George Paul

Buddha and some Leo live videos

It is Total enlinghtenmment what I am challenging here not partial or some feelings or awareness. Intelegi Codrina ?

This video explains better, you can just have glimpses, not total enligtenment. That brings up the question if otman is brahman, or we are God . Are we ? We cannnot know that because in the moment we know we are not existing anymore. So if we are not exisiting then there is not a WE who is presumend to be God. In the sentence "I am God" the words "I" and "God" are mutualy exclusive. They can't be put in the same sentence. "I am made of God" or "I am a son of God" or "God made me" are more accurate. If I were God and tried to tell people this , I would literally say just "I am". This if fucking creepy since I dont buy Christianity.

If some individual claims that he has been subject to a total enlightenment, like Buddha claimed, then how come that he remembers ? If total enlightenmnet assume ego death, then who has been the subject of that experience ? How come that the same person can say anything when he was not even in existence during the experience ? Why he remembers something from a time in which he was not existing at all ?

Hi, I wonder if anybody here managed to complete the exercises in the book Course in Miracles. It is on Leo's list with 5 stars of 5. My question is , is it worthy? How you feel aboutt the book? Is it genuinly inspired by God? Does it make you do some progress? I am asking because I am having some doubts, maybe ego backlash, so the community's opinion might help me trust more this book. On the other hand, I am asking because it is written there that the answer will come from Holly Spirit.

What's that a "pokemon" ? and "hp" ? I know what a "sadghuru" is.

This is not materialism as it is understood hereabout. Materialism goes much more deep than this. What you experience is a very common weakness that every human being has. I have it, and it has manifested as me willing to posses from phones to cars, motorcycles , clothes and even big house. Useless to say that I am not happier than before anything of those. By contrary, I want more or bigger everything. In my opinion there is just one solution to it. KNOW about it. Be aware that what is happening is just your delusion. You know it, but you will still can't stop going for it. Simply put, go and experience this weakness of yourself, buy things, but know that they are only delusions, accept them and, why not, have fun with them. God wants you to experience whatever you can. He needs that experience. Why would He spent a lot of effort in creating this world of abundant opportunities if "we" wouldn't benefit from them ? Because "we" are "He".

@Aquarius I am replying to this thread

@Leo, what is this video about?

Try to flip over your paradigm. It is not the universe that is working in consistent way with mathematics, it is vice-versa. We invent mathematics to figure out how the universe works. But we cant find through mathematics the cause that makes the universe work, we can only understand how some parts of the universe interact with each other, by "how" meaning "the mechanics" not the cause.

Fibonacci sequence is just 1+1=2. I mean it has the same roots (Fibonacci builds on 1+1=2). In fact everything that we could ever create under the hood of mathematics has the same nature as 1+1=2. Logical sentences. Thoughts, or just another material occurrence inside the fabric of matter, using matter as ground, hence it is groundless. If matter does not exist, maths does not exist of course. The fact that some objects in the nature have a Fibonacci like structure or geometry, it shouldn't be a surprise, nor magic, it is the logic this matter is built on. Including maths and Fib. I mean it couldnt be otherwise at all in this Universe.

Intelligence is a thought.

So far I though that it is enough to get enlightened to understand him. is that equivalent to embodying infinite intelligence ? If I become one with God, don't I embody infinite dumbness in the same time ?

I am not sure he was talking about quantum computer. He said quantum computing. I implied it was about a computer. Dunno if somehow he referred to something that subatomic world can do with or without a computer. I might lead you wrongly then.

So the absolute is not non-intelligent ? How could it be absolute than? It misses being dumb.