Nahm

@WokeBloke Hope it’s not taken in any personal way, but I don’t want to contribute to existential rumination. For the answer to that and anything else existential; meditation.

@machinegun What was the so called douchery?

@WokeBloke More of the same there. Meditation.

@WokeBloke Circular logic.

@WokeBloke I is a thought.

@WokeBloke No. That’s just ‘the emperor’s new clothes’, a new / another belief.

Nice! Meditation.

@WokeBloke No one is needed. There is no realizer, thinker, or seer. Notice these, in direct experience, are only thoughts. Could also contemplate, when there is manipulation, there is the projection of the belief in inferiority. This is aversion.

It can be realized there is no self, no you which could be gotten rid of, no you which thinks, no thinker of thoughts. Freedom. Meditation.

What’s being said is that there is no you, which would include that there is no you which said anything. The reply to which is ‘you just…’, ‘you refers to….’, or, the insistence there is a you. Meditation, for those with two good ears.

You is a thought, without any actuality.

In all fairness, you is a thought without any actuality. How could I care about myself, I am myself. How could I care about humanity, I am humanity.

You thinking so to speak is circular and exemplifies thought attachment, and the conjecture which results from thought attachment. God is God. God has no experience of God.

Yes. Mums & kids are thoughts, not perception. Meditation.

I’m suggesting inspection of direct experience to find out if that claim pans out to be true. Meditation, so to speak, creates ample investigation non-thought-reaction ‘space’. Whatever the thought is, it is, always just another thought, including thoughts about thinking, that there are other thinkers, and that there is a problem.

Might enjoy this short read / contemplation.

That’s God. Meditation.

How can you tell that is perception, vs thoughts about perception? What is the direct experience? Meditation.

Tempting humor aside, head and other people, actually are in direct experience.

Is that subject/hearer of direct experience, or concept? Has a subject/hearer ever been witnessed, seen, heard?

@Mason Riggle Maybe, but let’s give him a chance.

Can behavior in all honestly be attributed to a room? Maybe reflection and state are justifications of beliefs, misunderstandings and misinterpretations. Maybe they’re just being, honest? Can it be said in honesty, that anything is in a universe, when it is said that said universe is a hallucination? (Such as a “hallucinator”) Maybe Dr Len simply didn’t share their beliefs. Can denial actually be projected? How would you know for sure? Can you explain / unpack more literally, what state is… what your view literally is (not what it’s believed to be)… how it is there is a universe which must anything, and precisely how this reflection mechanism works, and precisely who is correct or uncorrect?

Many do, so, yes. Also, lives are created via procreation, so, no. ‘Sex’ is a conceptual ego construct. As a concession, an enlightened person would never harm (as in rape) themself. In truth there are no enlightened people, but there apparently are egos which believe there are, to justify the belief, that they are. Does the doubt lead to disappointment, and overwhelment?

@WokeBloke God doesn’t / can’t care about God, because God is God. Meditation, the other-than solipsistic self referential rumination.

@WokeBloke If a tree falls in the woods and there is no one there to hear it, does it make a sound? (Suggestion, notice aversion to directly answering that question)