Nahm

@Khron That is awesome to hear! Rather than think about establishing a distinction between thinking and overthinking....just consider, that the amount of voluntary thinking necessary, is 0%.

If you held a rubber band against your face with one finger, while pulling it away from your face with a finger on the other hand....when you let go with that other hand, what’ll likely happen? Where do you get questions from?

Ego is the greatest job security possible.

@28 cm unbuffed To see another approach / angle / perspective....imagine for a second, that I call my wife all of those labels, and talk about her that way. Imagine that she actually believes my words, over her own sensation which is screaming to her that what Nahm says about her is not actually true. How does it look from that perspective? What advice would you give Mrs. Nahm? What advice would you give Mr. Nahm?

@28 cm unbuffed This is now. There is not the past three years actually, there is only the baggage and veils we recreate & carry, now, by identifying via experiences, and labeling sensation as...wrong. (That way, in thought, one get’s to be right. Being “right” is the opposite of being vulnerable) As soon as you get even a glimpse of how you are recreating this, you begin the relief, release, healing, and thus begins the trajectory of well being you are desiring. Does this readily make sense (feels true) to you, when I reframe in this manor.... - The good name of your ever-loving inner being is being beaten up on routinely, in this manor, you are creating your suffering: You can do that, you can say what you are and judge & label yourself, you can say there are second and third you’s, demons, entities, etc, and fragment yourself into ideas. But believing these thoughts & repeating them, recreating them effortlessly in habit, suppresses feeling. You are free to create such experiences, but.... Ya. I bet. That’s exhausting. It’s exhausting to read, I really feel for you living it, except, you are creating it...so... There is no such thing as a wrong feeling. One can willingly acknowledge sensation which “does not feel good” - is right / true, and in doing so, one can ponder, “ok then, how am I looking at this, which is not true?”.

@28 cm unbuffed To me, your answer here, is zero. Am I right? As in, you are not at all willing to be vulnerable, because you could get hurt.

@Mason Riggle That feel true, right, for you? Is there really any response there?

If there is a transmission of God...what is the vehicle, the means, - that by which God delivers the transmission, which is not in and of itself, God?

@28 cm unbuffed How vulnerable are you on a 1 - 10 scale? (By vulnerable, I mean willing to just experience anything and everything, feel amazing love, as well as lose amazing love and experience the heartbreak) Then, what is the number on the 1 - 10 ‘scale of vulnerability’, which you think is ideal, in general?

@Scholar What do you think about perception = sentience? In the sense, the delusion is required, thus making the intelligence of a plant, incomprehensible, based on the illusion one is comprehending (a delusion which the plant is not under)

Awesome. Actuality of memory is a key to no mind, and I can’t help but wonder, did you see the love / attention ‘answer’ you were looking for?

@Swagala Great resource. I remember once, seeing the Efficiency, it popped into mind from years prior....why did Ra always prefaced the answers with the redundancy of “I am Ra”.

Help me understand that. Why the middle? And why a new number system, why linguistics? And again, what is the usefulness of the end result / what comes of it which is shareable, communicable?

@Thewritersunion Work it backwards, from usefulness. That’d make the unification easier, keeping in mind you can’t disprove something which does not exist to begin with. You might also find useful a book called The Fields (Lynn McTaggert) , and a YouTube search of John Hagelin’s work. Also, consider why the speed of light limit, isn’t simply called light.

@OmniYoga https://www.actualized.org/forum/topic/41062-law-of-one/

@Wonderer What time did you take it?

@cetus56 Ran out of wine.

@Giulio Bevilacqua There is suffering, until there is no such thing as a wrong feeling.

@Raptorsin7 You even created believability. Unbelievable dude.??

@Raptorsin7 There is no little you. That’s how good of a job you’re doing.

@SvanteTheBeast Awareness and attention are the same ‘substance’ but are also not the same. There are some good descriptions and a source link in my signature for do nothing. ??

@OmniYoga What you perceive is never a perceiver.

The Who’s are love, but Horton knows it. Hard to see a snow globe from the inside, when you’re made of snow globe.

@Raptorsin7 Ya.