Joseph Maynor

This is the game. Ready, play.

To counter you here what I find is a denial of ego that is most revealing. This is the archetype of the faker revealed.

It's best to take this with a grain of salt so to speak.

I would say this would be the wrong approach. This is way too theoretical and nobody will integrate this.

I've had this debate many times already. If this feels right to you, I would say keep on keeping on with it.

This just shows me you don't know what Love is. This is common. People who know Truth don't necessarily know Love.

This is not Love.

I'm trying not to be now. Have at it.

Okay.

Really?

It's good to be mindful of how much theory you actually put into practice. Think of all the plans you made that you didn't actually implement. We go to theory thinking it will help us with practice without realizing there is no guarantee at all here.

You seem to be selective when you use and when you omit "you". It's not consistent.

I would agree with this take if people who believe this would actually put it into practice. To me this is a weird conceptual layer almost like a philosophical religion.

I think there's a myth in spiritual enlightenment groupthink that anger or being triggered is always caused by ego. Ditto for all emotions seen as belonging to ego alone.

Yes. And then we have Intuition which is part of Beauty IMO. But Truth is the foundation.

You're trolling now bro. Come on.

Nope.

Not only did Phil ban you but they wiped out all your content.

I argued that you should be let back on believe it or not. And it was declined.

You made a thread about me in the friendship forum asking everyone about me after you were banned from Phil's forum, which I defended you on and they decided not to let you back because you were seen as overly aggressive.

This is just really stupid.

I'm not banned from Phil's forum as far as I know.

Because that's just following some leader. You're being a follower not a leader.

God I hope not for you lol.

Okay Jane.