Joseph Maynor

Then what do you see as the beyond human?

You're free to disagree. That's the feature not the bug.

Do you really think this?

So it seems you take an entirely human perspective as to the self?

Good. We can agree to disagree. I love this.

This is really the point I'm making which goes against this perspective.

Maybe the Absolute is the Creator. I notice you use Creation, which is a passive version.

I agree Phill seemed to love your insights.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Maybe that is your point.

Can you elaborate on this?

Hang in there. This place teaches a lot about human nature.

@James123 Can you explain your spiritual point of view in a succinct paragraph?

Does the experience involve thought or words?

Metaphysically, once you have an original thing presupposed; then a relation becomes something that then needs or tends to want to be defined.

But isn't this a thought or a belief?

I think his current position is if you imagine it hard enough you can become anything.

What is the unfiltered vision of reality?

I think it is a valid question. If you did what you said in your original post, it seems like you would have it? You would be free. The want to share is different from a need to share.

Start with coming up with a number of the money you would like to make or need to make per year to break even with your expenses.

I sense a need that you need to be agreed with though. If you realize this, why the need to keep telling others what reality is?

What losses do you feel like you need to cut?

@Yimpa I found this good fun to watch similar to your video but different too.

This is a good insight but most people think knowing the name or class of something is knowing what it is in essence. Even physicists like Feynman.

This reminds me of the there is no separate self thing. I'm not sure of this.