ValiantSalvatore

@Bobby_2021 I read a recent review of a study from PISA showing that through the introduction of conservative values IQ scores have been dropping in Sweden. Many schools in scandinavian countries force basically their parents by paying taxes for schools and to create equal playground therefore there is a higher incentive for intrinsic learning. By providing toys that are not instrumentalized. I dunno this smells like bias and disrciminatory psychology and testing. As if it is not possible to train for an IQ test, nothing against high iq etc and gifted classes and so to speak "extra stimulatory feeding of information" the sheer arrogance of schools and their mindsets and psychology also about sexual subjects and this includes genetics, is very bad. So yeah it's kinda obvious. Calling people low iq looser and dorks publically is discriminatory and should pratically be punished with some sort of fee, to incentivize more equality again lol. Bullying people calling them low iq and having an over-demanding and none self-discriminatory attitude is rather unauspicous in terms of creating a more harmonious discourse in science. This winner looser mentality of pride is what makes a looser a looser and a winner a winner. I find it hilarious how far good cooperation can take you. Class stereotypes should be abolished and people appreciated for who they are intrinsically. https://psmag.com/education/women-math-and-the-addition-of-stereotypes-41287 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19025250/ Legit get an EEG or smth, this is horeshit what I am seeing and please analyze a set of genes. If your perception to not become proficient in a task does not matter, I am unsure what so called "rational humans" are, seems more like a predator and reptile lol. Clearly evident. This is very close to racism. So I dunno why you are allowed to do science, it should be illegal. I tell you one thing I will errdicate your science 100%. Get a feeling for objectivity once, I can play you better any day than you could, that is the joke.

https://www.integralworld.net/harris22.html Presumably he was simply in a sexual repressive household and culture/religion/ideology and expresses classic hyper-masculinity... gone astray into the garbadge. This is simply evil.

@Illusory Self Bro thanks for trusting hope it helps! I created a love-map of what I like in women for example that was one part of the course as well as to identify for example feminine elements in oneself and stuff like this, hope this helps to connect to others and build courage I hope positivity is allowed in the dating section .

I sent you the book loving completly from Dr.Keith Witt if you see love as a problem I bet these exercises solve them... as they dive into the physiology as to why you even "instinctively" based on neurology/parental upbringing etc. based on parents etc. It's very tedious I stopped it although seen longterm... it's a quick hack. Integral relationships looks very complex, this is very practical to real life experience... Anyway. I bet I am not making much friends with these opinions . Hope you still have it if not I can re-send it to you. I like all of these books. Will also read integral relationships at one point.

90% of the people posted did not even read the proper material and the only thing I like about the current left is that they are forced in academia to read hegel. The more I get insight into how academia works, I can tell you the left is to ignorant to advance it's position and I think it's a tragedy in terms of providing holism, the funny part is 90% of people in tech are open to the ideas, they just want it to be valid and tested and the current green society, would not validate and test, even with their own criteria and then instead of taking action they complain from the outside. There are a couple of TIER 2 thinkers, yet I think Marxism is the worst idea possible, I kept contemplating how Marx lived even visted his grave with one of his followers. I feel bad for the man for being utterly misunderstood even when I read parts of it. He wanted equality, yet I don't think he would have wanted it in terms of how it plays out here. That is why I like reading auto-biographys. I mean if he is a true person from the region I am from he must be an utter idiot like most people from there call me arrogant and ignorant whatever, yet these people are so radical and frustrated I would not be suprised if he it's some crazy theory to justify their survival, just by the nature of the region. I don't believe anyone connects history as deeply to fully grasp Marx, I prefer Hegel. Anyway the Marxist will tell me. Marx influnced Hegel. Great. The point is distinguishing higher from lower, if Marx is the highest political idea I disagree there needs to be some form of higher and lower and even within a flat-hierachy there is a hierachy. Primus inter pares is to high of a concept to consider for many, although Greens play it out quiet well. At a higher level of competencies this flex-flow happens without so much drama... that is why I like IT, you get more of this high Green and Yellow teamwork. I don't know about societal strutctures, yet from reading Wilber I like Hegel and some other German philos. I think Marx is overrated and overpopulized. Many milk Marx without understanding him and if you fully understand him you'd switch to other ideas and look at them. Without a network of ideas unified there is no way a larger philosohpy can be built. Many jump onto the bandwagoon without providing solutions I mean I know my road and why I will not neccesarily read Marx. It's just not as important I would rather consider someone like Hegel and even Kant/Schoppenhauer, even if some of them had very discriminatory views. The ideas might be good. Also Jeff Bezos and other billionars should not neccesarily be forced to spen their money, yet their should be way way higher taxes for the rich, so the more common and average people can decide on policies and what can be done. Instead of only the rich etc. Also the existence of lobbyism is a cruse. Anyway, I am going astray a bit. I do think Philosophy is needed because this is about ideas. I hope Green will realize (as it partially did today... as I sat near Greens and the "bakers" where not there) that Yellow is needed, we need functional and lean answers to current societies problems that are flexible. I am not part of engineering these solutions, so I don't know what is the best answer, I would definitely be for a policy that taxes rich people way more, so less fortunate people can create equality with the capital the goverment could provide and decide on policies. Pay teachers more money, give researchers more money, create better infrastructure etc. Similar to church taxes some of this money is used unwisely... Most of these people are also succesful because they work hard and long hours like how bill gates created microsoft. Humans somehow have the capabillity of killing themselves. The unfortunate truth will be that tools and material will save them. As they already serve as a distraction, that might be a to simple thing to realize, yet it's partially true. And no I never claim absolute truth for any horseshit hater. Sorry for grammar I am very tired and definitely procrastinating on more important work, yet this bothers me partially as people already expect an answer for me. BECAUSE OF BIAS. Even though I never studied the material. I am just a dude with an opinion take ir and/or leave it.

Check the book: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7640261-sex-at-dawn Eventually will get back at dating, hope this is not hypocrtical advice.The book gives a scientific review of relationship models it's quiet complex so it certainly is interesting. They talk about polyamory and other social/sexual relationship models. I dunno I've been on a sorta double date once with a crush and she took a friend with her to bs test me, I made them laugh the whole time so I had the same concern at one point of wanting a polyamorous relationship. The book helped to wrap my mind around multiple ideas... without being fully biased in one. Yes, I listend to the audiobook version .

Do all random mutations stem from one invidiual so to speak? So saying a random mutation (variance) diversified height for example as a property of an individual in a population as the result of one individual having that genetic mutation. Said with less complexity and to be a bit more paradigmatic... All varations in a population stem from genetic mutation so there needed to be that one individual that had X height for X height to exist. There needed to be one individual with green eye colors to diversify green eye colors? There needed to be one individual with red hair to diversify red hair? There needed to be one guy with thicker more curly hair for more invidiuals (populations) with thicker and more curly hair. Does this also account for intelligence so one high IQ individual must needed to exist in order for the population to diversify in high IQ?

Even then through globalization every idiot in every country can learn about the same topics. This already shows if someone is an idiot and/or not stupid... so academia still works as an intelligence test as a whole. Who ever wants to hire a shitty employee with 0 work ethic? In a sense it makes testing for IQ easier as every idiot as access to it and those are weeded out relatively quickly. As intelligence certainly exists, the point is people want to leverage the enviroment for growth as a whole and abolishing class type thinking as this benefits the culture. See northern countries and PISA tests etc. Egaliterian principles do have their value. I dunno so many papers I read have the most idiotic rigid testing procedures. I hope stage orange science finally comes to an end. Anyway progress is already there lol social engineering is quiet real with the topic of HCI, so dunno why there needs to be 0 respect towards people from liberal arts. But okay. I presume there is to much bias.

If you have experience do it! I tripped with sober friends and told them I would trip was definitely awesome, I certainly levelel consciouness from my perspective. I went to a Kendrick Lamar concert also and looked the guy (Kendrick lamar) dead into the eye while high on LSD when he played the song humble after that we got Zoroastrian impression definitely a good thing to take LSD outside . He certainly transformed my inner rage. I don't think it's that risky just fear in that sense is a bitch. Also could be quiet helpful a different example I had while "high" on LSD and I walked back from my friends house I saw a drunk hooligan I was happy that I still had enough conscious aggression to defend myself in terms of an emergency as he headed straight towards me with no options to pull away, if I would have pulled away he would have moved towards me as I generally have a dark vibe that can pull in people. So yeah I was happy I could legit defend myself if that is any concern. Hope this sort of helps as a feedback. It might sound odd, yet you can certainly tell how conscious... the weather is on LSD, yet maybe that is just me...

Look at Alibaba and similar e-commerce plattforms, these smaller plattforms that sell via these plattform only get global value through higher level global distribution if it would not be for Alibaba/Amazon the smaller plattforms that sell there could never leverage their brand and their products and their whole supply and demand structure could collapse in that sense it is. As global markets are dominating. If there would be a more inherent value in local consumption this kind of disparaity and arugmentation would not exist, as businesses could opt for alternative marketing strategies of their products aka selling globally instead of only locally. For sure there is value in the inital creation, yet you can't give workers and the creators money for creating the products. If they are not distributing it, buying the production goods, organiazing the material, buying engines and machines if the workers themselves are not supplying that. The inherent value of the material would be considered worthless and only their utility value is considered as a finished and raw product. Which is hypocritical in a sense, as the material itself has value. Even then if every worker would fully autonemously take the good that their are producing carving stones from a mine, producing chairs, chopping wood etc. The re-distrubition of these goods creates the value as well as cooperation and a market of possible supply and demand.To claim that only the thousands of worker have these value is false, it would still be the individual who claimed the good so to speak and has to distribute it through the facilitation of distribution value is created. The worker might be unable to sell his mineral at a given marekt and has to give it to some distributer/merchant who is able to sell the good at a different place. When I come as a business man and create with my own money a factory and production goods based on material and land that I bought, then yes I own it and have a right to distribute it. It's more the arbitariness of law itself that is an issue then and greed/power etc. I am not an expert just sharing an opinion I had marxist friends who identify as marxist and I see now more of why this is a serious issue. Imagine working in China translating articles because european consumers are interested in quality products as well as even in their region english is a neccessary pre-requiste if I want to order as a japanese/vietnamese customer from China. For example in China I talked in english with a lot of Indian customers about their products in e-commerce. E-commerce in itself is a unique cooperation of multiple stakeholders that share value based on interst and intrinsic value of the product that they created. I am unsure what this has to do with beign power hungry, it is simply also the demand and supply created by the inviduals themselves that live in a society. Anarchism in that sense does not really work for like see 1936 spain and their attempt to outlaw money and trade goods for goods. IIRC for example they tried to buy agricultural machines from England and faild to pay as they "outlawed" monetary value and instead wanted an equal value trade based on the inherent value of goods. For example traiding machinery for food products. That is utterly delusional that level of fairness is partially idiot compassion as everyone has interests up and down the spiral and there needs to be a monetary equivalent that has a meta-structure to create fairness like money as well as tokens for example (Spain tried). Trust me I was for this idea and thought it was genius and the current left with hate Jeff Bezos etc. Without Jeff I could never study what I study it's painstakingly cumbersomly annoying to walk into every store in a city and buy specific products. This also speeds up communication and cooperation. For sure cooperation is good and communication and communcal aspects, yet partially and I am no expert 1936 spain anarchism and bolchevist movements clearly showed how this sort of "marxist ideas" are abused. It is commonly stated from Marxists that people don't understand Marx I come from the direct region where Marx was born, sometimes I think when I read Wikipedia he had to write this for survival . He accurately observed the class dynamics during this time and I also dislike classism and the priviledges that elites have, yet most marxists are the elite and are utterly biased. A marxist friend told me how bias in dating her friends in the same party were. So I wonder sometimes the main issue is balance and harmony. If the "bourgouise" gives other enough ressources for themselves to become the bourgouise a lot of power and class struggles would stop to exist. There needs to be a means TO GAIN POWER AND NOT ABOLISH POWER. That is like saying stage red in spiral dynamics never existed in humanites time period and it never produced evolution. We now have the time where we could create more peaceful and harmonic means for less privileged people to gain a similar level of power, yet you can't say we are all equal in terms of competencies and predispositions. Yes human integrity and human rights as well as the biological construct of the human should be untouchable, unfortunately that is not a reality. That is why you see movements of body positivism, feminism, hyper-masculinity etc. As these power structures are out of whack. What changes it mostly is unfortunately a very very very very very broad education and that is not enough. I wish I had an answer I for sure know Marxism it is not I prefer Hegel anyway. I just also don't have the time to consider all of these complex positions, I am also just a kid with desires/demands and interests. Imagine beign bashed in online dating for writting you are genuiently interested in feminism. Now I am not anymore because I am beign attacked for beign interested in justice. Marxists for me are huge hypocrites. I prefer Hegelians even though I have no idea what that might mean. Also to relativize everthing and not make a clear distinction of higher and lower/earlier and later. It's really stupid most of these people turn to integral theory at one point for example Starhawk a famous feminists is working at an integral institute. Greens need to realize that Yellow is the option, they are massively afraid and correctly so of self-actualization as they hide like sheeps in a herd and don't develop themselves anymore in a holistic manner. They claim they are holistic, yet they are reductonistic. Especially when it comes to Marx and monetary value. Imagine I would need to trade my penciles and calculators to buy a pair of shoes on the street as monetary value stops to exist, because capital? Even in terms of estate should be abolished. With that level of reductonism? How do I trade and produce value and communicate and cooperate with others, if everything is devalued materially. I don't quiet understand...

Wow that is incredible that biologist can be that percise! I am pratically talking about this subject. It's more A.I related seemingly yet inspired by biology... anyway... I am learning! From you . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_algorithm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_computation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution Stage Green academia is kinda shitty imo... I like it when stuff interconnects. I love what you wrote about biology, as I just dabble into it with pre-conceived notions. I am imagining in the near-future you can have entire biospheres simulated at a nearly realistic level, otherwise we would not learn this stuff, this mainly accounts for randomness. Hope this is somewhat interesting.

Leo is cheating again with the books. He reads all of my intuitions in real time that is cheating . How the Enneagram was made imo. God I wish I had a super-computer brain to intake more psychedelic philosophy presuming I am just flattering, altough I am sincere . Big Dick Energy (this is a term heavily used for the position I play in a video game, as well as a desired charateristic no joke) would be a subtle phenomena of the subtle body (basically compasisonate abundance feels with assertivness if positve and social domination if more negative), so it should be upper left quadrant. Would be intersting what big dick energy consists just out of curiosity... It's a 4 quadrant afair stemming for UL (upper left quadrant) as the perception of it and it's recognition drives it's behaviour imo. Anyway don't take my science serious seems like I would get to many haters to beginn with that is good. It should have a gross body origin, although the dynamic itself is more subtle. Similar to dreams...

I know Twitter is good for scientific political drama, yet this horseshit does no good or does it? Every "scientist" I see enter into Twitter besides businessmen get abused imo for some agenda and I bet lobbying is not far away at one point. Won't deny it's good drama and has use for networking. Maybe I am just to ehtical in a sense. I don't think of myself as ethical, yet I see the same patterns where people go in disarray and I am extremely good at detecting ideologies and not believing anything. Just saying... I will make twitter paradoxically when I get the chance to enter science to skew things into my favour. Yes I am that manipulative in a good sense. I do have a business background also...

In terms of biology we would talk about the Variance of parents genepool passing on their genes to their offspring? Is the use of variance associated with genetic mutation correct? Anyway this stuff is very complex imo in a ML context I don't even understand it's current maths. Without variance the offsprings parent generation would be inable to diversify their population. Basically this is the definition of Variance in terms of a fitness function in ML meaning a fitness function f(x) represents the quality of adaptation of an individual/population to it's enviroment. It's simply a measure of quality (driven by competition). I am not even 10h into this so spare me any criticism. This is our definition of Variance in machine learning (my own notes, the Prof does a good job to present this practically and mathematically) as this is more our job. Offspring not exact copies of parents Offspring are subject to random variance Reproduction process can cause small variations (positive and negative) Increases diversity of population Driven by recombination and mutation (non-goal oriented) In that sense as blue eyes are recessive in themselves some mutation has to happen and that mutation could be genetic as well as enviromental? Is that presumption fair and justified? I am just intersted in the topic...

I dunno sure there has been a particular history in my country both countries in fact as I am German American, that has massively shifted since the 1960's if you check statistics etc. The amount of openness is mind-boggling if you just think for a second and realize how that ww2 was held not even 100 years ago. America is seemingly worse than Germany and I live in Germany. I don't think socially Germany has as much of an awarness of the topic of racism, although through their particular history created a lot of unity through divsion with the fall of the Berlin wall etc. It's one of the most open countries with Christohper Street Day, Love Parades etc. I just moved cities and it's incredible how open all of them are here. Still it is not enough if I would do some guesswork it's maybe 10-22.5% of the population that is on that high-end of openess. A lot of immigrants in fact are by far the more discriminating minority. That is a paradox also to consider and I am not an immigrant lol. Although I get bias so I know how twisted it is as I have a darker skin color. ( I would never be discriminated in India I am way to white in a sense by skin color) I lived in China and saw how ignorant bias plays itself out for the advantage of others survival out of pure glee and ignorance. Also by statistics India is one of the most racist countries and has racist/bias views againsst darker skin tones. I am not denying that I could be overcompensating, also you could be compensating with your science based on the history of your country. That is also very obvious and a serious perspective to consider as these numbers did not change as far as I know. There are plenty of things that are offensive towards certain cultures here, not racist yet ignorantly stuck in bias. This is the kind of thinking that is very damaging towards understanding and accepting other cultures. For example many people in Germany complain about turkish people and indian people in a completely different way, it's the attitude and behaviour of those. I never got that once in a way, I legit get proper "racist bias" in a sense it's very akin to scientific racisim and their biased observation as they are utterly stuck in TIER1 moral and emotional development. I hope the terminology is fine we are here at actualized.org and it's part of the course. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/most-racist-countries https://www.kajalmag.com/india-is-the-most-racist-country-i-have-been-to-an-african-americans-pov/ This is what I mean your country is one of the most discriminating countries in the world. There is no way when you release a paper as well as share your story I could take anything seriously, besidses the content of the discussion. What you are missing imo, is that you have a public image even on this forum and yes me2. I bet we both frankly don't care and this is why I would personally like you. I don't think you did anything particular wrong as you sound rational, yet I've seen those kind of scientists and they are certainly not happy. The happy scientist I saw as a personal anecdot are mostly working on robotics and HCI. There is also a lot of international collaboration which fosters strong bonds between cultures. I disagree I received some threats that concerned racist bias. So it is not an overreaction it is a proper reaction towards harsh discrimination. It's impossible to not include emotions that means people especially from countries that have a strong discriminatory bias, need to flesh out their bias. In the near future all of this stuff might not work. Depending on what happens with Putin and Ukraine and nationalism/maga movements world-wide. There needs to be a solution for this not further skewed and biased science for some stupid survival agenda of becoming a scientist. This is scary in my point of view.

@integral Yeah that would be cool! That could definitely facilitate learning if someone can copy it and learn from the data itself. Also to spike the action potential of neurons I am hypothezing so there is more activity to begin with and there would be an incentive for NGF and BDNF and higher learning could kick in and facilitate the process. Like a brain-device that gives small electron input at specific regions of the brain for paino playing for example, so there is a larger incentive to activate that specific part while training through elctrode input of some sort, as well as focusing for example on that specific brain area after observing a professional piano player by just observing for example raw and live data of a pianest etc. A more or less stupid example again... I watched Martin Balls brainwave pattern video on DMT and on my first DMT trip I noticed just beign aware of the oscilating energy in my head I could partially re-create a more balanced experienced as I knew and observed how someone else went through the experience. Anyway I am legit just speculating. I dunno it's interesting I might get closer to working with such data...

@integral The author IIRC has more maps in case that is interesting that show for example how a Tennis player maps differently showing just how activity influences the wiring of the brain as far as I know. Which makes personality already so complex thanks for sharing again! Hope I don't come accross to toxic sometimes. Will add them in case this threads lives for a while, there is no audibook version of the book as far as I know so I ordered it....! For example as a master students I heavily train and use P4 apparently according to the authors videos on youtube.

I started listening to the audibook the brain and the enneagram and just have this personality book about MBTI with EEG scans, I don't know how scientifcally valid they are and in the audiobook about the enneagram they explain we all have these proficencies etc. For example I see INFP's and 9w1's often type themselves in personality cafe forums etc. As these types and I typed at the beginning as an INFP and read the description as this was advised on forums and then typed INFJ noticed this is more of the me I have. I liked it that in the book and also courses at integral life... sorry for not getting into depth as I lack the total know-how also. According to all information I looked at you can deconstruct your type and have a proficency in all and draw upon all with some evidence looking at the brain etc. It's interesting I will read the book can definitely recommend this as contemplation I liked this as fun.. for video games it was funny how accurate observations can be. I am just hobbying my observations... For example I think it's stupid that the MBTI community hacks on ISFP's and ESFJ's when I contemplate how insane they are in group work and at their "base" brain activation patterns. I dunno I just find it intersting to look at. I am not an expert yet might become one. Also INFJ's and INTJ's use their whole brain in a zen mode, so basically we are the proof that this personality shit is a hoax partially. Especially in higher flow states personality just does not matter. It's pure biology in that sense imo speaking and expressing itself in it's current enviroment... This is just my opinon. Please don't take it all to seriously. https://imgur.com/gallery/9AVYAxg The book explains the cortexes moduses and what each part does specifically, it's quiet intersting I just looked at how F8 plays itself out... I don't know for example which part of the brain it is although it is intersting that there is causality in itself. Meaning this brain part produces this result and is this active based on this typology testing and pattern mapping. I am biased because I am heading into this direction so dunno, just sharing info. For example in the past before breaking up my personality (through meditation mostly) a lot of people liked my on-sized fits all answers as an INFJ even though I have no idea of what I was actually doing. It is intersting to see I have mild activations there.

To be quiet frank the neuroscience of MBTI gives more answers to all of these quesions and I did not even open the book. Personality is partially a hoax. Especially when using the whole brain imo.

I voted even though I understand like 1% . I give my best to channel all.

How come? A lifter that has shorter arms can leverage more power because of physics and strength is not part of the concept of athletecism? The enviroment would need to favour tall people, so there is an evolutionary advantage to begin with, similar to giraffes?. This is not to myopic? Enviroment consistently changes also, so there will be a general baseline for most things or not? For example a hypothetical example some european culture values athletecism, altough the enviroment is designed to favour those who are small, have endurance and can run and hide in order to survive and produce progency. So there is selection pressure from the enviroment? That shape the decision making of the culture? As a whole they decide to mandatorily train in these aspects for the genetics of their progeny and for their survival as a group and individual. Basically, causing some form of re-inforcement learning based on semi-supervised behaviour with "almost" labeld data? As reward and punishment behaviour, in short do or die? Oceans Forests Thicket Plains Animals Plants Are all present in an ecosystem? Still the choice of the group and the selection pressure would create the genetic expression that based on the cause and effect the enviroment produces? Genetic expressions over periods of time changes? I dunno for example and it's a stupid one trust me. Humanoid apes loosing their tail as a survival advantage for example swinging in the forest like a monkey? As speed would certainly be a part of athletecism for monkeys/apes? In general... Why does genetics need to be the root cause for it not having the whole perspective? What about epi genetic changes? What about the brain? For example a fat guy that trains himself in this day and age to a muscular guy and creates progeny as a musculur guy, his offspring will also have more of these genetics as far as I know from podcasts of scientists. (Dr. Rhonda Patrick) So how come dynamics and changes are not included and genetics is looked at as a fixed trait. When re-inforcement can consistently happen, especially when culture rewards it like athelecism and the guy who is fat turned into muscles, creates progeny. Is this to far-fetched? I don't know why genetics need to be a fixed thing. Yes they are partially no? Do my genetics change when I workout? When I eat certain foods. Then how is anything fixed to beginn with? These are just stale observations no? Maybe I am stupid, yes call me out please if I am stupid. There certainly can be a weeding out proccess and also the agency of an individual can change the genetics of the entire group by sharing a specific trait? Then to progency sharing that specific trait. Although the likelyhood of survival would certainly decrease. Anway. Just here for some random cents.

If that is the norm under science something should be done to prevent that, that is not the norm. I never heard of any of this. I mean I have nothing against it personally if you benefit as a human for survival, yet if it causes damage to other beigns I don't think a person like this should be allowed to do science, and should be held accountable for undertaking direct actions to skew and manipulate results. In a sense it is a crime as well as corrupt, if it is a mistake and made by accident that is something entirely different. Yet to deliberately and consciously fake results is not rational. It's basically an adhominem attack towards science, as well as the integrity of science. A good Prof once told me in science even a mistake can be a success, so to consciously fake information to ones own agenda is basically corruption of science. The perception of the person who has done science, certainly matters to neglect that entirely is also partially ignorant even if the results speak for themselves, the perception that went into the creation of the science done does matter, I am really curious as to what you did lol. So in an odd way I appreciate your stance towards an ethnocentric as well as possible racist viewpoints, that you seemingly adhere to. Or am I misconceiving that? The truthfulness of the science done by you should speak for itself, so if it causes racism and ethnocentric viewpoints. You also are part of that creation. How do you take responsibillity for that? Or do you simply not care enough to eliminate bias from your studies? Enlighten me what context am I missing? I never said science should be not done at all of these race scientist and explorers/pioneers had certainly their value, although from a holistic factual perception it's obvious that truthfulness was lacking and that many of these findings are utterly skewed by their cultural perceptions, as well as the cultural repercussions are horrific. What pre-conveived notions are you talking about, that I supposedly have? If you want fame and money I don't think science is the right way. I don't know which science you are doing so to speak to even claim a good scientist is one who can manipulate and get more publications, I bet there are more ethical ways to bend a paper into ones own agenda, that is not entirely selfishly derived out of seemingly questionable movitations. Just getting a good name out and publishing has 0 truthfulness to it. I don't know which game you are playing I bet you can get a good name as a scientist by doing projects normally for a longer period of time. To me this sounds like horrific self-management. For me it's clearly evident that there is an agenda to push ones own culture instead of creating equality. There is no way science and or anything can not be done and viewed from a personal "ad hominem" perspective if you look at the horros of history etc. I don't know dude this is a new level of ignorance not needed in science. I appreciate you beign honest about your manipulations, yet there are so many pre-conceived notions, there should be a prerequist test to test for bias. When I see how you conduct science and yes please take that personal, that should not be allowed and possibly be illegal. I would also appreciate it when you personally address me, so I become aware of my potential biases, yet that seems to be to advanced? Also to just view IQ as intelligence is very myopic. Human life is much broader even in academia they will use multiple intelligence test and they are looking for new ways to quantify intelligence? To boil down everything to genetics is quiet reductionistic. That is like saying I suck at dating because of how I look, and never address the problem. Then I could throwback the same argument, don't hate the player hate the game. Yet, I don't know if no one wants to even change the game, as well as how it's done. It's evident that there will be no fame and glory. It's rare imo to be a highly famously enamoured scientist. You'd basically need the personality of a champion?

Notion is great I am using the systems in systems view currently for my studies and I have an edge clearly imo. 1 week in so no idea how far it can go. I like Thomas Frank helped me a lot during shitty times during early college days so to say.

@Tahuti No I don't lol. I don't know what I am supposed to make out of this comment. IQ can be tested why should IQ not be tested? Fluid intelligence as well as crystallized intelligence is testable. IQ is just not true intelligence, I had a peak experience during meditation of what omniscience can be with strong kriya elements. I don't think of crowley as well as people who like him very well. It's rather unscienfitic...following the advice of a stonemason and not using it as a tool to reflect is a bit delusional to me. Basically if you have ADHD and apparently your executive functions are inhibited, according to your logic and report it would definitely reduce fluid intelligence and IQ. IQ is relative. True intelligence is more of the absolute I had a good taste of it, if it was somewhat accurate, it's more like sheer intuition of a quality that resembles God/Omniscience. It's not really IQ and the usual problem solving and novel information processing concepts that are associated with IQ. Most oranges and stage orange people hyper-focus on IQ as this is the only way they seemingly can satisfy their deficency needs for recognition and status. I am pretty sure IQ can be tested with standarized tests, I don't think it displays true intelligence. I meet many people who truely have ADHD and I am just gifted and the difference is very obvious. I am also HSP, so I don't like it sometimes to be around ADHD people as they emit sometimes not so good energy, especially if it is the impulsive and hyperactive type. This causes a lot of disorganization and even though I have worked succesfully with ADHD people, they have been on medication most of the time and did not even try natural alternatives like exercise and meditation because it is to exhausting apparently. I dunno I am a bit scattered as discursive tought (according to german pages about gifted kids) can be a sign of high iq/giftedness. So, I am always very open around people who seemingly have ADHD. Yes, it's a good question to contempate what is true intelligence. I once took LSD and meditated for hours and asked these questions, what is true intelligence, what is the nature of nature and I started to merge with the outside world very strongly. God/Omniscience is way beyond what humans can fathom. In that sense yes IQ is a hoax, on a relative plane it's absolutely real and relevant. Being obstructed by ADHD in terms of IQ beign inhibited in it's full expression is a survival threat and I bet there are gifts and curses so to speak about the condition of ADHD itself. So, I dunno not speaking from direct experience as I don't really have ADHD, yet I have ADHD like symptoms that are closely relateable to giftedness, I can understand some states, although I'd be more of the inattentive type as I am also highly introverted usually, I changed a lot. Again, full self-disclosure I've been tested and I don't have ADHD. There is also bias in how it's identified etc. So, I dunno. I even believe it's partially possible to increase the relative IQ with proper nutrition, exercise, social-enviroment etc. To some degree depending on genetic potential. There were some articles posted by the scientific american, yet I don't think this will sound credible to you. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/you-can-increase-your-intelligence-5-ways-to-maximize-your-cognitive-potential/ I followed most of these principles ever since I read the article and I definitely have become more intelligent in terms of surivial, I would also bet I increased my IQ through studying etc. There are some "studies" articles pinponting as to how many school years you have your IQ increases and stuff like this anyway. Hope this is not to much and makes sense somehow lol. This is my personal anecdote tbh I notice partially I am still increasing my IQ believe it or not lol, even then just crystallized intelligence, street smarts etc. OP has certainly valid points, it's just the frame that is horrible imo. I don't think this will continue for long the same for this Crowley stuff, it's not really good imo for academia. Most of these people are not doing well.

@Tahuti I am just beign non-rational. For fun nothing serious lol. I am half German, so I just love to see how toxic something can be won't make sense I know. I am surprised by what standards people can do science today, and I saw someone in class today, that acted like OP. I don't think these people have a bright future. It's just a personal opinion. Who knows what will happen. I find it amusing that people seemingly try to revive race science and skew results into their favour to create some bias and to push their personal egoic agenda. I'd rather be interested to know which gene pairs etc. cause an increase in IQ and if it is possible to what degree to change that and not to argue about cultures and why jews are succesful in that way. The more interesting question would be imo what external factors / internal increase the gene "cluster" that caues IQ in the first place And to not link it to cultures, yet to the cluster of genes themselves. I find this so hypocrtically to just frame everything into one culture, as if other cultures don't have that pair of genes? Well, then at least show evidence. I don't know why I should believe a single word of OP, even when these people have higher IQ. The more interesting question is what cluster of genes causes high IQ to what degree are they changeable and not also why can't they be changed at age 80 for example? To what degree have they been analyzed. I dunno I am sitting in classes with medicinal physicist currently I don't really care that much about op opinon, as it's very narrow-minded imo. Just googled a bit I am still setting myself up for science, I dunno how much D.N.A is changeable, I find it funny I could start to do a PH.D in this area and I see this ignorant post. It gives me more motivation to corret "stupidity" in that sense... Please don't take my post "rationally seriously" like the nazi scientist I hate. Some just care about their dogma, and ego instead of researching for truth and actual causality. That is why I wrote the pissed and not so serious comment. With Adolfian Tactics I mean nothing lol, imagine my Grandpa was named Adolf because of WW2. I find social phenomena so interesting it's crazy. Sorry if I am misleading. Don't take it seriously, at best it's good food for thought. Not interested to skew people into Hitlers direction if you get now more what I mean lol. Who knows the 0.1% of genes that differ between humans are caused 100% by my intuition by either random mating of pre-existing genes and mutation. As well as enviromental influneces possibly over 10,100 years even shorter who knows exactly? Science seems to change rapidly at least computer science. https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Genetics-vs-Genomics#:~:text=All human beings are 99.9,about the causes of diseases. It's funny I legit could do this now and disproove everything possibly that OP has done. I do think our institue is also better and more open. It's kinda funny how far bias will go... Anyway. Again I am writting this light heartedly. I am not an expert/authority. Just a guy with a path ahead of me and an opinion like op. Anyway. Even then what about artifical digital enviroments? Will they change gene expression also? How much does the enviroment impact my gene health in that sense? Will using AR change my D.N.A? If I am exposed to it over periods of time? How much does internal perception matter? Will thinking I can grow and become smarter and more intelligent pay of for families/progeny of my family for example? How can I measure the affects even of a mindset in terms of gene expression for example in a given culture? If for example people in Canada believe we can become taller and smarter and act accordingly and others just act accordignly how much will that impact the genes that modulate height? I dunno to see everything as a deterministic event is myopic imo. Anyway. I bet there are smarter takes on this, I am just painfully aware of my intellecutal humility at times, maybe so much that I become arrogant at seemingly ethnocentric science...