Joseph Maynor

Leo is playing you all.

Yes. Unless and until you real what character of the play you are playing and from what perspective, I agree. You're incognito.

This is this whole thing. We don't know who we're talking to.

Show us your face.

Whatever Monster Energy.

Because you're not presenting as a human being.

I'm not sure what you're talking about or even who you are.

To me, you're scared to reveal yourself.

But nobody knows if you're a real person. This is the problem with the Internet. You agree but who?

I always say if you're in doubt, ban yourself first.

I feel like all of them are good. When I was on here way back it was much more of a free for all. This was years ago.

I feel like this forum has good moderators.

To me the ego is just the finite perspective one is identified with. This just means that aspect of the self that is showing up in space and time.

Correct. From my experience. I'm not here to persuade anyone.

Direct experience with people who have claimed this.

To assume you have no ego and are unconditioned in my long experience is a red flag.

I feel like a lot of spiritual people could benefit from going back and doing more practical self-help work to be honest. It just depends on the person. It depends on what you want.

Sure — here’s how I see the interdependence in practice: 1. Practical self-help like improving health, finances, and relationships builds stability and reduces stress, which makes deeper reflection and inquiry possible. 2. Accountability and structure cultivate self-awareness and agency rather than avoidance or drift. 3. Work on purpose, career direction, and leadership naturally raises existential questions about meaning, values, and identity. 4. Adult development and self-leadership involve examining assumptions, motivations, and worldview — which is philosophical work expressed through life decisions. So practical growth and truth-seeking aren’t separate tracks in lived development.

Agreed in part. I’m not equating pop self-help with spirituality. I’m pointing to forms of development where improving one’s life and examining what’s true are interdependent.

Fair point. I meant the general moral orientation, not excluding protective force when harm is present.

If Absolute Solipsism is Real and True, could there be more than one God?

This is a great example of how to create justice in a power mix.

This is kind of an unusual insight and a half-truth but a good person generally puts people and other beings at ease and causes others to identify with the peaceful/non-threatening side of life, the opposite of defensive relation.

I've seen all forms of this play out. Sometimes it's a masculine type at the so called helm supported by feminine types that all share power. That one is very common.