Alex4

Fear has been proven throughout history to be a brutally effective tool.

If this data is true, it seems that Islam takes advantage of the division within the rest of society. With a simple majority, they are able to dominate the country.

They are forced to wear veils to protect them from sexual harassment from other men.

You have to admit the guy is coherent, few pro-Russia supporters in the West would be brave enough to actually move to Russia. It’d be interesting to see how he survives there, whether through the local economy or with passive income from Canada. It would be quite hypocritical of him to live in Russia while criticizing the West if his livelihood still depends on it. I also want to see how long his honeymoon with Russia lasts. I remember years ago following a Frenchman living in Russia who was pro-Putin. In the end, the guy was honest enough to change his position and admit that living in Russia isn’t as great as white nationalists make it out to be. P.S. The Russian countryside is really beautiful.

Well explained. Do you know any documentary that explains this conflict from a green (non-radical) perspective?

Most of the conquistadors came from low nobility, good lineage, but poor. Many had no future in Spain, and some were even criminals who had their sentences pardoned in exchange for going to America. Religious started arriving in big numbers later and played a big role in reducing the exploitation of indigenous people, often clashing with landowners who mistreated indians. Meanwhile, the spanish crown sent officials to oversee, they considered the indigenous people as citizens, just like Christians in Castile (largely because they would pay taxes). The problem was that the crown also demanded wealth to fund wars in Europe, so the conquistadors if they wanted to be rich and gain royal recognition, had little choice but to enslave indigenous people for cheap labor in agriculture or mining. Spain did pass laws to limit or prohibit abuse, but by the time royal emissaries arrived It had already been a long time, also a common response from the conquistadors was, "I obey but I do not comply." America was simply too far away for effective control. The most violent phase of the conquest was early on, up until the mid-16th century. It's easy to see why things got so brutal: first, the people who went to the Americas weren't the best of Spanish society. Second, they were far from Spain without supervision. Third, they were incredibly greedy, to a level that’s hard to grasp. Fourth, and often overlooked, the Spanish were actually a minority and conquered with the help of indigenous allies, but they never fully trusted them and lived in constant paranoia. The indigenous people were skilled at plotting conspiracies against the Spaniards. At any sign that the Indians were conspiring to kill them, the Spanish would strike first, killing them treacherously.

I honestly believe you are wrong here, but you've mind fucked me so many times before that I'm not completely confident I have the truth on this. What I can tell you is that I have come to this conclusion after reading history from serious English historians and accounts from conquistadors, not hearsay from bullshit spanish nationalistic pseudohistorians.

Being a right-winger is one of the biggest traps for young men. You think you have everything figured out and that leftists are stupid. While your worldview isn’t entirely wrong, it is very myopic and narrow. I know this quite well because I was one for 20 years. Ridiculing and insulting them doesn’t help at all, in fact, it’s counterproductive because it makes them close off even more. For me now, it’s also very tempting to mock them, since you can clearly see their limitations. But the counterintuitive move here is not to demonize them, 95% of them genuinely believe they are doing good for the world.

I don't think the word "genocide" is the most accurate, I would rather say it was an extermination. I know the history of the Spanish conquistadors quite well, and there was no deliberate or even centralized plan to exterminate the natives, although in many cases it happened due to viruses, wars, marginalization of the indigenous people, which led them to not reproduce or commit suicide, etc.

England's 'worst street' is not representative of the entire West.

If you have a vocation for public service, I find it more practical to join or support a political party in your local community.

They are the minority within the right. The entire center-right (PP) and the majority of the far-right in Europe support Ukraine.

How come all right wingers in Europe support Ukraine?

Didn't the spanish succeed at the end?

Exactly. My point is that invasion shouldn't be dismissed in all cases, as some users here have suggested. However in most cases, it ends up backfiring. I believe that the invading culture must have a significantly greater cultural difference compared to the invaded, such that the majority of the population prefers to be invaded.

I believe that if the ground is fertile, as @Atb210201 mentioned—meaning a big percentage of the population is favorable to foreign intervention—then it could be successful. Didn't the Americans, Russians, and other Europeans enter Germany at World War II? Yes, and to this day, no German has opposed that foreign intervention. The same with the Romans when they entered Gaul. A few years of uprisings followed, but in the long term, they adopted Roman culture and progressed to stage red. There are rotten regimes where the society is so frightened that it only takes a little stirring of the hornet's nest for them to collapse. In any case, I recognise that very favorable conditions must be in place for a foreign invasion to succeed in the long run.

If I realize the book is good but didn't fully absorb its content, I read it again a few months later. And when possible I try to watch documentaries on the same subject.

I’m tall, young, good looking, fit, and my financial situation is quite good for my age. And still I spent almost all of my twenties struggling when it came to women. It wasn’t until I let go of my victim mentality that I started to see even a little success. They didn’t care if I was tall or had my finances in order, my insecurity and fears were paralyzing me and they punished me brutally for it, and rightly so. I don’t know how much money really matters to them, but after spending a lot of time with women now, I’d say is very low. At first, some might be dazzled by the car or expensive watch, but if you’re boring and dull, there are two options, either they take advantage of you in exchange for low-quality sex, or, in the best-case scenario, they won’t want anything to do with you.

Women are attracted to authenticity, sense of humor, and personality, not money. I know this firsthand, if it were about money, I would have had way more success than the average guy.

Recently, I've been thinking about how lucky I am to live in a first-world democracy. We take so much for granted while complaining about petty human bullshit.

Why not use Linkedin? It's more business oriented.

very well explained sir.

Again, look at the whole picture, don’t just focus on small bits of what he says. He uses lines like that to hook potential audiences. This is the same guy who tells 16-year-olds that sleep is overrated and to cut ties with their family if needed.

Having several girlfriends sounds like a nightmare to me. I don't even think it's possible. It would take an extremely mature group of people to make it work, which I highly doubt is the case. Why not commit to one person? Sure, there are downsides, like not being able to have sex with other women. But the positives clearly outweigh the negatives. If she's the right person for you, it saves a lot of drama and time that would otherwise be spent chasing other relationships.

This video triggered my blue shadow.