Alex1o1

For me , when i recently reached a state of complete death and complete detachment, the only thing that made sense after that was to do some big dives in the matrix again. I notice a tendency to balance out on the extreme of attachment, but my spiritual habits keep me from changing from one day to the next. When that enlightenment happened i felt there was no need to be involved in "spirituality" ever again. Similarly my favorite Quote from Alan: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/1501096-let-s-suppose-that-you-were-able-every-night-to-dream#:~:text=“Let's suppose that you were able every night to dream,time you wanted to have.

What would be, in your opinion, the next easiest psychedelic to handle for experienced LSD user. (Between normal DMT, 5-meo-dmt , and 5-meo-malt) As a context, I've had an experience with DMT that was quite aggressive which I will have to work through (it was not a big dosage, and wasn't close to a breakthrough) Thank you for your perspectives!

I see, well if you are talking from the detachment point of view I agree

Oh, by the way Leo thank you so much, personally i have found tremendous value in your work and has helped me a lot. (Although I'm far far off from your point of view, so i hope you are understanding :D)

Ok first of all by suffering you mean emotional/psychological or you are referring just on the time that should be devoted in a relationship? I can see a how relationships can drain somebody. But what about healthy relationships? What about a genuinely loving relationship when each person seeks only the best for the other? or a friend who can give advice from a different point of view, or even a service expecting nothing in. Why ALL relationships?

Hi antonio I have studied trading to the fuckin bone, for quite some time. I can provide you very valuable info, and im happy to help, If you want to add me on facebook https://www.facebook.com/alex.pyrgakis

Im stealing this concept from a guy called "Tai lopez" if you have any idea of who he is, please forget everything and just consider this post and this video So Tai always brakes down the "good life" in the following 4 pillars: Health Wealth (take it as freedom) Love Happiness Now i know that happiness is a very broad term, and as everything else it might be different for everybody so you can define it as you wish (i.e. by having a purpose in life, contributing to society, emotional psychological well-being , connected to nature. etc.) Im not suggesting anything here, but i am stating that i cant find any flaws in this (and that why im making this post :D) So do you see any flaws in this highly strategical approach to "a good life" ?

First of all this is my first post here so HELLO So to get to the point I strongly disagree with some parts of the "Lifestyle minimalism" video, specifically the part about relationships and here's why: As humans of course we are social creatures, thus our lives since the beginning of time are based on communities. With that logic becoming anti-social would lead to less happiness to the average human (as proven by all studies done on the subject https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KkKuTCFvzI) , (On the other hand this might not apply for Leo or anybody who is that "actualized") I would totally agree if his concept of life minimalism had social life as one of the essentials I would really like to hear what are your opinions on this