservatives are the way they are because they are old fashioned and have more of a survival mentality.

I would try my best to approach at least 30-40 girls per week, if not 20 girls per day/night, every week as those such as Leo have suggested. However, what if after approaching 1000s of them in a row none of them find no chemistry with me even if I truly gave it my best shot and talked a really good game with each one of them?

As a resident of California, I will be very upset if she does become my new governor. She would be a total disaster for our state. She's also another idiot who fell for Trump's con. Also, why is she a conservative Republican when she also obviously is a major supporter of transgender rights and the LGBTQ+ community?

Yeah, but how does one know that they will ever be a match with anyone? I get that it's better to be positive, but at the same time one has to be realistic as well.

Was that a response for me?

Sounds like Donald Trump who also speaks his mind. lol

There is more bad news now. Reaching ‘Herd Immunity’ Is Unlikely in the U.S., Experts Now Believe. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/03/health/covid-herd-immunity-vaccine.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage Very sad and worrisome. Also, the coronavirus cases and related deaths are now skyrocketing in big countries like Brazil and India

Yeah, centrists are somewhat fence sitters. However, you can't get anything done if you are a radical left, radical right, or even as a radical centrist. Btw, here's what James Carville said recently: https://www.vox.com/22338417/james-carville-democratic-party-biden-100-days

I keep hearing from progressives like Cenk Uygur saying that most Democrats, especially the corporate Democrats don't know how to fight back or don't fight back aggressively enough, whereas Republicans do. They also say that Republicans are generally better at branding their proposals or messages than Democrats are. What do you guys think?

https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/29/politics/border-patrol-unaccompanied-minors/index.html https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/551109-biden-on-influx-of-migrants-at-the-southern-border-weve-now-gotten https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/one-god-awful-mess-biden-lays-border-crisis-trump-admin-n1265908 There you go.

Yeah, I totally agree. Also guys, the Biden administration was finally able to get the southern border crisis situation under control by the very end of his first 100 days of office.

Yeah, it is odd. All of his content in each of his videos have been brilliant. While I am skeptical about his advocacy of psychedelics, I still think that each of one his videos are chock-full of vital knowledge and wisdom. They all deserve at least several million of views.

It would be fantastic if this got passed by Congress, but I skeptical about it because of the fact that conservative Dems like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema who don't want to eliminate or weaken the filibuster and Manchin is not inclined to use budget reconciliation again. I think he has done very well overall. He's so far really cleaned house within his entire executive branch given how inefficient, disordered, and corrupt it became under Trump's administration. Also, according to sources such as The Washington Post, "President Biden’s government transition, initially delayed by Donald Trump’s refusal to concede, early disputes over who would control Senate committees, and Trump’s second impeachment trial, has made up ground in comparison with his predecessors’ transitions. In March, Biden moved ahead of Trump and Barack Obama, who both waited more than a month longer to completely fill their Cabinet secretary slots. Biden is the first president in decades to secure those picks without a failed nominee, despite an evenly divided Senate." Plus, in comparison to his predecessors, even though Biden wasn't able to get nearly as many appointees confirmed by the senate as Obama did during his first 100 days in office, he still ended up surpassing both Trump's and W. Bush's total number of appointees that they each got confirmed by the senate during each of their first 100 days in office. Bill Clinton got a total of 45 of his appointees confirmed by the senate within his first 100 days of office, whereas Biden got a total of 44 appointees his appointees confirmed by the senate within his first 100 days of office. So Biden definitely got close to Clinton's record. Obama had 68 of his appointees confirmed by the senate within his first 100 days, but Bush had only 33 of his appointees confirmed by the senate within his first 100 days, and Trump only had 25 of his appointees confirmed by the senate within his first 100 days.

Would she try to fix an Incel murderer or rapist?