Nahm

Sometimes (actually every time without exception) if there seems to be an existential stuckness, it is actually a regular something in life stuckness. So if one is experiencing stuckness on how it is there is not actually something, but nothing… the alignment would be to part from existential rumination, and instead inspect in one’s life, ‘what I am saying there is, which is a belief, and there actually, isn’t?’

@Raptorsin7 Really nice. ???

Breakthrough is a matter of feeling breathing in the stomach, which is the same as saying not focusing on thoughts like (I assume) is the case the rest of the day. The suggestion is phrased this way because one can not ‘stop thought’ via direct attempts. Think of this as unconditioning. Physical difficulties, such as a sore lower back, are resolved by exercise / strengthening the muscle group, and also evaluating diet for inflations caused by some foods. A cautionary word though, never strengthen some muscles and not others, implement a full body routine. Think of this as conditioning.

In this experience there is an ineffable obviousness which to offer some communication could be accredited to cessation, which can not be communicated in any literal sense as it is too much a matter so to speak of direct experience & obviously much more so that there isn’t. It does not seem to communicate anything when I say that higher is an idea and not a thing, lower is an idea and not a thing, teachings is an idea and not a thing, advanced is an idea and not a thing, duality is an idea and not a thing… that there are not these things… but thought makes it seem so. Thus the question & phrasing there in makes no sense. The ‘question behind the question’ is really, how do I go about addressing thought attachment. Personally, is an idea, support is an idea. Might be somewhat communicative to suggest writing each of these words in a level manor on a piece of paper, and kind of taking a step back and visually seeing these are all thoughts, and then looking around the room for the actuality, or, the other than conceptual ‘things’, to notice there isn’t / aren’t. The simplest answer perhaps, is awareness is directly aware of sensation, perception, and thought. But this is not new info for you, isn’t it so? Please, share your honest answer, or really just whatever arises as to… what could possibly be done here to answer any of what is being asked, which has not already been shared here… And if any more clarity could in some way be said to be ‘needed’ or simply desired of interest… here… And much less so, in a concessionary ‘helpful’ sense… here… And then what I believe could be said to be a generous leaving of what I do share, in regard to understanding misunderstandings… here… And then if there were any chance of meat remaining on the bone so to speak, and also for any one interested in the greater good, the actual implementation of said teachings, or even just an interest in hearing a pointing to delightful experiences ‘beyond’ thought attachment & concepts etc, like Siddhis, Shaktipah, etc… here… And if it were possible, that I could somehow yet still be more straightforward… more comprehensive offerings on how you are creating reality right now, and how this can be realized right now… What could possibly be said here in text which would be more straightforward and non-elusive than the videos shared? It is funny!!! Look again at the videos above which have been offered, I don’t mean watch them all… just look… and then notice how funny it is to be asked if I support x, y, or z, concepts of separation / duality. I hope you ‘get’ or receive this lovingly… this entire matter is simply so absurd it is hysterical. If you, or @4201 or any one simply can not let go of the notion of separate selves and wether a separate self supports or does not support other separate selves ideas (dualities about dualities) what can possibly be said to you which was not shared in these videos? Please, offer whatever answer arises. I’ll share that. And do you see how funny that is or no? I really am wide open to feedback, critique, etc. It would be appreciated if it was specific to the content, and not ‘how a you is being’, given that there is this content. I have no problem whatsoever of pulling videos down, editing, and reposting them to youtube. Really. That is ideal, as I am sharing, yet have no answers at the same time. I don’t know if you ‘get’ that… all I can say is here’s (the content) where I’m coming from so to speak… and that I’m open to tweaking any of it. It isn’t like it’s really mine you know? @TruthSoldier The gift that keeps on giving. Well done sir. Your work here will echo & billow the hallows of mankind unending.

@Raptorsin7 Kind of just a bare accusation there. Care to elaborate? And are you certain it isn’t the comment on ‘higher places to go’, perhaps being received as a bit triggering?

@4201 God damn it in hindsight I gotta say… so to speak, the point you make is superior. I still find this thread to be a trolling of a trolling and pure in it’s humor, but, indeed the greater point is the greater point, in the bigger picture or beyond this one thread sense. My apologies for that. @TruthSoldier And to you as well, if in fact this inquiry is / was sincere, which it still doesn’t seem it was, which of course is simultaneously funnier. @BenG If there’s not a higher place to go, that there is, is misleading.

Nice. Can also just think awareness anytime you like.

If thought attachment, liberation, cessation, discord, conscience, feedback on conflicting logical fallacies, hypocrisy, the veils of ego, spiritual ego, materialism and what could be coined as conceptual-spiritual-ego-materialism are ignored, then yes, you’ve got it.

@Zeroguy Much love my man.

@Javfly33 Take one day and don’t talk about yourself.

@4201 I’m ‘struggling’ in two ways here. How you aren’t finding this hilarious… “What a cesspool. Ill be asking future questions elsewhere.” That is comedic gold right there. The other thing I don’t get is why you’re asking me about any of this when what you’re asking about is Leo’s content, who you can ask. If you sincerely are interested in what I share, it’s not like I don’t have ample content available.

Would you feel bad about spitting in faces, when you don’t spit in faces? Would you feel bad about stealing cars, when you don’t steal cars? Would you feel bad about breaking windows, when you don’t break windows? Would you feel bad about eating animals, when you don’t eat animals? The psychedelics didn’t make you feel bad about food or animals. Has nothing to do with food or animals. Psychedelics are essentially a dose of truth. That there are deities is not true, it’s a belief. When you take a dose of truth, the discord between what is true and what you believe is amplified. To continue believing there are deities, you are believing the discord (bad feeling) is about eating food or animals. Which doesn’t make sense, because you don’t eat animals.

@Javfly33 Oh wow, I had no idea you were allowing this awareness. My God thank you so much, we all owe you our lives! “All hail Javfly33, the allower of awareness!”. (Looks for end of feet kissing line).

@Raptorsin7 I could see how the tear jerker could be the reference to the cause of death being ‘the field of honor’. Strikes me as incredibly discordant to combine harm & murdering over ‘stuff’, with honor in the name of this field. I’m not convinced they ever really knew you at all.

What was said here is actually that there would still be the belief ‘complete lack’, which is an oxymoron, like non-existence.

Yes, of course, entirely possible. Awakening / enlightenment means inspecting the beliefs though, like ‘states’. Wether taking medications or not, wether adopting any practices or not, one can inspect. Try to find the states in sensation, and then in perception. It’ll be recognized as a thought, repeated, a belief, and in the inspection it is ‘seen through’, and therein so is ‘the one who knows / experiences states’… the ‘separate self’ of thoughts, or, the veil of thought attachment / non-awake.

@Javfly33 Really though. Those added characters / entities, and the belief in states, is how the separate self (asleep) is perpetuated. (All thoughts). It’s the ‘one who knows’ about all of those ‘others’, the one said to be ‘in’ the pain. This is seen in trips, and this is how it resumes post trips. The resuming can be seen, and then the trip is no longer a necessary method to see this.

@BenG nice. @4201 Have you ‘tried’ / experienced simply not believing the thought / concept (‘advanced’), not adding it as a concept, and basically instead seeing first hand if there is advanced this or that vs if it (‘advanced’) is / was a thought you kept believing each time it arose? What happens when you inspect what you’re asking? Do you find ‘advanced’ anywhere? There’s also of course self inquiry, so weed out the ‘one’ who experiences the ‘advanced’. Might also be helpful to pop advanced in where what is. Essentially, see if it’s circular self referential ‘logic’, ‘for yourself’.

Awesome. Got a version without the ego & consciousness & awareness added? Might be clarifying.

Nobody knows, but without upholding that belief that there is that need for this to happen, this is that which you speak of, which is why there is that ‘notion within you’ that it is. Look to inspection & actuality (this), vs the conceptualizing of another world / dimension.

@Schahin The deities thingy is the ‘off’ or slight discord, not the psychedelics making a vegetarian feel bad for eating meat. Which as you shared, you aren’t actually doing.

@Raptorsin7 Just be aware of being aware. Jk. Great to hear of the releasing my friend, great to hear.

By all means have a dr check it out. You could also consider your ear doesn’t make sound per se, and it is the vibrational background hum of the universe which is you being ‘your ear’. The middle C all musical scales are constructed of. The ‘channel’ of all ‘channelers’ opening up. It’s common before awakening to frame it as a problem because though it was always there it was never noticed. There is usually ‘something to be heard’. I definitly agree with observing any emotions arising, as that’s how you ‘hear it’ in the receiving sense & it’s no longer experienced as a problem. Try to consider it’s the most positive thing ‘you’ve ever heard’. Also, scrutinize the attempt to apply ‘logic’ to notice it doesn’t add up, of course no one can hear silence. So maybe let faith in logic go, in that sense, a bit. Not all beliefs will resonate, in the literal ‘physical stuff’ (‘your ears’) sense, through the entire path. Could also consider the analogy of the universe as a perfect vibrational orchestra, and ‘you’ as a violin, a mind, attuning to it / with it / as it for the first time. Also, as far as that ‘yet to be heard’ factor, you mentioned the ‘sound is heard’ in only one ear. Look up info on the left & right sides of the body as representative of masculine & feminine, and consider that info in regard to which ear / side is ‘plugged’, or, not ‘hearing’ the sound / silence / frequency. Look to connect the dots in that regard with whatever arises emotionally, and think in terms of conditioning being brought into the light, or coming ‘up & out’.

Inspect what you’re saying for conflicting statements. This highlights beliefs for you to inspect. Inspection and meditation coalesce.