Nahm

It can be realized there is no self, no you which could be gotten rid of, no you which thinks, no thinker of thoughts. Freedom. Meditation.

What’s being said is that there is no you, which would include that there is no you which said anything. The reply to which is ‘you just…’, ‘you refers to….’, or, the insistence there is a you. Meditation, for those with two good ears.

You is a thought, without any actuality.

In all fairness, you is a thought without any actuality. How could I care about myself, I am myself. How could I care about humanity, I am humanity.

You thinking so to speak is circular and exemplifies thought attachment, and the conjecture which results from thought attachment. God is God. God has no experience of God.

Yes. Mums & kids are thoughts, not perception. Meditation.

I’m suggesting inspection of direct experience to find out if that claim pans out to be true. Meditation, so to speak, creates ample investigation non-thought-reaction ‘space’. Whatever the thought is, it is, always just another thought, including thoughts about thinking, that there are other thinkers, and that there is a problem.

Might enjoy this short read / contemplation.

That’s God. Meditation.

How can you tell that is perception, vs thoughts about perception? What is the direct experience? Meditation.

Tempting humor aside, head and other people, actually are in direct experience.

Is that subject/hearer of direct experience, or concept? Has a subject/hearer ever been witnessed, seen, heard?

@Mason Riggle Maybe, but let’s give him a chance.

Can behavior in all honestly be attributed to a room? Maybe reflection and state are justifications of beliefs, misunderstandings and misinterpretations. Maybe they’re just being, honest? Can it be said in honesty, that anything is in a universe, when it is said that said universe is a hallucination? (Such as a “hallucinator”) Maybe Dr Len simply didn’t share their beliefs. Can denial actually be projected? How would you know for sure? Can you explain / unpack more literally, what state is… what your view literally is (not what it’s believed to be)… how it is there is a universe which must anything, and precisely how this reflection mechanism works, and precisely who is correct or uncorrect?

Many do, so, yes. Also, lives are created via procreation, so, no. ‘Sex’ is a conceptual ego construct. As a concession, an enlightened person would never harm (as in rape) themself. In truth there are no enlightened people, but there apparently are egos which believe there are, to justify the belief, that they are. Does the doubt lead to disappointment, and overwhelment?

@WokeBloke God doesn’t / can’t care about God, because God is God. Meditation, the other-than solipsistic self referential rumination.

@WokeBloke If a tree falls in the woods and there is no one there to hear it, does it make a sound? (Suggestion, notice aversion to directly answering that question)

@Vynce Us, when you focus on what you want to create.

@thenondualtankie You assumes God knows suffering. You could say this is the egos view and the justification(s) of it. Take note the emotional guidance within you, is prior to & transcendent to whatever you put in front of you.

Meditation.

Let go of ‘levels thinking’. You feel the discord & alignment between what you want, and what you’re thinkin. There are no negative thoughts, just thoughts which aren’t aligned with what you want. The clear correlation is emotion, which is the guidance to what you want. Anger isn’t something which does or could manifest in that way, it is guidance felt in regard to what you’re thinking. With loa, what you think is true doesn’t matter, what you want and how you feel matters. With loa, confidence is a nonissue, because you have emotional guidance about your thoughts. If you think you are not confident and this feels discordant, you would look at the scale, and express which emotion you’re experiencing, and continue to do so all the way on up the scale. Loa is about manifesting the life you desire, not making things disappear. With loa, there is no opposing force. If you want to cut down a tree, cut down a tree. There is one reality. ‘Realization’ is a thought. ‘Deep’ is another thought. ‘Solid’ or ‘material’, also thoughts. Shift attention to receiving the guidance of emotion. That reality is a reflection, or some how reflected back at you is a misnomer, a misunderstanding. That is already the actuality. However, be in accordance with what you want, listen to the guidance of feeling. Emotions help you realize & focus on what you actually want (and not rumination over random dumb examples). Create a dreamboard, then write what you want on it, then receive it. Allow it to be that simple, by noticing conceptual intellectual rumination is not ‘advanced’, and doesn’t ever actually add up to anything, and simply isn’t related at all to what you actually want for your life.

This is definitely the good news. Without persistent activity of thought, there can not therefore be value, meaning, purpose, a separate self, control, decisions, etc, as those are conceptual, or, thoughts. That is all the facade of the separate self, which is exactly the same as saying thoughts, or, thought activity, to “whom” all of the control, purpose, meaning etc revolves around. When that activity of thought is allowed to settle from the daily practice, ‘no self’ is realized, and all of that ‘thinking’ is then understood to have been conditioning. So meaning doesn’t become contextualized… what’s realized is that it, life, existence, etc, was already contextualized. Another way to say this… the peace is directly experienced via meditation… and at some point in the day it seems attention has shifted into the activities of the day, and thus ‘where did that nice peaceful feeling go’? Naturally, from continuing to meditate every morning, that peace ‘lasts longer into the day’, and inevitably days happen where it is very much, and very joyfully felt and noticed, that peace didn’t go anywhere (it’s still present). The activities of the day happen, but clearly happen, within this peace, not in opposition to it.

The ‘answered once and for all’ would be to no longer believe there is a you and an existence, nor anyone who could tell you with any truth you are serious or fun.

@Javfly33 Very nice! Counterintuitively perhaps… but with continued daily meditation, meditation does ‘go there’, as ‘you’ & ‘there’ are thoughts / beliefs, and no longer attached to, thanks to, meditation.

Allowing thought activity to settle meditatively, and self inquiring directly into feeling, the “feeling of me”. Allow the concept of a ‘you’ which could ‘know’, of ‘feel’, go, meditatively, and re-inquire into the feeling ‘itself’. Not knowing appears as thoughts, like knowing, knowledge, concepts, etc. When the thoughts are let go meditatively, and the not knowing is directly inquired into, not knowing awakens.