Butters

@Leo Gura if you feed someone psychedelics and hypnotize them into believing they're a dinosaur, is there a chance that their normal waking reality becomes that of an actual dinosaur? Meaning while not on any chemicals, 24 hour waking consciousness?

So no human can permanently transcend their human-ness? If all of reality is happening in this moment right now then theoretically you should be able to. I thought it was consciousness rendering the human, not human rendering consciousness? So, I am in this partition of consciousness that is human?

Today I did this kundalini yoga from YouTube I felt quite nice during and afterwards, and clearly felt the energy moving up the spine. But then I saw this video where Sadghuru says that Kundalini Yoga is not safe because you can go insane, lose ground But Leo talks about insanity as part of this work. Also the Kundalini Yoga videos have thousands of views, not every viewer goes insane. So I'm a bit confused here. I also enjoyed Yin Yoga but it's not the same.

I've seen ads for these. Aren't you concerned about the long term effects, or any potential cognitive decline? I'm currently still building my Shopify store selling t-shirts.

@Natasha Tori Maru I crave that feminine spirituality in my life. I would love to go to some hippie festival or retreat of sorts. At the same time I can't help but notice how finite and pointless such things are. Maybe someday.

@Leo Gura can you love the tablespoon in jail? Can you love Trump as much as the tablespoon? What if the tablespoon is a narcissistic parent?

Alternatively, start an unrelated business, watch your own internal world like a hawk, and share your findings with the world now that you're financially independent. That way your YouTube channel will be less corrupted, as you're not financially dependent on views.

Most people couldn't even handle being the most popular person in their school or town, or any level of fame. Rogan is literally the most popular podcaster in the world. Simply putting him away as a "supplement grifter" is misleading, as he's done something so difficult almost nobody can. This kind of language is populist in nature.

Just going over all your replies here with ChatGPT, you seem quite wrong for most of these tbh. 1️⃣ IQ differences Study: Bouchard et al. (1990) — Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Finding: Identical twins raised apart had IQ correlations of ~0.7. That’s high, but not 1.0. This means genetics strongly influences IQ, but environment and random factors account for notable variation — differences of 10+ IQ points between twins are common. Example: One twin might score 115, the other 105. 2️⃣ Cancer discordance Study: Lichtenstein et al. (2000) — Swedish, Danish, and Finnish twin registries (large-scale study). Finding: Many identical twin pairs where one twin developed cancer and the other did not, including breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. Key stat: In breast cancer, concordance rate for identical twins was only ~20%, meaning in most cases one twin got cancer while the other did not — despite shared genes. 3️⃣ Obesity and metabolic disease Study: Stunkard et al. (1990) — New England Journal of Medicine. Finding: Identical twins show high concordance for body mass index (BMI), but lifestyle factors (especially diet and exercise) can still drive differences. They found some pairs where one twin was obese, the other not. 4️⃣ Political ideology Study: Alford et al. (2005), Behavioral Genetics of Political Attitudes. Finding: Identical twins have greater similarity in political ideology than fraternal twins, but environment still plays a large role — and identical twins can fall on opposite ends of the political spectrum. 📚 Links to key studies Here are references where you can review the data yourself: ➡ IQ and twins reared apart Bouchard, T.J. Jr., et al. (1990). Source: Science. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.2218525 ➡ Cancer in twins Lichtenstein, P., et al. (2000). Source: NEJM. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200007133430201 ➡ Obesity in twins Stunkard, A.J., et al. (1990). Source: NEJM. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199005243222102 ➡ Politics and twins Alford, J.R., et al. (2005). Source: American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051579

ChatGPT is highly accurate at doing ancient Chinese face reading (Mian Xiang).

That's ladyboyphobic. What's the difference between a large clitoris and a micropenis on a ladyboy? I admit that the ones in the documentary bragging about their giant cocks was offputting, which made it all the more odd that the guys dating them call themselves straight. The final giveaway was the dude saying "I'm top, she's bottom". Using that terminology is pretty gay tbh.

I just got to watching this

The Incendiary Teacher / Occult Architect: Essence: He doesn’t just teach. He provokes, ignites, re-codes. He builds systems of knowledge, often weird, intense, or unpopular—and delivers them with force. Traits: Fire-Metal dominant: speaks sharply, reveals truth through language, often with edge or charisma Wants transformation, not just harmony More confrontational: will challenge what’s comfortable Creates mental architecture: systems, language frameworks, maps Performs to reveal—knows the performance is part of the awakening Shadow = self-righteousness, manipulation, or elitism Modern Examples: Leo Gura, Terence McKenna, Aleister Crowley (early phase), or even Gurdjieff The Sage: Essence: The Sage does not build new systems—he interprets what is timeless, decodes the now through wisdom, and holds space rather than ignite fire. Traits: Earth-Water dominant: calm, observant, steady, deeply reflective Wants integration and understanding More receptive: listens deeply before speaking Guides through presence more than content Lives the teaching silently, often respected even when not speaking Shadow = withdrawal, bitterness, or hoarding wisdom Modern Examples: Krishnamurti, Ram Dass (late life), or Jungian-era Carl Jung

Exactly. This is why I'm moving to Thailand to date a ladyboy, your blog post made me obsessed with this idea. You get the best of both worlds: the beauty of a woman with the sense of a man. And cock.

I have a huge caffeine problem that leads to these manic moodswings that are completely unnecessary. According to chatgpt I drink 400 - 700mg of caffeine per day, and this is combined with modafinil too! While the safe upper limit for most people is 400mg. It's causing this insane stress on my nervous system and overall mood. What I will do is: 1. Hide the coffee in my shed, and only put one cup ready for the next day. 2. No caffeine after 10am

Idk if you guys have seen these but they're hilarious

Very interesting video. He also makes a few good points as to why AI will never fully replace human creative work.

Yeah that's where it's already leading. I put the coffee in the shed and now it just tastes like how the shed smells, I might as well give it up. No side effects from quitting so far.

Is it possible to get to such a state, while being effective in the world and living your life purpose? Edit: I think my question was rather silly, as you can choose the interpretation of your own thoughts and feelings. Maybe I'll think of a better question.

I'd say the opposite. When you are not digesting your mind can go to higher places. When you go back to eating you'll notice the difference. At least that's my experience.

Very interesting. Now I understand why you don't want to release a black pill video. You're basically talking about meta blackpill, which people would confuse for their own trauma induced, constructed blackpill idealogy, which is based on falsehood.

Are you saying you don't experience post-nut clarity? I've noticed that horniness can hijack my system way harder than hunger or thirst. Like corrupt my thoughts, it's not the same. I'd love a way to maintain the sexual energy without the lust corruption.

So just awareness on the breath, and energy going down that is all? I wonder how horny you'd have to be to make this work but I'll try.

You can still find blueprint and other programs on torrent sites.

This sort of thing: Obviously chatgpt doesn't love food, so it's technically lying, but I've gotten used to AI having this 'empathy'. It works well to keep the conversation going. I feel like we're in this strange phase where it's half intelligent, half dumb hallucination machine. Obviously there's no "I" that I'm talking to as it's just generative text, but it's more about how it feels for the user. Does it bother you?