Quader

Is this a sort of "if you know, then you know" type situation? i.e. what the worse could mean will not service you if I told you what it could look like, only cause worry/panic? If you could explain in detail what the worst entails you could help friends and families rally together to make sensible decisions before things become limited.

I'm not sure if being an indiscriminate ill willer would vindicate him of racism or invertedly prescribe him to all of the ism's seeing as it's wanton hatred. I understand his viewpoint but to not call out his number would be to completely rationalize someone who is deeply unguided.

@Hojo Okay, if granted Elon has gone full autist and did the salute "ironically", he's completely neglecting his influence and the context of his position. The issue isn't fighting a woke mind virus with ironic inflammatory gestures, it's about the people who most definitely are Nazi supporters and they exist in the world, America, everyone is watching. People could easily assume that Elon was just supporting Nazi beliefs and some people might have been hoping to see that come to fruition. You are downplaying his role and assuming this hyper-meta battle to oust a virtue signaler mind affliction. If what he was trying to do was innocuous it was still extraordinarily irresponsible given the influence he has over everyone that may subscribe to radical beliefs. Even if he's trolling, that's going to cause a lot of fear and panic. It's funny as a solo keyboard twitter troll trying to get banned by the woke snowflakes but when it's a head member of governance it becomes unbearably foolish.

Having that fear grow and crush you may be required to let go but make no mistake that is a dangerous undertaking that when taken lightly can truly maim you. Sometimes people just get crushed and dont make it to the other side. I dont think people know much about fear until they lose all faculties while conscious under psychedelics. It is unimaginable, no amount of torture or shenanigans could result in that experience. Like more real than a dream yet more absurd than any dream. Like a lucid dream. In the future with different policies, protocols and study I'm sure psychedelic risk will be a lot lower. We face discrimination, criminalisation, demonization. Sometimes the mental toll of not being supported by your community (ie all drugs are bad at all times) can be more significant than a negative trip.

@The Crocodile Are you literally talking about someone who sees the future like Paul Atreides? Didn't even this fantastical character have blind spots? Who is the perfect man you speak of that only speaks the truth. He may be the one of prophecy (Dune reference)

Leo was just joking because bobby said Canada was suffocating to live in, which is a bit of a stretch. We're incredibly privileged in Canada even with the corporate, food and housing squeeze going on. It's nothing as bad as what most of the world goes through daily. I don't know enough about Singh to fully defend him but I will say that many people's criticisms assume that he is in it for the money and personal gain/security. I have heard this so much: "Sellout Singh". My intuition tells me this is a result with not being able to trust and reckon with a person who is concerned and actively fighting for vulnerable Canadians. It's as simple as that, they can't handle someone different running the country because of fear he is some traitor in disguise. This is extraordinarily racist and basic. That's where these narratives are coming from, and I feel sorry for him. The reason I make this claim is solely because I can't find any evidence that indicates Jagmeet has acted greedy, selfish, or said anything in general about personal power. If there was an event where he said something regarding his retirement or anything suspicious I haven't been able to find one. But what I do immediately find is name calling that just seems to be blind hatred. It's used to keep liberals away from NDP by preying on their worst qualities/fears. If you want to roll back the clock on environmental protection, PP is your man. If you want to Axe the Tax and save money on your paycheck while cutting government services, vote PP. If you want to stick it to the libtards and gloat with glee as the woke moralists scramble to rationalize our behavior, vote PP. NDP is the opposite of all that. There is an NDP mayor of Toronto and Hamilton (Ontario). There is genuine support for them, it's not a hopeless vote (unlike the green party, who are unrealistic). Unfortunately the truth is the average Canadian is not quite involved much in politics and will revert to their baseline feelings where is becomes a political boxing match/theatrics as opposed to addressing the function of governance (just like the states!), i.e. "I like the way that guy talks and he's hilarious!!".

@Ero @The Crocodile You're wrestling with an Ox and asking it to tell you how it's being tangoed. I personally ascribe to a no source method of magic, as in, it is given only how it is received. If you subscribe to an outwards notion of validity, of concrete power, you will lose it all because it wasn't yours. I would focus on reducing the impact of your relative state as an imposition of what is and accept graciously what is given in absence of your want. If you desire black magic, you'll get it. But this is weak and vulnerable. If you ascribe to black magic as a conduit for protection, for undoing what is afflicted, you might stand a chance in undoing what you're asking as an ego. It's a be careful what you wish for scenario because if you play in this way you will be played by that way. So don't request anything you wouldn't do unto yourself. If you seek more than that, be warned. The piper will be played/paid.

@NewKidOnTheBlock What grows from the earth without some strange concoction of human "ingenuity*? Almost everything that is raw. The real issue is frozen crap and uber orders from fast food. If you learn to cook with wholesome ingredients (only one, or limited number of primarily pronounceable components per item) can you create something hearty, Most foods at that level are simply unpalatable. But the processed foods lean too much in the other direction with over salting, false-substitution, plastics and general favor for price -to- ingredient quality ratio. Cut out the middle man and buy it whole. No pre-sauced crap. If you study how to cook well you will crave wholesome food and it won't be a chore anymore. Buuuut that requires a lot of effort because it could be a premade meal! Luckily there's enough recipe sites out there that can guide you through what intrigues you the most and you don't have to cook fully experimentally, a lot of ground work has been paved through. Many line cooks have died to deliver you this message.

@NewKidOnTheBlock What do you mean? People who blindly support carnivorism are putting their health at risk the same as any who abstains from blood. Both are equally dysfunctional, we are truly meant to be omnivores. If you deny this, you are cutting yourself off from what you need. No one with prejudice in food based on concepts of it's constituent parts have any idea of what their doing. No one knows how nutrition works. When in Rome, do as the romans do. All other animals don't struggle with this ideological dilemma, they somehow inherently know what to do, what to eat. We are the same, but fragmented.

You're right, it's about returning to form and shedding the excess greed. The natives know all about this, and they would roll in their graves upon learning all their herds are all but gone. If we could utilize our technology without an imposition of "personal gain" we could have earth flourish with life greater than it ever could on its own without us. We can do it. If money == environment diversity than it would be done instantaneously. We just haven't been pushed into a corner hard enough to change our cancerous way.

You realize the robots got their jimmies rustled because they were being treated like a rock, right? If you punished the earth based on it not having feelings its prototypical life blood would be destroyed. We're made of rocks and minerals dude. I'm just saying this compassion of life can expand in scope genuinely, there is note and appreciation to be found.. rocks being important is not moot. In regards of how to treat plants, tread lightly. Open your eyes. Take a responsibility to learn what grows in your backyard and the wondrous medicine and nutrition can be found at arms reach. I'm not the poster boy of this ideal, but it's a good place to start and everyone starts somewhere. I'm not bothered by plants and I care more about animals. I'm trying to address a bigger issue that isn't limited to what we personally can or cannot relate to on a surface (face) level.

I meant that efficiency when viewed in terms of profit claims no responsibility outside of earning profit. The money leads astray any concept of something that could be more important (like sustainability). I'm talking about the way things are right now not what my notion of a solution could be because I just don't have one, otherwise it would be done. There is peace to be found in reconciling the gritty life factors as to why it has lead to current circumstance. Having your cake and eating it too is not something to be shaming others for, unless you want them to follow your superior spiritual ideals. There is a distinct difference between being sour of the current state of affairs and being understanding of why it is that way. @Something Funny

The solution is to embrace what it means to be an animal instead of resent it. There'll be plenty of time to not be a consumer of nature. We are supposed to take from the earth what we give back, when we ourselves are eaten and released back to the earth. It comes from our poo, our sweat, our energy. Before we die, and after. But it will all be released and returned in a different form. The issue with cruelty is valid, and I support the notion of being a responsible waste not want not citizen. But there's a lot of $$$ that says things could be done more efficiently otherwise. When there were no supermarkets we ate what was on our plate, or starved. You are so far away from that reality it has clouded your judgement.

What bothers me most is that people aren't respecting plants for their livelihoods at all. It's like plants are not alive with feelings and all the while cute critters are lil humans (akin to pets, children). Even rocks deserve this reverence. We are so attached to what we identify with (can we recognize a face?) we're cherry picking what deserves sanctity. The issue is with the wanton cruelty perpetrated by factory farming. Waste, neglect and disrespect. Harvesting animals doesn't have to be so disgusting and savage. This is a recent invention

@Buck Edwards What matters to canadians who are struggling? Rent control, post secondary education/training costs, healthcare (remove the cost of medicines/aid), food prices that skew towards corporate milking, to provide people dignity in life regardless of production potential. There is compassion and kindness amongst canadians that supercede the law. There is no threat from "illegal aliens", only from monopolistic contractors that the government needs to hire to "get 'er done". They can supply a workforce through policy, but their teeth ends in sorting it all out on the ground (who builds the homes and sells them for what price?). Canada can be a bastion of support to the disenfranchised and those people need help first. It would be a vision to see the canadian populace stay their blade and let others through first. There's a lot of greed that could use to be stifled, many rich who feel wanting. It's a tall order, Canada isnt ready and it will succumb to the AXE THE TAX movement. Most people in canada don't even know why taxes exist outside to rob them. Educated people but there's too much mud in the water. The best I can hope for Canada is to limit the backsliding I'm afraid, Canada follows suit with Trump.

You're right. But only one of those peoples deserve much better. The immigrant issue is caused by a prolific increase in the cost of living. The government invited people to help our economy but they assumed the logistics would sort themselves out by some type of free market correction or something. The Canadian conservative notion of liberal's ready, Shoot, aim is not far off the mark. It's like they paid off half of us to fight the other half. Leo referencing a populism surge is correct and I wish he were wrong.

Canada is open about freedom of religion, many parents still send their children to catholic school without the imposition they remain that way, but to learn discipline respect and conformity to be a proper citizen (ie formal attire, silence until apropos, taking turns, listening to elders etc. Kids can make their own mind up after Tolerance for deviancy (fashion, appearance, disability, sexuality etc) is fairly high, people know that those who disrespect others for their outward appearances are bigoted and its frowned upon, not celebrated Access to health care is considered a human right that should be protected by governance (in practice, only ~80% complete, ie lacking total pharmacare, dentistry, optometry) Universal basic income is supported broadly by those whom you might think would have a crab in the bucket mentality Canadiens who travel the world are generally regarded as very respectful in comparison to more dominating types (US of A) Native american heritage is given a significant leg up and platform to return to form. (Not enough, but there's at least the notion) Reproductive rights and feminism are on a seemingly linear path to improvement, dissenters (ie Christian nationalists) are now too woke or something Canadians dont naturally feel competitive in as in an us vs them dichotomy but instead value holistic harmony between many conflicting value systems (multicultural without dissent) Canadians have a significant third party that is heralded by a minority, taking slack from bigots but they start to get ironed out by the mental gymnastics they have to pull by hating him primarily for his creed. It's all civil.. Canadiens view their role as peace keepers as oppose to victims or Victor's. We're not interested in conquest. Canada is ahead of the game in terms of decriminalization. Drug use is considered an ailment, not a crime. Unless you're distributing. All of these points may only be reflected by 50% at best of the Canadian population, sorry about that

Fascinating. This wokism dilemma could be perpetrated by stage orange looking to earn cookies from other people while subsequently being shot down for being disingenuous. If you were stage orange, would it really be conceivable that some pussy snowflake doesn't have a knife hiding under his altruistic flagrancy? They have to find it, because after all, it's a dog eat god world after all.

I would personally choose beige because it's a stage without pretext, it's kind of the core of being. Beige is the source from which every other stage sprouts

I should become a trump supporter just as a performance art @Leo Gura That would be fucking hilarious

In your particular position I honestly feel the betrayal felt by your fans would be a bit frightening in terms of their disillusionment. It would be truly diabolical. You're an icon to me because every chance you have to sink your teeth in you don't manipulate for some bullshit end. To many I assume they would watch you to see if you're a cult leader or not and being flagrant with your wealthy position would not at all be a safer decision. Purely on paper sure.

@SwiftQuill I agree, you're articulating well serious flaws in Stage Green. I think a lot of the blowback comes from people wanting to avoid impeding people's progress to get TO green as opposed to understanding it's limitation. It's a bit of a trick to gloss over greens toxicity but the reason is genuinely meant to facilitate a growing sense of compassion for the world, damn the consequences. Because the consequences are less severe than rejecting progress.

@Joker_Theory You're genuine interest in the possiblity of the unknown and the new is far from the recipe of a scorching hell. Hell is when there is no possibility of anything else. If you keep the mystery clouds of life afloat you will always be able to find beauty because it is still yet possible. There's no time for hell for a dead man. Nor anything better than hell. A fleeting life would never dictate an eternity of punishment. God is so chill he wont even stop you from feeling like he doesn't know you. God is so chill you can believe in him or not. Trust that God cares more about everything more than anything could ever know.

@Princess Arabia This isn't about woman's desire for sex or beauty. It's about the feeling like you deserve (are potentially worthy of) the best man in the world in a real relationship. The issue is the entanglement with outward appearance and what's under the surface, the quality of character. Men don't really want to be with beautiful woman they want meaning in a relationship outside of those basic bounds. If woman think that quality men want beautiful women, there is a bit of a misunderstanding. These things are so fleeting and hollow they will rot when the sex dries out. The bottom line for a woman to be attractive physically is quite low and doesn't require 10/10 thot genetics. But in our world today we scroll through 1000s of the top 0.01% of people living their best most attractive lives (digitally altered too, not even authentic per se). So woman who genuinely (including the beauty component) have lots to offer high quality men might wind up thinking that it could be hopeless or something, they'll never be good enough. Men irl didn't even try that, it's just money sucking attention grabbing emotional manipulating social media companies. You already know about all about this. But ultimately people play this game because it's the most basic and fundamental one there is. To acquire security, safety and as a consequence a long and prosperous life. Nothing else matters to most people. If you can't generalize you will always find counter examples. You are finding a niche counter example and writing off the whole thing as not the way things necessarily could be. How can you define man and woman in any capacity that which is unconquerable by some alternate examples/explanations? A woman's (and man's) self image includes the image of what they think someone else thinks of them. If a woman did not care about anyone else, what about that makes them a woman besides their sex? For a man, caring about nothing else but their survival could include a woman. But if a woman cares about no one else would they include a man to be with? What would be the point? Oh yeah, sex. And when I talk about care I refer to that capacity to give care, not to feel caring (there's two forms, one is feeling the other is doing).

@AION These battles are games imbued with a violence and lust that could be similarly found in any highly engaging contest that you enjoy. Violence is just one type of emotion, and it is certainly not all you've cracked it up to be. You get to choose what you attribute spirit to, very rarely is that a catch all classic game of war. Unless if you're that kind of person, and you can bring out the divinity within it if you like. But make no mistake, it's a dead end friend It's one thing to find enjoyment in a hobby but then another to claim that being able to sudo chop someone in a contest is a core tenant in spirituality.