Tyler Robinson

The best part is that I got liberated from fucking monkeys at last

I'm finally glad I'm able to close this journal section forever. I will never have to deal with the bullshit that happens on here anymore

.

I also felt a bit horny today. And I enjoyed it.

Hmm. I'm feeling a bit relieved and relaxed today. Sexual elements. Love, compassion, softness Sadomasochistic elements, this is not evil, only animalistic Machiavellian elements Alpha Male elements Feminine elements There is no evil only enemy of love Satan meditation

You're right on that one.

This part hurts the most. I'm too sick of dealing with this. They are the biggest pain in the ass, they bitch, whine and complain all day. They literally destroy the fabric of society.

Something all kids these days can relate to and will come to resent in the future. In 20 years from now, Legend says that - One day feminism got a reality check and it was big and fat. Damn.

@Ethan1 I get your progressive take and appreciate it. Yet you have to take into account that not all rules are meant to be broken. Traditional gender roles weren't bad. Feminism demands a lot out of women. The level of stress that women face trying to live up to the expectations of feminism is causing women mental and emotional stress. They aren't really happy. In fact most Hyper masculine women are resentful, bitter and aggressive. Seems like all of this is hurting women more than helping them. The pressures of standing up to the demands to be equal to men in terms of productivity is not only causing decline in femininity but making women fatter, obese and overworked, stressed, irritable and depressed. I don't see the gain. If they feel independent, it's coming at a heavy cost on health.

I don't see how this is related to feminity. It has everything to do with strength. Even children are scared to walk into dark alleys because they are scared of ghosts. I guess you're misinterpreting how women behave. Some women are just more of the mommy kind and usually choose men who act like kids. A man cannot change a woman. Her femininity is something she is born with. I'm more child like from birth. I can't act like a mommy. So if I'm paired with a submissive man, I'll still remain feminine. It won't change who I am although I won't be happy with that man since his nature doesn't complement mine. In fact I have been around such a guy in a relationship. I wasn't a mom to him. He wanted me to be that way. I did not like it so I dumped him.. The reason I want to be with a specific kind of a man is not to preserve my feminine. It's only for my desire. Man is like food. What I desire to eat has nothing to do with my face. Men are an object of desire. They fulfill that desire. That's it. Same goes for women. Women are an object of desire for men. That's it. A man wants to look at what he desires to look at. Same for women. I have mostly been with dominant guys. So I don't know what you're talking about. You assuming that I'm resentful is your own projection. I love men infinitely and more. I have zero resentment against men. Male passivity? I blame male passivity on both men and feminism. Part of the problem being that men don't put enough effort in developing their masculine fully. Most men don't even want to get up from their couch. A lot of them are plagued by insecurities and victim mentality. A lot of men are passive solely because of genetics. That can't be blamed on them though. And some of it has to do with feminism. The emasculation of men where women simply don't allow enough space for a man to be masculine. Although men can still feel masculine as long as they keep away from women (this proves my point that the opposite gender has a bad impact), feminism causes men to not be able to dominate women and this causes emasculation and passivity which is harmful.

This was a vague insipid definition and you were simply looking for interconnections. A man can be masculine without a woman. His own masculine energy can guide him to connect with his Masculinity. In fact men spend majority of their lives without the presence of a woman but still strive to be masculine. In fact men who hang around too much with loads of women start acting feminine in the presence of females. The same happens to women surrounded by multiple men, they begin to act tomboyish if they have many brothers or male roommates. This is an observed phenomenon. The opposite gender actually has a bad impact. Their qualities begin to rub on you. You're talking about definitions of feminine and masculine in the context of each other. But these are loose definitions. A woman is still a woman even without a man. My own hormones are enough to guide me on how I should feel as a woman. I never needed a man to tell me. For example my own body tells me that curves look good on me. If a man told me that he doesn't like curves, it wouldn't matter. I would still have what makes me feel and look good as a woman. You think as though women are robots who are shaped into women by men.. This is a patriarchal thought. Women are women because their biology dictates them to be that way. Men are men because their biology dictates them to look and act like men. Masculinity and femininity are totally independent of each other. It's another thing entirely that they contrast each other and even attract each other through polarity. But it's very ignorant to say that they depend on each other to retain their respective qualities. There's no empirical study to support your claims. I feel like a woman even when I don't have a man around me. It has more to do with my hormones and because I have a Y chromosome than anything else including men, you or patriarchy

@BlessedLion don't know what to tell ya. Relationships are never 100% ethical. But if you wanna keep this ethical, respect her, tell her in all honesty all the truth. Be by her side throughout her heartache phase and don't block or ghost your angel. Be friends with her and but let her know the truth.

How exactly? Be more succinct in your explanation and don't resort to some sexist bullshit. Not making the cut!

In that case, shouldn't psychedelics come with prescriptions just like pharma medications? Do we simply give out bottles of medications to dumb/messed up people?

Umm. You might think so. But this didn't happen. You're right about the small sample size though.

Me wanting a dominant guy is a personal matter. Nothing to do with my objections to feminism Guys like you jump to conclusions that everything a woman does is to want to appeal to men. Can't blame you. It's usual male bias. I was talking about women being women so that feminine nature is not lost. Not to appeal to men. You're comparing apples to oranges. I am a woman and I'm very well aware of what is appealing to men, you don't have much to teach me in that department. This wasn't about what's appealing to men. Me wanting a dominant guy has nothing to do with the subject of feminism. Why are you threading together two irrelevant things is beyond me. It's like you can't separate the two. Doesn't really matter how you see it. A woman sees it as weakness. And you care too much about what I think again makes me wonder that you secretly look for my approval. As most men do. Look, you even remembered that I want dominant guys. Although you don't like it, your mind subconsciously notes down things that I like and don't like. Hilarious that your logical mind doesn't see its own contradictions. What if a woman told you she prefers bad boys? Anyone can prefer anything. Well he can kiss his ass. A manipulative woman will look for a guy she can manipulate. She doesn't care about definitions. If a guy doesn't fall for her manipulations, not her loss, she will find another who will. Dating is not a morality soap opera, it's wicked and cunning, it's a demand supply market, whether there is a supply, there's a demand.

Women like to see change. But it's not always how they want it. What gives you the impression that I'm doing any of this to appeal to dominant guys? You're the least dominant guy. Otherwise you wouldn't have thanked me. Dominant men don't look for approval. Btw women can dominate even the most dominating guys and you wouldn't even know it, it's a subtle feminine game that logical guys like you can't put into a computer, it's not a code or formula.

@Leo Gura I thought your new awakening course was about God realization.

@mr_engineer that's why it matters when a woman speaks. Put that in your head

@tezk even if it's a bias, at least it's partially true if few people I met were addicted to it. The matter of the fact rather is — How much of a coincidence is it that each one of the few people I met had problems with weed? Is it that I coincidentally met only those people who were addicted to weed? Or there's a hidden problem that's being purposely ignored because truth will stop people from wanting weed. It could be either my own bias at play or the greater dissonance of people at large who don't like to be challenged on their fancy beliefs. Children don't like to be told candy is bad.

I'm going to keep posting the dangers of weed on this thread and I'm not going to stop even if the whole forum is against it I don't care. I care about people's well being more than any backlash

That's the whole point. Hippies are not necessarily the most knowledgeable people on planet earth. Btw I'm a hippie myself. But I'm slightly more logical and more aware than my other hippie friends here. I haven't lost myself yet.

I had a notification a week ago in my YouTube feed that said that the weed currently in circulation is very high in THC and this is dangerous.

And I'm good at smelling those sneaky Jezebels that always get away.

Actually and surprisingly weed does not have a negative stigma. Weed is a hell of an anomaly. It's like a seductress, the Jezebel of drugs. Even people who were severely addicted to it, actually vouched in its favor. It has a curious hold on people. In fact most people admit that cigs and alcohol are dangerous, despite them being legal. You have cigarette cartons that say smoking is dangerous, namesake disclaimers but still disclaimers. Have you ever seen a pouch of weed with a disclaimer - "weed is dangerous." That should tell you how acceptable and normalized weed is.. Isn't this thread an evidence that most people don't view weed negatively?