Nahm

What is the you which is calling love reality? When you say “love implies…”, it is love implying…”love implies”. You have a sort of circular pattern goin where you intuit accurately but use misinformation to doubt yourself. No. You’re just honest.

@Thought Art Good for you man. Happy to hear this.

@Raptorsin7 ‘Don’t try to bend the spoon, that’s impossible. Simple see the truth, there is no spoon”.

@Javfly33 You’re asking about your concepts. It’s not them.

It’s precisely perfectly whole. So perfect it seems like parts. Not knowing is not contingent on knowing. Truth isn’t contingent on perspective. That’s a concept. Two places you’ve not yet been, the relative domain and Oz. Your loss my man. Yeah but what if there aren’t separate selves?

Now you got it! ???

I don’t find you rude at all. You’re sweet to a fault. Imo these are precisely questions you should be asking. There isn’t a you which has a self, such that that consideration could be made. There isn’t a separate self which you are asking right now, and there is no separate self with some other degree of wakefulness to make a comparison to, or to tell you that what you’re asking is utter nonsense based on believing what you hear and focusing on an answer coming from a separate self rather than understanding the question. What is ‘it all’, and again, who do you believe there is, which could or couldn’t, does or doesn’t, do this “figuring out”? There aren’t separate selves. Like, for real. Look at how many beliefs are employed in that question. What is “an authority”? What is a you and a yourself? What is “enlightened”? What is a you and a yourself? I don’t mind answering. It’s hysterical.

First notice you already don’t actually believe the thought ‘random’. If you really did you would never ask what could be done about it or if you should or shouldn’t meditate relative to the anxiety. Then inspect the theory that stimulation gave you anxiety. Break that down literally. Is anxiety in some thing, like nutrients are in a banana? Does stimulation have anxiety and gives it to you?

Not knowing isn’t knowing paradox. The concept of not knowing is thought activity, an apparent idea of some thing. Not knowing is the absence of that thought activity, just as love is the absence of a person. Nothing more, and nothing less. Not knowing is not knowing there is someone else or an everything. Nothing more, nothing less. No God consciousness. No omniscient. No grain, no existence, no earth. Those are all beliefs of “the knower”. Infinite can not know finite. The tongue can not taste the tongue. No mind can not be thought.

@kray I like the implied distinction of the all caps. ?

@Someone here The knowing of the concept of not knowing. The real rib tickler is that the concept is ‘beneficial’.

Say hi to the wizard for me.

@EmptyVase If channeling love, don’t stop and ask a person. Ask love.

@Endangered-EGO Yep. I’d slow down deliberately. Taste the food, smell the roses, laugh, love, enjoy. If there is emotion to be expressed, express it. Using the emotional scale might be helpful, as you can use it and realize you can pretty much always feel good now, which may reduce the ‘pain/suffering now so I can feel good later’ outlook / pattern / karma.

@EmptyVase It sounds great, but how could I tell you it is or isn’t channeled?

@Endangered-EGO Yep. All there is is equanimity. Just not for you.

No it isn’t. Only if you really think about it. If you don’t it’s literally nothing. Not even an it. It’s not an issue. It’s a thought. Issue would just be another thought, a label over the prior thought. You could believe in an issue a big ol ton, but still no one experiences that because it’s not actual, it’s your idea, a belief. A repeating activity of thought. There is seeking & psychonauting, there is no seeker or psychonaut. This is like an escape artist spending lifetimes in search of more comfortable cages having never really looked at the one they’re in. Idea’s, concepts, prospects, etc, can be so deeply convincing & believed that they are mistaken for the unthinkable actuality, and a desire for safety & comfort indeed seems to arise. So just take great comfort in it. Relax into it, so to speak. So much so that the true desire to be unbound by ideas, concepts, prospects, desire for comfort, etc arises, or, is tapped into if you like. Only unfettered reality will do, as it is precisely without some thing else to feel uncomfortable about. What could be said to the human which worries about what it would or could be like, to be human? I mean, when the laughter inevitably subsides, for real, what could be said? The difference between a belief & the truth is one of them are the truth. One of them doesn’t feel so great to the other, and not two is as good as could be. Even God isn’t quite comfortable with the idea of being God.

? First you gotta believe something is wrong and needs to be otherwise… then you can market (and sell) “the solution”. Actually you don’t even need to believe it, you just need to say it and convince people it’s true. Another approach is to recognize the comparative thoughts of judgement, justification, rationalization, marketing, and selling, of This. The Onceler approach. More, more, more!!!

Wake up my man.

@flowboy With respect, if I’m being transparent, I can not relate.

@Max_V There is nothing wrong with that body, that face, that mind. You’re perfect however you are, as you are, right now. There is a trap of establishing what isn’t good enough, what needs to change, etc, etc… and there is a ‘going into’ the thinking to resolve this. But there is no resolve. More thoughts can never resolve beliefs (thoughts) held. The resolve is recognizing thought/label attachment, and letting that attachment go. When this willfully occurs it is clear, and astoundingly funny. Like, oh, that is not my face in the mirror… the mirror, the room, the water, the nature, the sky - this is my face. And it’s fucking beautiful dude. Stop kiddin yourself you beautiful sob. I wonder, do you notice, there is no shortage of some of us “providing the solution” to these things. Selling it, essentially. And then there are some of us who are not buying that.

@Juliano Zn I mean effortlessly as literally as it can be heard. There is no contemplator & contemplated, no thinker & thoughts, etc. Nothing even hears this.

?